Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0214111-184603 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0214111-184603
論文名稱
Title
探討創業過程對創業團隊之影響-以台灣文化創意產業為例
The Study in entrepreneurial process to influence of the entrepreneurial team :A case of Taiwan cultural and creative industry
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
122
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2011-01-24
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2011-02-14
關鍵字
Keywords
文化創意產業、競爭優勢、團隊特性、創業過程、先驗知識、創業團隊
entrepreneurial processes, team characteristic, prior knowledge, cultural and creative industry, entrepreneurial team, competitive advantages
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5853 次,被下載 3366
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5853 times, has been downloaded 3366 times.
中文摘要
因應近幾年來政府積極發展文化產業的施政主軸,在文創產業不同的創業階段中,創業團隊、機會與資源又是如何對創業活動產生影響,這個議題將是本論文的主軸之一。

由於本研究著重在探討創業團隊的機會、資本與團隊特性,創業本身就是具備了動態性與複雜性,更將會細化這三大主軸的內部因素,期望透過研究來了解其間之差異,旨在瞭解在不同的創業過程中,面對機會與資源的變化,創業團隊如何去因應與調適,並深入地去分析創業各因素對創業團隊的影響。

在這次的研究中,在創業過程中的母體期,在社會文化、產業環境、科技發展對創業均呈現顯著之影響,由此可知,在社會文化的變遷之下,人民的生活素養提升了,越來越多人追求生活與文化的平衡點,也為產業環境帶來了改變,讓傳統的創意者必須跳脫框架,建立一套詮釋文化創意的模式;在創業過程中的孕育期,強調的是創業團隊的組成與團隊特性,而先驗知識與共享價值觀對於這個階段有顯著的影響,說明了創業團隊的組成,有其互補或是相似的先驗知識,才能讓創業團隊的成員不論在溝通上或專業上能相輔相成,且因具有共享價值觀,能夠作為團隊成員行事與決策的依據,降低不必要的衝突產生;最後,在創業過程中的嬰兒期,解釋了其競爭優勢主要來自於其無形資產,主要是來自於創作者本身獨特的創作哲學、詮釋角度與表現手法,在講究文化創意的前提之下,創作者的無形資產便不是有形資產或組織能力所能夠取代的。
Abstract
Develops the cultural and creative industry is the main policy of the Taiwan government in recent years. Entrepreneurial as cultural creative industry in different stages, what an opportunity, resources and entrepreneurial team to influence an entrepreneurial activity, this is a main topic discussing in this research.
This research topic’s is focus on an opportunities, resources and entrepreneurial team. To perform a new business that should existence the natures both of dynamic and complexity. Furthermore, to had sort out three issues within internal factors, this expect to awareness what the differences between with opportunity, resources and entrepreneurial team through this research as well as tries to understand the entrepreneurial team how to respond it when opportunity and resources change in the different entrepreneurial processes. And other, this research had been analyzed an entrepreneurial team how to influence by these factors.

