Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0623111-133231 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0623111-133231
論文名稱
Title
台灣推動食品產銷履歷關鍵成功因素之研究
A Study of Key Successful Factors of Promoting Food Traceability System in Taiwan
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
107
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2011-05-24
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2011-06-23
關鍵字
Keywords
層級分析法、關鍵成功因素、食品安全、食品產銷履歷
AHP, food traceability, key successful factors, food safety
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5837 次,被下載 15
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5837 times, has been downloaded 15 times.
中文摘要
自從大陸在2008年所爆發的三聚氰氨事件以來,各界對於食品安全的關注與要求與日俱增。事實上,國內產官學界也針對此議題發起許多的研究與政策措施。目前,政府已開始分層建構食品產銷履歷系統平台,包含農產品安全追溯資訊網、加工食品追溯網與加工食品流通履歷系統。然而在成本花費與效益不明等因素下,食品產銷履歷必須有足夠的吸引力與價值才能讓市場廣為認知與接受。因此,關於產銷履歷推展的關鍵因素以及各個因素的評估準則便成為政府與食品業者亟待了解的問題。
本研究依據國內外文獻與食品產銷履歷現況整理出推行產銷履歷關鍵因素的層級架構,包含政府政策面、第三方驗證機構、產銷履歷資訊系統、企業生產與管理面、供應鏈協同合作、消費者認知等因素,設計層級分析法之質性與量化問卷,訪問九位產、官、學的專家得出台灣推行食品產銷履歷關鍵因素權重與優先順序。
總結本研究結論與建議,如下:
1.「企業生產與管理面」、「政府政策面」、「消費者認知與接受」為驅動食品產銷履歷發展的主要因素。「供應鏈協同合作」、「產銷履歷資訊系統」、「第三方驗證機構」則為輔助性要素,仍然需要妥善規劃與建構。
2.企業事先評估規劃食品產銷履歷之導入成效最大。於內改善作業流程、風險管理,於外保障消費者安全健康、提昇企業聲譽。
3.政府宜參考食品產銷履歷發展領先國家進行食品安全法規的研擬,分層、有序地規劃食品產銷履歷系統,對食品業者、消費者進行推廣宣傳。
Abstract
Years since the outbreak of the mainland in 2008, melamine incident, public concern and requirement about food safety are increasing. In fact, the industry, government and academia also initiated many research plans and policy measures for the issue. Currently, the government has begun construct food traceability system plaforms layer by layer, including Taiwan agriculture and food traceability system, Taiwan processed food traceability system and food distribution traceability system. However, since the implement costs are considerable and the benefits of food traceability are unknown, to enhance the willingness to implementation food traceability, it must be attractive enough to let the market value widely recognized and accepted. Accordingly, the key factors in promoting food traceability and assessment criteria of each factor would be the issues that the government and the food industry are eager to figure out.
Based on literature and traceability current developments, this study sort out the hierarchy factors of implementation of food traceability system, including government policy side, third-party certification unit, traceability information system, production and management side, supply chain collaboration, consumers cognitive, then design the qualitative and quantitative questionnaires by Analytic Hierarchy Process. Interview with nine experts (3 industrial, 3 government unit and 3 academic) and conduct in-depth discussion to reach key factors in the weight and priority of promoting food traceability system in Taiwan.
In conclusion, our three major conclusions and recommendations, as follows:
1."Production and management side," "government policy side", "consumer awareness and acceptance" are driving foctors of the development of food traceability. "Supply chain collaboration", "traceability information system" and "third-party certification body" are complementary elements, which still needs proper planning and construction.
2. From the perspective of business, prior assessment of the food traceability will maximum effectiveness. It helpbusiness to improve the internal processes, risk management, in addition to protect consumer health and safety, enhance corporate reputation.
