Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0118108-234815 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0118108-234815
論文名稱
Title
以社會認知理論及社會資本理論之觀點探索電子訊息傳遞意圖之實證研究
An Empirical Investigation of Message Pass-along Behavior Intention: From the Perspectives of Social Cognitive Theory and Social Capital Theory
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
70
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2007-06-28
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2008-01-18
關鍵字
Keywords
病毒式行銷、電子口碑行銷、訊息傳遞、社會認知理論、社會資本理論
viral marketing, Social cognitive theory, e-WOM, message passing along, Social capital theory
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5857 次,被下載 1906
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5857 times, has been downloaded 1906 times.
中文摘要
口碑行銷由於不受到業主廣告商等的影響,遂成為消費者在做採購決策時候的重要依據。在網路盛行的現今,過去面對面的口碑行銷方式已漸轉型成以網路為媒介傳遞的口碑行銷方式。網路口碑行銷(e-WOM),可以一次快速地傳遞訊息給各地方的人,突破了過去只能由一人傳遞訊息給一人且受到距離的限制。因此,越來越多人注意到其行銷價值,並想找出其背後的動機因素。本研究以過去成熟運用於研究人類行為的兩大理論 — 社會認知理論以及社會資本理論 — 從人、環境兩個角度為出發點,觀察網路口碑行銷意圖的影響因素。
本研究以問卷法調查網路使用者傳遞訊息行為的意圖,並利用PLS法進行檢驗。研究結果發現一般人在傳遞訊息時,比起考慮訊息內容的正確性與否,更在意此訊息是否跟自己的生活有關,顯示訊息傳遞的行為是一項生活化的舉動 — 若該訊息與生活相關才會讓人們想分享給他人。此外,一般人傾向於傳遞訊息給和自己真正有相互往來的人。同時,傳遞訊息不是想要提高自己的地位或聲譽,其意圖大多是想表達對對方的關心及注意。最後,一般人也會對於他們是否能夠傳遞對方認為重要且有用的資訊感到重視。
另外,本研究更進一步將傳遞訊息行為的意圖分為娛樂性及有用性。其結果發現隨著意圖的不同,人們傳遞的對象及傳遞的態度亦有所不同。總而言之,訊息傳遞常是人們聯繫情感並且表達感情的管道,本研究具體提出傳遞訊息意圖之因素動機,以提供日後網路口碑行銷研究之應用。
Abstract
With the common adoption of the Internet and Web in the recent years, the WOM has been changed to electronic WOM (e- WOM). E-WOM is the positive or negative statements made about a product, company, or media personality that are made widely available via the Internet. It has become an important source of information for the consumer to make decisions including purchase and more and more people have noticed the importance of its applications. The goal of this research is to investigate “message passing along behavior intention” (MPBI) by using Social Cognitive Theory and Social Capital Theory from the viewpoints of people and environment.
We use survey method to collect the data and use PLS to analyze it. And the results reveal that when people passing message along to others, they care about how close these messages are with them instead of how correct these messages are. It implies that MPBI has the nature of daily life, and therefore, people will be more willing to pass daily life messages. Besides, individuals tend to pass along messages to people who have substantial relationship with him/her. We also found people pass message along to people not for reputation but for expressing their affections to others. In addition, message passing Self-efficacy is also important to MPBI.
We also classified MPBI into two types — the one is hedonic and the other is utilitarian. The results indicate that people have different behavioral pattern when they deal with different kind of MPBI. In sum, MPBI is a channel for people to maintain the relationship with others and the findings of this study provides some suggestions for the e-WOM research.
