Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0722104-145336 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0722104-145336
論文名稱
Title
以組織學習觀點評估知識管理實務應用之研究
A study of KM Practices in organizations based on the views of organizational learning
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
139
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2004-07-07
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2004-07-22
關鍵字
Keywords
知識管理、知識管理應用實務、組織學習
KM Practice, knowledge management, organizational learning
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5794 次,被下載 6406
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5794 times, has been downloaded 6406 times.
中文摘要
近幾年來,許多學者不斷地強調知識管理在組織競爭優勢提昇上的重要性,但卻未進一步釐清或建議組織應如何建立知識管理環境將會最具成效。而Gartner的五大知識管理應用類別的出現,說明了不同的知識管理類型的發展進程,然而卻未針對如何運用及其影響因素加以探討,因而引發本研究的動機。
本研究希望經由學習的觀點,並透過對表現績優廠商學習系統、學習行為之探究、比較及彙整,探索出組織在處理知識管理的過程中,受到哪些關鍵因素的影響。研究結果中發現,組織往往會受其產業環境不確定性、組織定位、以及任務型態的影響而有不同的學習動機以及學習行為,而不同的動機和行為則會引發差異性頗高的知識管理作法以及不同類型的知識管理系統之建置,亦即,組織面臨到不同的環境壓力時會採取不同的知識管理實務來回應之。
本研究乃著眼於不同組織間的差異性作法,以及引發差異的原因。然而,許多過去的文獻在探討知識管理相關議題時,假設所有組織都是具有相同需求、相同作法的單位,因此他們提出一個單一性的資訊系統應用方法,並且認為組織中的所有單位皆遵循同樣的作法即可,這種情況尤其發生於研究知識管理系統(KMS)的文獻上,本研究推翻了這樣的假設,認為知識管理乃是一項多元化的運用,且受到許多促動因子(enabler)的影響,包括環境不確性、組織定位以及任務性質。此外,本研究更進一步提出這些因素如何對組織知識管理產生影響,以及組織在面臨不同的狀況及條件時,應如何選用適當的知識管理實務。
Abstract
Up to now, the extant research has emphasized the employment of KM to gain competitive advantage for organization, but few studies address the relevance of KM environment to support the strategic objective. Gartner has proposed a classification scheme for KM implementation, which indicates that life cycle of KM practice, but the study still falls short of guiding organizations to implement the suggested KM category. The motivation and purpose of this study are induced.

This study attempts to investigate the impact on KM implementation based on the organizational learning perspective. The investigation is conducted through a case study approach, where some companies with best KM practice are included. The findings based on case study results indicate that environment uncertainty, organizational orientation, and task type can influence organizational learning behavior and subsequent the deployment of KM systems. In summary, organizations may implement different KM systems depending on the environment confronted by the organization.

This study is focused upon the difference in KM systems deployed by various organizations. Past research has assumed that all organizations have similar needs in KM and therefore proposed an uniform IT framework to suit organizational needs. This argument has been refuted by this research. We suggested that KM is a multi-facet phenomenon, in which many enablers contribute to the working of KM. An organization ought to establish its KM environment based on its organization imperatives and learning needs.
目次 Table of Contents
第一章 緒論 7
1.1 研究背景 7
1.2 研究動機 7
1.3 研究目的 10
1.4 研究流程 10
第二章 文獻探討 12
2.1 知識管理 12
2.1.1 知識的本質 12
2.1.2 知識特質的探討 14
2.1.3 知識管理的本質 15
2.1.4 知識管理的目的 17
2.1.5 知識管理的程序 18
2.1.6 知識管理應用類型 19
2.2組織學習 22
2.2.1組織學習的意義 22
2.2.2組織學習意圖 25
2.2.3組織學習機制 25
2.3知識管理與組織學習之關聯 30
2.4 影響組織學習的因素 32
2.4.1 環境不確定性 33
2.4.2 工作特性 37
2.4.3 組織定位 44
第三章 研究架構與方法 45
3.1研究架構 45
3.2研究變數的定義與操作 46
3.3研究方法 47
3.3.1 探索性之個案研究 47
3.3.2 個案研究之設計 48
第四章 個案簡介與分析 53
4.1半導體產業之簡介 53
4.1.1 產業說明 53
4.1.2 晶圓代工業現況 55
4.1.3 晶圓代工製造程序 57
4.1.4 晶圓代工產業特色 58
4.2 台積電簡介 59
4.3 個案一:研發部門的知識管理 59
4.3.1 部門背景介紹 59
4.3.2 個案描述 60
4.4 個案二:電子商務部門的知識管理 72
4.4.1 部門背景介紹 72
4.4.2 個案描述 74
4.5 個案三:人力資源部門的知識管理 84
4.5.1 部門背景介紹 84
4.5.2 個案描述 85
4.6 個案四:中鋼的知識管理 93
4.6.1 鋼鐵產業說明 93
4.6.2 產業結構 94
4.6.3 中鋼背景介紹 95
4.6.4 個案描述 96
4.7 個案彙總 107
第五章 研究命題 115
第六章 結論與建議 128
6.1 研究結論 128
6.2 研究限制 132
6.3 後續研究 132
附錄一:參考文獻 134
參考文獻 References
1. Ames, B. Charles and James D. Hlavacek (1989), “Market Driven Management :Prescriptions for Survival in a Turbulent World”, Homewood, Dow Jones-Irwin
2. Appleyard M.(1996) , “How does knowledge flow? Interfirm patterns in the semiconductor industry “ Strategic management journal, 17, 10 pp. 137-154
3. Argyris, and Donald Schon (1978), “Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective.” Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
