Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0129108-101251 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0129108-101251
論文名稱
Title
品牌形象、涉入程度、與延伸契合度對品牌態度的影響-以捷安特品牌延伸為例
Impact of consistency between brand image, involvement and brand extension on brand attitude - A case of Giant brand extension
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
112
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2008-01-21
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2008-01-29
關鍵字
Keywords
涉入程度、品牌形象、契合度、延伸評價、品牌態度、捷安特
fit, involvement, brand image, brand attitude, Giant, brand evaluation
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5750 次,被下載 93
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5750 times, has been downloaded 93 times.
中文摘要
本研究以自行車製造廠巨大公司之自創品牌-「捷安特」為測試對象,瞭解當捷安特進行品牌延伸,消費者對品牌延伸的評價是否會影響品牌延伸評價,研究中亦探討品牌形象(brand image)與產品涉入程度(product involvement)對品牌延伸態度影響。
本研究採用深入訪談與問卷調查法,深入訪談中分別訪問高、低涉入程度的受訪者,瞭解他們對該品牌形象看法,利用受訪者自由聯想該品牌可發展之品牌延伸,作為問卷調查中品牌延伸之受測項目。
本研究發現在品牌形象對產品和服務延伸評價影響的部分,功能性品牌形象對產品和服務延伸有顯著影響,亦即,消費者對廠商推出功能性的延伸產品(車身與人身用品)和延伸服務(車子維修、組裝課程和人身運動課程)評價較正面。
其次,高、低契合度對延伸服務評價都有顯著影響,消費者對高契合度延伸服務(車子維修、組裝課程和人身運動課程)評價最高,而對低契合度延伸服務(銀行與保險業)評價最低。
再者,涉入度程度對延伸產品與高、低契合度延伸服務評價之影響中,高涉入者對高契合度延伸服務(車子維修、組裝課程和人身運動課程)有顯著影響,高、低涉入程度對延伸產品和低契合度無顯著影響。
最後,涉入程度對品牌形象看法的影響,高涉入者對功能性、象徵性與經驗性品牌形象看法較正面。
Abstract
“Giant” is the study case of this research, which attempts to establish what influences consumers’ attitude to brand extension and brand attitude when Giant promoted extension of its brand. The study also investigated the influence of brand image and product involvement on attitude to brand extension.
The methodology of the study includes in-depth interview and questionnaire survey. Consumers with high and low levels of product involvement were interviewed. An understanding of their perspective on brand image was gained. Interviewers’ free thoughts of potential brand extensions were gathered. These were used in the brand extension items of the questionnaire.
It is found from the study, with respect to the influence of brand image on product and service extension, functional brand image bears significant influence on product and service extension. In other words, consumers have positive responses to functional product (the bike and personal gear) and service (bike repair, assembly tuitions and exercise courses) extensions.
Secondly, high and low consistencies both bear significant influence on the service extension. Consumers have the greatest response to highly consistent service extension (bike repair, assembly tuitions and exercise courses). Consumer response to low consistent service extension (bank and insurance) is the lowest.
Furthermore, with respect to the influence of involvement in high and low consistent service extension, those with high involvement have significant influence on high consistency service extension (bike repair, assembly tuitions and exercise courses). The level of involvement has not significant influence on product extension and low consistency. With respect to the influence of involvement on brand image, those with high involvement has more positive response on functional, symbolic and experience brand image.
