Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0205106-183931 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0205106-183931
論文名稱
Title
以真實折價觀點進行台灣IPO現象之再檢視
none
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
114
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2005-07-31
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2006-02-05
關鍵字
Keywords
展望理論、市場反應、真實折價、真實價值、折價、初期報酬、新上市上櫃股票
IPOs, true discount, intrinsic value, Prospect Theory, initial return, underpricing, market reaction
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5720 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5720 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
過去討論IPO折價的文獻中,雖然對於IPO折價之解釋會有不同的假設與論點,但對於IPO折價定義卻是一致的,即折價是初期上市價與承銷價間的差距。究其定義,折價幅度取決於初期上市價與承銷價兩項因素,因此折價發生的原因就不外乎為承銷價定價偏低或發行初期投資人之錯誤評價,且兩項因素可能同時存在。由此Ma(1999)乃將傳統的折價幅度(即初期報酬)再區分為因公司承
銷訂價相對真實價格偏低所造成的「真實折價」以及上市後投資人的「市場反應」兩個部份,表示構成初期報酬的除了訂價偏誤外,還包括市價偏誤;且模式中「真實折價」才能真正代表承銷價之「價值低估」幅度。
本研究以1990至2001年之台灣663個台灣新上市上櫃公司為研究對象,使用EBO評價模式與市場比較法評估其真實價值,然後以真實折價的觀點重新檢視台灣IPO市場現象。其中較重要的發現為:1. IPO承銷價有系統性地被高估的現象;2. 無論使用哪一種評價模式評價,皆呈現低E o P P / 投資組合其初期報酬為最低,而高E o P P / 投資組合其初期報酬反而最高的結果,此一現象顯示承銷價相對高估之IPO其初期報酬反而較高,此等與基於訊號假說等理論之傳統折價模型的預測結果大相逕庭;3. 本研究同時使用IPO上市上櫃後各年超常報酬與長期買進持有超常報酬兩種方式衡量IPO上市上櫃後五年期間的長期超常報酬,結果顯示不管使用那一種評價模式評價IPO,或選擇何種指標估計正常報酬,低E o P P / IPOs之長期買進持有超額報酬率高於低E o P P / IPOs之長期買進持有超額報酬率;6. 影響IPO真實折價因素,顯著者有:上市櫃、承銷方式、電子業與市場景氣。7. 關於更換承銷商因素之Logistic 迴歸分析結果顯示,只有承銷商聲譽與在釋股期間兩變數具有顯著性。
Abstract
none
目次 Table of Contents
第一章 續論………………………………………………….1
第二章 文獻探討…………………………………………….7
2.1 企業評價模式理論與證…………………………………7
2.1.1 企業評價簡介…………………………………………7
2.1.2 EBO評價模式…………………………………………10
2.1.3 市場比較法………………………………………….18
2.1.4 評價模式有效性實證研究………………………….20
2.2 IPO折價因素探討………………………………………25
2.2.1 資訊不對稱………………………………………….26
2.2.2 承銷配售機制……………………………………….31
2.2.3 公司特質…………………………………………….37
2.2.4 市場因素…………………………………………….40
第三章 樣本資料與IPO評價方法………………………….44
3.1 樣本篩選及資料來源………………………………….44
3.2 使用EBO評價模式估計IPO真實價值………………….51
3.3 使用市場比較法估計IPO真實價值……………………55
3.3.1 選擇同產業對照公司…………………………………55
3.3.2 使用對照公司價格乘數估計IPO價值………………57
第四章 實證分析與結果…………………………………..59
4.1 IPO評價結果……………………………………………59
4.1.1 敘述統計.……………………………………………59
4.1.2 評價是否忽略了成長貼水?.………………………67
4.1.3 IPOs是否風險較低.…………………………………68
4.2 IPO評價與後市報酬率………………………………..70
4.2.1 初期報酬………….…………………………………70
4.2.2 長期報酬.……………………………………………75
4.3 IPO評價與事後績效表現……………………………..80
4.4 影響真實折價因素之迴歸模型分析………………….82
4.5 結合展望理論與真實折價模型探討承銷商更換因素.88
參考文獻………………………………………………………99
參考文獻 References
一、IPO相關文獻
(一)中文部分
1. 洪振虔、吳欽杉、陳安琳,非理性投資行為對新上市股票價格績效之影響,管理評論,民國九十一年四月,第二十一卷第二期。
2. 馬黛、胡德中,承銷配售機制之決定及其對IPO 折價之影響:競價拍賣、詢價圈購與公開申購,財務金融學刊,民國九十二年四月,第十一卷第一期。
3. 陳軒基、葉秀娟、陳右超,承銷制度與折價幅度:台灣初次上市櫃股票之實證分析(1980~2000),證券市場發展季刊,民國九十二年,第十四卷第四期。
4. 馬黛、胡德中,由承銷價低估、市價高估與股權結構觀點分析最適釋股策略與IPO 折價,經濟論文,民國九十三年,第三十二卷第一期。
5. 劉玉珍、陳薇如,為何詢價圈購方式逐漸取代競價拍賣,證券暨期貨月刊,民國九十三年五月,第二十二卷第五期。
(二)英文部分
Aggarwal, Raj, Laurie Krigman, and Kent Womack, 2002, Strategic IPO Underpricing, Information Momentum, and Lockup Expiration Selling forthcoming in the Journal of Financial Economics.