4. Argryis, C. and Schon, D. (1996), “Organizational learning II: theory, method, and practice” Reading M A: Addison-wesley
5. Barney, J. B. and Baysinger, B.(1990), “The organization of Schumpeterian innovation, inLawless & Gomez-mejia(eds) “ Strategic management in high technology firms, JAI Press Inc.pp.3-14
6. Becerra-Fernandez I. & Sabherwal R.(2001) “Organizational Knowledge Management: A Contigency Perspective” Journal of Management Information Systems Summer 2001, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp.23-55
7. Beckman, T.(1997), “A methodology for knowledge management.” International Association of Science and Technology for Development (IASTED) AI and Soft Computing Conference. Banff, Canada.
8. Bennett R. and Gabriel H.(1999), “Organizational factors and knowledge management within large marketing departments: an empirical study “ Journal of knowledge management ,3 , 3.
9. Bierly, P. and A. Chakrabarti (1996),“Generic knowledge strategies in the US Pharmaceutical Industry “ Strategic management Journal, 17
10. Brown, J. W. and Utterback, J. M.(1985) , “Uncertainty and Technical Communication Patter,” Management Science, Vol.31, No.3, pp.301-311
11. Carlsson, S. A. et. Al. “Gaining Competitive Advantage Through Shared Knowledge Creation: In Search of a New Design Theory for Strategic Information Systems” in Proceeding of the Fourth European Conference on Information Systems.
12. Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G.(1992), “A Behavioral Theory of The Firm”, 2nd Edition, Blackwell
13. Daft, R.L., Sormunen, J. And Parkes, D.(1972) , “Chief Executive Scanning, Environmental Characteristics, and Company Performance: An Empirical Study,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.9, No. 2, pp.123-139
14. Davenport, T. H. and Prusak, L.(1998), “Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know “ Harvard College Press
15. Day, G. S. (1994). “The capabilities of market-driven organizations.” Journal of Marketing, 58(October), 37-52
16. Day, G. S. (1994) , "Continuous Learning About Markets," California Management Review, Summer, pp.9-31
17. Dreske, F. (1981) “Knowledge and the Flow of Information” MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
18. Drucker, Peter.F.( 1993), “Post-Capitalist Society “ Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann
19. Duncan, R.B.(1972), “Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environment Uncertainty “ Administrative Science Quarterly, 17 : pp.313 -327
20. Fahey, L., and Prusak, L. (1998), “The Eleven Deadliest Sins of Knowledge Management” California Management Review (40:3), pp.118-122.
21. GartnerGroup (2002), “Management Update: The 2002 knowledge management hype cycle “ Inside Gartner this week vol. XVIII, No.4 23 January
22. Garvin, David A. (1993), “Building a Learning Organization,” Harvard Business Review , July/August, pp.78-91
23. Grant, R. M. (1996),.”Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. “Strategic Management Journal, 17 , Winter Special Issue ,pp.109–122
24. Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2000). “Knowledge flows within multinational corporations.” Strategic Management Journal, 21: 473-496.
25. Hackman J. R. and Oldhan G. R. (1975).”Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey” Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, p:159-170
26. Hamel, G., Doz, Y. L., & Prahalad, C. K. (1989), “Collaborate with your competitors –and win.” Harvard Business Review, 67(January-February): 133-139
27. Hansen, M. T. & N. Nohria, & T. Tierney, (1999), ”What’s your strategy for managing Knowledge?”, Harvard Business Review, Mar/Apr. 1999.
28. Heeseok L. and Byounggu C. (2003) “Knowledge Management Enablers, Processes, and Organizational Performance: An Integrative View and Empirical Examination”, JMIS Vol. 20, No. 1, pp.179-228 Summer 2003
29. Helleloid, D. and Simonin, B.(1994), “Organizational Learning and a Firm’s Core Cometence,” in Hamel, Gary, and Heene A(ed.), Competence-Based Competition, New York: John Wiely and Sons, pp.213-240
30. Holsapple, C. W. and Joshi, K. D.(1999), "Knowledge Selection: Concepts, Issues, and Technologies", Knowledge Management Handbook, CRC Press, February
31. Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Sciences, 2 (February), 88-115.
