論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內立即公開,校外一年後公開 off campus withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
以關係模式理論探討企業員工知識分享之意願 Exploring the Knowledge Sharing Intention of Business Employees with Relations Model Theory |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
89 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2007-06-28 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2007-07-16 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
知識分享、知識管理、關係模式理論、任務互賴性、合作時間 Knowledge sharing, Knowledge management, Relations Model Theory, Task Inter-dependence, Time of Cooperation |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 5954 次,被下載 2904 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5954 times, has been downloaded 2904 times. |
中文摘要 |
企業經營目標,為首重獲利、並著眼於永續發展與經營。然而,並非所有企業均具備達到永續經營的競爭條件,根據研究指出:維繫企業其自身競爭優勢的關鍵資產為智慧資本,而知識則是此項對企業日形重要的智慧資本與無形資產的主要促進力量。因此,有關知識管理的議題與相關的企業內部活動方興未艾,但除了實徵研究的進展有限之外,企業推動知識管理的成效似乎也並未彰顯。 本研究以Fiske的關係模式理論為基礎,探討職場在不同企業文化下所孕育出不同的人際關係模式(共同分享、權力排序、平等互惠、與市場訂價),是否影響著企業員工知識分享意願,並進一步探究哪一種關係模式最能鼓舞員工之間的知識分享行為。此外,為求更貼近職場的實際狀況,本研究另加入了二個干擾變數:任務互賴性、與合作時間,以釐清關係模式對於員工知識分享的作用影響上,是否同時受到其它企業內在因素的干擾。 本研究使用問卷調查法對於台灣地區的企業員工進行結構化抽樣,以取得其日常工作中與知識分享行為有關的實際資料;並以統計分析對所提出的研究架構進行驗證;數據結果顯示,在理論模式的部份:共同分享以及平等互惠對於員工知識分享的意願,有明顯的正向影響,而市場價格則有略為負面的影響,至於權力排序則沒有顯著的影響力;此外在完整模式的部份,任務互賴性同時對於上述三種關係模式(除權力排序外)影響分享意願的作用上,產生了調節的作用、而合作時間則在共同分享、平等互惠及市場價格對於員工分享意願的影響上產生調節作用。本研究的結果,可讓我們更進一步瞭解員工分享知識的行為,並可作為企業訂定知識管理策略與設計企業內知識分享計劃或活動的參考。 |
Abstract |
With a view to achieve the ultimate goal of a permanent development, operation, and growth, to any business and enterprise, the strategy of knowledge management must be reinforced, and the sooner the better. In despite of those new and high interests shown toward the organization-embedded knowledge, not much concrete finding has been obtained regarding how and why employees are reluctant to share what they know. In our research, we proposed to base on the Relations Model Theory to explore how different relation models, cultivated and shaped by different corporate cultures, give their influences on the willingness of knowledge sharing from employees. In the mean time, with a view to get closer to the realistic circumstance in the office, we give it a shot to include additional moderating variables, task inter-dependence, as well as time-of-cooperation, into our full research framework, aiming to see if they will disturb the influencing processes between the four principal relations and the willingness of employees to share their knowledge. The result reflects the distinct impact from communal sharing and equality matching on the willingness of sharing, while a subtle but negative impact of market pricing on the sharing willingness. There is no clear effect of authority ranking. Furthermore, in the analysis of interaction mode including additional moderators, the result has exhibited that task inter-dependence does moderate the relationship between communal sharing / equality matching / market pricing and the notion of sharing, while time-of-cooperation also adjusts the influencing processes between communal sharing, equality matching, market pricing, and willingness of sharing. This analysis and study grant us some clues regarding how corporate culture would eventually leverage employees’ intention in sharing their knowledge, and advise the business organizations how they should correctly formulate the knowledge management strategy and activities to augment the knowledge inter-flows between employees. |
目次 Table of Contents |
