Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0419110-194819 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0419110-194819
論文名稱
Title
創業家人力資本與社會資本對創業機會確認之影響
The Influence of Entrepreneur's Human Capital and Social Capital on Opportunity Identification and Development
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
127
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2010-03-25
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2010-04-19
關鍵字
Keywords
人力資本、社會資本、創業機會、機會辨識
Human Capital, Opportunity Identification, Social Capital
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5787 次,被下載 1831
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5787 times, has been downloaded 1831 times.
中文摘要
學術上對於創業機會是客觀存在或是主觀創造出來的兩個論點仍爭論不休,而主要的觀點趨向於創業機會可能經由辨識(recognition)、發掘(discovery)、創造(creation)創造而來。由此,我們可以說創業家似乎擁有某種知識與能力並藉由廣泛的資訊蒐集才得以辨識創業機會的存在,而創業家廣泛利用個人網絡關係,取得有用的資訊與資源使得創業得以成功。

本研究採取Ardichvili(2003)等學者提出的機會辨識理論模型觀點,並簡化為「創業家人力資本」與「創業家社會資本」兩大構面進行探討,一方面探索這些些構面的相關內涵,同時也提出這些人力資本與社會資本構面與創業機會確認模型之關係。本研究採取質姓方法中的個案研究法,以創業家訪談的方式,取得一手資料進行編碼分析,並得出以下結論:

一、創業家的一般性人力資本與創業機會辨識的相關程度為(中等);一般性人力資本與創業機會發展與評估的關連性為(高)。
二、創業家的特殊性人力資本與創業機會辨識的相關程度為(高);特殊性人力資本與創業機會發展與評估的關連性為(高)。
三、創業家網絡關係中的弱鏈結與創業機會辨識的相關程度為(高);弱鏈結與創業機會發展與評估的關連性為(低)。
四、創業家網絡關係中的強鍊結與創業機會辨識的相關程度為(高);強鏈結與創業機會發展與評估的關連性為(高)
五、創業家的「社會資本」與「人力資本」的關連性為(中度)
Abstract
Whether entrepreneurial opportunity is objectively existed or it could be deliberately created is still a disputable issue in academic filed. However, increasing number of scholars tend to conclude that entrepreneurial opportunity comes from a process of recognition, discovery and creation by alerted entrepreneurs. Based on this point, it seems to be obvious that entrepreneurs must have some kind of knowledge and abilities, poses special source of information and involved in certain social networks. So that they can easily find those opportunities that other can’t.
In this study, I apply Ardichivili’s(2003) opportunity identification and development theory to discuss this issue through a viewpoint of human capital and social capital. Seven entrepreneurs were interviewed to conduct the survey, and the content is analyzed through six coding unit to show the following results:

1. The general human capital is intermediately positive to opportunity recognition and highly positive to opportunity development.
2. The specific human capital is highly positive to both opportunity recognition and opportunity development.
3. The weak-tie network is highly positive to opportunity recognition but low positive to opportunity development.
4. The strong-tie network is highly positive to both opportunity recognition and opportunity development.
5. Entrepreneurial human capital is mediated by social capital to have positive effects on opportunity recognition and opportunity development.
目次 Table of Contents
第一章 緒論 1  
第一節 研究背景與動機 -- 2
第二節 研究議題與研究目的 -- 5  
第三節 研究流程 8 
第二章 文獻探討 9
第一節 創業機會 9  
第二節 創業家與創業機會辨識與利用的 - 14  
第三節 以資源基礎理論探討創業機會之辨識 - 22
第三章 研究方法與研究架構 -- 31  
第一節 研究架構與假設 31  
第二節 研究方法與資料蒐集- 36 
第四章 實證結果分析 55
第一節 人力資本對創業機會辨識與確認之影響 - 55  
第二節 社會資本對創業機會辨識與確認之影響 - 64
第三節 結果分析與驗證研究假設 -- 74   
第五章 結論與建議 - 88
第一節 研究發現 - 88
第二節 研究意涵 - 91
第三節 研究限制 - 95
第四節 後續研究建議 - 96 
參考文獻 97
附錄A 訪談題綱 - 103
附錄B 訪談摘要記錄 - 104
表目錄 
表2-1 創業經驗、先驗知識與人力資本比較 26
表3-1 訪談個案公司簡介 53
表4-1 「人力資本」、「社會資本」對「創業機會辨識」之影響 74
表4-2 「人力資本」、「社會資本」對「創業機會發展與評估」之影響 75
表4-3 訪談資料整合及驗證假說 -- 82
圖目錄 
圖1-1 創業研究之觀念模式 6
圖1-2 研究流程圖 - 8
圖2-1 機會辨識理論模型 16
圖2-2 機會確認的內涵與功能 18
圖2-3 創業家資源稟賦 23
圖3-1 本論文研究架構 36
圖4-1 創業家人力資本與社會資本對創業機會確認之影響關係 85
參考文獻 References
中文部份

