Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0620116-140056 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0620116-140056
論文名稱
Title
CEO權力、企業社會責任與企業價值:代理理論之論述
CEO Power,Corporate Social Responsibility,and Firm Value:The Perspective of Agency Theory
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
60
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2016-05-26
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2016-08-09
關鍵字
Keywords
CEO權力、代理問題、企業社會責任、過度投資、公司價值
Corporate social responsibility, CEO power, Overinvestment, Firm value, Agency problem
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5823 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5823 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
本研究主要探討有權力的CEO是否傾向過度投資於企業社會責任活動,並減損企業社會責任投資所帶來的正面回饋。本文以2007年至2014年天下雜誌公佈之「企業公民獎」名單作為善盡企業社會責任公司的代理變數,並根據市值及淨值市價比,找出5家與企業社會責任公司樣本最接近的已上市櫃公司做為對照控制公司,計取得1,214筆有效樣本。實證結果發現,權力愈大的CEO,傾向投入愈多企業社會責任活動。其次CEO權力使得公司績效與企業社會責任投資兩者關係呈現負向關係,支持過度投資假說,顯示無論公司目前績效為何,有權力的CEO基於營造個人聲譽或私利,都會選擇積極投入社會責任活動。此外,本文發現企業社會責任投資確實有助公司價值的提升,然而CEO權力卻會破壞企業社會責任表現與公司價值兩者間的正向關係,說明因CEO權力過大所衍生的企業社會責任投資是項代理問題,非但無法取得市場正面回饋,甚至傷害公司價值,顯見在CEO權力過大下,企業社會責任投資是項代理成本。

關鍵字:企業社會責任、CEO權力、代理問題、公司價值、過度投資。
Abstract
This thesis examines whether powerful CEOs overly invest in activities realted to corporate social responsibility (CSR) hurting the potential benefits from CSR. This thesis uses the winners of “Corporate Citizen Award” by Common Wealth Magazine as the sample of investing in CSR from 2007 to 2014. I also choose five matching control firms based on market capitalization and book-to-market ratio and reach 1,214 firm-year observations. The results demonstrate that the more powerful CEOs tend to invest more in CSR. The power of CEO contributes to the adverse effect of CSR on firm value. Therefore, the overly investment hypothesis is supported. The results also show that regardless of the present firm performance, the powerful CEOs invest in CSR for personal reputation or personal benefit. Besides, this thesis also suggests that the CSR have a positive effect on firm value, however, the power of CEO mitigates the positive relationship between CSR and firm value due to agency relationship. Once the CEO is powerful, CSR implies some agency cost to the firms.

Key words: Corporate social responsibility; CEO power; Agency problem, Firm value, Overinvestment.
目次 Table of Contents
目錄
論文審定書
公開授權書
誌謝…………………………………………………………………………..…………i
中文摘要………………………………………………………………………..…...…ii
英文摘要 ………..……………………………..…………………………….…….…iii
目錄 ………..……………………………..…………………………….…….………iv
表次 ………..……………………………..…………………………….…….………v
第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………………...……01
第二章 文獻探討…………………………………..……………………..…..…….04
第一節 影響企業社會責任之因素……………………………………………04
第二節 CEO權力與企業社會責任………………………………...….……...05
第三節 企業社會責任與公司績效…………………………………….…,,,…08
第三章 研究設計………………………………………………………...…….……11
第一節 樣本選取與資料來源…………………………………………....……11
第二節 變數定義與衡量……………………………………………..…..……15
第三節 敘述性統計分析…………………………………………..……..……18
第四章 實證分析…………………………………………………….……..………25
第一節 CEO權力與企業社會責任…………………………………...………25
第二節 CEO權力、公司績效與企業社會責任………………………………30
第三節 CEO權力、企業社會責任及公司價值………………….………..…34
第四節 敏感性分析………………..………………………………..…………38
第五章 結論與建議…………………………………………………..….…………46
參考文獻……………………………………………………………….…..…….……47

表次
表3-1 各產業樣本分佈狀況……………………….…………………………….…13
表3-2 各年度樣本分佈狀況……………………………………………….…….…14
表3-3 樣本敘述統計量………………………………………………….……….…19
表3-4 Pearson 相關分析……………………….………………………….……….21
