Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0511114-130805 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0511114-130805
論文名稱
Title
臺灣家族企業管理者關係類型與領導行為之研究
A Study of Guanxi Type and Leadership Behaviors in Taiwan Family Business Manager
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
99
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2014-01-07
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2014-06-11
關鍵字
Keywords
家族企業、內外控人格特質、領導行為、權力基礎、關係
Based of Power, Guanxi, Family Business, Locus of Control, Leadership Behavior
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5815 次,被下載 122
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5815 times, has been downloaded 122 times.
中文摘要
家族企業在臺灣社會扮演了重要角色,這也是華人社會中常見的企業型態,也因為在企業內部不論是經營權、所有權,亦或是重要的管理角色幾乎都是由親人或親密友人所擔任,使得公司內部階級制度和充斥著關係 (Guanxi)的概念,所以在上司-部屬間存在著濃厚地信任與溝通問題。因此關於家族與企業的治理問題,及組織的職責分配和權力劃分就變成一個重要的課題。本研究目的在於探討家族企業中管理者的關係類型、人格特質與其所擁有的權力和領導部屬行為間之關聯性。
本研究主軸係以華人社會中獨特的關係為基礎,衍生出關係類型和知覺關係兩種型式,並結合了內外控人格特質、權力基礎和領導行為等概念而導出研究模型。並針對臺灣中部和南部地區147家金屬加工業中的家族企業進行問卷調查,共回收332份有效問卷。經過單因子變異數分析和階層迴歸分析後發現,家族企業中不同關係類型的管理者所擁有的權力和對待部屬的影響策略均有所不同;擁有越多職位權的管理者,尤其是屬於家人關係的管理者,在對待部屬上越會使用剛強果斷的方式。而內控型的管理者,不論其擁有職位權或是個人權,均與逢迎策略間的成正向關係。
就企業運作而言,關係是一種獨特且重要的資源,它可以填補制度模糊或法規無法保護的部分,以保障個人應有的權力;因此,在該企業中建立或保持良好的關係,雖然不一定會得利,但一定不會吃虧。此外,屬於朋友關係的管理者在家族企業中扮演著橋梁的角色,以補足家人關係的管理者過於剛強的影響策略,是一種使企業順利運作的潤滑劑。為了完成組織賦予的目標和提升整體的工作績效,建議這類型的企業應該多重視人和的概念,維持企業內部良好的溝通管道。
Abstract
The family business is a common business model among the Chinese community, and it has played an important role in the Taiwan society as well. However, this type of organization structure often causes communication problems between supervisor and subordinate, and it is because that the management, ownership and other pivotal positions of management are assigned to family or close friends. Thus, how to manage between family affairs, business, and distribution of responsibilities for the family business becomes an issue. The purpose of this study is to investigate the guanxi type and personalities of managers in the family business, as well as the correlation between managers’ power and their influence tactics to the subordinates.
The core of this study is based on the guanxi theory, and it is divided to guanxi type and perceived guanxi. The research model has combined locus of control, power based and influence tactics. We conducted a questionnaire survey from the 147 family businesses of metal processing industry in midland and south Taiwan, collecting 332 valid samples from all returned questionnaires. Through ANOVA and hierarchical regression analysis, it is learnt that the manager’s power and influence tactics to the subordinates vary as the managers’ guanxi type changes. For managers, who possess more position power, especially those in the family guanxi, they are more likely to use assertive attitude when treating subordinates. As for the internal personality pattern managers, the power and the ingratiatory strategies are in direct proportion.