The results obtain from research that social culture, industrial environment and technological progress still influencing in the first stage of entrepreneurial processes obviously. Under the social culture's vicissitude, people's life accomplishment had been promoted; the most of people are pursue to balancing between the life and culture. Thus, this makes the industrial environment have to the change, in other, the traditional creators should out of box as well, and establish a model of culture creativity. Entrepreneurial processes within gestation stage, it had emphasis the entrepreneurial team's composition and characteristic. Prior knowledge and shared values have influence obviously in this stage. It can be explain that entrepreneurial team's composition has complementary or similar in the prior knowledge. Let the members of entrepreneurial team no matter can complement one another in the communication or the specialty. Because they can be share their values with other into the team members, to conduct and policy-making standard. It should reduce the nonessential conflict. Finally, entrepreneurial processes within infancy stage that can explanation as the competitive advantages of entrepreneur from intangible assets. Intangible assets are from philosophy, annotation technique and style of creator. In this way, creator's intangible asset is not the tangible asset or the organizational capability can substitute.
目次 Table of Contents
目錄
摘要 i
Abstract ii
表目錄 V
圖目錄 V
第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 研究流程與章節分佈 5
第貳章 文獻回顧與探討 7
第一節 文化創意產業之介紹 7
第二節 創業意涵、創新 21
第三節 創業過程 24
第四節 創業團隊與創業家 28
第五節 創業管理的觀念模式 34
第參章 研究方法與研究假設 41
第一節 研究方法的介紹與採用 41
第二節 研究架構 43
第三節 研究變項定義 46
第四節 研究假說 49
第五節 個案挑選原則與介紹 52
第肆章 假設驗證與研究發現 57
第伍章 結論與建議 85
第一節 研究結論與發現 85
第二節 研究建議 88
第三節 研究限制 89
第四節 後續研究之建議 90
參考文獻 92
附錄A 100
附錄B 102
表目錄
表2-1:各國際組織或國家對文創產業之定義與說明 7
表2-2:台灣2002∼2007年文化創意產業家數、就業人數及產值表 17
表2-3:台灣2002∼2007年文化創意產業家數與組織型態統計表 18
表2-4:台灣2002∼2007年文化創意產業家數與資本額統計表 19
表2-5:PSED 的理論模型 26
表2-6:創業團隊特性定義表 31
表3-1:量化與質化研究特性之比較 41
表3-2:量化與質化研究取向之比較 42
表3-3:文化創意產業類別 52
表3-4:訪談對象介紹 54
表3-5:廣義與狹義文化創意產業之區別 55
表4-1:外部機會與環境個案與創業機會之相關性 64
表4-2:創業團隊之人數 67
表4-3:團隊特性之個案團隊完整性比較 71
表4-4:團隊特性對創業過程的影響 78
表4-5:競爭優勢對創業團隊之影響 83
表5-1:研究假說之驗證結果 85
圖目錄
圖1-1:研究流程圖 5
圖3-1:研究架構圖 45
參考文獻 References
中文部分

日下公人:新、文化產業論,1978,無摩擦的輸出 文化產業的國際化之路,
倪心一譯,錦繡,1994。

朱延智,創業管理。台北市:鼎茂,P5,2009。

行政院文化建設委員會,文化創意產業發展法,2010。

吳家慧,文化創意產業經營績效之影響因素探討-以地方特色糕餅廠商為例,國
立中興大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文,2005。

吳連賞,高雄市推動文化創意產業策略之研究,高雄市政府研究發展考核委員
會,2008。

周雅菁、曾啟雄,台灣文化創意產業政策之研究,設計研究,5,
2005/07,p.132-140。


胡愈寧等,向成功女性靠攏:企業女性資源開發與應用,財團法人中華民國職業
訓練研究發展中心,p153-162,1997。

香港大學文化政策研究中心,香港創意產業基線研究,2003。

張維仲,新創科技公司進駐創新育成中心所遇問題案例談,國內公民營機構中小
企業創新育成中心座談會,台北市:經濟部,(2001)

侯嘉政,企業動態能力與創業管理之研究,創業管理研究,3(2),p6,2008。

侯旭倉,台灣遊戲產業的發展與創業團隊特性關係之研究,國立政治大學科技
管理研究所碩士論文,2003。

陳振烜,信任與文化—人性化過程與文化產業發展,理得,2005,

莊任暘,高科技創業成功的因素研究,國立台灣大學會計研究所未出版碩士論
文,1999。

郭洮村,工研院研發人員離職創業相關因素之研究,國立中央大學企業管理研究
所碩士論文,1998。

萬榮水、陳姿香,創意人創業過程所需的管理知識:觀點陳述和需求的呈現。嘉
義:第一屆文化事業,創業及管理研討會論文集,2005。

劉大和,(2002)。從文化創意產業特質思考何謂文化創意產業。

劉大和,文化創意產業界定及其意義,台灣經濟研究月刊,26:5,2003/05 ,
p.115-122。

劉大和、黃富娟,賦予舊城新生命—宜蘭舊城歷史建築空間營運管理之概念
性探討,台灣經濟研究月刊,27:6,2004/06, p.108-117。

劉常勇,科技產業投資經營與競爭策略。台北:華泰出版,1997。

劉常勇,創業管理的12 堂課,天下文化,2002。

劉常勇、謝如梅,創業管理研究之回顧與展望:理論與模式探討,創業管理研究,1(1),p15,2006。

鄧欣豪,創新策略、創業團隊特性和根源對新事業績效之影響-以IC設計業為
例,實踐大學企管研究所碩士論文,2003。

鄭琳,探解提高我國文化產業的國際競爭力,南昌大學學報(人文社會科學
版),36:6,2005/11,p.66-69。

滕人傑,國內文化創意產業生態初探—以新興之音樂與表演藝術、視覺藝術
及工藝產業為例,台灣經濟研究月刊,27:6,2004/06, p.90-100。

謝東宏,文化創意產業發展之影響因素研究-以高高屏地區為例,長榮大學經營
管理研究所碩士論文,2004。

Caves, Richard, Creative Industries: Contracts Between Art and Commerce,
2000,文化創意產業—以契約達成藝術與商業的媒合,仲曉玲、徐子超譯,
典藏藝術家庭,2003。