Aggarwal, Reena, 2000. Stabilization Activities by Underwriters after Initial
Alexey Malakhov, 2004, The Role of Uninformed Buyers in Optimal IPO Mechanisms,working paper.
Allen, Franklin, and G. Faulhaber, 1989, Signaling by underpricing in the IPO market, Journal ofFinancial Economics 23, 303-323.
Randolph P. and Jay R. Ritter, 1986. Investment banking, reputation, and the underpricing of initial public offerings. Journal of Financial
Benveniste Lawrence, Huijing Fu, Paul J. Seguin and Xiaoyun Yu, 2000. On the Anticipation of IPO Underpricing: Evidence from Equity Carve-outs. Working paper, University of Minnesota.
Benveniste, L., and P. Spindt, 1989, How investment bankers determine the offer price and allocation of new issues? Journal of Financial Economics 24, 343-361.
Benveniste, Lawrence M. & Paul A. Spindt, 1989. How investment bankers determine the offer price and allocation of new issues. Journal of Financial
Berkman, Henk, Venkat R. Eleswarapu, 1998. Shourt-term traders and liquidity: a test using Bombay tock Exchange data. Journal of Financial
Bernstein, Peter L, 1987.Liquidity, Stock Markets and Market Makers. Financial
Brav, Alon, and Paul A. Gompers, 1997, Myth or Reality? The long-run underperformance of initial public offerings: Evidence from venture and nonventure capital-backed companies, Journal of Finance 52, 1791-1821.
Carter, Richard B., Frederick H. Dark, and Ajai K. Singh, 1998. Underwriter reputation, initial returns, and the long-run performance of IPO stock. The Journal of Finance 53, 285-311.
Chemmanur, Thomas J. and Huanliang Liu, 2002, How Should A Firm Go Public? A Dynamic Model of the Choice Between Fixed-Price Offerings and Auctions in IPOs and Privatizations, working paper.
Chowdhry, Bhagwan and Ann Sherman, 1996a, International Differences in Oversubscription and Underpricing of Initial Public Offerings,” Pacific-Basin finance Journal , 4, 15-30.
Daniel, Kent, & Sheridan Titman, 1999. Market Efficiency in an irrational world. Financial Analysts Journal, 28-39.
Daniel, Kent, David Hirshleifer, and Avanidhar Subrahmanyam, 1998. Investor Psychology and Security Market Under- and Overreactions. Jouranl of Finance 53, 1839-1886.
Derrien, Francois and Kent L. Womack, 2001, Auction vs. Bookbuilding and the Control of Underpricing in Hot IPO Markets,” Review of Financial Studies, forthcoming.
DuCharme, Larry L., Shievaram Rajgopal and Stephan E. Sefcik, 2001. Lowballing for “Pop : The case of Internet IPO underpricing. Working paper. University of Washington.
Dunbar, Craig G., 1998. The choice between firm-commitment and best-efforts offering methods in IPOs: The effect of unsuccessful offers. Journal of Financial Intermediation 7, 60-90.
Ellis, Katrina, Roni Michaely, and Maureen O’hara, 2000. When the underwriter is the market maker: An examination of trading in the IPO aftermarket. The Journal of Finance 55, 1039-1073.
Fama, Eugene F., 1998. Market efficiency, long-term returns, and behavioral finance. Journal of Financial Economics 49, 283-306.
Grinblatt, Mark, and C.Y. Hwang, 1989, Signaling and the pricing of new issues, Journal of Finance 44, 393-420.
Grundfest, Joseph A., 2000. The future of United States securities regulation in an age of technological uncertainty. Working paper, St. John’s University School of Law.
Hanley, Kathleen Weiss, & William J. Wilhelm, 1995. Evidence on the strategic allocation of initial public offerings. Journal of Financial Economics 37, 239-257.
Hasbrouck, Joel, 1988. Trades, quotes, inventories and information. Journal of Financial Economics 1988, 229-252.