1.王國川、翁千惠譯,Richard E. B. 著,2005,質性資料分析─如何透視質性資料,台北,五南圖書出版有限公司。
2.史考特•夏恩,2005,科技創業聖經,培生出版社。
3.朱沛,2005,創業者的知識與創業機會對差異性產品競爭優勢之影響─在原產業成長期創業之情境,國立政治大學企業管理學系博士論文。
4.尚榮安 譯,Yin, R.K. 著,2001,個案研究,台北:弘智文化事業有限公司。
5.范麗娟,1995,深度訪談簡介,戶外遊憩研究,第7期。
6.郭俊德,2001,事業生涯成功因素之探討 : 一個社會資本理論的觀點: A perspective of social capital theory,國防管理學院後勤管理研究所碩士論文
7.陳韋廷,2006,創業經驗與機會確認的關係探討,國立中山大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
8.陳家聲、戴士嫻,2007,創業家社會網絡行為之質性研究,創業管理研究,第二卷第四期,頁1-24。
9.詹秀員,2002,社區結構與社區發展功能,台北:洪葉文化事業有限公司。
10.劉常勇、謝如梅,2006,創業管理研究之回顧與展望:理論與模式探討,創業管理研究,第一卷第一期,頁1-44。
11.簡春安、鄒平儀,1998,社會工作研究法,台北:巨流圖書有限公司。

英文部分

1.Alvarez, S. A., and Busenitz, L. W., 2001, “The Entrepreneurship of Resource-Based Theory”, Journal of Management, Vol.27 (6), 755–775.