目次 Table of Contents
CHAPTER1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1. BACKGROUND 1
1.2. MOTIVATION 2
1.3. PURPOSE 3
CHAPTER2. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND 5
2.1. WORD OF MOUTH AND E-WOM 5
2.2. THE SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY 9
2.3. THE SOCIAL CAPITAL THEORY 11
CHAPTER3. THE RESEARCH MODEL AND HYPOTHESES 14
3.1. RESEARCH MODEL 14
3.2. RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS 15
3.2.1. Environment 15
3.2.2. Person 19
CHAPTER4. RESEARCH METHOD 22
4.1. SUBJECT 22
4.2. MEASUREMENT 22
4.3. PROCEDURE 26
4.4. DATA COLLECTION 26
CHAPTER5. DATA ANALYSIS 29
5.1. ASSESSMENT OF THE MEASUREMENT MODEL 29
5.2. ASSESSMENT OF THE STRUCTURAL MODEL 34
5.3. ALTERNATIVE MODEL 37
5.4. DEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLES 41
CHAPTER6. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATION 46
6.1. RESULT 46
6.2. CONTRIBUTION 49
6.2.1. Theoretical implications 49
6.2.2. Practical implications 51
6.3. LIMITATION AND FUTURE STUDY 52
APPENDIX 53
REFERENCE 56
參考文獻 References
[1] Agarwal, R., Prasad, J. (1999), “Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies?” Decision Science, 30(2), 361–391.
[2] Agnew, C.R., Van Lange, P.A.M., Rusbult, C.E., Langston, C.A. (1998) “Cognitive Interdependence: Commitment and the Mental Representation of Close Relationships.” Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 74 (4), pp. 939-954.
[3] Ajzen, I. (1991) “The Theory of Planned Behavior.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
[4] Arndt, J. (1967) “Role of product-related conversations in the diffusion of a new product.” Journal of Marketing Research, 4 (3), 291-295.
[5] Babin, B. J.; Darden, W. R. (1994), “Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value.” Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (4), 644
[6] Bandura, A. (1982) “Sclf-efficacy mechanism in human agency.” American Psychologist, 372 ,p122-147.
[7] Bandura, A. (1986), Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[8] Bandura, A. (1989). “Human agency in social cognitive theory.” American Psychologist, 44(1) 175- 1 184.
[9] Bandura, A. (1990) “AUTHOR'S RESPONSE: Some Reflections on Reflections.” Psychological Inquiry, I (1), 101-105
[10] Bandura, A. Wood, R.(1989), “Social Cognitive Theory of Organizational Management.” Academy of Management Review, 14(1), p361, 24p,
[11] Betz, N.E. and Hackett, G.. (1981), "The Relationships of Career-related Self-efficacy Expectations to Perceived Career Options in College Women and Men," Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28 (5), 399-41 0.
[12] Blau, P.M. (1964), Exchange and Power in Social life, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
[13] Bock, G., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. and Lee, J. (2005), “Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-psychological Forces, and Organizational Climate.” MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87-111
[14] Brown, J. J. and Reingen, P. H. (1987). “Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior”. Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (3), 350-362.
[15] Burt, R. S. (1992), Structural holes: The social structure of competition, Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.
[16] Chau, Y.K., Hu, J.H. (2001), “Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model comparison approach.” Decision Sciences, 32(4), 699–718.
[17] Childers, T.L., Carr, C.L., Peck, J., & Carson, S. (2001), “Hedonic and Utilitarian Motivations for Online Retail Shopping Behavior.” Journal of Retailing, 77, 511–535
[18] Chin, W. W. (1998), “The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling.” Modern methods for business research, Marcoulides, G. A., editor, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 295-236.
[19] Chiu, Chao-Min; Hsu, Meng-Hsiang; Wang, Eric T.G.. (2006) “Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories ”, Decision Support Systems,42(3), p1872-1888
[20] Chrysanthos, D. (2003), “The Digitization of Word of Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms,” Management Science, 49 (10), 1407-1424.
[21] Coleman, J. S. (1990), Foundation of social theory., Cambridge, MA: Belknap press of Harvard University Press.
[22] Compeau, D. R., and Higgins, C. A. (1995) “Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test.”, MIS Quarterly, 19 (2), pp.189-211.