表3-5 根據企業社會責任分組下之樣本統計量………………………….……….23
表3-6 根據CEO權力分組下之樣本描述性分析…………………………………24
表4-1 CEO權力對企業社會責任表現之影響…………………………….………27
表4-2 CEO權力對企業社會責任得分之影響………………………………….…29
表4-3 CEO權力對公司績效與企業社會責任關係之影響…………………….…31
表4-4 CEO權力對公司績效與企業社會責任得分關係之影響………….………33
表4-5 CEO權力對企業社會責任與公司價值關係之影響……………….………35
表4-6 CEO權力對企業社會責任得分與公司價值關係之影響……………….…37
表4-7 根據CEO權力分組下之公司績效與企業社會責任之關係……….………39
表4-8 根據CEO權力分組下之公司績效與企業社會責任得分之關係…….……41
表4-9 根據CEO權力分組下企業社會責任與公司價值之關係…………….……43
表4-10 根據CEO權力分組下企業社會責任得分與公司價值之關係……………45
參考文獻 References
中文文獻
丁秀儀,2003。CEO權利與公司績效:分量迴歸分析,證券市場發展季刊,第二十五卷第四期,207-250。
池祥萱、池祥麟與梁綺羚,2016。企業社會責任之策略性分析,管理評論,第三十五卷第一期,21- 45。
池祥萱、繆文娟與莊瑩臻,2014。企業社會責任對於公司財務績效之影響是雙面刃嗎?來自全球5 00 大公司的證據,管理學報,第三十一卷第一期,1-19。
李秀英、劉俊儒與楊筱翎,2011。企業社會責任與公司績效之關聯性,東海管理評論,第十三卷第一期,77-112。
李瓊映與顏建和,2013。企業社會責任對庫藏股宣告效果之影響,管理資訊計算,第二卷第二期,84 -101。
沈中華與張元,2008。企業的社會責任行為可以改善財務績效嗎?-以英國FTSE社會責任指數為例,經濟論文,第三十六卷第三期,339-385。
高瑞新與陳俊穎,2014。主題樂園產業的企業社會責任推行對其遊客企業形象的認知與員工的組織認同具有顯著的正向影響,商略學報,第六卷第四期,281-300。
張元與沈中華,2014。企業社會責任與公司獲利-兼論債務資金成本的中介角色,經濟研究,第五十卷第二期,291-357。
陳育成、許峰睿與黃聖雯,2013。企業社會責任與經營績效之關聯性研究,評價學報,第六期,53-72。
陳彩稚、許永明與張智媛,2015。企業社會責任對於股東價值之風險管理效果,臺大管理論叢,第二十六卷第一期,153-179。
黃家齊,2000。企業社會績效研究-社會責任表現、企業聲望與財務績效關聯性 之實證分析,亞太管理評論,第五卷第三期,367-380。
黃瓊瑤、方世榮與陳育成,2012。家族控制與企業社會責任績效之關聯性,中山管理評論,第二十卷第二期,673-711。
黃瓊瑤、張瑞元與林金賢,2014。企業社會責任揭露對權益資金成本之影響,臺灣企業績效學刊,第七卷第二期,103-124。
劉美纓、丁碧慧與朱奐聿,2014。企業社會責任與公司治理、公司績效之關連性研究,第17屆科際整合管理研討會論文集,17-30。
英文文獻
Adams, R., Almeida, H., & Ferreira, D. (2005). Powerful CEOs and Their Impact on Corporate Performance. Review of Financial Studies, 18(4), 1403-1432.
Aupperle, K., A. Carroll, & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 446-463.
Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conflict between Shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 71-86.
Bebchuk, L. A., Cremers, M., & Peyer, U. (2011). The CEO Pay Slice. Journal of Financial Economics, 102(1), 199-221.
Becchetti, L., Ciciretti, R. & Hasan, I. (2012). Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder’s Value. Journal of Business Research, 65(11), 1628-1635.
Beltratti, A. (2005). The Complementarity between Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility. The Geneva Papers, 30(3), 373-386.
Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. (1997). The Company and the Product: Corporate Beliefs and Consumer Product Responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68-84.
Byrd, J. W., & Hickman, K. A. (1992). Do Outside Directors Monitor Managers? Evidence from Tender Offer Bids. Journal of Financial Economics, 32(2), 195-221.
Cardebat, J. M., & Sirven, N. (2010). What Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Adds to Financial Return? Journal of Economics and International Finance, 2(2), 20-27.
Chan, K., Ikenberry, D., & Lee, I. (2004). Economic Sources of Gain in Stock Repurchases. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 39(3), 461-479.
Chen, A., Kao, L., & Lu, C.-S. (2014). Controlling Ownership and Firm Performance in Taiwan: The Role of External Competition and Internal governance. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 29, 219-238.
Chen, H.-L., 2014. Board Capital, CEO Power and R&D Investment in Electronics Firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(5), 422-436.
Cheung, Y. L., Jiang, K., Mak, B. S. C., & Tan, W. Q. (2013). Corporate Social Performance, Firm Valuation, and Industrial Difference: Evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(4), 625-631.
