Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0424112-205409 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0424112-205409
論文名稱
Title
跨界聯名對於企業整體評價影響之研究
The Study on How A Company's Brand Evaluation Change After Crossover with Trendy Brand
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
148
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2011-07-04
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2012-04-24
關鍵字
Keywords
跨界聯名、潮流、潮牌、潮、自我建構類型、聯合品牌、適配度
Trendy Brand, Trendy, co-branding, fitness, self construal type, Crossover
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5828 次,被下載 7919
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5828 times, has been downloaded 7919 times.
中文摘要
在金融海嘯的衝擊下,全球經濟衰退,國際精品退燒,給了潮牌崛起的機會。2008年後,各種不同類型、國家的潮牌開始在台灣出現,也立刻受到年輕人的歡迎與喜愛。講求獨特感、注重自我表現的潮牌除了成為街頭流行的趨勢,更是青少年次文化中重要的一環。而隨著潮牌越來越風行,許多企業也開始積極與潮牌接觸,希望能透過與潮牌的跨界聯名來吸引年輕客群,企業潮化更是成為了現今最重要的議題。
由於目前並無與潮牌或是跨界聯名等相關研究,因此本研究以聯合品牌理論為基礎來建構研究架構,並藉由分析企業品牌在與不同類型的潮流品牌進行跨界聯名下,消費者對企業品牌之整體評價,即正、負向品牌情感、涉入程度以及品牌認同感會產生何種影響;並加入企業品牌與潮牌適配度變數作為調節,探討加入此變數後是否會干擾跨界聯名企業品牌整體評價的提升,及其影響程度為何。並將消費者依不同認知類型分群,以了解在相同的跨界聯名組合適配度下,不同的認知類型是否會對跨界聯名企業品牌產生不同影響。
研究結果發現,在企業與名人創立潮牌進行跨界聯名後,對於正、負向品牌情感、品牌認同度有較佳的評價;在與素人創立潮牌跨界聯名後,則對於品牌認同度有較佳評價。而跨界聯名組合的適配度,以及消費者的自我建構類型則不會影響跨界聯名後消費者對於企業品牌的評價。因此,企業品牌在考慮雨潮牌進行在考慮雨潮牌進行跨界聯名時,可以依照企業所欲達成的目標來選擇跨界聯名的潮牌品牌,已達到跨界聯名最大的效益。
Abstract
Under the impact of the financial tsunami, global economy was weaken, lots of luxury brands’ profits decreased, but trendy brands rise at that time. There are many kinds of trendy brands appear in Taiwan since 2008, and become famous between young people immediately. Trendy brands emphasize with uniqueness、self-expression, not only become the fashion tendency, they also play an important role in teenagers’ sub culture. As trendy brands get popular, some companies want to attract more young people by cooperating with trendy brands. Crossover with trendy brands is the main topic for companies.
There is a lack of research about trendy or crossover so far, so this study is based on co-branding theory, analysis the change of consumers’ evaluations about Positive brand emotions, negative brand emotions, involvement, and brand identity after company crossovers with different kinds of trendy brand. Then the study adds fitness between company and trendy brand and self-construal types of consumer as mediators, trying to comprehend the influence.
This study finds consumers’ evaluations about positive brand emotions and negative brand emotions will be better if company crossover with trendy brand founded by famous people. But consumers’ evaluations about brand identity will be better if company crossover with both trendy brand founded by famous people and ordinary people. However, fitness between company and trendy brand and consumer’s self-construal types don’t change evaluations after crossover.
