Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0617114-150522 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0617114-150522
論文名稱
Title
主併公司規模、員工效率、雙方關係對併購後績效之影響-台灣上市櫃公司的實證研究
The Effects of Size, Employee Efficiency and Bilateral Relationship on Post-acquisition Performance – Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies in Taiwan
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
101
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2014-05-29
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2014-07-21
關鍵字
Keywords
縱向研究、價值創造、交叉持股、整合績效、購併、銷售成長、資源觀點理論
Cross holding, Longitudinal, Value creation, Integration Performance, Acquisition, Sales growth, RBV
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5778 次,被下載 647
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5778 times, has been downloaded 647 times.
中文摘要
企業購併一直是企業發展的重要議題,實證研究顯示企業購併的失敗率超過60%。特殊情境如台灣本地的購併,實證研究更是少見,本研究從台灣的觀點分析,說明購併的績效定義不同,實證研究的表現也因此不同。
本研究針對台灣上市櫃公司於1997-2006 十年間共297筆的購併資料,整理後共174筆資料的實證研究,利用事件研究法及多元回歸模型及SPSS統計軟體的分析,共整理出三個子研究:
子研究一,從資源觀點理論,討論規模大小的影響,對績效的差異,本研究結果顯示規模大小與員工多寡對併後銷售成長分別是正向顯著與不明顯的差異。併前主併公司的員工生產力對併後的銷售成長有反向顯著的關係。
子研究二,以往績效的研究通常以股價不正常報酬(CAR),或資產報酬率(ROA)的財務觀點來看併後績效,本研究從台灣作為新興工業化國家的立場,認為台灣產業長期需要市場的開拓及銷售的成長,以銷售成長作為績效表現的模型相較於以財務績效的模型更適合本地購併績效的衡量。
子研究三、從購併後的價值創造假說為基礎,本研究討論相關購併與「關係購併」在規模經濟、範疇經濟、及市場力分別表現的差異。研究指出關係購併的績效表現會因為併前雙方間的關係而提前反應,非關係的購併對併後銷售成長的績效表現有正向顯著的關係。
Abstract
Mergers and acquisitions have provided important inspiration for enterprise development. Previous studies have addressed how acquisition integrations are often unsuccessful, but, empirical studies within the special context of Taiwan are rare. This study analyzed panel data from Taiwan and found different definitions of acquisition performance; thus, the results of empirical research differ.
The study initially collected 297 bidding events over 10 years, from 1997 to 2006, that were listed or OTC firms in the TSEC(Taiwan stock exchange) and eventually obtained data on 174 events from the M.O.P.S. (Market observation post system). Employing multivariate regression analysis, event study methodology and the SPSS statistics program, this paper presents three studies as follows:
Study One, from the resource-based perspective, discussed the size problem impact to the post-performance, and the results presented the physical size and the organizational size, the numbers of acquiring employees, reveal positive related and a null relationship respectively. Furthermore, the pre-acquisition productivity of acquiring employees is negative related to post- acquisition sales growth.
Study Two, prior studies used accounting-based post- acquisition performance measures, such as CAR for the short-term and ROA for the long-term, but this study used the marketing perspective and sales growth as the performance index. From the standpoint of new industries and sustainable operations in the context of Taiwan, business development and sales growth should give more consideration to firms’ long-term survival. The results of the study presented a sales-growth-based model that better fits to post-event performance than does the financial-based model in the case of Taiwan.