Hesmondhalgh, David : The Cultural Industries,2002,文化產業,廖珮君
譯,韋伯文化,2006。

Newman,W. Lawrence, Social Research Methods Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches ,2000,當代社會研究法:質化與量化途徑,王佳煌、潘中道、郭俊賢、黃瑋瑩、邱怡薇譯,學富文化,2002。

Throsby, David, Economic and Culture, 2001,文化經濟學,張維倫、潘筱瑜、
蔡宜真、鄒歷安譯,典藏藝術家庭,2003。

線上資料

文化創意產業專屬網站【線上資料】,來源:http://www.cci.org.tw/portal/index.asp

文創藝角,文化創意產業內容及範圍【線上資料】,來源:
http://designartcorner.blogspot.com/2010/09/blog-post_02.html

行政院文化建設委員會,文化創意產業發展法【線上資料】,來源:http://www.cca.gov.tw/law.do?method=find&id=247

行政院文化建設委員會,全國各縣市藝文展演活動統計【線上資料】,來源:
http://www.cca.gov.tw/public.do?method=list&categoryId=3,2010

行政院文化創意產業發展方案【線上資料】,來源:http://www.ey.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=53821&ctNode=2922&mp=1

香港特別行政區政府,香港創意產業基線研究報告,【線上資料】,中華人民共和國香港特別行政區政府,來源:http://www.cpu.gov.hk/tc/research_reports.htm,2003.09.16

英文部分

Audretsch, D.B. and Thurik, A. R.(2000), Capitalism and Democracy in
the 21stCentury: From the Managed to the Entrepreneurial Economy,
Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol.10 (1), 17-34.

Barney, J. B.(1986), Strategic Factor Markets:Expectations, Luck, and
Business Strategy, Management Science,42, 1986,pp.1231-1241.
Barney, J. B.(1991), Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,
Journal of Management, 17, pp.99-120

Bird,B(1992).The Roman God Mercury :An Entrepreneurial Archetype, Journal of Management Enquire, vol 1,no3,September.

Bollinger, H., Hope, K. & Utterback, J.M. (1983). A Review of Literature and Hypotheses on New Technology-Based Firms , Research Policy,
Vol.12,1-14.

Bruno, A.V. & Tyebjee, T.T. (1985). The entrepreneur's search for
capital ,Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.1(1),.61–74.

Bustamantc, E. & Zallo, R. (1988).Las industrias culturales en España Akal/ComunicaciÓn. Barcelona.

Casson, M.(1982).The entrepreneur. Totowa, NJ: Barnes and Noble.

Chandler, Gaylen N. & Hanks, Steven H. (1998). An Investigation of
New Venture Teams in Emerging Business, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research.

Christian, B. & Julien, P.A. (2000). Defining the Field of Research in Entrepreneurship , Journal of Business Review, Vol.16.

Collins, J. & Moore, D(1970). The Organization Makers, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.

Collis & Montgomery(1997), Corporate Strategy-Resources and the Scope of the Firm, Irwin Book Team, pp.28-29.

Cooper, A.,(1993), Challenges in predicting new firm performance, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.8, 241-253.

Cooper, C. A. and Artz, K. W.,(1995), Determinants of Satisfaction for Entrepreneurs, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.10 (6), 439-457.

Damanpour, F. & Gopalakrishnan, S.(1998).Theories of organizational structure and innovation adoption: the role of environmental change. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 15, 1-24.

Gartner, W. B. (1985). A Conceptual Framework for Describing the Phenomenon of New Venture Creation, Academy of Management Review,Vol.10 (4).

Holt, D.H.(1992), Entrepreneurship: New Venture Creation,
Prentice-Hall,pp.55-351.


Hoselitz, B(1952). Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth, American Journal of Economic Sociology.

Janszen, F.(2000). The Age of Innovation, Prentice Hall, Britain.

Kamm, Judith B. Jeffrey C. Shuman, John A. Seeger, & Aaron J. Nurick(1990).
Entrepreneurial Teams in New Venture Creation: A Research
Agenda, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Summer.