For the internal corporation, guanxi is an unique and vital resource, because it can fill the gap, which the system is vague or the law cannot contain, and ensure the personal power. Therefore, maintaining a good guanxi in business may not get you somewhere for sure, but it will not be a loss definitely. Besides, managers, who are in the friend guanxi, often play a bridging role to complement the function of those managers, who may use the assertive attitude too significantly in the family guanxi. In addition, this type’s managers also provide a “lubricant” effect in order to keep the family business running smooth. We recommend that family business owners should pay more attention to harmonious relationship, working environment, and internal communication channels in the organization as to attain the objectives and improve the overall performance in the family business.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
誌謝 ii
摘要 iii
Abstract iv
目錄 v
圖次 vii
表次 viii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 .1
第二節 研究目的 5
第三節 研究流程 6
第四節 研究範圍與限制 7
第二章 文獻探討 8
第一節 家族企業 8
第二節 關係 (Guanxi) 11
第三節 權力基礎 19
第四節 領導行為 23
第五節 內外控人格特質 28
第三章 研究設計 33
第一節 研究架構 33
第二節 研究模式與假設 34
第三節 研究變數衡量方式與操作型定義 37
第四節 研究對象 42
第五節 資料分析方法 42
第四章 實證分析 45
第一節 樣本結構敘述與變數基本分析 45
第二節 管理者的權力基礎與知覺關係對領導行為之影響驗證 51
第三節 管理者的關係類型的干擾效果驗證 52
第四節 管理者的內外控人格特質的干擾效果驗證 60
第五章 結論與建議 68
第一節 結論 69
第二節 建議 74
第三節 管理意涵 77

參考文獻 79
附錄 86
參考文獻 References
中文部分
方至民、 鍾憲瑞,2006,策略管理,台北:前程。
司馬嘯青,2005,臺灣新五大家族,台北:玉山社。
吳東儒,2007,市場策略與關係(Guanxi)的運用對台商投資中國之進入模式與營運績效間影響之研究,義守大學管理研究所碩士論文。
李亦園、楊國樞,1988,中國人的心理,台北:桂冠圖書。
李再長、李俊杰、曾雅芬,2005,「大型企業組織生涯管理、個人生涯規劃、個人人格特質、工作滿意度之關連研究」,人力資源管理學報,5卷,1期:53-76。
李禮仲、鄧哲偉,2002,「公司治理對家族企業的效益」, http://www.npf.org.tw/post/3/3447
林欽榮,1983,管理心理學,台北:五南。
邱皓政,2005,量化研究法(一):研究設計與資料處理,台北:雙葉。
金耀基,1988,人際關係中人情之分析,台北:桂冠出版社。
洪春吉,1999,「臺灣地區中、美、日資企業主管之領導行為與權力基礎、影響策略之實證比較」,中山管理評論,七卷,四期:1115-1146。
洪晨桓,2008,華人「關係」量表之發展-內部顧客觀點,國立東華大學企業管理系博士論文。
張春興、林清山,1989,教育心理學,台北:東華書局。
許士軍,2002,管理學,台北:東華書局。
費孝通,1948,鄉土中國,上海:人民出版社。
黃貞芬、林東清,2002,「資訊部門的權力基礎與決策影響策略之分析:結合定量法與定性法」,資訊管理學報, 九卷,一期:81-106。
經濟部中小企業處,2012,2012中小企業白皮書,台北:經濟部。
劉兆明,1993,「發展工作動機理論的初步實徵研究」,應用心理學報,1-23。
謝明芳,2000,國小學童學校生活情緒經驗及其知覺教師權力類型關係之研究, 國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文。
英文部分
Adler, P.S., & Kwon, S.W. 2002. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1): 17-40.
Allport, G.W. 1937. Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt.
Alston, J.P. 1989. Wa, guanxi, and inhwa: Managerial principles in Japan, China, and Korea. Business Horizons, 32(2): 26-31.
Ang, S. H., Leong, S. M., & Kotler, P. 2000. The Asian apocalypse: crisis marketing for consumer and business. Long Range Planning, 33: 97-119.
Arregle, J., Hitt, M.A., Sirmon, D.G., & Very, P. 2007. The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1): 73-95.
Bacharach, S.B., & Lawler, E.J. 1980. Power and politics in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bandura, A. 1961. Psychotherapy as a learning process. Psychological Bulletin, 58(2): 143-159.
Baron, R.M. & Kenny, D.A. 1986. The moderator-mediator variables distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6):1173-1182.
Bell, D. 2000. Guanxi: A nesting of groups. Current Anthropology, 99: 132-138.
Benassi, V.A., Sweeney, P.D., & Dufour, C.L. 1988. Is there a relation between locus of control orientation and depression? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97(3): 357-367.