Study Three, based on the value creation hypothesis in the post-acquisitions, distinguished between related and "relationship" in mergers and acquisitions using value sources, economies of scale, economies of scope and market power. With early responses based more on the performance of ‘relationship’ acquisitions than on related ones, relationship acquisitions were negatively related to post- acquisition performance sales growth.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
誌 謝 ii
中文摘要 iii
ABSTRACT v
TABLE OF CONTENTS vii
LIST OF FIGURES x
LIST OF TABLES i
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Research Questions 2
1.2 The Context of Taiwan 3
1.3 The Development of Newly Industrialized Countries 6
1.4 Theoretical Framework 7
CHAPTER 2. LIERATURE REVIEW 9
2.1 Mergers and Acquisitions 9
2.2 Motives for Acquisitions 10
CHAPTER 3. STUDY 1: PHYSICAL SIZE AND ORGANIZATION SIZE TO POST-PERFORMANCE 14
3.1 Resource-based Perspectives on Acquisitions 14
3.2 The Size Problem 15
3.3 The Effect of Physical Size - Total Assets 19
3.4 The Effect of Organization Size - Numbers of Employees 20
3.5 Productivity Challenges among the Bidder’s Employees 24
3.6 Sample and Data 25
3.6.1 Model 29
3.6.2 Measures 29
3.7 Results 36
3.8 Discussion 43
CHAPTER 4. STUDY 2: THE MEASUREMENT OF POST- PERFORMANCE: ROA OR SALES GROWTH? 46
4.1 Overview 46
4.2 The Marketing Perspective 46
4.3 Long-term Performance: ROA versus Sales Growth 47
4.4 Sample and Data 50
4.5 Results 53
4.6 Discussion 54
CHAPTER 5. STUDY 3: RELATEDNESS AND RELATIONSHIP TO POST-PERFORMANCE 57
5.1 Overview 57
5.2 The Bilateral Relationship before Acquisition 58
5.3 Sample and Data 64
5.4 Results 65
5.5 Discussion 67
CHAPTER 6. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION 69
6.1 Conclusion 69
6.2 Limitations and Future Research 73
REFERENCES 75
參考文獻 References
Ahuja G, and Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms:a longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 197-220
Alarik, B. and Edstrom, A. (1983). Post-merger integration as a process of conflict resolution. W. H. Goldberg, ed. Mergers: Motives, Modes, Methods. Gower, Aldershot, England, 217-238.
Altendorf, D. M. (1986). When cultures clash: A case study of the Texaco takeover of Getty Oil and the impact of acculturation on the acquired firm. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.
Andrade, G., Mitchell, M. and Stafford, E. (2001). New evidence and perspectives on mergers. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15(2), 103–120.
Arnold, J. D. (1984). Special challenges in merging manufacturers. Mergers and Acquisitions, 19, 49-55.
Astrachan, J. H. (1990). Mergers, Acquisitions, and Employee Anxiety: A Study of Separation Anxiety in a Corporate Context, Praeger, New York.
Bailey, E. E. and Helfat, C. E. (2003). External management succession, human capital, and firm performance: An integrative analysis. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24, 347-369.
Barney, J. B. (1988). Returns to bidding firms in mergers and acquisitions, Strategic Management Journal, 9, 71-78.
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competi¬tive Advantage, Journal of Management, 17 (1), 99–120.
Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Benkenstein, M. and Block, B. (1994). Strategic marketing management in hi-tech industries: a stock-taking. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 12(1), 15-21.
Bergh, D. (1997). Predicting divestiture of unrelated acquisitions: An integrative model of ex ante conditions, Strategic Management Journal, 18(9), 715-731.
Bergh, D. D., and Holbein, G. F. (1997). Assessment and redirection of longitudinal analysis demonstration with a study of the diversification and divestiture relationship. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 557-571.
Bhaumik, S. and Selarka, E. (2008). Impact of M&A on firm performance in India: Implications for concentration of ownership and insider entrenchment, William Davidson Institute Working Paper at the University of Michigan.
Blake, R. R., and J. S. Mouton. (1985). How to achieve integration on the human side of the merger. Organization Dynamics, 13, 41-56.
Boeker W. and Karichalil, R. (2002). Entrepreneurial transitions: Factors influencing founder departure. Academy of Management Journal, 45(3), 818-826.
Boeker, W. (1989). Strategic change: The effects of founding and history. Academy of Management Joumal, 32, 489-515.
Borenstein, S., and Bushnell, B.J. (2000). Electricity restructuring: deregulation or reregulation?, Regulation 23(2), 46–52.
Bradley, M., Jarrell, G. A. (1988). Knights, Raiders, and Targets: The Impact of the Hostile Takeover, Oxford University Press, New York, 253-259.
Bragado, J. F. (1992). Setting the Correct Speed for Post¬ Merger Integration, M&A Europe, 5, 24–31.
Buono, A. F. and Bowditch J. L. (1989). The Human Side of Mergers and Acquisitions. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
Buono, A. F., Bowditch, J. L., and Lewis, J. W. (1985). When cultures collide: The anatomy of a merger. Human relations, 38(5), 477-500.
