Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0620111-181240 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0620111-181240
論文名稱
Title
影響企業購併績效因素之探討-以台灣金融產業為例
Factors in the Performance of Enterprises after Mergers and Acquisitions - A Case Study of the Financial Industry in Taiwan
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
56
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2011-05-25
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2011-06-20
關鍵字
Keywords
購併、績效、主併者特性、組織文化、產業因素
merger character, industry factor, performance of M&A, M&A, organizational culture
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5686 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5686 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
企業經營追求成長是必然的,然而成長的方式有很多,近年來興起透過購併的方式而達到快速成長的效果,然而並不是每一次的購併行為都可以為企業帶來正面的績效。因此,本研究整理過去國內外相關文獻,針對台灣金融產業,以2000年至2010年為研究範圍,探討主併者特性、企業文化差異以及產業因素對購併績效的影響,期望能找出不同因素與購併績效之間的關聯。本研究使用複迴歸模型,有5個自變數,分別為主併公司規模、主併公司經營能力、主併公司成長機會、組織文化差異以及產業因素;而在績效變數方面,採用3個應變數來探討不同的績效指標,分別為累積異常報酬率、員工單位產值以及稅後每股盈餘。 研究結果顯示,在主併者特性方面,公司規模的確對購併績效具有正向關係,但公司成長機會卻與購併績效呈現負相關與假設不合,另外,本研究假設組織文化差異與產業因素對購併績效有顯著影響,結果為部分成立,代表不同因素的確會對購併績效產生不同之影響。
Abstract
The pursuit of business growth is unquestionable. However, there are many ways to achieve the growth. In recent years, the number of mergers and acquisitions has risen, in order to achieve the effect of rapid growth, but M & A behavior cannot always guarantee positive business performance. Therefore, this study refers to the literature presented, with year 2000 to 2010 as the scope of study, to look deeply into the influences caused by main characters, differences in corporate culture and industry factors on M & A performance. We expect to construct the relationship between different factors and performance of acquisition. This research uses multiple-regression model which has five independent variables-company scale, management ability, Growth opportunities, cultural differences and industry factors. This research also applies 3 dependent variables to compare different aspects of performance, which are CAR, EPS after taxes and unit employee output value.
The result shows that the Company scale indeed has a positive effect on the performance of acquisition. On the other hand, the company's growth opportunities are negatively correlated with the performance of M, thus our assumption is false. In addition, the study has assumed, beforehand, that all differences in organizational culture and industry factors have significant influence on acquisition performance, but the result shows that it is not necessarily true in all cases, which reflects that different factors introduce different effects to the performance of mergers and acquisitions.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書.......................................................... i
致謝詞..................................................................ii
圖目錄..................................................................iv
表目錄..................................................................v
摘要..................................................................... vi
ABSTRACT.........................................................vii
第一章緒論..........................................................1
第一節研究背景..................................................1
第二節研究動機..................................................3
第三節研究問題與研究目的..............................4
第四節研究流程..................................................5
第二章文獻探討..................................................6
第一節購併的定義與動機..................................6
第二節主併者特性對購併績效的影響............16
第三節組織文化差異對購併績效的影響........17
第四節產業因素對購併績效的影響................18
第三章研究方法................................................21
第一節研究對象................................................21
第二節研究架構與假說....................................22
第三節變數定義................................................23
第四節統計分析方法........................................26
第四章研究結果................................................27
第一節敘述性統計分析....................................27
第二節複迴歸模型統計分析............................29
第三節小結........................................................34
第五章結論與建議............................................35
第一節研究結論................................................35
第二節研究貢獻................................................38
第三節研究限制................................................39
第四節對未來研究之建議................................39
參考文獻............................................................40
附錄....................................................................44
參考文獻 References
ㄧ、中文部分
吳美麗(1995),台灣製造業購併前後購併綜效與經營績效之實證研究,淡江大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
林永隆(1998),企業購併綜效在財務上之探討,中興大學企業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
林柄滄(2002),安隆破產事件引發的會計危機,會計研究月刊,195,24-25。
陳志光(1991),我國企業購併前後綜效及經營績效之比較研究,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版之碩士論文。
陳明子、張惠婷、黃于真、張芳儀、王惠茹、王憶如(2002),證券業併購之探討─以元大京華證券合併案為例,屏東科技大學企業管理系實務專題。
胡慈容(2003),企業購併之長期績效評估,東海大學管理研究所碩士論文。
許李瑋(1999),我國銀行業購併之績效與綜效之實證研究,中國文化大學國際企業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
曾瑞雯(2001),銀行購併前後經營績效的比較,文化大學經濟研究所未出版之碩士論文。
陳隆麒(1993),現代財務管理-理論與應用,台北:華泰。
蕭惠元(1996),購併活動對股價行為與會計資訊之影響-以台灣上市公司為例,東吳大學會計研究所未出版之碩士論文。
謝采紋(2001),購併活動對企業績效評比及綜效之研究-以上櫃綜合證券商為例,東華大學企業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
黃明琦(2000),臺灣金融機構購併前後績效與綜效之研究,成功大學企業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
洪梓程(2007),公司規模與購併績效之相關性,國立政治大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。
陳紜佩(2010),影響企業購併後績效的因素-以台灣科技產業為例,國立成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
魏啟林(1993),掌握企業購併的最適策略,台北:遠流。
余尚武、汪玉柏(1998),影響企業併購成敗因素與策略探討,國立台灣科技大學。
楊文禎(2003),台灣企業購併環境、企業特性與購併綜效關聯性之研究,淡江大學會計系。
二、英文部分
Amihud Y., Lev. B., Travlos NG(1990). Corporate control and the choice of investment financing: the case of corporate acquisitions. Journal of Finance, 45(2), pp.603-616.