中文摘要 2 ABSTRACT 3 CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION 8 1.1. RESEARCH BACKGROUND 8 1.2. RESEARCH MOTIVATION 9 1.3. STATEMENT OF RESEARCH PROBLEM 11 1.4. PURPOSES OF THIS STUDY 11 1.5. OVERVIEW OF CHAPTERS 12 CHAPTER II: LITERATURE REVIEW 14 2.1. KNOWLEDGE SHARING 14 2.2. RELATIONS MODEL THEORY 16 2.3. FACTORS AFFECTING KNOWLEDGE SHARING WILLINGNESS, REPRESENTING EACH RELATION 20 2.4. MODERATORS 29 CHAPTER III: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 32 3.1. MODEL DEVELOPMENT AND HYPOTHESES 32 3.2. THE MEASUREMENT OF VARIABLES 38 3.3. PRE-TESTING 44 3.4. DATA COLLECTION 45 3.5. DATA ANALYSIS 46 CHAPTER IV: DATA ANALYSIS AND RESULTS 51 4.1. SAMPLE DEMOGRAPHICS / CHARACTERISTICS 51 4.2. ANALYSIS FOR MEASUREMENT MODEL 53 4.3. ANALYSIS FOR STRUCTURE MODEL 58 CHAPTER V: RESEARCH DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 65 5.1. DISCUSSIONS 65 5.2. THEORETICAL CONTRIBUTIONS 70 5.3. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTITIONERS 71 5.4. LIMITATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE STUDY 72 REFERENCE 74 APPENDIX A: QUESTIONNAIRE FOR SURVEY 86 |
參考文獻 References |
1. Allen, T. J., (1977), “Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information within the RandD Organization”, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 2. Anderson, J. C. and Gerbing, D. W. (1988), “Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach”, Psychological Bulletin, 49, 411-423 3. Andrews, K. and Delahaye, B.L., (2000), “Influences on Knowledge Processes in Organizational Learning: The Psychosocial Filter”, Journal of Management Studies, (73:6), pp.797-810 4. Andriessen, J.H. E., (2006), “To share or not to share, that is the question: Conditions for the willingness to share knowledge”, Delft Innovation System Papers 5. APQC (American Productivity and Quality Center), (1999), “Creating a knowledge-sharing culture”, Houston, Texas 6. Arthur Andersen Business Consulting, (1999), “Zukai Knowledge Management”, Tokyo: Toyo Keizai 7. Bartol, K.M. and Srivastava, A., (2002), “Encouraging Knowledge Sharing: The Role of Organizational Reward Systems”, Journal of Leadership and Organizations Studies, (9:1), pp.64-76 8. Berry, D.C. and Broadbent, D.E., (1984), “On The Relationship between Task Performance and Associated Verbalizable Knowledge”, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, (36), pp.209-231 9. Berry, D.C. and Broadbent, D.E., (1987), “The Combination of Explicit and Implicit Learning Processes in Task Control”, Psychological Research, (49), pp.7-15 10. Blau, P.M., (1967), “Exchange and Power in Social Life”, New York: JohnWiley and Sons 11. Bock, G.W. and Kim, Y.G., (2002), “Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An Exploratory Study of Attitudes about Knowledge Sharing”, Information Resources Management Journal, pp.14-21 12. Bock, G.W. and Kim, Y.G., (2002), “Determinants of the Individual’s Knowledge Sharing Behavior: The Theory of Reasoned Action Perspective”, The Pacific Asia Conference on Information System 13. Bock, G.W., Zmud, R.W., and Kim Y.G., (2005), “Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Forces, and Organizational Climate,” MIS Quarterly, (29:1), pp.87-111 14. Boer, N.I., (2002), “The implications of different models of social relations for understanding knowledge sharing. In Support for knowledge sharing in communities” Delft, DUP Science 15. Boer, N.I., Van Baalen, P.J. and Kumar, K., 2002, “An Activity Theory Approach for Studying the Situated-ness of Knowledge Sharing”, HICSS 35 16. Boer, N.I., and Berends, H. 2003, “The Relational Dimension of Knowledge Sharing: An Empirical Study of An Industrial Research Group”, Fourth European Conference on Organizational Knowledge (OKLC), Barcelona 17. Boer, N.I., Van Baalen, P.J., and Kumar, K., 2004, “The Implications of Different Models of Social Relations For Understanding Knowledge Sharing”, in Tsoukas, H. and Mylonopoulos, N. (Eds), Organizations as Knowledge Systems: Knowledge, Learning and Dynamic Capabilities (pp. 130-153), New York: Palgrave Macmillan 18. Brockner, J., (1998), “Self-Esteem at Work: Theory, Research, and Practice”, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books 19. Butler, J.K. (1991), “Towards Understanding and Measuring Conditions of Trust: Evolution of a Condition of Trust Inventory”, Journal of Management, 17, pp.643-663 20. Cavanaugh, M., (1979), “A Formulate Investigation of Power Orientations and Preliminary Validation of Relationships between Power Orientations and Communication