Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0102115-194521 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0102115-194521
論文名稱
Title
探討不同的組織內部互補性資產對於資訊系統成功之影響
The Impact of Different Complementary Assets within Organizations on the Success of Information Systems
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
99
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2015-01-23
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2015-02-02
關鍵字
Keywords
資訊系統成功模式、生產率悖論、互補資產理論、系統滿意度、資訊系統導入
Information System Implementation, Information System Satisfaction, Complementary Asset Theory, Productivity Paradox, IS Success Model
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5963 次,被下載 136
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5963 times, has been downloaded 136 times.
中文摘要
為了因應眼下瞬息萬變的競爭環境,現今的企業必須具備快速應變的能力,資訊科技的實施因而成為企業最重要的發展項目之一。然而,儘管耗費了大量金錢與資源進行投資,資訊科技卻不能夠保證成功提升企業的獲利與生產效率,此現象被稱為「生產率悖論」(Productivity Paradox)。針對此問題,過去許多研究均著重於資訊科技本身的品質是否優良,但透過實務觀察可以發現,當同樣的資訊科技引進不同的組織時,產生的效益卻不一定相同,因此我們懷疑組織內部有其他因素影響著資訊科技導入後的表現。本研究以DeLone and McLean (1992)所提出的「資訊系統成功模式」為基礎,結合互補性資產理論,試圖找出除了資訊科技本身的品質外,組織內部中會影響資訊科技成功與否的其他因素。
本研究測量對象為在台工作、具備資訊系統導入經驗的IT員工,採集了 138 份有效樣本,並以實證研究方法,針對六個假說進行模型驗證。研究結果發現,MIS相關與組織相關的互補性資產會直接且正面地影響IS的表現。此外,在IS品質對於IS表現的調節效果方面,兩者均超出研究預期,前者調節效果不顯著、後者則與IS品質呈現替代性、而非互補關係。
期望藉由本研究,可以提供實務界以及學術界未來在IT引進成敗的關鍵因素上一個有效的參考,讓組織與企業的管理者能更妥善地進行IT投資策略規劃與執行。
Abstract
Nowadays, firms must possess the capability of expeditious response due to the rapid change of competitive environment. Thus, the implementation of information technology (IT) has become one of the most important development projects. However, despite spending enormous amount of capital and resources, IT is not the guarantee of enhancement for profitability and productivity for firms, which is called the “Productivity Paradox.” When it comes to this issue, previous researches had focused on the factor of IT quality. But through observing practical cases, it is realized that when the same IT is introduced to different organizations, different consequences occur. For this reason, we assume there are other factors within organizations affecting user satisfaction after implementation. In this study, we adopt DeLone and McLean’s (1992) IS Success Model and combine it with Complementary Asset Theory, attempting to identify other factors within organizations which would impact IT success, in addition to IT quality itself.
Empirical research method is adopted to verify six hypotheses in our model. They are tested with data collected from 138 IT related workers who possess the experiences of IT implementation in Taiwan. The research result indicates that MIS-related and Organization-related complementary assets (CAs) will directly and positively affect information system (IS) user satisfaction. What’s more, from the aspect of the moderating effect of IS quality on IS user satisfaction, the result exceeds our expectation. MIS-related CA shows an insignificant influence, while on the other hand the effect of Organization-related CA turns to be substitutive rather than complementary.
We expect our research result could provide practitioners and academics an effective reference in the future, on the critical factors for IT implementation success. Managers in organizations or firms can better carry out the planning and execution for IT investment strategy.
目次 Table of Contents
1. Introduction 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Research Motivation 3
1.3 Research Purpose 5
2 Theoretical Background 7
2.1 D&M IS Success Model 7
2.1.1 System Quality 11
2.1.2 Information Quality 13
2.2 Complementary Assets theory 15
2.2.1 MIS-related Complementary Assets 20
2.2.2 Organization-related Complementary Assets 24
3 Research Model and Hypotheses 27
3.1 Research Model 27
3.2 Research Hypotheses 28
3.3 Sampling and Data Collection 39
3.4 Constructs and Measurements 41
4 Data Analysis 44
4.1 Sample Demographics 44
4.2 Common Method Variance 48
4.3 Reliability and Validity 51
4.3.1 Cross Factor Loading 55
4.4 Formative Second Order Constructs 59
4.5 Hypothesis Test: The Structural Model 60
4.6 Discussion 63
4.6.1 Influence of Information and System Quality on User Satisfaction 63
4.6.2 Influence of MIS Complementary Asset on User Satisfaction 63
4.6.3 Influence of Organizational Complementary Asset on User Satisfaction 64
4.6.4 Influence of MIS Complementary Asset on Information and System Quality 64
4.6.5 Moderating effect of Organizational Complementary Asset 65
4.6.6 Moderating effect of MIS Complementary Asset 68
5 Conclusion and Implications 70
5.1 Conclusion 70
5.2 Academic Implications 73
5.3 Practical Implications 74
5.4 Limitation and Suggestions for Future Study 76
Reference 77
Appendix (Questionnaire) 84
參考文獻 References
Reference
Al‐Mashari, M., & Zairi, M. (1999). BPR implementation process an analysis of key success and failure factors. Business Process Management Journal, 5(1).