3. The Government should refer to the development of food traceability leading countries develop food safety regulations, orderly planning of food traceability systems. Also promote to food industry, and consumer.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書................................................................................i
誌謝...........................................................................................ii
中文摘要...................................................................................iii
英文摘要..................................................................................iv
目錄..........................................................................................vi
圖次.........................................................................................viii
表次..........................................................................................ix
第一章 緒論.............................................................................1
第一節 研究背景與動機.......................................................1
第二節 研究目的..................................................................3
第三節 研究流程..................................................................4
第四節 研究範圍與限制........................................................5
第二章 文獻探討.....................................................................6
第一節 食品產銷履歷...........................................................6
第二節 食品產銷履歷評價與效益......................................12
第三節 關鍵成功因素.........................................................22
第三章 食品產銷履歷現況....................................................25
第一節 國外食品產銷履歷推行現況...................................25
第二節 國內食品產銷履歷推行現況...................................35
第四章 食品產銷履歷關鍵成功因素研究設計......................47
第一節 研究架構.................................................................47
第二節 食品產銷履歷關鍵成功因素層級架構....................48
第三節 層級分析法.............................................................53
第四節 問卷設計.................................................................58
第五節 研究對象.................................................................59
第五章 食品產銷履歷關鍵成功因素實證資料分析...............60
第一節 問卷回收與樣本敘述..............................................60
第二節 食品產銷履歷關鍵因素量化資料分析....................61
第三節 食品產銷履歷關鍵評估準則整體權重....................68
第四節 食品產銷履歷關鍵因素質性資料分析....................71
第五章 結論與建議...............................................................75
第一節 結論........................................................................75
第二節 建議........................................................................78
第三節 管理意涵.................................................................80
參考文獻................................................................................81
附錄-台灣推動食品產銷履歷關鍵成功因素之研究問卷........88
參考文獻 References
(一)中文部份
大前研一,1997,策略家的智慧,台北:長河出版社。
工研院,2010,加工食品流通履歷追蹤計畫(3/4)執行成果報告書,台北:經濟部商業司計畫。
王旭昌,2005,「如何推動豬肉衛生安全與產銷履歷」,農產品衛生安全與市場消費研討會論文集,台中:國立中興大學。
木村彰利,2005,訪台報告,畜產品產銷履歷講習會。
行政院農業委員會編印,2008,牛乳之臺灣良好農業規範(TGAP)。
余宣佑,2008,我國產銷履歷制度規劃與執行面探討以風險社會觀點為例,國立台灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文。
林勇信,2008,「高屏地區推廣作物產銷履歷制度之研究」,第九屆永續發展管理研討會論文集: 795~803。
林隆儀、陳俊碩,2010,「來源國形象與品牌知名度的組合效果對消費者購買意圖的影響-產品涉入的干擾效果」,聯大學報,7卷1期:129~147。
胡忠一,2005,「安全農產e指搞定從日本立法推動可追溯性制度談產銷履歷」。農訓,22卷8期:11~14。
胡忠一,2006,「我國農產品產銷履歷制度推動現況」,農業貿易人才訓練班-出口實務班講義。
高源豐,2005,「日本開發牛乳產銷履歷之探討」,酪農天地,70期:38~43。
張永春,2006,消費者對食品產銷履歷願付價格之研究,國立中興大學應用經濟學系碩士論文。
許輔,2004,「借鏡日本食品履歷追朔制度」,農政與農情,148期:54-59。
陳志成,2006,食品安全資訊價值之研究-以國產牛肉產銷履歷為例,國立中興大學應用經濟系碩士論文。
陳祈睿,2008,「安全農業年—全面啟動產銷履歷制度」,農政與農情,189期: 5~8。
曾國雄、鄧振源,1989,「AHP 之內涵特性與應用(下)」,中國統計學報,26卷7期: 13767~13870。
曾國雄、鄧振源,1989,「AHP 之內涵特性與應用(上)」,中國統計學報,26卷7期: 13703~13724。
黃炳文、施孟隆,2006,「台灣牛乳供應鏈發展情勢與策略之研究」,中華農學會報,7卷3期:277~295。
黃炳文、施孟隆,2007,「台灣牛乳供應鏈發展之關鍵因素研究」,中華農學會報,8卷3期:194~209。
黃淑惠,2005,消費者對基因改造食品之願付價值-條件評估法與拍賣時驗之比較,國立台灣海洋大學應用經濟研究所碩士論文。
經濟部商業司,2009,2008台灣物流年鑑,台北:經濟部商業司。
葉執東,2004,「建構台灣農產品生產履歷資訊系統」,農政與農情,149期: 53~58。
鄭蕙燕、凃鈺城,2004,「食品安全規範對台灣消費者之福利分析」,農業與資源經濟,2卷2期: 69~96。
賴鴻慶,2009,消費者對產銷履歷農產品認知、態度及購買意願之研究,國立屏東科技大學農企業管理系碩士論文。
龔俊光,2008,RFID在食品產銷履歷應用發展前景分析,台北:資策會資訊市場情報中心產業研究報告。


(二)英文部分
Aaker David, A. 1984. Strategic Market Management. NY: John Wiley & Son.
Alimentarius, C. COMMISSION 1999. Guidelines for the production, processing, labelling and marketing of organically produced foods. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations—FAO & World Health Organization—WHO, Rome, Italy.
