Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0522116-212151 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0522116-212151
論文名稱
Title
不同選擇權隱含資訊交差影響建構投資策略之實證
Predicting stock returns by option implied information
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
47
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2016-06-17
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2016-06-22
關鍵字
Keywords
資訊交易、選擇權市場、資訊投資者、隱含波動度、股票報酬預測
Informed trading, Option market, Informed trader, Stock return predictability, Implied volatility
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5817 次,被下載 38
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5817 times, has been downloaded 38 times.
中文摘要
本文旨在探討在選擇權市場中是否有資訊交易人所透露的隱含資訊。本篇文章根據過去文獻中衡量有資訊交易人之變數,以不同的樣本選取與頻率,發現確實存在預測股價的情況。觀察變數與股價未來報酬的關係,發現幾項有趣的結果: 1. 若以單變數來進行股價預測,以價平的買權隱含波動率變動能夠最有效的預測股價變化。 2.隱含資訊投資人在股價未來有下降風險時較容易交易選擇權來避險或獲利。 3. 在同時使用多個變數來預測股票報酬時價平選擇權之隱含波動率變化有最好的影響力。
Abstract
This research offers an extensive discussion on whether informed traders prefer to choose the options market to acquire an information advantage. If informed trading exists, then the option implied information could predict underlying stock returns. In this paper we extend the Baltussen et al. (2012) and An et al. (2014) implied information measures and test them in different samples. We find several interesting results of these measures as follows. First, they do have predictive ability, and the change in at-the-money call implied volatility presents the best predictive ability. Second, most predictions of implied information are reflected whenprices drop moreso than when they rise. Third, when predicting stock prices by multiple measures, the change in at-the-money put implied volatility exhibits a large influence.
目次 Table of Contents
Contents
論文審定書 i
摘要 ii
ABSTRACT iii
1. Introduction 1
2. Data and Option Measures 5
2.1 Data 5
2.2 Option Measures 6
2.3 Descriptive Statistics 8
3. Empirical Method and Results 9
3.2 Empirical Method 9
3.3 Empirical Results 11
4. Results of Combined Option Measures 16
4.1 Double-Sorted Portfolio 16
4.3 Company-Level Regression 18
5. Conclusion 21
Reference 23
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics 26
Table 2. Portfolio Return Base on Option Measures 27
Figure 1. Cumulative Performance of SkewOTM, RVIV, and Skew, January 1996 to June 2013 28
Figure 2. Cumulative Performance of Cvol and Pvol, January 1996 to June 2013 29
Table 3. Double sorted Portfolio 30
Table 4. Company-Level Regressions without Control, January 1996 – June 2013 31
Table 5. Company-Level Regressions with Control, January 1996 – June 2013 32
Appendix 33
參考文獻 References
An, B.-J., Ang, A., Turan G. Bali, & Cakici, N. (2014). The Joint Cross Section of
Stocks and Options. The Journal of Finance, 69(5), 2279-2337.
Bakshi, G., & Kapadia, N. (2003). Delta-Hedged Gains and the Negative Market
Volatility Risk Premium. Review of Financial Studies, 16(2), 527-566.
Bali, T. G., Cakici, N., & Whitelaw, R. F. (2011). Maxing out: Stocks as lotteries and
the cross-section of expected returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 99(2), 427-446.
Bali, T. G., & Hovakimian, A. (2009). Volatility Spreads and Expected Stock Returns.
Management Science, 55(11), 1797-1812. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1090.1063
Baltussen, G., Grient, B. v. d., Groot, W. d., Hennink, E., & Zhou, W. (2012).
Exploiting Option Information in the Equity Market. Financial Analysts Journal, 68(4),56-72.
Boyer, B., Mitton, T., & Vorkink, K. (2010). Expected Idiosyncratic Skewness.
Review of Financial Studies, 23, 169-202.
Cao, J., & Han, B. (2013). Cross section of option returns and idiosyncratic stock
volatility. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(1), 231-249.
Chowdhry, B., & Nanda, V. (1991). Multimarket Trading and Market Liquidity. The
Review of Financial Studies,.
Conrad, J., Dittmar, R. F., & Ghysels, E. (2013). Ex Ante Skewness and
Expected Stock Returns. The Journal of Finance, 68(1), 85-124.
Cremers, M., & Weinbaum, D. (2010). Deviations from Put-Call Parity and Stock
Return Predictability. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,
45(02),335-367.
Dimson, E. (1979). Risk measurement when shares are subject to infrequent trading.
Journal of Financial Economics, 7(2), 197-226.
Easley, D., O'hara, M., & Srinivs, P. S. (1998). Option Volume and Stock
Prices:Evidence on Where Informed Traders Trade. The Journal of Finance, 53(2), 431-465.
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2015). A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of
Financial Economics, 116(1), 1-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.10.010
Fama, E. F., & MacBeth, J. D. (1973). Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests.
The Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 607-636.
Garleanu, N., Pedersen, L. H., & Poteshman, A. M. (2009). Demand-Based Option
Pricing. Review of Financial Studies, 22(10), 4259-4299.
Goyal, A., & Saretto, A. (2009). Cross-section of option returns and volatility.
Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 310-326.
Jegadeesh, N. (1990). Evidence of Predicatable Behavior of Security Returns. The
Journal of Finance, 45(3), 881-898.
Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers:
Implications for Stock Market Efficiency. The Journal of Finance, 48(1), 65-91.
Lehmann, B. N. (1990). Fads, Martingales, and Market Efficiency. The Quartely
Journal of Economics, 105(1), 1-28.
Scholes, M., & Williams, J. (1977). Estimating betas from nonsynchronous data.
Journal of Financial Economics, 5(3), 309-327.
Xing, Y., Zhang, X., & Zhao, R. (2010). What Does the Individual Option Volatility
Smirk Tell Us About Future Equity Returns? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45(03), 641-662.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code