Capron, L., Dussauge, P. and Mitchell, W. (1998). Resource redeployment following horizontal acquisitions in Europe and North America, 1988–1992. Strategic Management Journal, 19(7), 631–661.
Chandler, G. N. and Hanks, S. H. (1994). Market attractiveness, resource-based capabilities, venture strategies, and venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(4), 331-349.
Chatterjee, S. (1986). Types of synergy and economic value: The impact of acquisitions on merging and rival firms, Strategic Management Journal, 7(2), 119–139.
Chatterjee, S. Lubatkin, M. H. Schweiger, D. M. and Weber, Y. (1992). Cultural differences and shareholder value in related mergers: Linking equity and human capital. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5), 319-334.
Chung, H. L. (2011). Taiwan's foundry, IC packing and IC testing products topped in market share [Online]. Taipei: Chinatimes.
Collis, D. and Montgomery, C. (1998). Creating corporate advantage. Harvard Business Review 76(3): 71–83.
Conner, K. R. (1991). A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: Do we have a new theory of the firm?, Journal of Management, 17, 121–154.
Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Datta, D. K. (1991). Organizational Fit and Acquisition Per¬formance: Effects of Post-Acquisition Integration, Strategic Management Journal, 12 (4), 281–97.
Department of Investment Service. (2007). Taiwan panel market share topped the world [Online]. Taipei: Department of Investment Service, Ministry of Economic Affairs, Taiwan.
Douma, S. and H. Schreuder (2013). Economic Approaches to Organizations. New York, NY: Prince-Hall.
Eisenhardt, K. M., and Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105-1121.
Eisenhardt, K. M., and Schoonhoven, C. B. (1990). Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, and growth among U.S. semi-conductor ventures, 1978-1988. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 504-529.
Finkelstein, S. (2009). The effects of strategic and market complementarity on acquisition performance: Evidence from the US commercial banking industry, 1989–2001. Strategic Management Journal, 30(6), 617-646.
Finkelstein, S. (2009). The effects of strategic and market complementarity on acquisition performance: Evidence from the US commercial banking industry, 1989–2001. Strategic Management Journal, 30(6), 617-646.
Finkelstein, S., and Mooney, A. C. (2003). Not the usual suspects: How to use board process to make boards better. Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 101-113.
Fischer, H. M., and Pollock, T. G. (2004). Effects of social capital and power on surviving transformational change: The case of initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 463-481.
Florin, J., Lubatkin, M. and Schulze, W. (2003). A social capital model of high-growth ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 46(3), 374-384.
Hall, M. and L. Weiss. (1967). Firm size and profitability, Review of Economics and Statistics, 49(4), 319-331.
Hambrick, D. (1987). Top management teams: Key to strategic success, California Management Review, 30, 88–108.
Hambrick, D. C., and Cannella, A. A. (1993). Relative standing: A framework for understanding departures of acquired executives. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), 733-762.
Hambrick, D. C., Geletkanycz, M. A., and Fredrickson J. W. (1993). Top executive commitment to the status quo: Some tests of its determinants. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 401-418.
Harford, J., Jenter, D., and Li, K. (2011). Institutional cross-holdings and their effect on acquisition decisions. Journal of Financial Economics, 99(1), 27-39.
Haspeslagh, P. C. and Jemison, D. B. (1991). Managing Acquisitions: Creating Value through Corporate Renewal. Free Press, New York.
Hayward M.L.A. and Hambrick, D.C. (1997). Explaining the premium paid for large acquisitions: evidence of CEO hubris. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(1), 103–127.
Hayward, M. L. (2002). When do firms learn from their acquisition experience? Evidence from 1990 to 1995. Strategic Management Journal, 23(1), 21-39.
Hayward, M. L. A. and Hambrick, D. G. (1995). Explaining premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris, paper presented at the BPS division of the Academy of Management Conference, Vancouver.
Hirsch, P. M. (1987). Pack your own parachute: How to survive mergers, takeovers, and other corporate disasters, MA, Addison-Wesley.
Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D. and Hoskisson, R. E., (2005). Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalization, 6th edition South-Western, Thomson
Hitt, M. Harrison J. Ireland RD, Best A. (1998). Attributes of successful and unsuccessful acquisition of U.S. firms. British Journal of Management, 9, 91–114.