Bechini, A., Cimino, M., Lazzerini, B., Marcelloni, F., & Tomasi, A. 2005. A general framework for food traceability.
Bredahl, M. E., Holleran, E., Zaibet, L.T., & Studies, C. f. I. T. 1997. ISO 9000 in the UK Food Sector. Center for International Trade Studies, Missouri University.
Busch, L., Bingen, J., & Harris, C. 2001. Global change in agrifood grades and standards: agribusiness strategic responses in developing countries. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 2(3/4): 421-435.
Caswell, J.A., & Mojduszka, E.M. 1996. Using informational labeling to influence the market for quality in food products. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78(5): 1248-1253.
Cebeci, Z., Alemdar, T., & OI, G. 2008. Designing a conceptual production focused and learning oriented food traceability system. İn Proc. Of 4th Int. Conf. On Information and Communication Technologies in Bio and Earth Sciences, (Ed. T. Tsiligiridis). (ISBN 978-960-387-725-7). 18-20 Sep 2008, Agric. Univ. Of Athens, Greece: 206-213.
Chryssochoidis, G., Karagiannaki, A., Pramatari, K., & Kehagia, O. 2009. A cost-benefit evaluation framework of an electronic-based traceability system. British Food Journal, 111(6): 565-582.
Daniel, D.R. 1961. Management information crisis. Harvard Business Review, 39(5): 111-121.
Davis, G. 1979. Comments on the critical success factors method for obtaining management information requirements in article by John F. Rockart. MIS quarterly, 3(3): 57-58.
Deaton, B.J. 2004. A theoretical framework for examining the role of third-party certifiers. Food Control, 15(8): 615-619.
Dickinson, D.L., & Bailey, D.V. 2002. Meat traceability: Are US consumers willing to pay for it? Journal ofAgricultural and Resource Economics, 27(2): 348-364.
Golan, E., Krissoff, B., Kuchler, F., Nelson, K., Price, G., & Calvin, L. 2004. Traceability in the US food supply: economic theory and industry studies: US Dept. of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
Hatanaka, M., Bain, C., & Busch, L. 2005. Third-party certification in the global agrifood system. Food Policy, 30(3): 354-369.
Henson, S., Loader, R., Swinbank, A., Bredahl, M., & Lux, N. 2000. Impact of sanitary and phytosanitary measures on developing countries. Center for Food Economics Research, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Hobbs, J.E. 1996. A transaction cost approach to supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 1(2): 15-27.
Hobbs, J.E. 2004. Information asymmetry and the role of traceability systems. Agribusiness, 20(4): 397-415.
Hobbs, J.E., Bailey, D.V., Dickinson, D.L., & Haghiri, M. 2005. Traceability in the Canadian red meat sector: do consumers care? Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, 53(1): 47-65.
Hofer, C.W., & Schendel, D. 1978. Strategy formulation: Analytical concepts: West Pub. Co., St. Paul.
Holleran, E., Bredahl, M.E., & Zaibet, L. 1999. Private incentives for adopting food safety and quality assurance. Food Policy, 24(6): 669-683.
ISO, N. 8402: 1994. Quality Management and Quality Assurance-Vocabulary, Standard and Industrial Research Institute of Malaysia (SIRIM).
Jaffee, S., & Jabbar, M. 2005. Food safety and agricultural health standards: challenges and opportunities for developing country exports. Keynote paper presented at the nineteenth conference of the Ethiopian Veterinary Association, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 8–9 June 2005. Nairobi (Kenya): ILRI.
Kelepouris, T., Pramatari, K., & Doukidis, G. 2007. RFID-enabled traceability in the food supply chain. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(2): 183-200.
Krieger, S., Schiefer, G., & Da Silva, C. 2007. Costs and Benefits in Food Quality Systems: Concepts and a Multi criteria Evaluation Approach. Agricultural management, marketing and finance working document, 22: 2-39.
Leidecker, J.K., & Bruno, A.V. 1984. Identifying and using critical success factors. Long Range Planning, 17(1): 23-32.
Loader, R., & Hobbs, J.E. 1999. Strategic responses to food safety legislation. Food Policy, 24(6): 685-706.
Meuwissen, M.P.M., Velthuis, A.G.J., Hogeveen, H., & Huirne, R.B.M. 2002. Technical and economic considerations about traceability and certification in livestock production chains. New Approaches to Food Safety Economics: 49-62.
Moe, T. 1998. Perspectives on traceability in food manufacture. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 9(5): 211-214.