Becketti, (1986), Corporate Mergers and the Business Cycle. Economic Review,
Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 71, pp.13-26.
Beckenstein, A.R.(1979), Merger activity and merger theories:an empirical Investigation,Antitrust Bulletin.
Berger, P. G. and Ofek, E. (1995), Diversification‘s Effect on Firm Value, Journal of Financial Economics, 37, pp.39-65.
Campa, J. M. and Kedia, S. (2002), Explaining the Diversification Discount, The Journal of Financial, 57(4), pp.1731-1762.
Cooke, T. E.(1986). Merger and Acquisition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Chung, K. H. &Pruitt, S.W (1994), A Simple Approximation of Tobin’s q,Financial Management ,23, pp.70-74
Dodd, P.(1980), Mergers proposals, management discretion and stockholder wealth, Journal of Financial Economics, 8, pp.105-138.
Eakins, S. and C. Mishra(1995). Large Institutions and Corportate Policy: the Differential Support. International Journal of Finance, 7(3), pp.1253-1267.
Fowler, Karen L., and Dennis Schmidt.(1989). Determinants of tender offer post-acquisition financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 10,
pp.339-350.
Hadlock, C., James, C.(2002), Do Banks Provide Financial Slack? The Journal of Finance, 57, pp.1383-1416.
Hitt, Michael A., Jeffrey S. Harrison, R. Duane Ireland, and Aleta Best,(1993), Lifting the veil of success in mergers and acquisitions. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Strategic Management Society, Chicago.
Houston, J. F. and M. D. Ryngaert, (1994), The overall gains from large bank mergers, Journal of Banking & Finance, 18, pp.1155-1176.
Jauch, L. & W. F. Glueck, (1989). Strategy management and business policy, 3ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Jensen, Michael C.(1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76: pp.323~329.
.Lakonishok, J. and T. Vermaelen, (1990), Anomalous price behavior around purchase tender offers, Journal of Finance, 45, pp.455-577.
Lewellen W., Loderer C., Rosenfeld A.(1985). Merger decisions and executive stock ownership in acquiring firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics,7,pp.209-231.
Lewellen, W. G. (1971). A pure financial rationale for the conglomerate merger. The Journal of Finance, 26(2), pp.521-537.
Marren, J. H. (1993), Mergers and Acquisitions: A Valuation Handbook, Homewood IL: Business One Irwin.
Melicher, Ronald W., Johannes Ledolter and Louis J. D’Antonio (1983), A Time Series Analysis of Aggregate Merger Activity. Review of Economics and
Statistic, 65, 423-429.
Morck R., Schleifer A., Vishny R.(1988)Management ownership and market valuation: an empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics,pp.293-315.
Pound, J. (1988), Proxy Contests and the Efficiency of Shareholder oversight. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, pp. 237-265
Reed, S.F. and Lajoux, A.R.(1995),The Art of M&A , A Merger Acquisition Buyout Guide , New York.
Roll R. (1986). The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. Journal of Business, 59, pp.197-216.
Seth, A. (1990). Value Creation in Acquisitions: Reexamination of Performance Issue. Strategic Management Journal, pp.523~534.
Schoenberg, R., & Reeves, R. (1999). What determines activity within an industry. European Management Journal, 17(1), pp.93–98.
Schlingemann F. P. (2004), Financing Decisions and Bidder Gains, Journal of Corporate Finance, 10, pp.683-701
Schulman, C. T., D. W. Thomas, K. F. Sellers, and D. B. Kennedy.(1996), Effectsof Tax Integration and Capital Gains Tax on Corporate Leverage, National Tax Journal, 49(5), pp.31-54.
Silhan, P. and H. Thomas (1986). Using simulated mergers to evaluate corporate diversification strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 11, p99-115.
Trautwein, F.(1990),Merger Motives and Merger Prescription., Strategic Management Journal, pp. 317-402.
Weber, Y. and Pliskin, N. (1996). The effects of information systems integration and organizational culture on a firm’s effectiveness, Information & Management, 30, pp. 81-90.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外均不公開 not available
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 18.117.196.217
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 18.117.196.217
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code