Homburg, C. and Bucerius, M. (2006). Is speed of integration really a success factor of mergers and acquisitions? An analysis of the role of internal and external relatedness, Strategic Management Journal, 27, 347-367.
Hunt, S. D., and Morgan, R. M. (1995). The comparative advantage theory of competition. Journal of marketing, 59(2).
Itami, H. (1987). Mobilizing Invisible Assets. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Jensen, M. (1988). Takeovers: Their causes and consequences. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2, 21-48.
Jensen, M. C. (1984). Takeovers: Folklore and science. Harvard Business Review. 62 6, 109-121.
Jensen, M. C. and Ruback, R. (1983). ‘The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence’, Journal of Financial Economics, 11, 5–50.
Kazanjian, R. K. (1988). Relation of dominant problems to stages of growth in technology-based new ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 257-279.
King, D. R., Covin, J. G., and Hegarty, W. H. (2003). Complementary resources and the exploitation of technological innovations. Journal of Management, 29(4), 589-606.
King, D. R., Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M. and Covin, J. G. (2004). Meta‐analyses of post‐acquisition performance: Indications of unidentified moderators. Strategic Management Journal, 25(2), 187-200.
Kor, Y. Y. and Mahoney, J. T. (2005). How dynamics, management, and governance of resource deployments influence firm-level performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(5), 489-496.
Kor, Y.Y. and Sundaramurthy, C. (2009). Experience-based human capital and social capital of outside directors Journal of management, 35 (4),981-1006.
Larsson, R. and Finkelstein, S. (1999). Integrating Strategic, Organizational, and Human Resource Perspectives on Mergers and Acquisitions: A Case Survey of Synergy Realization. Organization Science, 10(1), 1-26.
Lee, C., Lee, K., and Pennings, J. M. (2001). Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 615-640.
Levinson, H. (1970). A psychologist diagnoses merger failure. Harvard Business Review. 48(2), 139-147.
Marks, M. L. and Mirvis, P. H. (2001). Making mergers and acquisitions work: Strategic and psychological preparation. The Academy of Management Executive, 15(2), 80-92.
Marks, M. L. and Mirvis, P. M. (1986). The merger syndrome. Psychology Today, 20 (10), 36-42.
Mitchell, D. (1989). The Importance of Speed in Post-Merger Reorganization, M&A Europe, 1 (3), 44–48.
Mosakowski, E. (1993). A resource-based perspective on the dynamic strategy–performance relationship: An empirical examination of the focus and differentiation strategies in 60entrepreneurial firms, Journal of Management, 19, 819–839.
Mueller, D. (1972). A life cycle theory of the firm. Journal of Industrial Economics, 20(3), 199-219.
Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242-266.
Nahapiet, J., and Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242-266.
Nahavandi, A. and Malekzadeh, A. R. (1988). Acculturation in mergers and acquisitions. Academy of Management Review, 13, 79-90.
Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Pablo, A. L. (1994). Determinants of Acquisition Integration Level: A Decision-Making Perspective, Academy of Manage¬ment Journal, 37 (4), 803–836.
Park, C. (2003). Prior performance characteristics of related and unrelated acquirers. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 471-480.
Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York, John Wiley.
Pettus, M. L. (2001). The resource-based view as a developmental growth process: Evidence from the deregulated trucking industry. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 878-896.
Porter, M. E. (1987). From competitive advantage to corporate strategy, Harvard Business Review, 65(3), 43–59.
Porter, M. E. (1991). Towards a Dynamic Theory of Strategy, Strategic Management Journal, 12, 95-117.
Ranft A. L. and Lord M. D. (2000). Acquiring new knowledge: the role of retaining human capital in acquisitions of high-tech firms. Journal of High Technology Management Research , 2, 295–319.
Ravenscraft, D. J. and Scherer, F. M. (1987). Mergers, sell-offs, and economic efficiency. Brookings Institution Press.
Rhoades, S. A. (1994). A summary of merger performance studies in banking, 1980–1993, and an assessment of the “operation performance” and “event study” methodologies, Federal Reserve Bulletin, July,1–37.
Sales, A. L. and Mirvis. P. H. (1984). When cultures collide: issues in acquisition'. In Kimberley, J. R. and R. E. Quinn (eds), Managing Organizational Transition. Irwin, Homewood, IL.
