Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0730107-121116 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0730107-121116
論文名稱
Title
影響在知識管理平台上進行知識分享之探討
Factors Affecting Knowledge Sharing Behavior in the Knowledge Management System.
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
151
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2007-07-11
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2007-07-30
關鍵字
Keywords
紮根研究、知識分享、知識管理系統、知識管理、團隊研究
Knowledge Management, Group Research, Knowledge Management System, Knowledge Sharing, Ground Theory
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5807 次,被下載 2021
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5807 times, has been downloaded 2021 times.
中文摘要
知識分享一直是探討知識管理成效的重要議題。過去研究探討了許多包含企業、營利組織、非營利組織等不同組織型態下的知識分享行為,卻鮮少將焦點放在大學的研究團隊中。大學研究團隊組成性質與實施目的皆有別於一般企業組織,其成員進行知識分享行為究竟基於何種價值觀、態度與動機,將是本研究關注的重點。本研究採用質化研究取向的研究方法,透過實地觀察法、深度訪談法以及系統資料進行資料的蒐集,並以一個實施知識管理逾六年的研究室作為個案探討的對象,探討研究室成員在使用知識管理平台的特定情境下所進行的知識分享行為,受到哪些因素所影響,並參考組織行為學的觀點將影響知識分享的因素分為個體、團體及組織三個層面。研究結果發現,影響知識分享的因素在個體層面中包含有主觀價值、工作態度、自我滿足、分享主義、自我評價、行為抗拒及行為能力等七項因素;在團體層面中包含有分享氣氛、互動、同儕刺激、團體文化、同儕情誼、社會期許、關係差異、領導風格、信任等九項因素;在組織層面中包含有工作模式與環境、組織文化、系統功能、知識管理制度以及知識內容等五項因素。最後,研究進一步探討上述這些影響因素之間彼此的交互關係,提出一個影響組織成員知識分享的概念性架構,並進一步分析建立其理論命題,以提供後續研究者改善與建議。
Abstract
Knowledge sharing has been an important issue to the outcomes of Knowledge Management. Although research in the past dealt with many subjects, such as firms and profit and non-profit organizations, the focus has never been on the research team in the university. . This research adopts qualitative oriented research method to investigate the differences of the nature and goals of a research team in the university by participant observation, in-depth interview and secondary data collection. The members of a research lab in the university which has implemented knowledge management in the past six years were observed to find out what factors affecting their knowledge sharing behaviors when using the KM platform under particular situations. Based on the views of organizational behaviors, the factors affecting knowledge sharing were divided into three levels: individual level, group level and organization level. The research found out that the factors influencing knowledge sharing in individual level are subjective value, working attitude, self-satisfaction, altruism, self-evaluation, behavioral resistance and ability. In the group level, the factors are sharing atmosphere, interaction, peer stimulation, group culture, peer affection, society expectation, relationship difference, leadership style and trust. In the organization level, the factors are working pattern and environment, organization culture, system function, KM institution and knowledge content. Finally, the interaction among factors is discussed and a conceptual framework of the knowledge sharing among members is presented. Suggestions and improvements toward future research are then provided.