目次 Table of Contents
中文摘要 I
Abstract II

第一章 緒論 1
   第一節 研究背景與動機 1
   第二節 研究目的 2
   第三節 研究流程 3
第二章 文獻探討 5
   第一節 潮流概述 5
   第二節 聯合品牌 16
   第三節 適配度 20
   第四節 自我建構類型 22
第三章 研究設計與方法 25
   第一節 前言 25
   第二節 研究假設與架構 25
   第三節 研究變數之定義與衡量 31
   第四節 實驗設計 35
第四章 研究結果分析 41
   第一節 前言 41
   第二節 樣本結構 41
   第三節 信度分析 43
   第四節 實驗情境操弄確認 44
   第五節 潮牌類型對消費者對於企業品牌之整體評 價的影響 45
   第六節 潮牌類型與適配度對消費者對於企業品牌之整體評價之交互效果 53
   第七節 潮牌類型、適配度與自我建構類型對消費者對於企業品牌之整體評價之交互         
       效果 65
第五章 結論與建議 86
   第一節 研究發現與討論 86
   第二節 研究貢獻 89
   第三節 研究限制 91
   第四節 研究展望 92

參考文獻 93
附錄一 前測問卷一(測量品牌知曉度) 99
附錄二 前測問卷二(測量跨界聯名適配度) 104
附錄三 正式問卷 105
參考文獻 References
一、 網址資料
AES,http://www.wretch.cc/blog/aestaipei,accessed on 2011/05/22
BAPE,http://www.bape.com/,accessed on 2011/05/23
CLOT,http://clotinc.com/zh/,accessed on 2011/05/23
MMJ,http://www.mastermindjapan.com/,accessed on 2011/05/23
OVERDOPE.COM,http://www.overdope.com/index.php,accessed on 2011/05/24
Pizza Cut Five,http://www.pizzacutfive.com/,accessed on 2011/05/24
REMIX,,http://www.remixtaipei.com/,accessed on 2011/05/24
STAGE,,http://www.ilovestage.com.tw/,accessed on 2011/05/22
STAYREAL,http://www.istayreal.com/,accessed on 2011/05/23
SQUAD, http://www.squad.com.tw/news.php,accessed on 2011/05/23
JUKSY線上街頭潮流雜誌,http://www.juksy.com/,accessed on 2011/05/22
吳偉立,2009,「年輕化!十八銅人化身變形金剛」,財訊雜誌,335期,http://monthly.wealth.com.tw/index2.aspx?f=301&id=901,accessed on 2011/05/28
瑞麗女性網,2009,「Marc Jacobs與Stephen Sprouse合作LV塗鴉系列」,搜狐文化,http://cul.sohu.com/20090705/n264992086.shtml,accessed on 2011/05/02
馬岳琳,2010,「五月天阿信 做出最夯潮T」,天下雜誌,445期,http://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5000432&page.currentPage=1,accessed on 2011/05/26
施毓華,2010,「痠痛藥布變潮 刺青豹紋上身」,蘋果日報,http://tw.nextmedia.com/subapple/article/art_id/32637794/IssueID/20100706,accessed on 2011/05/28
陳舜協,2010,「老品牌新風範 鬍鬚張潮T搞花招」,中央社即使新聞,http://www.cna.com.tw/ShowNews/WebNews_Detail.aspx?Type=Personage&TNo=1098&ID=201001060006,accessed on 201105/28
彭杏珠,2010,「Pizza Cut Five 以潮為尊,代客潮化操盤手」,遠見雜誌,292期,http://www.gvm.com.tw/Board/content.aspx?ser=16702&pg=1,accessed on 2011/05/28
彭杏珠,2010,「藝人開潮店,潮中做先鋒」,遠見雜誌,292期,http://www.gvm.com.tw/Board/content.aspx?ser=16704&pg=1,accessed on 2011/05/27
彭杏珠,2010,「潮經濟 席捲台灣」,遠見雜誌,292期,http://www.gvm.com.tw/Board/Content.aspx?ser=16690&keyword=%e6%bd%ae%e7%b6%93%e6%bf%9f%e5%b8%ad%e6%8d%b2%e5%8f%b0%e7%81%a3,accessed on 2011/05/27
張翔一,2011,「台灣潮街 VS. 東京潮街」,天下雜誌,431期,http://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5012815,accessed on 2011/05/26
二、 雜誌資料
張翔一,2009,「只愛潮牌,不愛名牌」,天下雜誌,431期:116~125。
三、 中文部分
徐世同編譯,Kevin Lane Keller著,2008,策略品牌管理,三版,台北市:華泰文化出版社。
殷仲華,1997,「品牌聯盟動機、聯盟型態與品牌權益關係之研究:資源基礎觀點之研究」,中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
陳欣怡,1999,「品牌個性契合度對品牌聯盟成效之影響」,雲林科技大學企業管理技術研究所碩士論文。
林震岩,2007,「多變量分析:SPSS的操作與應用= Multivariate analysis: SPSS operation and application」,台北市:智勝文化。
蕭文龍,2007,「多變量分析最佳入門實用書─SPSS+LISREAL(SEM)」,台北市:碁峰資訊。
簡緯宸,2008,「品牌認同感與所有權效果對品牌延伸評價的影響:以象徵性以及功能性品牌探討之」,國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
謝楚培,2011,「就是要『瘋潮』 ─ 次文化消費研究」,東吳大學社會學系碩士論文。
侯馨淑,2011,「青少年使用潮牌之次文化研究」,國立中山大學企業管理學系未出版之碩士論文。
四、 英文部分
Aaker, David A., 1990, “Brand Extensions: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 31, 47-56.