Salter, M. S. and Weinhold. W. A. (1979). Diversification Through Acquisition: Strategies for Creating Economic Value, The Free Press, New York.
Schweiger, D. M. and DeNisi, A. S. (1991). Communication with employees following a merger: A longitudinal field experiment. Academy of Management Journal. 34 110-135.
Schweiger, D. M. and Goulet, P. K. (2001). Integrating mergers and acquisitions: An international research review. Advances in mergers & acquisitions, 1, 61-91.
Schweiger, D. M. and Walsh, J. P. (1990). Mergers and acquisitions: An interdisciplinary view. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, Vol. 8. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT. 41-107.
Schweiger, D. M. Ivancevich, J. M. and Power, F. R. (1987). Executive actions for managing human resources before and after acquisition. Academy of Management Executive, 1, 127-138.
Searby, F. W. (1969). Control postmerger change. Harvard Business Review, 47 5, 4-12, 154-5.
Seth, A. (1990a). Value Creation in Acquisitions: A re-examination of Performance Issues, Strategic Management Journal, 11 (2), 99–115.
Seth, A. (1990b), Sources of Value Creation in Acquisitions: An Empirical Investigation, Strategic Management Journal, 11 (6), 431–446.
Shleifer, A, and Summers, L. (1988). Breach of trust in hostile takeovers. In Corporate takeovers: Causes and Consequences, Auerbach A (ed.). University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL; 32–67.
Simonin, B.L. (1997). The importance of collaborative know-how: an empirical test of the learning organization. Academy of Management Journal 40, 1150–1174.
Singh, H. and Chang, S. J. (1996). Corporate reconfiguration: A resource perspective, working paper, Management Department, Wharton School, Philadelphia.
Singh, H. and Montgomery, C. A. (1987). Corporate acquisition strategies and economic performance, Strategic Management Journal, 8(4), 377–386.
Sirower, M.L. (1997). The Synergy Trap: How Companies Lose the Acquisition Game. Free Press: New York. Stringer R. 2000. How to manage radical innovation. California Management Review, 42(4), 70–89.
Steiner, P. O. (1975). Mergers: Motives, Effects, Policies. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
Tan, J. and Peng, M. W. (2003). Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: two studies from an emerging economy. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1249–1263.
Teece, D. J. (1982), Towards an Economic Theory of the Multiproduct Firm, Journal of Economic Beliavior and Organization, 2, 39-63.
Tetenbaum, T. J. (1999). Beating the odds of merger and acquisition failure: seven key practices that improve the chance for expected integration and synergies. Organizational Dynamics 28, 22–36
Tsang, E. W. K. (2002). Acquiring knowledge by foreign partners from international joint ventures in a transition economy: Learning-by-doing and learning myopia. Strategic Management Journal, 23(9), 835-854.
Uhlenbruck, K., Hitt, M. A. and Semadeni, M. (2006), Market value effects of acquisitions involving internet firms: A resource based analysis, Strategic Management Journal, 27(9), 899-913.
Varaiya N. (1987). Determinants of premiums in acquisition transactions. Managerial and Decision Economics, 14, 175–184.
Walsh, J. P. (1989). Doing a deal: Merger and acquisition negotiations and their impact upon target company top management turnover. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 307-322.
Walter, G. A. (1985). Culture collisions in mergers and acquisitions. Organizational culture, 301, 311-13.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.
Winn, D. N. (1975). Industrial Market Structure and Performance: 1960-1968, Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Wright, P. Kroll, M. Load, A. and Van, B. (2002). The Structure of Ownership and Corporate Acquisition Strategies, Strategic Management Journal, 23, 41–53.
Yang, C. C. (2005). High technology industry and innovation of manpower – Taiwan model and experiences. Taipei, National Policy Foundation.
Yeh, Y. H. Lee, T. S. and Woidtke, T. (2001). Family control and corporate governance: Evidence from Taiwan. International Review of finance, 2(1‐2), 21-48.
Zollo, M., and Singh, H. (2004). Deliberate learning in corporate acquisitions: post‐acquisition strategies and integration capability in US bank mergers. Strategic Management Journal, 25(13), 1233-1256.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code