Munro, M.C., & Wheeler, B.R. 1980. Planning, critical success factors, and management's information requirements. MIS quarterly: 27-38.
Nanseki, T. 2008. Food safety and traceability in Japan. The Dominican Institute of Agriculture, Livestock and Forestry Research (IDIAF): Kyushu University.
Olsen, P. 2009. Food traceability process mapping. Standard methods for analyzing material flow, information flow and information loss in food supply chains. Nofima report 15/2009, Trosmo, Norway.
Pettitt, R. 2001. Traceability in the food animal industry and supermarket chains. Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International des Epizooties, 20(2): 584-597.
Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive strategy. New York: Free press.
Rabade, L.A., & Alfaro, J.A. 2006. Buyer-supplier relationship's influence on traceability implementation in the vegetable industry. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 12(1): 39-50.
Regulation, E. 2002. No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and 70 REV MED UNIV NAVARRA/VOL 50, No 4, 2006, 62-70 of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety. Official Journal of the European Communities, 31: 1-24.
Rockart, J. F. 1979. Chief executives define their own data needs. Harvard Business Review, 57(2): 81.
Rockart, J. F., & Bullen, C. V. 1981. A primer on critical success factors. Center for Information Systems Research, Working Paper, 1220-1281.
Saaty, T. L. 1980. The analytical hierarchy process: New York: McGraw-Hill.
Salaun, Y., & Flores, K. 2001. Information quality: meeting the needs of the consumer. International Journal of Information Management, 21(1): 21-37.
Schwagele, F. 2005. Traceability from a European perspective. Meat Science, 71(1): 164-173.
Seddon, J., Davis, R., Loughran, M. & Murrell, R. 1993. BS5750 Implementation and Value Added: A Survey of Registered Companies. Vanguard Consulting Ltd.
Smith, G., Tatum, J., Belk, K., Scanga, J., Grandin, T., & Sofos, J. 2005. Traceability from a US perspective. Meat Science, 71(1): 174-193.
Sparling, D., & Sterling, B. 2004. Food traceability: understanding business value. RCM Technologies Canada.
Thompson, A.A., & Strickland, A. 1989. Strategy formulation and implementation. New York: Irwin.
Thompson, M., Sylvia, G., & Morrissey, M. 2005. Seafood traceability in the United States: Current trends, system design, and potential applications. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 4(1): 1-7.
Verbeke, W. 2005. Agriculture and the food industry in the information age. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 32(3): 347.
Wilson, T., & Clarke, W. 1998. Food safety and traceability in the agricultural supply chain: using the Internet to deliver traceability. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 3(3): 127-133.
Wu, L.H., & Xiao, L.L. 2009. Post-olympic food supply chain traceability framework design. Management and Service Science, 2009. MASS '09. International Conference on , vol., no., pp.1-5, 20-22 Sept. 2009

(三)網路部份
工研院,「加工食品流通履歷追蹤計畫」部落格,2011, http://blog.xuite.net/rfidfood/blog。
工研院台灣物流網,2010, http://www.logistics.org.tw/flow/work/index.jsp。
行政院食品藥物管理局加工食品追溯網,2010,http://140.126.254.153/tfts/Default.aspx。
行政院農業委員會,2011,http://pingjen.efarm.org.tw/。
味全官方網站,2010,「嚴選品質看得見─味全嚴選純牛乳幸福上市」,http://www.weichuan-sh.com.cn/news_ny.php?id=93,November 15.
許輔,2010,解析國際食品履歷標準TRACE XML之語法,台灣農產品安全追溯資訊網,http://taft.coa.gov.tw/welcome.asp。
新東陽官方網站,2011,http://www.hty.com.tw/。
農委會台灣農產品安全資訊追溯網(農委會 TAFT),2011,http://taft.coa.gov.tw/welcome.asp?mp=8&role=C&mpap=A。
Global GAP. 2010. http://www.globalgap.org/cms/front_content.php?idcat=9.
Trienekens, J., & Beulens, A. 2001. The implications of EU food safety legislation and consumer demands on supply chain information systems. http://library.wur.nl/wasp/bestanden/LUWPUBRD_00339667_A502_001.pdf.
Produce Traceability Initiative. 2010. http://www.producetraceability.org/.
Promoting European Traceability Excellence and Research. 2010. http://www.eu-peter.org/.
TraceFood,2010, http://193.156.107.66/ff/po/TraceFood/index.htm.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內一年後公開,校外永不公開 campus withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 18.191.202.72
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 18.191.202.72
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code