目次 Table of Contents
致謝 III
摘要 IV
ABSTRACT V
圖目錄 VIII
表目錄 IX
第一節、研究背景 1
第二節、研究動機 2
第三節、研究目的 3
第二章、文獻探討 5
第一節、知識 5
第二節、知識管理 10
第三節、知識分享 17
第四節、知識分享與組織行為 24
第三章、研究方法與步驟 27
第一節、研究流程 27
第二節、研究對象 30
第三節、實地觀察法之實施步驟 32
第四節、深度訪談方法與工具 33
第五節、資料整理與分析 35
第六節、資料編碼 37
第七節、三角驗證 40
第四章、個案簡介 41
第一節、個案對象 41
第二節、組織特性 43
第三節、成員特性 44
第四節、知識管理系統簡介 44
第五節、成員在知識管理中所扮演的角色 50
第六節、系統累積資料(前10) 52
第五章、研究發現 53
第一節、個體層面 55
第二節、團體層面 74
第三節、組織層面 91
第六章、綜合討論 107
第一節、組織與成員之間的價值槓桿 108
第二節、團體激勵的效應 109
第三節、知識需求與能力的差距 111
第四節、組織對於個體的影響 113
第五節、團體的文化、氣氛與互動 116
第六節、組織知識分享的演進 118
第七章、結論 120
第一節、研究成果 120
第二節、研究貢獻 128
第三節、研究限制與未來研究 132
中文參考文獻 134
英文參考文獻 135
附錄一、訪談組織成員(研究生)題目大綱 140
附錄二、訪談組織領導者(指導教授)題目大綱 142
參考文獻 References
中文參考文獻
朱儀羚(民92)。犯行青少年之自我敘事與自我認定。國立中正大學犯罪防治研究所碩士論文。
余朝權(民94)。組織行為學。台北:五南。
吳芝儀(民89)。中輟學生的危機與轉機。嘉義:濤石。
林東清(民92)。知識管理。台北:智勝。
知識管理:企業組織如何有效運用知識(胡瑋珊 譯)(民88)。台北:中國生產力中心。 (原著出版年:1998)。
知識管理的基礎與實例(吳承芬 譯)(民89)。台北:小知堂文化。(原著出版年:1999)。
知識管理的第一本書(劉京偉 譯)(民89)。台北:商周出版,(原著出版年:1998)。
胡幼慧(民85)。質性研究:理論、方法與本土女性研究實例。台北:巨流。
組織行為 : 管理心理學理論與實務(黃囇莉、李茂興 譯)(民79)。台北:揚智。(原著出版年:1990)。
創新求勝-智價企業論 (楊子江、王美音譯)(民86)。台北:遠流出版。(原著出版年:1995)。
質性研究概論(徐宗國 譯)(民86)。台北:巨流。(原著出版年:1990)。
質性教育研究 : 理論與方法(李奉儒 譯) (民90)。嘉義:濤石。(原著出版年:2001)
質的評鑑與研究(吳芝儀、李奉儒 譯)(民84)。台北:桂冠。(原著出版年:1990)。
嚴祥鸞(民87)。危險與秘密:研究倫理。台北:三民。
英文參考文獻
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Knowledge Management Systems: Emerging Views and Practices from the Field. Communications of the AIS, 1(5).
Allee, V. (1997). 12 Principles of Knowledge Management. Training and Development, 51(11), 71-74.
American Product & Quality Center, APQC (2000). Identifying and Transferring Internal Best Practices [On-Line]. Available: http://www.apqc.org [No Date].
Bassi, L. J. (1997). Harnessing the Power of intellectual capital. Training & Development, December, Vol 51, Iss 12.
Beehr, T. A. (1996). Basic organizational psychology. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Bjorn, S. (1999). Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning. Diploma Thesis, September IESE.
Broadbent, M. (1998). The phenomenon of knowledge management: What does it mean to the information professions? Information Outlook, May, 22-36.
Chait, L. P. (1999). Creating a successful knowledge management system. Journal of Business Strategy, 20(2), 23-26.
Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Davenport, T. H. (1997). Ten Principles of Knowledge Management and Four Case Studies. Knowledge and Process Management, 4(3), 187-208.
Dixson, N. (2000). Common Knowledge: How Company Thrive By Sharing What They Know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Earl, M. (2001). Knowledge management strategies: Toward a taxonomy. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.18, 215-233.
Goh, S. (2002). Managing effective knowledge transfer: An integra-tive framework and some practice implications. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(1), 23-30.
Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge Management:An Organizational Capabilities Perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185-214.
Greengard, S. (1998). How to make KM a reality. Workforce, 77(10), 90-92.
Hansen, M. T., Nohria, N., & Tierney, T. (1999). What’s Your Stratege for Managing Knowledge? Harvard Business Review, March-April.