Berle, A.A. 1967. The Three Faces of Power. Harcourt: Brace & World.
Bian, Y. 1994. Work and inequity in urban China. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Brass, D.J., & Burkhardt, M.E. 1993. Potential power and power use: An investigation of structure and behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 441-470.
Burkart, M., Panunzi, F., & Shleifer, A. 2003. Family firms. Journal of Finance, 58: 2167- 2210.
Carol, A.H., & Qingwen, D. 2001. American public relations networking encounters China’s guanxi. Public Relations Quarterly, 46(2): 16-19.
Cattell, R.B. 1943. The description of personality: basic traits resolved into clusters. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38(4): 476-506.
Cavanaugh, M.S. 1979. A formulative investigation of power orientations and preliminary validation of relationships between power orientations and communication behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Denver.
Chiu, C.K., Chien, C.S., Lin, C.P., & Hsiao, C.Y. 2005. Understanding hospital employee job stress and turnover intentions in a practical setting: the moderating role of locus of control. Journal of Management Development, 24(10): 837-855.
Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H., & Sharma, P. 2005. Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5): 555-576.
Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H., Pearson, A.W., & Barnett, T. 2012. Family involvement, family influence, and family‐centered Non‐economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2): 267-293.
Chua, J.H., Chrisman, J.J., & Sharma, P. 1999. Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 23: 19-40.
Chung, H.M. 2012. The role of family management and family ownership in diversification: The case of family business groups. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(3): 871-891.
Costa, P.T., & McCrae, R.R. 1985. The NEO personality inventory manual. FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Detert, J.R., & Burris, E.R. 2007. Leadership behavior and employee voice: is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4): 869-884.
Dubrin, A.J. 2010. Leadership: Research findings, practice, and skills (6th ed.). OH: Cengage Learning.
Dyer, W.G. 2006. Examining the “family effect” on firm performance. Family Business Review, 19(4): 253-273.
Ensley, M.D., & Pearson, A.W. 2005. An exploratory comparison of the behavioral dynamics of top management teams in family and nonfamily new ventures: cohesion, conflict, potency, and consensus. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3): 267-284.
Eysenck, H.J. 1968. Eysenck personality inventory. San Diego, Calif.: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.
Farh, J.L., Tsui, A.S., Xin, K., & Cheng, B.S. 1998. The influence of relational demography and guanxi: The Chinese case. Organization Science, 9(4): 471-488.
Ferris, G.R., & Kacmar, K.M. 1992. Perceptions of organizational politics. Journal of Management, 18: 93-116.
French, J.R.P., & Raven, B. 1959. The bases of social power. In Cartwright, D. (Ed.) Studies in Social Power. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Freud, S. 1896. Further remarks on the defense neuropsychoses. Collected papers, London: Hogarth Press.
Friedman, M., & Rosenman, R.H. 1959. Association of specific overt behavior pattern with blood and cardiovascular findings blood cholesterol level, blood clotting time, incidence of arcus senilis, and clinical coronary artery disease. Journal of the American Medical Association, 169(12): 1286-1296.
Fu, P.P., & Yukl, G. 2000. Perceived effectiveness of influence tactics in the United States and China. Leadership Quarterly, 11(2): 251-266.
Furnham, A. 1986. Economic locus of control. Human Relations, 39(1): 29-43.
Gandz, J., & Murray, V.V. 1980. The experience of workplace politics. Academy of Management Journal, 23: 237-251.
Gardner, J.W. 1986. The task of leadership. Washington, D.C.; Independent Sector.
Gold, T., Guthrie, D., & Wank, D. 2002. Social connections in China: Institutions, culture, and the changing nature of guanxi. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Gomez-Mejia, L., Larraza-Kintana, M., & Makri, M. 2003. The determinants of executive compensation in family-controlled public corporations. Academy of Management, 46(2): 226-237.
Habbershon, T.G., & Williams, M.L. 1999. A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12(1): 1-25.
Hammer, T.H., & Vardi, Y. 1981. Locus of control and career self-management among nonsupervisory employees in industrial settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18(1): 13-29.