Kim, Ku, and Ritter, 1999. Valuing IPOs. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 53, No.3, pp.409-437
Kothare, Meeta, 1997. The effects of equity issues on ownership structure and stock liquidity: A comparison of rights and public offerings. Journal of Financial
Kutsuna, Kenji and Richard Smith, 2001, Issue Cost and Method of IPO Pricing: Japan’s Change from Auction to Book Building, working paper.
Lee, Yi-Tsung, J.C. Lin and Yu-Jane Liu, 2003, What is IPO Auction’ Weakness? working paper, presented in EFMA.
Liu, Crocker H., 1993. Insider Trading as a signal of private information. The Review of Financial Studies 6, 79-119.
Ljungqvist, Alexander P. and Tim Jenkinson , 2001, Global Integration in Primary Equity Markets: The Role of U.S. Banks and U.S. Investors, working paper.
Loughran, T. and JR Ritter, 2002, Why Don’t Issuers Get Upset About Leaving Money on the Table in. IPOs? Review of Financial Studies 15, 413-443
Loughran, T. and JR Ritter, 2004. Why has IPO underpricing changed over time?, Financial Management 33(3) 5-37
Loughran, T., 1993, NYSE Vs NASDAQ returns: Market microstructure or the poor performance of IPOs? Journal of Financial Economics 33, 241-260.
Loughran, T., and J. R. Ritter, 1995, The new issues puzzle, Journal of Finance 50, 23-51.
Ma, Tai & C.Y. Hong, 1999. The issuer’s decision of IPO mechanisms: fixed price versus auction. The 6th Annual Global Finance Conference, Istanbul, Turkey.
Loughran, T., 1993, NYSE Vs NASDAQ returns: Market microstructure or the poor
Ma, Tai, 1993. Price limits, margin requirements, and stock market volatility: An empirical analysis of the Taiwan Stock Market. Research in International Business and Finance, 227-251.
Ma. Tai & Tsai Pei Ru, 2001, Are Initial Return and IPO Discount the Same Thing? A Comparison of Direct Public Offerings and Underwritten IPOs. The 10th Conference of the Theories and Practices of Securities and Financial Markets.
Massimb, Marcel N. & Bruce D. Phelps, 1994. Electronic Trading, Market Structure & Liquidity. Financial Analysts Journal 1994 January-February, 39-50.
Mello, Antonio S. & John E. Parsons, 1998. Going public and the ownership structure of the firm. Journal of Financial Economics 49, 79-109.
Odean, Terrance, 1998. Volume, volatility, price, and profit— when all traders are above average. The Journal of Finance 53, 1887-1990.
Pagno, Marco & Ailsa Roell, 1996. Transparency and liquidity: A comparison of auction and dealer markets with informed trading. The Journal of Finance 51, 579-611.
Parkinson, Michael, 1980. The extreme value method for estimating the variance of the rate of return. The Journal of Business 1980 January, 61-65.
performance of IPOs? Journal of Financial Economics 33, 241-260.
Purnanandam, Swaminathan, 2004. Are IPOs Really Underpriced?The Review of Financial Studies Vol. 17, No. 3 © 2004
Rajan Raghuram & Henri Servaes, 1997. Analyst following of initial public offerings. The Journal of Finance 52, 507-529.
Ritter , Jay R and Ivo Welch,2002, A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing, and Allocations, working paper.
Ritter , Jay R.,1998, “Initial Public Offerings,” Contemporary Finance Digest, 2, 5-30.
Ritter, Jay R., 1984. The ‘hot issue’ market of 1980, Journal of Business 32, 215-240.
Ritter, Jay R., 1991. The long-run performance of initial public offerings. The Journal of Finance 46, 3-27.
Ritter, Jay R., 2002, “Investment Banking and Securities Issuance,” North-Holland Handbook of the Economics of Finance, forthcoming.
Rock, Kevin, 1986, Why new issues are undervalued? Journal of Financial Economics 15, 187-212.
Roll, Richard, 1997. Learning and Reacting to Other Traders in Speculative Markets. 6th SFM Conference, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Dec 1997.
Schwartz, 1988. Equity markets, structure, trading and performance. Harper & Row, Publisher, Inc.
Schwert, G. William, 1989. Why does stock market volatility change over time? The Journal of Finance 44, 1115-1152.
Sherman , Ann E.,2002, “Global Trends in IPO Methods: Book Building vs. Auctions,” working paper.
Simaan, Yusif, Daniel G. Weaver, David K. Whitcomb, 2001. The quotation behavior of ECNs and Nasdaq market makers. Working paper.
Singh, Ajai K., Mir A. Zaman, and Chandrasekhar krishnamurti, 1994. Liquidity changes associated with open market repurchases. Financial Management 1994 Spring, 47-55.
Stoughton, Neal M. & Josef Zechner, 1998. IPO-mechanisms, monitoring and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 49, 45-77.