[23] Compeau, D. R., and Meister, D. B. (1997) “Measurement of Perceived Characteristics of Innovating: A Reconsideration Based on Three Empirical Studies,” presented at a workshop of the Diffusion Interest Group on Information Technology, Atlanta, CA, December 13,
[24] Compeau, D. R., Higgins, C.A. and Huff, Sid.(1999) “Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: a Longitudinal Study”, MIS Quarterly, 23 (2), p145-158
[25] Cotte, J.; Chowdhury, T. G..; Ratneshwar, S.; Ricci, L. M. (2006), “Pleasure or utility ? Time planning style and Web usage behaviors.” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 20 (1), 45-57
[26] Daniel, B., Schwier, R.A. and McCalla, G.. (2003) “Social Capital in Virtual Learning Communities and Distributed Communities of Practice”, Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 29(3)
[27] Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R.( 1989,) “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models.”, Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
[28] DeCarlo, Thomas E.; Laczniak, Russell N.; Motley, Carol M.; Ramaswami, Sridhar. (2007), “INFLUENCE OF IMAGE AND FAMILIARITY ON CONSUMER RESPONSE TO NEGATIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION ABOUT RETAIL ENTITIES.” Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 15 (1), 41-51
[29] Dellarocas, Chrysanthos (2003), “The Digitization of Word of Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms.” Management Science, 49(10),1407–1424.
[30] DeLone W.H., McLean E.R. (2003), “The Delone and Mclean model of information systems success: a ten-year update.” Journal of Management Information Systems, 19 (4), 9–30.
[31] Dwyer, Paul. (2007), “Measuring the value of electronic word of mouth and its impact in consumer communities.” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(2), 63-79
[32] Fornell, C, and Larcker, D. F. (1981), “Evaluating Structural Equations Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.” Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39-50.
[33] Godes, D. and Mayzlin, D. (2004). “Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication.” Marketing Science, 23 (4), 545-560.
[34] Granovetter, M. (1973) “The strength of weak ties.” American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6), 1360–1380.
[35] Granovetter, Mark. (1992) “Problems of Explanation in Economic Sociology.” Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, Nitin Nohria and Robert Eccles (eds.), Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 25-56
[36] Gruhl, D., Guha, R., Liben-Nowell, David and Tomkins, A. ( 2004) “Information diffusion through blog space”. In WWW 2004
[37] Hair, Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006), Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
[38] Holbrook, M.B., & Hirschman, E.C. (1982) “The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings and Fun.” Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 132–141.
[39] Johnson, Devon and Kent Grayson, (2005), “Cognitive and Affective Trust in Service Relationships,” Journal of Business Research, 58 (4), 500-507.
[40] Kankanhalli, A., B.C.Y. Tan, and K.K. Wei. (2005) “Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: an Empirical Investigation.” MIS Quarterly, 29 (1), 113-143
[41] Kaplowitz, Michael D.; Lupi, Frank. (2004) “Color Photographs and Mail Survey Response Rates.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 16(2), 199-206
[42] Katz, E. and P . F. Lazarsfeld (1955) “Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications.” Glenencoe, I (11), The Free Press.
[43] Kjerstin, S.T., and Shelly ,R. (2006), “Relationship between Blogs as eWOM and interactivity, perceived interactivity, and parasocial interaction.” Journal of interactive advertising, 6 (2), 39-50
[44] LaRose, R., Lai, Y., Lange, R., Love, B. and Wu, Y. (2005). “Sharing or piracy? An exploration of downloading behavior.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11 (1), Article 1.
[45] LaRose, Robert; Eastin, Matthew S. (2004), “A Social Cognitive Theory of Internet Uses and Gratifications: Toward a New Model of Media Attendance.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48 (3), 358-377
[46] Lazarsfeld, P. F., B. Berelson. and H, Gaudet. (1948), The People’s Choice. (2nd. ed.), New York: Columbia University Press
[47] Levin, D., Cross, R. and Abrams, L. (2002) “Why Should I Trust You? Predictors of Interpersonal Trust in a Knowledge Transfer Context”, Journal of Applied Psychology, August 19
[48] Li, Chau. and Lou. (2005) “Understanding Individual Adoption of Instant Messaging: An Empirical Investigation”, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 6 (4), 102-129
[49] Mathieson, K. (1991) “Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior," Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173-191.