Hersey, P., & Natemeyer, W.E. 1979. Power perception profile. CA: Center for Leadership studies.
Hinkin, T.R., & Shriesheim, C.A. 1989. Development and application of new development and application of new scales to measure the French and Raven (1959) bases of social power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 561-567.
Ho, C., & Redfern, K.A. 2010. Consideration of the role of guanxi in the ethical judgments of Chinese managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(2): 207-221.
Hollander, E.P. 1993. Legitimacy, power, and influence: A perspective on relational features of leadership. New York: Academic Press.
House, R.J., Wright, N.S., & Aditya, R.N. 1997. Cross-cultural research on organizational leadership: A critical analysis and a proposed theory. In P. C. Earley & M. Erez (Eds.). New perspectives in international industrial/ organizational psychology. San Francisco: The New Lexington Press.
Huang, Q., Davison, R.M., & Gu, J. 2008. Impact of personal and cultural factors on knowledge sharing in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25(3): 451-471.
Hwang, K.K. 1987. Face and favor: the Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology, 92: 944-974.
Ibarra, H. 1993. Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3): 471-501.
Jacobs, J.B. 1979. A preliminary model of particularistic ties in Chinese political alliances:Kan-ch’ing and Kuan-hsi in a rural Taiwanese township. The China Quarterly, 78: 237-273.
Judge, T.A., & Ferris, G.R. 1992. The elusive fit in human resources staffing decisions. Human Resources Planning, 15: 47-67.
Kanter, R.M. 1979. Power failure in management circuits. Harvard Business Review, 57(4): 65-75.
Kellermanns, F.W. & Eddleston, K.A. 2004. Feuding families: When conflict does a family firm good. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(3): 209-228.
King, A.Y. 1991. Kuan-his and network building: A sociological interpretation. Daedalus, 20: 63-84.
Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S.M., & Wilkinson, I. 1980. Intraorganizational influence tactics: Exploration in getting one’s way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 440-452.
Kotter, J.P. 1990. A force for change: How leadership differs from management. New York: Free Press.
Lee, D.J., Pae, J.H., & Wong, Y.H. 2001. A model of close business relationships in China (guanxi). European Journal of Marketing, 35(1/2): 51-69.
Lee, D.Y., & Dawes, P.L. 2005. Guanxi, trust, and long-term orientation in Chinese business markets. Journal of International Marketing, 13(2): 28-43.
Lefcourt, H.M. 1982. Locus of control: Current trends in theory and research (2nd ed.). NJ: Erlbaum.
Litz, R. 1995. The family business: Toward definitional clarity. Family Business Review, 8(2): 71-81.
Luo, Y. 1997. Partner selection and venturing success: The case of joint ventures with firms in the People’s Republic of China. Organization Science, 8(6): 648-662.
McClelland, D.C. 1975. Power: The inner experience. NY: Irvington.
Miller, D., & Breton‐Miller, L. 2006. Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Family Business Review, 19(1): 73-87.
Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R.H., & Cannella Jr, A.A. 2007. Are family firms really superior performers? Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(5): 829-858.
Nunnally, J.C. 1978. Psychometric Theory. NY: McGraw-Hill.
O'Reilly, C.A. 1977. Personality-job fit: Implications for individual attitudes and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 18(1): 36-46.
Park, S.H., & Luo, Y. 2001. Guanxi and organizational dynamics: organizational networking in Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(5): 455-477.
Pfeffer, J. 1981. Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitt-man.
Rahim, M.A., & Magner, N.R. 1996. Confirmatory factor analysis of the bases of leader power: First-order factor model and its invariance across groups. Multivariate Behavior Research, 31: 495-516.
Ralston, D.A., Giacalone, R.A., & Terpstra, R.H. 1994. Ethical perceptions of organizational politics: A comparative evaluation of American and Hong Kong Managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(2): 989-999.
Raven, B.H. 1965. Social influence and power. In I. D. Steiner & M. Fishbein (Eds.), Current studies in social psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Robbins, S.P. 2001. Organizational Behavior (9th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Romano, C.A., Tanewski, G.A., & Smyrnios, K.X. 2001. Capital structure decision making: A model for family business. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(3): 285-310.