Ang, J., & Soh, P. H. (1997). User information satisfaction, job satisfaction and computer background: An exploratory study. Information & Management, 32(5).
Au, N., Ngai, E. W. T., & Cheng, E. (2002). A critical review of end-user information system satisfaction research and a new research framework. Omega, 30(6), 27.
Bailey, J. E., & Pearson, S. W. (1983). Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction. Management Science, 29(5).
Bollen, K., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional Wisdom on Measurement: A Structural Equation Perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110(2), 10.
Brynjolfsson, E. (1993). The Productivity Paradox of Information Technology. Communications of the ACM, 36(12), 12. doi: 10.1145/163298.163309
Carbaugh, R. J. (2010). Contemporary Economics: An Applications Approach (6 ed. Vol. M.E.Sharpe).
Choe, J.-M. (1996). The Relationships among Performance of Accounting Information Systems, Influence Factors, and Evolution Level of Information Systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4).
Christmann, P. (2000). Effects of "Best Practices" of Environmental Management on Cost Advantage: The Role of Complementary Assets. The Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 18.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3).
DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (1992). Information Systems Success The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Information System Research, 3(1), 36.
DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 22.
Devaraj, S., Fan, M., & Kohli, R. (2002). Antecedents of B2C channel satisfaction and preference: validating e-commerce metrics. Information Systems Research, 13(3).
Doll, W. J., & Torkzadeh, G. (1988). The measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction. MIS Quarterly, 12(2).
Drew, C., Hale, K., Hahn, W. L., Atwal, R., Graham, C., O'Connell, A., & Sumner, B. (2014). Forecast Alert: IT Spending, Worldwide, 1Q14 Update. from https://www.gartner.com/doc/2694417
Duncan, N. B. (1995). Capturing Flexibility of Information Technology Infrastructure: A Study of Resource Characteristics and their Measure. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(2).
Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 20.
Fichman, R. G., & Nambisan, S. (2009). Deriving Business Value from IT Applications in Product Development: A Complementarities-Based Model. Information Technology and Product Development Annals of Information Systems, 5.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1).
Franke, R. H. (1987). Technological Revolution and Productivity Decline: Computer Introduction in the Financial Industry TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 31(2), 12.
Gorla, N., Somers, T. M., & Wong, B. (2010). Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19, 22.
Hamilton, S., & Chervany, N. L. (1981). Evaluating Information System Effectiveness - Part I: Comparing Evaluation Approaches. MIS Quarterly, 5(3), 15.
Helfat, C. E., & Lieberman, M. B. (2002). The Birth of Capabilities: Market Entry and the Importance of Pre-History. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(4), 36.
Helfat, E., & Raubitschek, R. S. (2000). Product sequencing: co-evolution of know capabilities and products. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11), 19.
Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, N. (1993). Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM systems journal, 32(1).
Hess, A. M., & Rothaerme, F. T. (2011). When are assets complementary? star scientists, strategic alliances, and innovation in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, 32(8), 15.
Hitt, L. M., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1996). Productivity, Business Profitability, and Consumer Surplus: Three Different Measures of Information Technology Value. MIS Quarterly, 20(2), 22.
Hitt, L. M., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1997). Information Technology and Internal Firm Organization: An Exploratory Analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(2).
Hsief, J. J. P.-A., & Wang, W. (2007). Explaining employees' Extended Use of complex information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 16.
Huang, H.-C. (2006). Factors Affecting the Adoption of Mobile Technology - the Fit-Viability Perspective. (Master), National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung.
Hunton, J. E., & Flowers, L. (1997). Information technology in accounting: Assessing the impact on accountants and organizations. (S. C. Sutton Ed.). Greenwich: JAI Press Inc. .
Iivari, J. (2005). An empirical test of the DeLone-McLean model of information system success. ACM Digital Library, 36(2).
Jacobides, M. G., Knudsen, T., & Augier, M. (2006). Benefiting from innovation: Value creation, value appropriation and the role of industry architectures. Research Policy, 35(8), 22.
Kao, Y.-T. (2006). A Study on User Satisfaction and Acceptance of MOD. (Master), National Sun Yet-sen University, Kaohsiung.
Kim, J., Lee, J., Han, K., & Lee, M. (2002). Business as buildings: metrics for the architectural quality of internet businesses. Information Systems Research, 13(3).
Lin, T. (2010). Management Information System: The Strategic Core Competence of e-Business (4 ed.): 智勝文化.