[50] Murray, K.B. (1991) “A test of services marketing theory: consumer information acquisition activities”, Journal of Marketing, 55 (1), 10-25.
[51] Nahapiet, J., and Ghoshal, S. (1998) “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage,” Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
[52] Norman, A. T., and Russell, C. A. (2006) “The pass-along effect: Investigating word-of-mouth effects on online survey procedures.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(4), article 10. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue4/norman.html
[53] Nunnally, J. (1978), Psychometric Theory, New York, McGraw-Hill.
[54] Pastore, Michael. (2000) “The Value of Word of Mouth”, [URL: http://adrt's.intemet.com/feature/article/0,1401,8961_395371,00.htm], accessed on September 4,
[55] Phelps, J. E., Lewis, R., Mobilio, L., Perry, D., & Raman, N. (2004) “Viral marketing or electronic word-of mouth advertising: Examining consumer responses and motivations to pass along email.” Journal of Advertising Research, 45 (4), 333-348.
[56] Porter, L.W. and Lawler, E.E. (1968) Managerial Attitudes and Performance, Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL,.
[57] Reichers, A.E. (1985) “A Review and Reconceptualization of Organizational Commitment.” Academy of Management Review, 10, 465-476.
[58] Reis, H.T. and Patrick, B.C. (1996) “Attachment and Intimacy: Component Processes.” Social psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, Higgins, E. T., and A.W., Kruglanski (eds.), New York: Guilford Press, 523-563.
[59] Rogers, E. M. and Hart, W. B. (2002) “New Communication Technology and the Changing Nature of Conversation.” The Changing Conversation in America, E. William & N. Paul (Eds.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 91-117
[60] Rubin, R. B., H. M. Perse, and C. A. Barbato. (1988) “Conceptualization and Measurement of Interpersonal Communication Motives.” Human Communication Research, 14(4), 602-28.
[61] Rusbult, C.E. (1983) “A Longitudinal Test of the Investment Model: The Development (and Deterioration) of Satisfaction and Commitment in Heterosexual Involvements.” Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 45 (1), 101-117.
[62] Steve Jurvetson and Tim Draper (1997)” Viral Marketing.” Business 2.0, November 1998
[63] Sun, T., Youn, S., Wu, G., and Kuntaraporn, M. (2006) “Online word-of-mouth (or mouse): An exploration of its antecedents and consequences”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(4), article 11.
[64] Susssman, Stephanie Watts; Siegal, Wendy Schneier.(2003) “Informational Influence in Organizations: An Integrated Approach to Knowledge Adoption.” Information Systems Research, 14 (1), 47-65
[65] Taylor, S. and Todd, P.A. (1995) “Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models”. Information Systems Research, 6, 144-176.
[66] Thorsten, H.T., Gwinner, K.P., Walsh, G. and Gremler, D.D. (2004) “Electronic Word- Of-Mouth Via Consumer-Opinion Platforms: What Motivates Consumers to Articulate Themselves on the Internet?” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18 (1), 38-52.
[67] Tsai W, Ghoshal, S. (1998) “Social capital and value creation: the role of intrafirm networks.” Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464-476.
[68] Wasko, M. and Faraj, S. (2005) “Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice”, MIS Quarterly 29(1), 35–58.
[69] Weill. R, and Vitale, M. (1999) “Assessing the health of an information system portfolio: An example from process engineering.” MIS Quarterly, 23 (4), 601-624.
[70] Wold, H. (1982) “Systems Under Indirect Observation Using PLS.” A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis, C. Fornell (Ed.), Praeger, New York, , 325-347.
[71] Woolcock, M. (1998) “Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework.” Theory and Society, 27(2), 151-208.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內立即公開,校外一年後公開 off campus withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code