32. Inkpen, A C. (1996), “Creating knowledge through collaboration.” California Management Review, 39(1): 123-140.
33. Ikujiro Nonaka & Noboru Konno (1998), “The Concept of Ba: Building a foundation for knowledge Creation “ California Management Review Vol. 40, No. 3
34. Kalakota, R. & Robinson, M. (1999). “e-Business. Roadmap for Success.” Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Addison-Wesley.
35. Eisenhardt K. M. (1998), “Building Theories from Case Study Research “Academy of management review vol. 14 No 4. pp532~550
36. Kim, D. H. (1993), “The link between individual and organizational learning.” Sloan Management Review, fall,37–50
37. Kohli, Ajay K. and Bernard J. Jaworski (1990), "Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions and Managerial Implications," Journal of Marketing, Vol.54, April, pp. 1-18
38. Leonard-Barton, Dorothy (1995), “wellsprings of knowledge “, Harvard business school press
39. Machlup, F. (1980) “Knowledge: its Creation, Distribution, and Economic Signifcance” Vol.1 Princetion University Press, Princeton, NJ
40. March, and H. Simon. (1958), “Organizations” , Blackwell Business.
41. Maryam A. and Dorothy E. L. (2001) “Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and research Issues” MIS Q Vol.25 No.1 pp.107-136.
42. McQueen, R. (1998) “Four views of knowledge and knowledge management,” in Proceedings of the Fourth Americas Conference of Information Systems.
43. Meyers, P. W. (1990). “Non- linear learning in technological firms.” Research Policy, 19, 97–115
44. Miller, K. D.(1993), “Industry and Country Effect on Manager’s Perception of Environmental Uncertainties,” Journal of International business studies, Vol.24, No.4, pp.693-714
45. Milliken, F.J.(1987), “Three Types of Perceived Uncertainty About the Environment: State, Effect and Response Uncertainty,” Academy of Management Review, Vol.12, No.1, pp133-143
46. Mohr, Jakki(2001), “Marketing of High-Technology Products and Innovations” ,New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, Inc
47. Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (1996), “Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer” Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter special issue): 77-91.
48. Nevis, E. C., DiBella, A. J. and Gould, J. M.(1995), “Understanding Organizations as Learning Systems”, Sloan Management Review, Winter, pp.73-85
49. Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H (1995), “The knowledge-creating company “ Oxford University Press, New Your
50. Nonaka, I. (1994), “ A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation.” Organization Science, 5(1): 14-37.
51. O’Conner G.C. (1998). “Market Learning and Radical Innovation: A Cross Case Comparison of Eight Radical Innovation Projects” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(2), PP.151-166
52. Paul S. Goodman(1998), “Computer-Aided System and Communities: Mechanisms for organizational learning in distributed environments “ MIS Quarterly vol.22, No.4
53. Perrow C. A., (1967), “A framework for the comparative Analysis of Organizations” , American Sociological Review, 32, p:194-208.
54. Petrash, G. (1996), “Dow’s Journey to a knowledge value management culture,” European Management Journal(14), pp.365~373
55. Robey D. ,Boundreau M. C., Rose G. M.(2000), “Information technology and organizational learning: a review and assessment of research “ Account Management and Information Technologies 10, pp125-155
56. Ruey-lin H. and Stephen T.(2003) “The Problem of Embeddedness: Knowledge Transfer, Situated Practice, and the Role of Information Systems” Twenty-fourth International Conference on Information Systems, 2003
57. Sarvary, M. (1999), “Knowledge Management and Competition in the Consulting Industry,” California Management Review, 41(2), 95-107
58. Schubert P. , Lincke D. and Schmid, B. (1998) “A Global Knowledge Medium as a Virtual Community: The NetAcademy Concept” in Proceedings of the Fourth Americas Conference on Information Systems E. Hoadley and I. Benbasat(eds.) , Baltimore, MD, August 1998, pp.618-620.
59. Selznick, P.(1996), “Institutionalism ‘Old’ and ‘New’”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.41, pp.270-277.
60. Senge, Peter M. (1990), “The Fifth Discipline”. New York: Doubleday
61. Slater and John C. Narver (1995), “Market Orientation and the Learning Organization,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.59, July, pp.63-74
62. Souder, W. E. and Moenaert, R. K.(1992) ,"Intergrating Marketing And R&D Project Personnel Within Innovation Projects: An Information Uncertainty Model", Journal of Management Studies 29:4 July 485-511
63. Souder, W. E. and Sherman, J. D. and Cooper, R. D. (1998), ”Environmental Uncertainty, Organizational Integration, and New Product Development Effectiveness: A Test of Contingency Theory”, Journal of Product Innovation management , pp.520-533.