Liu, Y.-H. (2013). Understanding the Affecting Factors of IT Investment Valuation Bias and IT Value Conversion Barriers. (Master), National Sun Yet-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Lucas, H. C. (1981). Implementation: The Key to Successful Information System: Columbia University Press New York, NY, USA.
McKeen, J. D., Guimaraes, T., & Wetherbe, J. C. (1994). The Relationship between User Participation and User Satisfaction: An Investigation of Four Contingency Factors. MIS Quarterly, 18(4).
Mirani, R., & King, W. R. (1994). Impacts of end-user and information center characteristics on end-user computing support. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(1).
Montazemi, A. R. (1988). Factors Affecting Information Satisfaction in the Context of the Small Business Environment. MIS Quarterly, 12(2).
Negash, S., Ryan, T., & Igbaria, M. (2003). Quality and effectiveness in Web-based customer support systems. Information & Management, 40(8), 12.
Nelson, R. R., Todd, P. A., & Wixom, B. H. (2005). Antecedents of Information and System Quality: An Empirical Examination Within the Context of Data Warehousing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(4).
O'Sullivan, A., & Sheffrin, S. M. (2005). Economics: Principles in Action, California Edition: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Palmer, J. W. (2002). Web site usability, design and performance metrics. Information Systems Research, 12(3).
Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2008). Measuring information system success models, dimensions, measures, and relationships. European Journal of Information Systems, 17, 28.
Petter, S., Straub, D., & Rai, A. (2007). Specifying Formative Constructs in Information System Research. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 34.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5).
Powell, S. C., & Dent-Micall, A. (1997). Information technology as Competitve Advantage The Role of Human, Business ,and Technology Resources. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5).
Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008). The Consequences of Technostress for End Users in Organizations: Conceptual Development and Empirical Validation. Information Systems Research, 19(4).
Rai, A., Lang, S. S., & Welker, R. B. (2002). Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis. Information Systems Research, 13(1), 20.
Ravichandran, T., & Lertwongsatien, C. (2005). Effect of Information Systems Resources and Capabilities on Firm Performance : A Resource-Based Perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(4), 40.
Rothaermel, F. T. (2001). Complementary assets, strategic alliances, and the incumbent’s advantage: an empirical study of industry and firm effects in the biopharmaceutical industry. Research Policy, 30(8), 17. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00142-6
Sabherwal, R., Jeyaraj, A., & Chowa, C. (2006). Information System Success Individual and Organizational Determinants. Management Science, 52(12), 16.
Sarker, S., & Valacich, J. S. (2010). An alternative to methodological individualism: a non-reductionist approach to studying technology adoption by groups. MIS Quarterly, 34(4).
Seddon, P. B. (1997). A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success. Information Systems Research, 8(3), 14.
Seddon, P. B., & Kiew, M. (1994). A partial test and development of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Paper presented at the The 15th International Conference on Information Systems, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Seddon, P. B., Staples, S., Patnayakuni, R., & Bowtell, M. (1999). Dimensions of Information Systems Success. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2(3), 61.
Sherer, S. A., Kohli, R., & Baron, A. (2003). Complementary Investment in Change Management and IT Investment Payoff. Information Systems Frontiers, 5(3).
Sircar, S., Turnbow, J. L., & Bordoloi, B. (2000). A Framework for Assessing the Relationship Between Information Technology Investments and Firm Performance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(4), 29.
Taylor, A., & Helfat, C. E. (2009). Organizational Linkages for Surviving Technological Change: Complementary Assets, Middle Management, and Ambidexterity. Organizational Science, 20(4), 22.
Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 21. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2
Tesch, D., Miller, R., Jiang, J. J., & Klein, G. (2005). Perception and expectation gaps of information systems provider skills: the impact on user satisfaction. Information Systems Journal, 15(4).
Tharcher, M. E., & Oliver, J. R. (2001). The Impact of Technology Investments on a Firm's Production Efficiency, Product Quality, and Productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(2), 29.
TJ, M., & JE, K. (2005). The role of spreadsheet knowledge in user-developed application success. Decision Support Systems, 39(3).
Tsai, C.-H., Hsu, F.-M., & Chih, W.-H. (2006). Applying D&M IS Success Model to develop the Success Model of Knowledge Management Systems. 資管評論, 14, 29.
Wixom, R. R. N. P. A. T. B. H. (2005). Antecedents of Information and System Quality: An Empirical Examination Within the Context of Data Warehousing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(4).
Wu, J.-H., & Wang, Y.-M. (2006). Measuring KMS success_a respecification of the DeLone and McLean model. Information & Management, 43(6).
Zhu, K. (2004). The Complementarity of Information Technology Infrastructure and E-Commerce Capability: A Resource-Based Assessment of Their Business Value. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(1).
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code