Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0618116-104453 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0618116-104453
論文名稱
Title
員工為何建言? 探討員工利社會動機與印象管理動機對建言行為的影響: 求成型焦點、情感性組織承諾與公民行為壓力的干擾效果
Why do employees speak up? Exploring employees' prosocial and impression management motives on voice behaviors: The moderating effects of promotion focus, affective organizational commitment, and citizenship pressure
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
58
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2016-07-07
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2016-07-18
關鍵字
Keywords
利社會動機、挑戰性建言行為、支持性建言行為、印象管理動機、求成型焦點、情感性組織承諾、公民行為壓力
prosocial motives, impression-management motives, affective organizational commitment, citizenship pressure, challenging voice, promotion focus, supportive voice
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5797 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5797 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
在這競爭激烈的時代中,該如何鼓勵員工提出有益組織的建言,已是經營管理的核心關鍵。為了解影響員工建言的動機,本研究試圖從Morrison (2011)的建言模式,探討員工建言動機對建言行為的影響:以員工的求成型焦點、情感性組織承諾與組織中的公民行為壓力作為干擾效果。
本研究樣本包括88間跨產業公司之在職員工為樣本,並透過時間隔離法,進行部屬及其主管等不同來源的配對問卷調查,共獲得415份有效配對樣本。經由階層迴歸分析結果發現: (1)印象管理動機與挑戰性建言呈負相關;當求成型焦點高時會減弱其負相關;當公民行為壓力高時呈負相關;(2)利社會動機與支持性建言呈正相關;當高情感性組織承諾或公民行為壓力高時則加強其正相關;(3)最後,借鑒Grant & Mayer (2009)的研究額外發現,印象管理/利社會動機會產生交互作用進而干擾建言行為。根據本研究結果,提出管理意涵如下:(1)講求創新變革的組織,應鼓勵自利動機與求成型焦點者,挑戰並提出改善見解;(2)追求穩健發展的組織,應重視利社會動機與情感性組織承諾者,支持組織政策的想法。
Abstract
Encouraging employees to provide advices on organization management is the key to making high-quality decisions and improving organizational effectiveness in today's turbulent and competitive business environment. The study applies the model of employee voice proposed by Morrison (2011) to examine the relationships between employees' prosocial and impression management motives and voice behaviors and the moderating effects of promotion focus, affective organizational commitment, and citizenship pressure.
In order to verify the proposed moderation model, the samples were collected from 415 supervisor-employee pairs at two different time points from different industries and positions. The results of the hierarchical regression analyses shows: (1) Employees' impression-management motive is negatively related to challenging voice. In addition, promotion focus attenuates the negatively relationships between impression-management motive and challenging voice, whereas citizenship pressure strengthens the negatively relationships between impression-management motive and challenging voice. (2) Employees’ prosocial motive positively predicts supportive voice. In addition, affective organizational commitment and citizenship pressure strengthen the positively relationships between prosocial motives and supportive voice. (3)The interactions between impression-management and prosocial motives positively predicted behavior. According to the results, the implications for practice are proposed as follows: (1) organizations that emphasize the need for change and innovation should encourage self-serving and promotion focusing on employees to express more challenging forms of voice; (2) organizations pursuing suitable development should value people with prosocial motives and affective organizational commitment to support suggestions of organizational policies.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
誌謝 ii
中文摘要 iii
英文摘要 iv
第一章 緒論 1
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 員工建言的動機與行為的關係 5
第二節 員工建言成本/效能與建言行為的關係: 個人面與情境面所扮演的角色 9
第三章 研究方法 15
第一節 研究架構 15
第二節 研究樣本與問卷發放程序 16
第三節 研究工具 17
第四節 資料分析方式 20
第四章 研究結果 21
第一節 各變數間之敘述統計與相關係數 21
第二節 驗證性因素分析 22
第三節 區別效度檢驗 22
第四節 假設檢定 23
第五節 動機交互作用間的額外分析 28
第五章 討論與建議 30
第一節 研究討論與發現 30
第二節 管理意涵 32
第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 34
參考文獻 36
附錄一 主管問卷 42
附錄二 部屬問卷 45
參考文獻 References
中文文獻
林鉦棽 (2007)。跨層次觀點下印象管理動機與主管導向之組織公民行為的關係:社會互動與組織政治氣候的調節角色。管理學報,24(1),99-111。
段錦雲、張倩 (2012)。建言行为的認知影響因素,理論基礎及發生機制。心理科學進展,20(1),115-126。
紀乃文、石蕙菱、郭智涵 (2015)。建言或諫言?探討員工正、負向心情與建言行為的關係:轉換型與交易型領導的干擾效果。管理學報,32(1),43-68。
紀乃文、高女媖 (2015)。員工每日的負向心情能促進其預防性建言嗎?探討員工年資、領導部屬交換關係、以及建言動機的中介式干擾效果。2015 AAOM & TAOM Joint Conference。香港:香港中文大學。
彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽 (2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報,23(1),77-98。
熊欣華、蔡年泰、陳建安 (2013)。員工意見表達行為:前因及其對主管績效評量之影響。臺大管理論叢。23(2),133-163。

英文文獻
Aiken, L. S. and West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.