Aaker, David A. and Kevin Lane Keller, 1990, “Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54, 27-41.
Aaker, David A., 1996, “Measuring Brand Equity across Products”, California Management Review, 38(3), 102-120.
Aaker, David A., 2004, “Leveraging the Corporate Brand”, California Management Review, 46(3), 6-18. 356.
Andres, Nils, 2003, “Ausstrahlungseffekte beim Co-Branding”, Hamburg: Kovac.
Agrawal, Nidihi and Durairaj, Maheswaran, 2005, “The effects of self-construal and commitment on persuasion”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 31, 841-849.
Baumeister, Roy F., 1998, “The Self”, in Daniel T. Gilbert, Susan T. Fiske and G. Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, 680-740. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bernard L. Simonin and Julie A. Ruth, 1998, “Is a Company Known by the Company It Keeps? Assessing the Spillover Effects of Brand Alliances on Consumer Brand Attitudes”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 35, 30-42.
Bernd Helmig, Jan-Alexander Huber, and Peter S. H. Leeflang, 2008, “Co-Branding: The State of The Art”, Schmalenbach Business Review (SBR), Vol. 60 Issue 4, 359-377.
C. Whan Park, Sung Youl Jun, and Allan D. Shocker, 1996, “Composite Branding Alliances: An Investigation of Extension and Feedback Effects”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 33, 453-466.
Chang, Chingching, 2010, “Making Unique Choices or Being Like Others: How Priming Self-Concepts Influences Advertising Effectiveness”, Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 27(4): 399-416.
Geertz, Clifford., 1975, “From the Native’s Point of View: On the nature of anthropological understanding”. American Scientist, Vol. 63, 47-53.
Huber, Jan-Alexander, 2005, “Co-Branding als Strategieoption der Markenpolitik”, Wiesbaden: Gabler.
Jap, Sandy D., 1993, “An Examination of the Effects of Multiple Brand Extensions on the Brand Concept”, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 20, 607-611.
Kevin, Lane Keller, 2008, "Strategic brand management: building, measuring brand equity", 3rd 15, New York: Prentice Hall.
Lafferty, Barbara A., Ronald E. Goldsmith, and G. Tomas M. Hult, 2004,” The Impact of the Alliance on the Partners, A Look at Cause-Brand Alliances”, Psychology & Marketing. Vol. 21, 509-531.
Lee Adler, 1966, “Symbiotic Marketing”, Harvard Business Review, 59-71.
Markus, Hazel Rose and Shinobu Kitayama, 1991, “Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation”, Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253.
Maslow, Abraham H., 1987, Motivation and Personality, 3rd, New York, NY: Harper & Row, Publisher, Inc.
Monga, Alokparna Basu and Lau-Gesk, Loraine, 2007, “Blending Cobrand Personalities: An Examination of the Complex Self”, Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), 389-400.
Rao, Akshay R., Lu Qu, and Robert W. Rueckert, 1999, “Signaling Unobserveable Product Quality Through a Brand Ally”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 36, 258-268.
Rui (Juliet) Zhu and Joan Meyers Levy, 2009, “The Influence of Self-View on Context Effects: How Dosplay Fixtures Can Affect Product Evaluations”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. XLVI, 37-45.
Singelis, Theodore M., 1994, “The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals” , Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 20, 580–91.
Daniel C. Smith and C. Whan Park, 1992, “The Effects of Brand Extensions on Market Share and Advertising Efficiency” , Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 29, 296-313.
Tauber, E.M., 1988, “Brand Leverage: Strategy For Growth in A Cost-Control Word”, Journal of Advertising Research, Vo1.28, 26-30.
Vaidyanathan, Rajiv and Praveen Aggarwal, 2000, “Strategic Brand Alliances: Implications of Ingredient Branding for National and Private Label Brands”, Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 9, 214-228.
Voss, Kevin E. and Patriya Tansuhaj, 1999, “A Consumer Perspective on Foreign Market Entry: Building Brands Through Brand Alliances”, Journal of International Consumer Marketing, Vol. 11, 39-58.
Yamada, Ann-Marie and Theodore Singelis (1999), “Biculturalism and Self-Construal”, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Vol. 23, 697–709.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code