目次 Table of Contents
摘 要 1
Abstract 2
誌謝 3
第一章 緒論 8
第一節 研究背景與動機 8
第二節 研究目的 11
第三節 研究流程 12
第二章 文獻探討 13
第一節 品牌( brand ) 13
第三節 產品涉入程度 29
第三章 個案描述 33
第一節 公司簡介 33
第二節 經營方針及重要產銷政策 35
第三節 臺灣捷安特通路經營 38
第四章 研究方法 41
第一節 研究架構 41
第二節 研究假設 41
第三節 深入訪談 43
第四節 研究變數、操作型定義與問卷設計 44
第五節 資料分析方法 49
第五章 資料分析 51
第一節 樣本結構 51
第二節 信度分析 52
第三節 假說檢定驗證結果 54
第六章 結論與建議 66
第一節 研究結果 66
第二節 總結 69
第三節 管理意涵 71
第四節 研究限制 73
第五節 未來研究建議 74
參考文獻 76
一、中文部分 76
二、英文部分 77
附錄一 前測問卷設計 84
附錄二 正式問卷設計 88
附錄三 深入訪談內容 92
附錄四 表 102
參考文獻 References
一、中文部分
1. 我的環台夢:劉金標的73歲自行車環島日記,劉金標口述;藍麗娟採訪;徐浩軒繪者,台北,天下雜誌股份有限公司,2007。
2. 品牌行銷法則,如何打造強勢品牌 大衛.愛格(David A. Aaker);沈雲聰、湯宗勳譯,初版,台北市, 商業周刊出版;城邦文化發行,1998。
3. 品牌管理,艾克等著;高登第譯,台北市,天下遠見,2001 。
4. 品牌領導,大衛、艾克,艾瑞克・喬幸斯瑟勒合著;高登第譯,台北市,天下遠見,2002。
5. 消費者行為,榮泰生,台北,五南圖書出版有限公司,1999。
6. 騎上峰頂,捷安特與劉金標傳奇,魏錫鈴著,聯經出版公司,台北,2004。
7. 體驗經濟時代,約瑟夫.派恩(B. Joseph Pine Ⅱ)與詹姆斯.吉爾摩(James H. Gilmore)著;夏業良、魯煒譯,台北,經濟新潮社,2003。
8. 別蓮蒂,產品契合度與品牌特質聯想對品牌延伸效果的影響,管理評論,第二十二卷, 第二期,民國92年4月。
9. 林萱萱(2000)。品牌延伸互動效果之研究。實踐大學企業管理研究所。未出版。
10. 吳珮鈺(2001)。消費者對品牌延伸評價的決定因素探討。長庚大學企業管理研究所。未出版。
11. 洪秀蓉(1992)。影響品牌延伸評估效果因素之研究。國中政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
12. 徐秀媚(2003)。品牌延伸前後之顧客忠誠度分析。國立台灣科技大學企業管理系碩士論文。
13. 施凱瑜(2005)。品牌優勢、產品屬性、延伸契合度與所有權狀態對母品牌態度的回饋效果之探討-以聯合報與蘋果日報為例。國立中山大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。未出版。
14. 陳振燧(1998)。品牌權益來源組合類型與品牌延伸策略關係之硏究。行政院國科會科資中心,台北市。
15. 陳振燧(2001)。從品牌權益觀點探討品牌延伸策略。輔仁管理評論。3 月,第八卷第一期,頁33-56。
16. 陳振燧、洪順慶(1992),顧客基礎的品牌權益建立之研究,管理學報,第15卷第4期,頁623-642。
17. 陳振燧、張允中(2001),品牌聯想策略對品牌權益影響之研究,管理學報,第18卷第1期,頁75-98。
18. 黃俊英,賴文彬(1990)。涉入的理論發展與實務應用。管理科學學報,第七卷,第一期,頁15-30。
19. 巨大機械工業股份有限公司 民國九十五年年報。
20. 捷安特網站 www.giant-bicycies.com
二、英文部分
1. Aaker, D.A.(1990).“Brand extensions: The good, the bad, and the ugly.’’ Sloan Management Review, 31(4)47-56.
2. Aaker, D.A., & Keller, K.L.(1990).”Consumer evaluatios of brand extensions.” Journal of Marketing, 53(1),27-41.
3. Aaker, D.A.( (1991).“Managing brand equity”. New York: The Free Press.
4. Aaker, D.A. (1996).”Building strong brands.”New York: The Free Press.
5. Ansoff(1957),”Strategies for Diversification”, Harvard Business Review, 114.
6. Biel, Alexander L.(1992)”How Brand Image Drives Brand Equity,” Journal of Advertising Research, 12, 6-12.
7. Boush David M. and Loken Barbara (1991), “A process Tracing Study of Brand Extension Evaluations,” Journal of Marketing Research, 28(February), 16-18.
8. Boush, David M., Shannon Shipp, Barbara Loken, Ezra Gencturk, Susan Crockett, Ellen Kennedy, Betty Minshall, Dennis Misurell, Linda Rochford, and Jon Strobel(1987),” Affect Generalization to Similar and Dissimilar Brand Extensions.” Psychology and Marketing 4(Fall), 225-237.