Cochran, P. L., & Wood, R. A. (1984). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 42-56.
Combs, J.G., Ketchen, D.J., Perryman, A.A., & Donahue, M.S. (2007). The Moderating Effect of CEO Power on the Board Composition–Firm Performance Relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 44(8), 1299-1323.
Cornell, B., & Shapiro, A. (1987). Corporate Stakeholders and Corporate Finance. Financial Management, 16, 5-14.
Fombrun, C. J., N. A. Gardberg, & Barnett, M. L. (2000). Opportunity Platforms and Safety Nets: Corporate Citizenship and Reputational Risk. Business and Society Review, 105(1), 85-106.
Freeman, R. E. (2004). Stakeholder Theory and Corporate Responsibility: Some Practical Questions. 3rd Annual Colloquium European Academy of Business in Society, Gent.
Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. New York Times Magazine, 13, 122-126.
Gaines-Ross, L. (2000). CEO Reputation: A Key Factor in Shareholder Value. Corporate Reputation Review, 3(4), 366-370.
Gregory, A., Tharyan, R., & Whittaker, J. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Value: Disaggregating the Effects on Cash Flow, Risk and Growth. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(4), 633-657.
Griffin, J., & Mahon, J. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research. Business & Society, 36(5), 5-31.
Hill, C., & Phan, P. (1991). CEO Tenure as a Determinant of CEO Pay. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 707-717.
Jamali, D., Safieddine, A., & Rabbath, M. (2008). Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Synergies and Interrelationships. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(5), 443-459.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Jensen, M. C., & Ruback, R. S. (1983). The Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1-4), 5-50.
Jiraporn, P., & Chintrakarn, P. (2013). How Do Powerful CEOs View Corporate Social responsibility (CSR)? An Empirical Note. Economics Letters, 119(3), 344-347.
Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. (2011). Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 351-383.
Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. (2012). The Causal Effect of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 53-72.
Khanna, V., Kim, E.H, & Lu, Y. (2015). CEO Connectedness and Corporate Fraud. Journal of Finance, 70(3), 1203-1252.
Landier, A., Sauvagnat, J., Sraer, D., & Thesmar, D. (2013). Bottom-up Corporate Governance. Review of Finance, 17, 161-201.
Lee, E. M., Park, S. Y., Rapert, M. I., & Newman, C.L. (2012). Does Perceived Con-Sumer Fit Matter in Corporate Social Responsibility Issues. Journal of Business Research, 65(11), 1558-1564.
Li, F., Li, T., & Minor, D. (2015). CEO Power, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Firm Value: A Test of Agency Theory. Working paper, University of Western Ontario.
Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2005). CEO Overconfidence and Corporate Investment. Journal of Finance, 60(6), 2661-2700.
Maron, I. Y. (2006). Toward a Unified Theory of the CSP-CFP Link. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(2), 191-200.
McGuire, J., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854-872.
McKendalll, M., Sanchez, C., & Sicilian, P. (1999). Corporate Governance and Corporate Illegality: The Effects of Board Structure on Environmental Violations. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 7(3), 201-223.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603-609.
Mcwilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127.
Milbourn, T. (2003). CEO Reputation and Stock-based Compensation. Journal of Financial Economics, 68(2), 233-262.
Morse, A., Nanda, V., & Seru, A. (2011). Are Incentive Contracts Rigged by Powerful CEOs? Journal of Finance, 66(5), 1779-1821.
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F., & Rynes, S. (2003). Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403-441.
Preston, L. E., & O’Bannon, D. P. (1997). The Corporate Social-financial Performance Relationship. Business and Society, 36(4), 419-429.
Ramasamy, B., & Yeung, M. (2009). Chinese Consumers’ Perception of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 119-132.
Schuler, D. A., & Cording, M. (2006). A Corporate Social Performance – Corporate Financial Performance Behavioral Model for Consumers. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 540-558.
Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2013). The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm Value: The Role of Customer Awareness. Management Science, 59(5), 1045-1061.
Shahin, A., & Zairi, M. (2007). Corporate Governance as a Critical Element for Driving Excellence in Corporate Social Responsibility. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 24(7), 753-770.
Stanwick, P. A., & Stanwick, S. D. (1998). The Relationship between Corporate Social Performance, and Organizational Size, Financial Performance, and Environmental Performance: An Empirical Examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(2), 195-204.
Tsoutsoura, M. (2004). Corpoate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance. Working paper, University of California at Berkeley.
Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1996). Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658-672.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.145.12.1
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.145.12.1
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 永不公開 not available

QR Code