Behavior”, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Denver 21. Chatman, J. and K. Jehn, (1994), “Assessing the Relationship Between Industry Characteristics and Organizational Culture: How Different Can You Be?” Academy of Management Journal, 37, 3, 522-552 22. Calder, B.J., and Staw, B.M., (1975), “The Self-Perception of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation”, J. Personality Soc. Psych, 31 599-605 23. Ch.R. Fu(傅振瑞), (2005), “A Research on The Attitude about Knowledge Sharing of IT employees in the Organization: A Multi-Layer Analysis Model”, Ph.D Dissertation, school of MIS, National Central University 24. Chin, W.W., et al., (2003), “A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-Mail Emotion/Adoption Study”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp.189-217 25. Chin, W.W., et al., (2002), “Partial Least Squares For Researchers: An overview and presentation of recent advances using the PLS approach”, C.T. Bauer College of Business University of Houston, 26. Ciborra, C. U. and Patriota, G. (1998), “Groupware and teamwork in RandD: limits to learning and innovation”, RandD Management, 28, 1-10 27. Clark, T.N., (1968), “The Concept of Power”, in T. Clark(eds.), Community Structure and Decision Making: Comparative Analysis, San Francisco: Chandler Publishing 28. Cohen, J., (1988), “Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences”, 2nd edition, Lawrence Eribaum, Hillsdaie, NJ 29. Constant, D., Kiesler, S. and Sproull, L., (1994), “What’s Mine Is Ours, or Is It? A Study of Attitudes about Information Sharing”, Information Systems Research, (5:4), pp.400-421 30. Cook, J. and Wall, T. (1980), “New Work Attitude: Measures of Trust, Organization Commitment and Personal Need Nonfulfillment”, Journal Occupational Psychology, 53, pp.39-52 31. Darr, Eric D. and Kurtzberg, Terry R., (2000), “An Investigation of Partner Similarity Dimensions on Knowledge Transfer,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, (82:1), pp.28-44 32. Davenport, T.H. and Prusak, L., (1998), “Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know”, Boston: Harvard B’z School Press 33. Davenport, T.H., (1997), “Some Principles of Knowledge Management,” Working Paper 34. Davenport, T.H. and P. Klahr, (1998), “Managing customer support knowledge”, California Management Review, 40(3) (1998) 195–208 35. Dieterly, D.L. and Schneider, B., (1974), “The Effect of Organizational Environment on Perceived Power and Climate: A Laboratory Study”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance (11), pp.316-337 36. Elliott, S., and O’Dell, C., (1999), “Sharing Knowledge and Best Practices: The Hows and Whys of Tapping Your Organization’s Hidden reservoirs of Knowledge,” Health Forum Journal, (42), pp.34-37 37. Fiedler, F.E. and Chemers, M.M. (1974), “Leadership and Effective Management”, Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Co. 38. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975), “Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research” MA: Addison-Wesley 39. Fiske, A.P., (1992), “The Four Elementary Forms of Sociality: Framework for a Unified Theory of Social Relations”, Psychological Review, (99), pp.689-723 40. Fiske, A.P., (1991), “Structures of Social Life: The Four Elementary Forms of Human Relations”, New York: Free Press 41. Fornell, C., and Bookstein, F. (1982), “Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory”, Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 440-452 42. Fornell, C., Lorange, P., and Roos, J. (1990), “The Cooperative Venture Formation Process: A Latent Variable Structural Modeling Approach”, Management Science, 36(10), 1246-1255 43. French, J.R.P., & Raven, B., (1959), “The bases of social power” In D.Cartwright (Ed.), (pp.150-167), Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research 44. G. Von Krogh, (1998), “Care in knowledge creation”, California Management Review 40(3), 133–153 45. Gouldner, A.W., (1960), “The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement,” American Sociological Review, 25, pp.161-179 46. Kou, D.Y., (2002), “The Transaction Cost Perspective on Knowledge Sharing”, master degree thesis, I-Shou University 47. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C. (1998), “Multivariate Data Analysis”, Prentice Hall 48. Hall, H., (2001), “Input-friendliness: Motivating Knowledge Sharing Across Intranets,” Journal of Information Science, (27:3), pp.139-146 49. Hansen, M. T., Nohria, N., and Tierney, T., (1999), “What’s Your Strategy for Managing Knowledge?” Harvard Business Review, March-April, pp. 106-116 50. Haslam, N., (2004), “Relational Models Theory: A Contemporary Overview”, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, London 51. Hedlund, G., (1994), “A Model of Knowledge Management and The N-Form Corporation,” Strategic Management Journal, 15, pp.73-90 52. Howells, J., (1996), “Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Technology Transfer,” Technology Analysis and Strategic Mgm’t, (8: 2), pp.91-106 53. Hsia-Hou, H.P.(夏侯欣鵬), (2000), “A Research About How Power and Trust Affect The Willingness of Knowledge Sharing in the Organization – Citing A Loan Dept. Manager in Bank System”, PhD Dissertation, Business Management, National Cheng-Chi University 54. Hu, Y. and Korneliussen, T., (1997), “The Effects of Personal Ties and Reciprocity on the Performance of Small Firms in Horizontal Strategic Alliances”, Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol., 13, No.2, pp. 159-173 55. Iacoboni, M., Lieberman, M.D., Knowlton, B.J., Molnar-Szakacs, I., Moritz, M., Throop, C.J., et al., (2004), “Watching social interactions produces dorsomedial prefrontal and medial parietal BOLD fMRI signal increases compared to a resting baseline”, NeuroImage 21 (3), 1167–1173 56. J.C. Lin, C.C. Wang(林鉦棽、王政智), (2005), “An Examination on Relationships among Competence, Social Capital, and Organizational Citizen Sharing Behaviors”, Asia-Pacific Economic and Management Review 57. Jarvenpaa, S.L. and Staples, D.S., (2001), “Exploring Perceptions of Organizational Ownership of Information and Expertise,” Journal of Management Information Systems, (18:1), pp.151-183 58. Jarvenpaa, S.L., and Staples, D.S., (2000), “The Use of Collaborative Electronic Media for Information Sharing: An Exploratory Study of Determinants”, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, (9), pp.129-154 59. Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B.C.Y. and Wei, K.K., (2005), “Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation,” MIS Quarterly, (29:1), pp.113-143 60. Kelley, H. and Thibaut, J.W., (1978), “Interpersonal Relations: A Theory of Interdependence”, New York: Wiley 61. Kiggundu, M.N., (1983), “Task interdependence and job design: Test of a theory”, Organizational Theory and Human Performance, 31, pp.145–172 62. Kim, H., Kim, J., Lee, Y., and Lee, I. (2003), "Post-Adoption Behavior of Mobile Internet Users: An Empirical Validation with a Structural Equation Model", Working Paper 63. Kim, W.C. and Mauborgne, R.A., (1998), “Procedural Justice, Strategic Decision Making, and the Knowledge Economy,” Strategic Management Journal (19), pp.323-338 64. Kluge M.A., (2002), “Understanding the essence of a physically active lifestyle: a phenomenological study of women 65 and older”, Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 10: 4–27 65. Kolekofski Jr. K.E., and Heminger, A.R., (2003), “Beliefs And Attitudes Affecting Intentions To Share Information In An Organizational Setting”, Journal of Information and Management, p.521-533 66. Kopfman, J.E., and Smith, S.W., (1996), “Understanding the Audience of a Health Communication Campaign: A Discriminated Analysis of Potential Organ Donors Based on Intent to Donate”, Journal of Applied Communication, 24, pp.22-49 67. Korman, A. K., (1970), “Toward an Hypothesis of Work Behavior”, Journal of Applied Psychology, (54), pp.31-41 68. Kurz. M. (1997), “Altruism Equilibrium”, Economic Progress, Private Values, and Public Policy: Essays in Honor of William Fellner. Eds. B. Balassa and