Rost, J.C. 1991. Leadership for the twenty-first century. NY: Greenwood.
Rotter, J.B. 1966. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied,80(1): 1-27.
Schriesheim, C.A., & Hinkin, T.R. 1990. Influence tactics used by subordinates: A theoretical and empirical analysis and refinement of the Kipnis, Schmidt, and Wilkinson subscales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 246-257.
Schriesheim, C.A., Hinkin, T.R., & Podsakoff, P.M. 1985. Have measurement shortcomings produced erroneous results in field investigations of the five French and Raven power bases? An empirical examination. Proceedings of the Southern Management Association, 100-102.
Sheldon, W.H., Stevens, S.S., & Tucker, W.B. 1940. The varieties of human physique. New York: Harper.
Sirmon, D.G., & Hitt, M.A. 2003. Managing resources: Linking unique resource, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4): 339-358.
Skinner, E.A. 1996. A guide to constructs of control. Journal of personality and social psychology, 71(3): 549-570.
Spector, P.E. 1982. Behavior in organizations as a function of employee’s locus of control. Psychological bulletin, 3: 482-497.
Spector, P.E. 1988. Development of the work locus of control scale. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61(4): 335-340.
Spreitzer, G.M. 1995. Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5): 1442-1465.
Standifird, S.S. 2006. Using guanxi to establish corporate. Corporate Reputation Review, 9: 171-178.
Tagiuri, R., & Davis, J. 1996. Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review, 9(2): 199-208.
Taormina, R.J., & Gao, J.H. 2010. A research model for guanxi behavior: Antecedents, measures, and outcomes of Chinese social networking. Social Science Research, 39(6): 1195-1212.
Tsai, H.T., Yeh, S.P. & Wu, T.J. 2011. The use of governmental-firm guanxi under different market conditions for Taiwanese hospitality firms invested in China. Actual Problems of Economics, 12(2): 4-11.
Tsai, H.T., Yeh, S.P., & Wu, T.J. 2013. Chinese paternalistic leadership and leadership effectiveness in textile industry. Autex Research Journal, 13(3): 82-88.
Tsang, W.K. 1998. Can guanxi be a source of sustained competitive advantage for doing business in China? Academy of Management Executive, 12: 64-73.
Tsui, A.S. & Farh, J.L. 1997. Where guanxi matters: relational demography and guanxi in the Chinese context. Work and Occupations, 24: 56-79.
Vanhonacker, W.R. 2004. Guanxi networks in China. The China Business Review, 31(3): 48-53.
Warner, M. 2009. Making sense of HRM in China: Setting the scene. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20: 2169-2193.
Wolfle, L.M., & Robertshaw, D. 1982. Effects of college attendance on locus of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(4): 802-810.
Wong, Y.T., Wong, S.H., & Wong, Y.W. 2010. A study of subordinate–supervisor guanxi in Chinese joint ventures. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21: 2142-2155.
Xin, K.R., & Pearce, J. 1996. Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (6): 1641-1658.
Yang, M.M. 1994. Gifts, favors and banquets: The art of social relationships in China. NY: Cornell University Press.
Yeung I.Y., & Tung, R.L. 1996. Achieving business success in Confucian societies: The importance of guanxi. Organizational Dynamics, 3: 54-65.
Yukl, G. 2002. Leadership in Organizations (5th ed.). NJ: Prentice Hall.
Yukl, G., & Tracey, B. 1992. Consequences of influence tactics used with subordinates, peers, and the boss. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77: 525-535.
Zaleznik, A., & Kets de Vries, M.F.R. 1975. Power and the corporate mind. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Zhang, X., & Li, G. 2003. Does guanxi matter to nonfarm employment? Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(2): 315-331.
Zhu, Y., Warner, M., & Rowley, C. 2007. Human resource management with 'Asian' characteristics: a hybrid people-management system in East Asia. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(5): 745-768.
Zhuang, G., Xi, Y., & Tsang, S.L. 2010. Power, conflict, and cooperation: The impact of guanxi in Chinese marketing channels. Industrial Marketing Management, 39: 137-149.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code