Hedlund, G., & Nonaka, I. (1993). Models of Knowledge Management in the West and Japan. In Implementing Strategic Process: Change, Learning and Cooperation. Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
Hedlund, G. (1994). A model of Knowledge-Based Theory of the N-Form Corporation. Strategic Management Journal, Vol.15, 73-90.
Hendriks, P. (1999). Why Share Knowledge? The Influence of ICT on the Motivation for Knowledge Sharing. Knowledge and Process Management, 6(2), 91-100.
Hlupic, V., Pouloudi, A., & Rzevski, G. (2002). Towards an integrated approach to knowledge management: ’Hard’, ’Soft’ and ’Abstract’ issues. Knowledge and Process Management, 9(2), 90-102.
Holub, S. F. (2003). Knowledge Sharing Is A Change-Management Exercise. Tax Practice Management, Vol.34, No.6, 361.
Honeycutt, J. (2000). Knowledge management strategies. Redmond, Washington: Microsoft Press.
Hycner, R. H. (1985). Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. Human Studies, 8, 279-303.
Kimberly, L. (2000). Successfully Implementing Knowledge Management (Consortium Learning Forum Best-Practice Report). American Productivity & Quality Center, Dec.(2).
Knapp, M. E. (1998). Knowledge Management. Business & Economic Review, July-Sept, 3-6.
Lee, J. N. (2001). The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success. Information and Management, 38(5), 323-335.
Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Source of Innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Lester, C. T. (1999). Building Wealth: The New Rules for Individuals, Companies, and Nations in a Knowledge-Based Economy. New York: Harper Collins.
Liebowitz, J., & Beckman, T. (1998). Knowledge organizations : What every manager should know. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press.
Loebecke, C., Van Renema, P.C., & Powell, P. (1999). Co-opetition and Knowledge Transfer, Database for Advances in Information System, 30(2), 14-25.
Maglitta, J. (1996). Know-How, Inc. Computerworld, Janunary, 74
Millar, J., Demaid, A., & Quintas, P. (1997). Trans-organizational innovation: A framework for research. Technology Analysis of Strategic Management, 9(4), 399-418.
Nancy, M. D. (2000). Common Knowledge: How companies thrive by Sharing What They Know. Boston:Harvard Business School Press.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory Of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company, New York: Oxford University Press.
O’Dell, C., & Grayson, C. J. (1998). If only we knew what we know: identification and transfer of internal best practices. California Management Review, 40(3), 54-174.
Petrash, G. (1996). Dow’s Journey to a knowledge value management culture. European Management Journal, 14, 365-373.
Polanyi, M. (1967). The Tacit Dimension. N. Y.: M. E. Sharp Inc.
Quintas, P., Lefrere, P., & Jones, G. (1997). Knowledge Manage-ment:A strategic Agenda. Long Range Planning, Vol.30, Jun, 385-391.
Saravary, M. (1999). Knowledge management and in the consulting industry. California Management Review, 41(2), 95-107.
Senge, P. (1997). Sharing Knowledge. Executive Excellence, 14(11), 17-20
Snowden, D. (2000). A framework for creating a sustainable programme. In S. Rock (Ed.) Knowledge management: A real business guide. London: Caspian.
Spek, R. V., & Spijkervet, A. (1997). Knowledge Management: Dealing Intelligently with Knowledge. In Liebowitz, J., & Wilcox, L. C. (Eds.), Knowledge management and its integrative elements (pp. 31-59). Washington: CRC Press.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research : Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park : Sage Publications.
Sveiby, K. E. (2000). What is knowledge management? Retrieved Dec. 10, 2006, from: http://www.sveiby.com/articles/KnowledgeManagement.html
Wijnhoven, F. (1998). Knowledge logistic in business contexts: Analyzing and diagnosing knowledge sharing by logistics concepts. Knowledge and Process Management, 5(3), 43-157.
Zack, M. H. (1999). Managing Codified Knowledge. Sloan Management Review, Summer, 45-48.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內立即公開,校外一年後公開 off campus withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code