在知識經濟的時代，企業為了保持領先優勢，需要雇用擁有領先知識技術的人才以刺激原有組織能力的升級。台灣位於亞洲經濟市場的重要位置，在吸引由先進國家往外發展的人才的政策及做法上，提供的誘因卻不及鄰近的南韓、新加坡，以及崛起的中國。
本研究以台灣電子科技產業在吸引、任用國際人才上有良好表現的企業為訪談個案，探究在組織本身特性及其他工作條件誘因上，企業有何不同實務作法吸引人才，並輔以問卷調查以驗證由質性研究所得的發現。在組織特性上，企業在國際人才市場上應利用自身優勢建立知名度及品牌聲譽，使求職者產生正面的觀感。同時發展國際性的招募網絡；經由工作的豐富化提供長期持續性發展的機會，滿足人才的需求。企業應主動提供社會支持以幫助外來人才適應環境，使其更有效率發揮所長為組織貢獻。

In the age of knowledge-based economy, company need to hire talented people who possess leading knowledge and skill to keep its competitive advantages. Taiwan located in crucial position of Asian market, but lost competitive advantages in attracting talented people when comparing the policies and environmental conditions with neighboring countries like South Korea, Singapore and the raising China
This study chooses case company which is successful in attracting global talent in Taiwanese electronic technology industry. To investigate the factors that make firm attractive to talented people. The finding show that company should build up international recruitment network and good reputation, thus job applicant will have positive perception to company. Providing long-term development opportunity to talented people to satisfy their need. Besides, company should provide social support actively, to help talented people get used to unfamiliar environment, thus talented people will contribute to company more effectively.

論文審定書 i
誌謝 ii
摘要 iii
Abstract iv
List of Figures vi
List of Tables vii
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1Research Background 1
1.2Research Motivation and Objective 3
1.3Research Procedure 4
Chapter 2 Literature Review 5
2.1 Organizational Attractiveness 5
2.2Organizational Attraction Strategy 9
Chapter 3 Research Methods 13
3.1Conceptual Framework 13
3.2Mixed Method Research 17
3.3Data and Samples 19
Chapter 4 Analysis and Findings 22
4.1Qualitative Analysis 22
4.2 Quantitative Analysis 35
Chapter 5 Conclusion 52
5.1 Summary and Discussion 52
5.2 Managerial Implication 54
5.3Limitation 55
5.4 Further Research Suggestion 55
Reference 57
Appendix The Questionnaire 60

Barber, A. E.(1998), Recruiting Employees: Individual and Organizational Perspectives. Sage, Thousand Oak, CA.
Belt, J. A., and Paolillo, J. G. P.(1982).The influence of corporate image and specificity of candidate qualifications on response to recruitment advertisement, Journal of Management, Vol.8.105-112.
Cable DM, Graham ME. (2000). The determinants of job seekers' reputation perceptions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21,929-947.
Cable, D. M., Turban, D. B. (2001), Establishing the dimensions, sources, and value of job seekers’ employer knowledge during recruitment, Research in Personnel and
Human Resource Management, 20, pp. 115-163,
Ehrhart, K. H., Ziegert, J. C.(2005), Why are individuals attracted to organizations?, Journal of Management, 31, pp. 901-919
Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy .Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233–258.
Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, N. A., & Sever, J. M.(1999), The reputation quotient: a multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation, The Journal of Brand Management, 7 (4): 241-255
Gatewood, R. D., Gowan, M. A., & Lautenschlager, G. J. (1993). Corporate image, recruitment image,and initial job choice decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36(2), 414–427.
Highhouse, S., Zickar, M. J., Thorsteinson, T. J., Stierwalt, S. L., & Slaughter, J. E. (1999). Assessingcompany employment image: An example in the fast food industry. Personnel Psychology, 52(1), 151–172.
Honeycutt TL, Rosen B. (1997). Family friendly human resource polices salary levels and salient identity as predictors of organizational attraction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50,271-290.
Lemmink, J., Schuijf, A., Streukens, S.(2003), “The role of corporate image and company employment image in explaining application intentions”, Journal of Economic Psychology, 24, pp. 1-15
Lievens F, Decaesteker C, Coetsier P, Geimaert J. (2001). Organizational attractiveness for prospective applicants: A person-organization fit perspective. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50,30-51
Lievens, F., Highhouse, S.(2003), The relation of instrumental and symbolic attributes to a company’s attractiveness as an employer, Personnel Psychology, 56, pp. 75-102, .
Lievens, F., Van Hoye, G.., Schreurs, B.(2005), Examining the relationship between employer knowledge dimensions and organizational attractiveness: An application in a military context”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, pp. 553- 572, 2005
Rynes, S. L. & Barber, A. E. (1990), Applicant Attraction Strategies: An Organizational Perspective, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 15, No. 2, 286-310.
Rynes, S. L.(1991), “Recruitment, job choice, and post-hire consequences: A call for new research direction”, Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2nd ed.), pp. 399-444, Dunnette, M. D., Hough, L. M. (Eds.), Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
Satir, C.(2006), The nature of corporate reputation and the measure of reputation components – an empirical study within a hospital, Corporate Communications, 11(1), 56-53
TUrban DB, Keon TL (1993). Organizational attractiveness: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78,184-193.
Turban, D. B.(2001), Organizational attractiveness as an employer on college campus: An examination of the applicant population, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58,
pp. 293-312, 2001.
Turban, D. B.(2001), Organizational attractiveness as an employer on college campus: An examination of the applicant population, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, pp. 293-312.
Turban, D. B., Forret, M., Hendrickson, C.(1998), “Applicant attraction to firms: Influences of organization reputation, job and organizational attributes, and recruiter behavior”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52, pp. 24-44.