9. Broniarczyk S.M. & Alba J.W. (1994), “The Importance of the Brand in Brand Extension”, Journal of Marketing Research , 214-228.
10. Chernatony, L. De. And G. McWillam(1989), “Branding Terminology The Real Debate,”Marketing Intelligence and Planning, July/August, 29-32
11. Court, David C., Leiter, Mark G. and Loch, Mark A. (1999), “Brand leverage”, The McKinsey Quarterly (2), 101-110.
12. Dacin, Peter A.;& Smith, Daniel C.,” The Effect of Brand Portfolio Characteristics on Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions.” Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2),229-242.
13. Daniel Katz,”The functional Approach to the study of Attitudes, ”Public Opinion Quarterly 24(Summer 1960):163-204;Richard J. Lutz,” Changing Brand Attitudes Through Modification of Cognitive Structure,”(1975), Journal of Consumer Research, 1( 4), 49-59.
14. Dawar Niraj and Paul F. Anderson(1994),” The effects of order and direction on multiple brand extensions,” Journal of Business Research, 30( 2), 119-129.
15. Deborah Roedder John; Barbara Loken; Christopher Joiner, (1998) “The Negative Impact of Extensions: Can Flagship Products Be Diluted?”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 62, No. 1. (Jan.), 19-32.
16. Dornblaser, L. (1992),“New Product Totals for 1991 Soar Past 16,000 Level,”New Product News. Gorman Publishing Co., 3.
17. Fishbein M.(1963).” An investigation of the relationships between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward that object.” Human Relations, 16(2), 233-240.
18. Fishbein M.,& Ajzen, I.(1975). “Belief, attitude, intention and behavior.”An Introduction to Theory and Research. MA:Addison-Wesley.
19. Gamble, T.R. (1967), “Brand Extension,” Plotting Marketing Strategy, Lee Adler ed.. New York: Simon and Schuster, 165-178.
20. Garvin, David A,” Product Quality: An Important Strategic Weapon.”Business Horizons, 27(3), 40-43.
21. Hem L.E.; De Chernatony L.; Iversen N.M.(2003),” Factors Influencing Successful Brand Extensions,” Journal of Marketing Management, 19. 781-806.
22. Keller, K. L.,& Sood, S.(2003). Brand Equity Dilution. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45 (1), 12-15
23. Keller, K.L.(1993),”Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity.”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57, No. 1. (Jan.), 1-22.
24. Keller, K.L.(1998), Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Management Brand Equity. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
25. Kim, Chung K.; Lavack, Anne M.; Smith, Margo,” (2001). “Consumer evaluation of vertical brand extensions and core brands”, Journal of Business Research,52(3), 211-222.
26. Kotler, P.(1994). Marketing management: Analysis, planning, implementation, and control 9thed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall International, Inc.
27. Lane Vicki and Jacobson Robert(1995),”Stock Market Reactions to Brand Extension Announcements: The Effects of Brand Attitude and Familiarity, ”Journal of Marketing, 59(1) , 63-77.
28. Lassar, W., B. Mittal and A. Sharma(1995),”Measuring Customer-Based Brand Equity,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 12(4), 11-19.
29. Laurent, Gilles; Kapferer, Jean-Noël. (1985)” Measuring Consumer Involvement Profiles.” Journal of Marketing Research,Vol. 22 Issue 1, 41-53.
30. Loken B. & John D. R. (1993),”Diluting Brand Beliefs: When Do Brand Extensions Have a Negative Impact?”Journal of Marketing, (Jul.)Vol. 57, No. 3., 71-84.
31. MacInnis, Deborah J. and Kent Nakamoto (l990), "Examining Factors that Influence the Perceived Goodness of Brand Extensions," Graduate School of Management, University of Arizona.,Working Paper #54, Karl Eller .
32. Muthukrishnan, A.V.& Weitz, Barton A, (1991)” Role of Product Knowledge in Evaluation of Brand Extension”,Advances in Consumer Research, , Vol. 18 Issue 1, 407-413.
33. Neal W.D.(2000).” For most customers, loyalty isn't an attitude.”Marketing News,34(8),7.
34. Nijssen, E., Uijl, R. & Bucklin, L.P.(1995),”The Role of Involvement for Brand Extensions”, in Bergadaa, M. (Ed.), Marketing Today and for the 21st Century, Proceedings of the 24th EMAC-conference, ESSEC, Paris, Vol. 1, 867-92.