Tinic, Seha M., 1988. Anatomy of Initial Public Offerings of Common Stock. The Journal of Finance 43, 789-822.
Welch, Ivo, 1989, Seasoned offerings, imitation costs, and the underpricing of initial public offerings, Journal of Finance 44, 421-449.
Welch, Ivo, 1992. Sequential sales, learning, and cascades. The Journal of Finance 47, 695-732.


二、企業評價模式相關文獻
(一)中文部分
1.郭敏華,1999。企業分析與評價,華泰文化事業,民國八十八年二月。
2.吳文清,2001,財務報表分析理論運用與解釋,台灣西書出版社,民國九十年一月。
3.吳啟銘,2001,企業評價--個案實證分析、智勝文化出版社、台北市。
4.金成隆、楊昌田及林憶樺,2000,如何以EBO評價模式衡量股票的真正價值,會計研究月刊第173期,八十九年四月。
5.顏信輝,2000,財務報表新要素:綜合淨利之報導與解析,會計研究月刊第176期,八十九年七月。
6.劉德明、熊嫦玲,2003,企業評價模型有效性之實證研究,證券櫃檯月刊第84期,九十二年六月。
7.盧麗安,民國85年6月,財務務基本分析與台灣股價表現,國立中山大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。
8.張健民,台灣上市公司企業價值與現金流量法之實證研究:以八十一年新上市公司為例,國立成功大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文,民國86年6月。
9.陳奉珊,企業評價模型有效性之實證研究,國立政治大學財務管理學系未出版碩士論文,民國87年6月。
10.張凱智,民國89年6 月,新上市公司股票現金流量評價模型實證研究,國立成功大學會計研究所碩士論文。
11.高誌謙,民國90年5月,台灣新上市公司承銷價格與公司價值之研究-Ohlson 模式之應用,中原大學會計系碩士學位論文。

(二)英文部分
Bernard, Victor L., 1995, The, Feltham-Ohlson Framework: Implications for Empiricists, Contemporary Accounting Research Vol. 11, No. 2, 737-747
Damodaran, Aswath, 2002,Investment Valuation, John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Feltham, G and J.Ohlson, 1994, Valuation and Clean Surplus Accounting for Operating and Financial Activities, Contemporary Accounting Research, 689-731
Frankel , Richard, 1988, Accounting valuation , market expectation and cross-sectional stock returns, Journal of Accounting & Economic, Amsterdam ; Jin 1998; Vol25, lss 3. Pg283.
Francis, Jennifer, Per Olsson, and Dennis R. Oswald, 2000, Comparing the Accuracy and Explainability of Dividend, Free Cash Flow, and Abnormal Earnings Equity Value Estimates,” Journal of Accounting Research, 45-70 Graham and Dodd, 1988, Security Analysis, McGraw-Hill Book.
Greig, Antony Charlton, 1992, Fundamental Analysis and Subsequent Stock Returns, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 413-442
Holthausen, R. W and David F. Larcker, 1992, The Prediction of Stock Returns Using Financial Statement Information, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 373-411
Hsiao, Cheng, 1981, Autoregressive Modelling and Money-Income Causality Detection, 87-106
Kallapur, Sanjay, 1994, Dividend Payout Ratios as Determinants of Earnings Response Coefficients, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 359-375
Kormendi, Roger and Robert Lipe, 1987, Earnings Innovations , Earnings Persistence, and Stock Returns, Journal of Business, 323-345
Lee, Charles M C, 1999, What is the intrinsic value of the Dow, The Journal of Finance , Cambridge ; Oct 1999; Vol 54 lss 5; pg1693.
Obrien, Patricia, 1988, Analyst Forecasts as Earnings Expectation, Journal of Accounting and Economics, January, 53-83
Ohlson, J., 1995, Earnings, Book Value, and Dividends in Security Valuation, Contemporary Accounting Research, 661-687
Ou, Jane A. and S. H. Penman, 1989, Accounting Measurement, Price-Earnings Ratio, and the Information Content of Security Prices, Journal of Accounting Research, 111-151
Penman, S. H.and Theodore Sougiannis, 1998, “A Comparison of Dividend, Cash Flow, and Earnings Approaches to Equity Valuation,” Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 15, no.3, 343-383
Shreives, Ronald E. and John M. Wachowicz,JR., 2001, Free Cash Flow (FCF), Economic Value Added(EVA),and Net Present Value (NPV):A Reconciliation of Variation of Discounted- cash –flow(DCF) Valuation, The Engineering Economist ,vol46,p33-51.
White, Sondhi, and Fried, 2003, Financial Statements, McGraw-Hill Book.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外均不公開 not available
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.22.51.241
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.22.51.241
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code