Allen, N. J. and Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of occupational psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
Anderson, J. C. and Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411.
Ashford, S. J., Rothbard, N. P., Piderit, S. K. and Dutton, J. E. (1998). Out on a limb: The role of context and impression management in selling gender-equity issues. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(1), 23-57.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230-258.
Bolino, M. C. (1999). Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors? Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 82-98.
Bolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H., & Niehoff, B. P. (2004). The other side of the story: Reexamining prevailing assumptions about organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 14(2), 229-246.
Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (2005). The personal costs of citizenship behavior: the relationship between individual initiative and role overload, job stress, and work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 740.
Bolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H., Gilstrap, J. B., & Suazo, M. M. (2010). Citizenship under pressure: What's a “good soldier” to do? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(6), 835-855.
Bolino, M. C., Klotz, A. C., Turnley, W. H., & Harvey, J. (2013). Exploring the dark side of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(4), 542-559.
Burris, E. R., Detert, J. R., & Chiaburu, D. S. (2008). Quitting before leaving: the mediating effects of psychological attachment and detachment on voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 912.
Burris, E. R. (2012). The risks and rewards of speaking up: Managerial responses to employee voice. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 851-875.
Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 69(2), 117-132.
Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869-884.
Dorfman, P. W., & Howell, J. P. (1988). Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership in patterns. Advances in International Comparative Management, 8(3), 127-150.
Dutton, J. E., & Ashford, S. J. (1993). Selling issues to top management. Academy of management review, 18(3), 397-428.
Dutton, J.E., Ashford, S.J., O’Neill, R.M., Hayes, E., and Wierba, E.E. (1997). Reading the wind: How middle managers assess the context for selling issues to top managers. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), 407-425.
Dyne, L. V., Ang, S., & Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidi-mensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1359-1392.
Ehrhart, M. G., & Naumann, S. E. (2004). Organizational citizenship behavior in work groups: A group norms approach. Journal of applied psychology, 89(6), 960.
Fuller, J. B., Barnett, T., Hester, K., Relyea, C., & Frey, L. (2007). An exploratory examination of voice behavior from an impression management perspective. Journal of Managerial Issues, 19(1) 134-151.
Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. Personality psychology in Europe, 7(1), 7-28.
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The leadership quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.
Grant, A. M. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 48-58.
Grant, A. M., & Mayer, D. M. (2009). Good soldiers and good actors: Prosocial and impression management motives as interactive predictors of affiliative citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 900.
Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280-1300.
Higgins, E. T. (1998), Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in experimental social psychology, 30, 1-46
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7 User's Reference Guide. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
Leary M. R. and Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 34-47.
LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 853-868.
LePine, J.A., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: Evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 326-336.
Liang, J., Farh, C. and Farh, J. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71-92.
Liu, W., Zhu, R., & Yang, Y. (2010). I warn you because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 189-202.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Meyer, J.P., Allen, N.J. & Smith, C.A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538-51.
Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of vocational behavior, 61(1), 20-52.
Milliken, F. J., Morrison, E. W., & Hewlin, P. F. (2003). An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don’t communicate upward and why. Journal of management studies, 40(6), 1453-1476.
Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management review, 25(4), 706-725.
Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373-412.
Morrison, E. W. (2014). Employee voice and silence. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 1(1), 173-197.
Mowday, R. T., Porter, L W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee-organization linkage. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2012). Employee voice behavior: A meta‐analytic test of the conservation of resources framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 216-234.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
Rioux, S., & Penner, L. (2001). The causes of organizational citizenship behavior: A motivational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1306-1314.
Rietzschel, E. F. (2011). Collective regulatory focus predicts specific aspects of team innovation. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(3), 337-345.
Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108-119.
Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2006). Compulsory citizenship behavior: Theorizing some dark sides of the good soldier syndrome in organizations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 36(1), 77-93.
Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2007). Redrawing the boundaries of OCB? An empirical examination of compulsory extra-role behavior in the workplace. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21(3), 377-405.
Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682-696.
Zhou, Q., Hirst, G., & Shipton, H. (2012). Context matters: Combined influence of participation and intellectual stimulation on the promotion focus–employee creativity relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(7), 894-909.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 18.223.107.149
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 18.223.107.149
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 永不公開 not available

QR Code