Kamm, Judith B. & Nurick, Aaron J. (1993). The Stages of Team
VentureFormation : A Decision Making Model, Entrepreneurship
Theory and Practices , Winter.

Kelley, A. J., Campanella, F. B., and Mckiernan, J., (1971), Venture Capital: A Guide Book for New Enterprises, Mass, The Management Institute, School of Management, Boston College, 33-34.

Lawrence, T. B. & Phillips, N. (2002). Understanding cultural industries. Journal of Management Inquiry; Dec 2002; vol.11, 4; pp.430-444.

Lee, C., Lee, K. and Pennings, J. M.,(2001). Internal Capabilities, External Networks,and Performance: A Study on Technology-Based Ventures, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.22, 615-640.

MacMillan, I. C., Siegel, R. and. Subbanarasimha, P. N.,(1985), Criteria Used byVenture Capital to Evaluation New Venture Proposals, Journal of BusinessVenturing, 119-128.

McClelland, D.C(1961). The Achieving Society, Van Norstrand, Primceton NJ.

McFadzean, E. &O`Loughlin, A. &Shaw, E.(2005). Corporate entrepreneurship and innovation part 1: the missing link, European Journal of Innovation Management,8(3),350.

Mitsuko Hirata (2000). Start-up Teams and Organizational Growth in Japanese Venture Firms, Tokai University.

Murphy, G. B., Trailer, J.W., and. Hill, R.C., (1996), Measuring Performance in Entrepreneurship Research, Journal of Business Research, 36 (1), 15-23.

Peter, D.,(1985), Innovation and Entrepreneurship, New York, Harper and
Row.

Reynolds, P. D., Carter, N. M., Gartner, W. B. and Greene, P. G., 2004, “The Prevalence of Nascent Entrepreneurs in the United States: Evidence from the Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics”, Small Business Economics,Vol.23 (4), 263-284.

Ronstadt, Robert and Robert J. Kramer(1982). Getting the Most Out of Innovation Abroad, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 60, March-April, 94-99.

Runka, J. C. and Young, J.E.(1987)A Venture Capital model Of The Development Process For New Venture, Journal of Business Venturing,Vol.2,p.167-184.

Sarkar, M., Echambadi, R. and Harrison, J.,(2001), Alliance Entrepreneurship and Firm Market Performance, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.22, 701-711.

Schumpeter, J.A(1934).The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Schumpeter, J.A(1950). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, 3rd edition, Harper and Row, New York

Scott, A. J. (1996).The Craft,Fashion,and Cultural-Products Industries of Los Angeles:Competitive Dynamics and Policy Dilemmas in a Multisectoral Image-Producing Complex. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 86[2].1996.pp.306-323.

Shane S. A., 2003, A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The
Individual-Opportunity Nexus, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK. Northampton, MA,USA.

Shane, S. A. and Venkataraman, S.,(2000), The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a
Field of Research, Academy of Management Review, Vol.5 (1), 217-226.


Shapiro Albert(1975). Entrepreneurship and Economic Development, Project ISEED,LTD., The Center for Venture Management, p.187.

Stevenson, H. H., & Jarillo, J. C.(1990). A Paradigm of Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurship Management. Strategic Management Journal, 11(2), 17-27.

Szilagyi, A. D. Jr., (1981), Management and Performance, California, Guodyear Publishing Company Inc.

Tang, H. K.(1998). An integrative model of innovation in organizations.
Technovation,18(5)297-309

Timmons, Jeffry A. (1999).New Venture Creation:Entrepreneurship for the 21STCentury, 5rd ed, Irwin McGraw-Hill.

Venkataraman, S.,(1997), The Distinctive Domain of Entrepreneurship Research: An Editor’s Perspective, In J. Katz and R. Brockhaus (eds.), Advances In Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth, Greenwich: JAI Press.

Venkatraman N., & V. Ramanujan, (1986), Measurement of business performance in research, Academy of Management Journal ,Vol.13, 109-122.

Vesper, K(1979). Strategic Mapping:A Tool For Corporate Planner , Long Range Planning, 12(4), 75-92

Wan, D. & Ong, C.H. & Lee, F.(2005). Determinants of firm innovation in Singapore, Technovation 25,261-268.

Williams, C.C. (1997).Consumer Services and Economic Development.London:Routledge.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內外都一年後公開 withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code