2.Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R. and Ray, S., 2003, “A Theory of Entrepreneurial Opportunity Identification and Development”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.18(1), 105-123.
3.Barney, J. B., 1991, “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, Vol.17, 99–120.
4.Baron, R. A., 1998, “Cognitive Mechanisms in Entrepreneurship: Why and When Entrepreneurs Think Differently Than Other People”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.12, 275-294.
5.Becker, G. S., 1993, “Nobel Lecture: The Economic Way of Looking at Behaviour”, The Journal of Political Economy 101, 385–409.
6.Brush, C. G. & R. Chaganti, 1998,” Businesses Without Glamour? An Analysis of Resources on Performance By Size and Age in Small Service and Retail Firms”, Journal of Business Venturing, 14, 3, 233-257.
7.Burt, R. S., 1992, Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.Busenitz, L. W., West III, G. P., Shepherd, D., Nelson, T., Chandler, G. N., and Zacharakis, A., 2003, “Entrepreneurship Research in Emergence: Past Trends and Future Directions”, Journal of Management, Vol.29 (3), 285-308.
9.Chandler, G. N. & S. H. Hanks, 1994a,“ Founder Competence, the Environment, and Venture Performance”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 18, 3, 77-89.
10.Coleman, J. S., 1988, “Social capital in the creation of human capital”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 94, S95-S120.
11.Cooper, A. C. & F. J. Gimeno-Gascon &, C. Y. Woo, 1994,” Initial Human and Financial Capital as Predictors of New Venture Performance,” Journal of Business Venturing, 9, 371-395.
12.Cooper, A. C.,1993,”Challenges in Predicting New Firm Performance,”Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 3, 241-253.
13.Cooper, A., 2003, “Entrepreneurship: The Past, the Present, the Future”. In Acs Z.J.(eds.), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, Kluwer Academic Publishers,21-36.
14.Davidsson, P., M. B. Low & M. Wright, 2001,” Editor’s Introduction: Low and MacMillan Ten Years on: Achievement and Future Directions for Entrepreneurship Research,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25, 4, 5-15.
15.Deniz U., Paul W. & Mike W., 2008,” Opportunity Identification and Pursuit: Does an Entrepreneur’s Human Capital Matter? ,” Small Business Economics, 30, 153-173.
16.Dollingers, M. J., 2003, Entrepreneurship: Strategies and Resources, Prentice Hall, (3ed.).
17.Dollingers, M. J., 2003, Entrepreneurship: Strategies and Resources, Prentice Hall, (3ed.).
18.Drucker, P., 1985, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, New York: Harper & Row.
19.Eckhardt, J. T. & S. A. Shane, 2003,” Opportunities and Entrepreneurship” Journal of Management, 29, 3, 333-349.
20.Eren Ozgen, Robert A. Baron, 2007,” Social sources of information in opportunity recognition: Effects of mentors, industry networks,and professional forums” Journal of Business Venturing 22 (2007) 174– 192.
21.Flap, H. D. and F. Tazelaar, 1989,”The Role of Informal Social Networks on the Labor Market: Flexbilization and Closure”,Flesibilization of the Labor Market. Utrecht, Holland :ISOR,University of Utrecht,p.99-118.
22.Granovetter, M., 1973, “The Strength of Weak Tie”, American Journal of Sociology,Vol.78, 1360-1380.
23.Henderson, K.A., 1991, “Dimensions of Choice: A Qualitative Approach to Recreation”, Park, and Leisure Research, Stage College, PA: Venture .
24.Johnson, P., 1986, New Firms: An Economic Perspective, London: Allen & Unwin.
25.Kaish, S. and Gilad, B., 1991, “Characteristics of opportunities search of entrepreneurs versus executives: sources, interest, and general alertness”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 6, 45-61.
26.Kirzner, I. M., 1997,”Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach”, Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 1, 60-85.
27.Kirzner, I.M., 1973, Competition and Entrepreneurship, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.Klevorick, A.K., Levin, R.C., Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. (1995) “On the sources and significance of inter-industry differences in technological opportunities,” Research Policy, 24, pp. 185–205.
29.Lerner, M., C. Brush & R. Hisrich, 1997,”Israeli Women Entrepreneurs: An Examination of Factors Affecting Performance”Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 4, 315-339.
30Lichtenstein, B. M. B. and Brush C. G., 2001, ”How do Resource Bundles Develop and Change in New Ventures? A Dynamic Model and Longitudinal Exploration”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol.26 (3), 37-58.
31.Miller W.L. & Crabtree B.F., 1992, Primary Care Research: A Multimethod Typology and Qualitative Road Map. In: W.L. Crabtree & B.F. Miller (Eds.), Doing Qualitative Research. Newbury Park CA: Sage, pp.3-28.
32.Mitchell, R. K., Busenitz, L., Lant, T., McDougall, P. P., Morse, E. A. and Smith, J.B., 2002, “Toward a Theory of Entrepreneurial Cognition: Rethinking the People Side of Entrepreneurship Research”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol.28, 93-104.
33.Patrick Firkin, 2001, Entrepreneurial Capital: A resource-based Conceptualization of entrepreneurial process.
34.Penrose, E. T., 1959, The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, New York: John Wiley.
35.Politis, D., 2005, “The Process of Entrepreneurial Learning: A Conceptual Framework”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 399-424.
36.Sarasvathy, S. D., Dew, N., Velamuri, S. R. and Venkataraman, S., 2003, “Three Views of Entrepreneurial Opportunity”, in Acs, Z. J. and Audretsch, D. B. (eds.), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, 141-160.
37.Schumpeter, J. A., 1934, The theory of economic development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.Seibert, S. E. and Kraimer, M. L. and Liden, R. C., 2001, “A social capital theory of career success”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44, No. 2, 219-237. De Koning, A., 1999, Conceptualizing Opportunity Recognition as a Socio-Cognitive Process, Centre for Advanced Studies in Leadership, Stockholm.
39.Shane S., 2003, A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual-Opportunity Nexus, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK. Northampton, MA,USA.
40.Shane, S. and Venkataraman, S., 2000, “The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research”. Academy of Management Review, Vol.25 (1), 217-226.
41.Shane, S., 2000, “Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurship Opportunities”, Organization Science, Vol.11 (4), 448-469.
42.Shepherd, D.A., Douglas, E.J., & Shanley, M., 2000, “New Venture Survival: Ignorance, External Shocks, and Risk Reduction Strategies”, Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5/6), 393-410.
43.Sigrist, B., 1999, “Entrepreneurial opportunity recognition”, A presentation at the Annual UIC/AMA symposium at Marketing/Entrepreneurship Interface, Sofia-Antipolis, France.
44.Singh, R. P., 2001,” A Comment on Developing the Field of Entrepreneurship Through the Study of Opportunity Recognition and Exploitation,”Academy of Management Review, 26, 1, 1-7.
45.Stinchcombe, A., 1965,” Social Structure and Organization,” In March, J.(Ed.), Handbook of Organizations, 142-193.
46.Ucbasaran, D., P. Westhead & M. Wright, 2001,” The Focus of Entrepreneurial Research: Contextual and Process Issues,”Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25, 4, 57-80.
47.Venkataraman, S., 1997, “The Distinctive Domain of Entrepreneurship Research: An Editor’s Perspective” In J. Katz and R. Brockhaus (eds.), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth, Greenwich: JAI Press.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code