64. Szulanski, G. (1996), “Exploring internal stickness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm.” Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue): 27-43
65. Tiwana, A.(2000) , “The knowledge management Toolkit-Practical techniques for building a knowledge management system “, Prentice Hall PTR
66. Vance, D. M. (1997), “Information, Knowledge and Wisdom: The Epistemic Hierarchy and Computer-Based Information System” in Proceedings of the Third Americas Conference on Information Systems, B. Perkins and I. Vessey(eds.), Indianapolis, IN, August 1997.
67. Walsh, J.P. and Ungson, G. (1991) “Organizational Memory” Academy of Management Review, 16, pp57-91
68. Wang, P., Singh, K., Tong W., & Koe, C. P. (2001), “Determinants and outcomes of knowledge transfer: A study of MNCs in China.” Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings
69. Watson, R. T. (1999) “Data Management: Databases and Organizations(2nd ed.)” John Wiley, New Work.
70. Wiig, K.M.(1997) “Knowledge Management: Where Did it Come from and Where Will It Go?” Expert Systems with Applications , Pergamon Press/Elsevier(14), Fall 1997
71. Yap, C.M. and Souder, W.E.(1994), “ Factors Influencing New Product Success and Failure in Small Entrepreneurial High-Technology Electronics Firms. “, Journal of Product Innovation Management;11:418-432
72. Yin, R. K. (1994) “Case study Research: Design and Methods”
73. Zack, Michael H.(1999), “Developing a Knowledge Strategy, California Management Review,” , Vol.41, No.3, pp.125-145.
74. 陳膺強,「應用抽樣調查」,台北:台灣商務印書館出版 民83。
75. 韓君豪, 「個人工作知識的取得-以工業工程專業人員為例」,國立清華大學 工業工程與工程管理研究所 民85
76. 鄭曉華,「物件導向資訊整合模式建立與應用在積體電路製造系統之研究」, 中原大學 工業工程研究所 民85
77. 李仁芳、賴建男、賴威龍,「台灣IC 設計業中技術知識特質與組織動態能耐之研究」,1997 科技管理研討會
78. 張鋼,「企業組織創新過程中的學習機制及知識管理」,科研管理:20卷3期 民88 
79. 許玉霞,「台灣光電產業研發部門組織技術知識管理之研究」,國立台灣大學 商研所 民88
80. 黃俊英,「行銷研究:管理與技術,第六版」,台北:華泰文化事業公司出版 民88。
81. 劉常勇,知識管理策略,http://www.cme.org.tw/know/ 1999
82. 李田樹譯,「創造價值的知識管理策略 by Donoghue L. P., Harrie J. G. & Weitzman B. A.」,世界經理文摘,1999。
83. 林義屏,「市場導向、組織學習、組織創新與組織績效間關係之研究--以科學園區資訊電子產業為例」,中山大學 企業管理研究所 民89
84. 尤克強,「知識管理的實踐策略」,遠見雜誌 2000年八月號,遠見雜誌社
85. 林至鴻,「影響知識整合機制因素與新產品開發績效關係之研究」,輔大管理學研究所 民 90
86. 蔡淑茹,「企業知識創造影響因素之研究」,國立成功大學 企業管理系 民90
87. 顧淑馨 譯,「資訊革命了什麼? (The Social Life of Information by Jonh Seely Brown and Paul Duguid (2000)) 」先覺出版股份有限公司 民90
88. 譚大純、汪昭芬,「知識管理之策略觀點:文獻回顧、分類與命題」,2001科技管理學刊 4月份
89. 曾意婷,「知覺環境不確定性、國際化策略與進入模式關係之研究—台灣高科技企業進入中國大陸跨文化之實證」,中原大學 企業管理研究所 民91
90. 陳嘉堯, 「製造業發展虛擬晶圓廠運籌模式之研究-以晶圓代工業、鋼鐵業、塑膠製品業之個案為例」,長榮管理學院 經營管理研究所 民91
91. 葉志偉,「系統分析的知識基礎與績效之關聯性研究:知識管理的中介角色」,國立中正大學 資訊管理研究所 民91
92. 柯雅琪 譯,「組織學習(Organizational Learning, by Morten T. Hansen):您的知識管理策略為何?」 民91
93. 林東清,「知識管理knowledge management」 智勝出版社 民92
94. 林永源,「知識管理策略與組織學習行為關聯性之研究-以積體電路設計及製造公司之研發單位為例」,國立清華大學 科技管理研究所 民92
95. 陳忠雄,「知識創造對新產品開發績效影響之實證研究」,義守大學 管理科學研究所 民92 
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內立即公開,校外一年後公開 off campus withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code