R. Nelson. Amsterdam: North Holland 69. L.I. Tang(湯令儀), (2000), “Research of the Network of Knowledge Sharing, Master Thesis”, Nat’l Cheng-Chi University 70. Lee, C., Bobko, P., Earley, P.C., Locke, E.A., (1991), “An Empirical Analysis of a Goal Setting Questionnaire”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 12, No. 6. pp.467-482 71. Levitt, B., and March, J.G., (1988), “Organizational Learning”, Annual Review of Sociology, (14), pp.319-340 72. Lewis, J.D., and Weigert, A., (1985), "Trust as a Social Reality", Social Forces, 63, pp.967-985 73. Liebowitz, J., and Beckman, T., (1998), “Knowledge Organizations: What Every Manger Should Know”, Boca Ration, FL:St. Lucie Press 74. Lin, T.C.,(林東清), (2003), Knowledge Management, pp.29-30 75. McAllister, D.J., (1995), “Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations”, Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), pp.24-59 76. Margolis, H., (1982), “Selfishness, Altruism, and Rationality: A Theory of Social Choice”, Cambridge University Press 77. Merali, Y., (2001), “Building and Developing Capabilities: A Cognitive Congruence Framework”, in R. Sanchez (ed.), Knowledge Management and Organizational Competence, New York: Oxford University Press 78. Morgan, S.E., and Miller, J.K., (2002), “Communicating about Gifts of Life: the Effect of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Altruism on Behavior and Behavioral Intentions Regarding Organ Donation”, Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30(2), pp.163-178 79. Nahapiet, J., and Ghoshal, S., (1998), “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage”, Academy of Management Review (23:2), pp. 242-266 80. Nelson, K.M., and Cooprider, J.G., (1996), “The Contribution of Shared Knowledge to IS Group Performance”, MIS Quarterly, pp.409-432 81. Nonaka, I., (1994), “A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation”, Organization Science, (5:1), pp.14–37 82. Nonaka, I., and Takeuchi, H., (1995), “The Knowledge-Creating Company”, Oxford University Press Inc 83. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R. and Konno, N., (2000), “SECI, Ba and Leadership: A Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation”, Long Range Planning, (33), pp.5-34 84. Nunnally, J. (1978), Psychometric Theory, 2nd Edition, New York, McGraw-Hill 85. O’Dell, C., (1999), “Knowledge Transfer: Discover Your Value Proposition”, Strategy and Leadership, (27:2), pp.10-15 86. O’Reilly, C.A., Chatman, J.A., and Anderson, J.C., (1987), “Message Flow and Decision Making. Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (F. Jablin, L. Putnam, K. Roberts, and L.Porter), Newbury Park: SAGE Publications, pp.600-623 87. Ojala, M., (1999), “Knowledge is Power,” Econtent 88. Oppen, C., Odekerken-Schroder, G., Wetzels, M., (2005), “External Value: A Hierarchical Model, The Impact On E-Loyalty And A Customer Typology”, University of Maastricht 89. Orr, J., (1996), “Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job”, ILR Press, Ithaca, NY 90. Osterloh, M., and Frey, B. (2000), “Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms”, Organization Science, Vol. 11 Issue 5, p538 91. Pearce, J.L., and Gregersen, H.B., (1991), “Task interdependence and extrarole behavior: A test of the mediating effects of felt responsibility”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 838–844 92. Pierce, J.L., Gardner, D.G., Cummings, L.L., and Dunham, R.B., (1989), “Organization-based self-esteem: Construct Definition Measurement and Validation,” Academy of Management Journal, (32), pp.622-648 93. Polanyi, M., (1958), “Personal Knowledge”, Chicago: University of Chicago Press 94. Polanyi, M., (1966), “The Tacit Dimension, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul” 95. Rokhin, L, Pavlov, I and Popov, Y. (1963) Psychopathology and Psychiatry, Foreign Languages Publication House: Moscow. 