35. Park,C. W., Milberg, S.,& Lawson, R.(1991).Evaluation of brand extensions: The role of product feature similarity and brand concept consistency. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(2), 185-193.
36. Park, C. S. and V. Srinivasan(1994), “A Survey-Based Method for Measuring and Understanding Brand Equity and Its Extendibility.”Journal of marketing research, 31(2), 271-288.
37. Pitta, D. A. and L. P. Katsanis(1995), “Understanding brand equity for successful brand extension,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 12(4), 51-64.
38. Ranagaswamy, A. , R. Burke and T.A. Oliva.(1993)“Brand equity and the extendibility of brand names”, International Journal of Research in Marketing,10(1), 61-75.
39. Reddy Srinivas K. , Holak Susan L. and Bhat Subodh,(1994)”To Extend or Not to Extend: Success Determinants of Line Extensions, ”Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 243-262.
40. Ries, A and J. Trout(1989), The 22 Immutable Laws of Marketing, New York: HarperCollins Publisher, Inc.
41. Richardson, Paul S.; Alan S. Dick; Jain Arun K. (1994)”Extrinsic and Intrinsic Cue Effects on Perceptions of Store Brand Quality”,Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, No. 4. (Oct.), 28-36.
42. Romeo, Jean B.(1991)”The Effects of Negative Information on the Evaluations of Brand Extensions and the Family Brand.” Advances in Consumer Research, 18(1), 399-406.
43. Rothschild, Michael L. (1984)” PERSPECTIVES ON INVOLVEMENT: CURRENT PROBLEMS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS.” Advances in Consumer Research, 11( 1), 216-217.
44. Ruyter, Ko de and Wetzels, Martin (2000), “The Role of Corporate Image and ExtensionSimilarity in Service Brand Extensions”, Journal of Economic Psychology, 21, pp. 639-659.
45. Sheinin Daniel A. and Schmitt Bernd H(1994),” Extending brands with new product concepts: The role of category attribute congruity, brand affect, and brand breadth,”Journal of Business Research, 31( 1), 1-10.
46. Smith, D.C. and C.W. Park(1992),” The Effects of Brand Extensions on Market Share and Advertising Efficiency,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 29, No. 3. (Aug.), 296-313.
47. Solomon M. R., “Consumer Behavior-buying, having, and Being.” Person Prentice Hall TM7th, 2007.
48. Sunde, L. and R. J. Brodie(1993),”Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions: Further Empirical Results,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10, 47-53.
49. Sullivan Mary W. (1992),”Brand Extensions: When to Use Them, ”Management Science , 38(6 ),793-806.
50. Swaminathan, V., R. J. Fox, and S.K. Reddy (2001), “The Impact of Brand Extension Introduction on Choice,”Journal of Marketing, 65(Oct.), 1-15.
51. Tauber, Edward M.(1981)” Brand Franchise Extension: New Product Benefits From Existing Brand Names.” Business Horizons, 24(2), 36-41.
52. Tauber, Edward M.(1988)” Brand Leverage: Strategy for Growth in a Cost Control World.”, Journal of Advertising Research, 28( 4), 26-30.
53. The economist (1990), “Brand-Stretching Can Be Fun-and Dangerous,” The Economist, 315, 73-74.
54. Warrington, Patti & Soyeon Shim (2000)” An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Product Involvement and Brand Commitment.” Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 17 Issue 9, 761-782.
55. Wernerfelt, Birger (1988),”Umbrella Branding as A signal of New Product Quality: An Example of Signaling by Posting a Bond.”Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 19, No.3, 458-466.
56. Wilson Lynn O. and Norton John A.,” (1989)Optimal Entry Timing for a Product Line Extension, ”Marketing Science, 8(1), 1-17.
57. Zaichkowsky, J.L.(1985). “Measuring the involvement Construct.”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 12, 341-352.
58. Zimmer, Mary R.& Bhat, Subodh.(2004)” The reciprocal effects of extension quality and fit on parent brand attitude”, Journal of Product & Brand Management,13(1), 37-46.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內一年後公開,校外永不公開 campus withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 44.195.47.227
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 44.195.47.227
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code