96. Purser, R.E., and Pasmore, W.A., (1992), “Organizing for Learning,” In William A. Pasmore and Richard W. Woodman(Ed). Research in Organizational Change and Development, London: JAI Press 97. Quinn, J.B., Anderson, P., and Finkelstein, S., (1996), “Managing Professional Intellect: Making the Most of the Best”, Harvard Business Review, pp.71-80 98. Rennie, M., (1999), “Accounting for knowledge assets: do we need a new financial statement?” International Journal Technology Management, Vol.18, pp.648-659 99. Rosenberg, M., (1965), “Society and the Adolescent Self-image”, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 100. Ruggles, R., (1998), “The State of Notion: Knowledge Management in Practice,” California Management Review, (40), pp.80-89 101. S.J. Fan(方世杰), et al, (2004), “Research on the Knowledge Sharing in New Product Development Teams: From the Integrated View-Point of Transaction Cost Theory and Social Exchange Theory”, Journal of Technology Management, (9:4), pp.67-100 102. Schopler, J., (1965), “Social Power”, in L. Berkowitz(eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.2, New York: Academic 103. Senge, P., (1997), “Sharing Knowledge,” Executive Excellence, (14), pp.17-18 104. Shea, G.P., and Guzzo, R.A., (1987), “Groups as human resources”, Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 5, pp.323–356 105. Spender, J.C., and Grant, R.M., (1996), “Knowledge ant the firm. Strategic”, Management Journal, 17, 5-9 106. Staples, D.S., and Jarvenpaa, S.L., (2002), “Using Electronic Media for Information Sharing Activities: A Replication and Extension,” International Conference on Information Systems 107. Starbuck, W.H., (1992), “Learning by Knowledge Intensive Firms,” Journal of Management Studies, (29), pp.713-740 108. Szulanski, G., (1996), “Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice within the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal, (17), pp.27-43 109. Ron, T.S., (2006), “SPSS and Research Methodology”, 2nd edition, pp.336 110. The Conference Board, (2001), http://www.info-edge.com/samples/EM-01free.pdf 111. Thompson, J.D., (1967), “Organizations in action”, New York: McGraw-Hill 112. Turban, E., Mclean, E., and Wetherbe, J., (2004), “Information Technology for Management”, 4th ed., John Wiley 113. Vijfeijken, H., Kleingeld, A., Tuijl, H., Algera, J.A., Thierry, H., (2002), “Task complexity and task, goal, and reward interdependence in group performance management: A prescriptive model”, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 11 (3), 363–383 114. Wageman, R. (1995), “Interdependence and group effectiveness”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 145–180 115. Wageman, R., and Gordon, F.M., (2005), “As the Twig Is Bent: How Group Values Shape Emergent Task Interdependence in Groups”, Journal of Organization Science, Vol. 16, No. 6, November-December, pp. 687–700 116. Wasko, M.M. and Faraj, S., (2005), “Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice”, MIS Quarterly, (29:1), pp.35-57 117. Weiss et al., (1998), “Business Process Redesign in Context: An Empirically Derived Management Framework”, Knowledge and Process Management 118. Williamson, O.E., (1975), “Market and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications”, New York: Free Press 119. Williamson, O.E., (1985), “The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting”, Free Press, New York 120. Williamson, O.E., (1996), “Economic Organization: The Case for Candor”, Acad. Management Review. 21 48-57 121. Wold, H., (1985), “Partial Least Squares”, in S. Kotz and N. L. Johnson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences (Vol. 6), New York: Wiley, 581-591 122. Y.C. Tung(董玉娟), (2004), “Antecedents of Knowledge Sharing Willingness: The Moderating Effect of the Threat Variable”, Journal of HR Management, (4:3), pp.117-137 123. Yoo, Y., Alavi, M., (2001), “MEDIA AND GROUP COHESION: RELATIVE INFLUENCES ON SOCIAL PRESENCE, TASK PARTICIPATION, AND GROUP CONSENSUS”, MIS Quarterly Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 371-390 |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內立即公開,校外一年後公開 off campus withheld 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |