Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0730107-233833 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0730107-233833
論文名稱
Title
企業學習對於轉型之影響分析-以台灣中小企業為例
Analyzing the influence of learning on transformation strategy: a case study of small and medium business in Taiwan
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
129
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2007-06-10
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2007-07-30
關鍵字
Keywords
企業學習、組織能力、企業轉型
enterprise transformation, organization learning, organizational ability
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5737 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5737 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
每一個組織所處的情境不同,也使得他們對環境的解釋亦有所不同,進而影響其採用的策略行動。本研究為探討企業在轉型上,面臨環境變化時,習於過去的企業在面臨本身體質不佳時,能否藉由企業學習來幫助企業轉型,在具轉型時機中,基於中小企業常面臨資源上不足之苦,要做出比其他企業更長遠的決策見解,通常無法周延,也略遜於較有規模的企業,但也由於中小企業習於冒險的精神以及具較彈性的組織個體,故常會因為短促的機會造訪,便做出積極大膽的策略。

企業的學習不只是改善組織效能,而是更具動力,洞悉機會,掌握資源,積極的將組織推向另一高峰,藉此也大致可推得企業學習在企業轉型上的影響,存在一個必然的關係。但在一般的中小企業看來,學習只是企業永續發展一個必備的工具,知識的吸收、創造、累積、擴散等都是每一家企業必須做的事,只是方法上、程度上有所差異,而這些差異就形成了組織能力的差異,進而影響企業在轉型上不論是發現機會或是機會的掌握還是促進企業轉型流暢等。本研究將企業學習與企業轉型之間的關係,利用組織能力分析出關連性,藉此本研究為進一步深入探討,故將組織能力再區分為四大構面:策略性能耐、組織設計、人力資源管理以及領導者。

本研究發現,學習會影響本研究所設計的四項組織能力,尤其以策略性能耐和領導者對於轉型更有直接性及重要性的影響,故當企業愈強調學習時,會促使組織能力內原素互相影響而使得組織的能力愈佳,而當組織能力愈強時,企業所能掌握轉型的機會就會愈多,而且愈能加速企業轉型。
Abstract
Every enterprise faces various situations in different environments, which influences how they explain the environment and the strategies that they take. This research focuses on exploring the transformational strategies and puts emphases on discussing whether enterprises can transform by their learning when they used to be in the poor situations, while facing the dynamic environment. In the chance of transformation, the Taiwan’s small and medium enterprises (TSME) lacked resources which can support them to do more. Due to rapidly changing conditions and the increasing pressure from the global competition, TSME are harder to make more a comprehensive decision than other enterprises which have great resources and big scales. However, they might get a chance to make a confidential decision for their adventure and flexibility.

The organizational learning not only improves the efficiency but also presents more chances to find out the opportunities and resources to make the enterprises grow rapidly. It is an access to the constant development for enterprises. The absorbing, creating, cumulating and diffusing of knowledge are the ways that every enterprise has to do, but we could see the differences within its method and degrees. These differences would be crucial for these organizational abilities. Furthermore, it would influence the chances they got or affluence the organizational transformation. The research was interested in the relation between organizational learning and organization transformation by analyzing organizational abilities. We divide organizational abilities into four dimensions: strategic competence, organization design, human resource management and leader.

The research finds that learning will influence four organizational abilities which we designed, especially the strategic ability and leader, which got a direct and crucial effect on organizational transformations. When corporations place emphasize on organizational learning, they would cause the abilities to influence each other and become better. Then, they would get more chances to transform and make it more efficiently.
目次 Table of Contents
目 錄
摘 要 i
致 謝 iv
表 目 錄 vii
圖 目 錄 viii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究流程 4
第四節 研究限制 4
第二章 文獻回顧 6
第一節 中小企業的轉變 6
第二節 中小企業面對的困難與挑戰 8
第三節 企業轉型 10
第四節 企業學習 22
第三章 研究設計 46
第一節 研究方法 46
第二節 研究對象與資料蒐集 50
第四章 個案介紹 52
第一節 A公司個案介紹 52
第二節 B公司個案介紹 54
第三節 C公司個案介紹 55
第四節 D公司個案介紹 57
第五節 E公司個案介紹 59
第五章 命題與個案研究分析 62
第一節 個案研究分析 62
第二節 個案企業學習類型分類 76
第六章 結論與建議 82
第一節 結論 82
第二節 建議 88
第三節 後續研究建議 88
參考文獻 90
附錄 97

表 目 錄
表2-1 企業轉型定義 11
表2-2 企業轉型類型彙整表 13
表2-3 影響企業轉型之成功因素 17
表2-4 影響轉型成功因素之觀察指標 19
表2-5 影響企業轉型之障礙因素 20
表2-6 影響企業轉型障礙因素之觀察指標 22
表2-7 企業學習定義 25
表2-8 學習型組織類型特徵 29
表2-9 組織能力定義 33
表2-10 策略定義 35
表5-1 研究發現一覽表 75
表5-2 五家個案企業學習分類表 76
表5-3 五家個案企業學習歸類統計表 79

圖 目 錄
圖2-1企業創造競爭優勢的過程 34
圖3-1研究架構圖 52
圖3-2研究流程圖 53
參考文獻 References
1.方至民,企業競爭優勢,前程,2000。
2.王平原譯,10倍速時代,(Andrew S. Grove, 1996),大塊文化,1996。
3.王冠惠,學習性組織建立之研究-以大然文化事業公司為個案探討,國立政治大學,公司行政學系,1997。
4.王享元,企業學習能力對企業轉型升級策略選擇的影響-以鴻海與神通為例,國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程未出版碩士論文,2003。
5.江金龍譯,成功的企業轉型:中小企業如何脫胎換骨,筒井信行、瀧澤正雄著,尖端,1998。
6.司徒達賢,策略管理,遠流,1999。
7.李弘暉&吳壇治,從「教育訓練」及「組織學習」談知識經濟時代下的人力資本蓄積,品質月刊,2002,P88。
8.李再長譯,組織理論與管理,(Richard L. Daft, 1999),華泰,1999。
9.余佩珊譯,非營利機構的經營之道,(Peter F. Drucker, 1994),遠流,1996。
10.李聲吼,人力資源發展的意義與內涵,人力發展月刊,36期,1997。
11.李聲吼,人力資源發展,二版,五南,2001。
12.吳思華,策略九說,麥田,1996。
13.林孟彥譯,管理學,(Stephen P. Robbins & Mary Coulter, 2003),華泰,2003。
14.周佳欣,台灣中小企業策略性轉型之研究,東吳大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文,1997。
15.周佩萱,試析我國中小企業轉型困境,台灣經濟研究月刊,第16卷第8期,1993,P41-47。
16.胡哲生,傳統企業參與合作聯盟建構國際化價值網路之策略歷程,商管科技季刊,3卷1期,2001,P71-89。
17.洪榮昭,知識創新與學習型組織,2001,P58。
18.袁素萍,企業轉型成功關鍵因素之研究,國立成功大學高階管理在職專班未出版碩士論文,2003。
19.徐慧純,我國企業在建立學習型組織之探討-三個個案的研究,國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所未出版碩士論文,1998。
20.許士軍,現代行銷管理,環球經濟社,1980。
21.陳介玄,台灣產業的社會學研究:轉型中的中小企業,聯經,1998。
22.陳介玄,台灣產業再結構與資本全球化:建構型網絡之發展(國科會87-89年度社會學門專題補助研究成果發表會),行政院國家科學委員會,2002。
23.陳金在,企業轉型與國際化之實證研究-以台灣鋼鐵產業為例,國立成功大學高階管理在職專班未出版碩士論文,2003。
24.陳明璋,中小企業轉型策略,戰略生產力雜誌,1980,P132-135。
25.陳明璋,企業嬴的策略-掌握成功的4項關鍵:經理人、接棒、轉型、創新,遠流,1990。
26.陳明璋,企業轉型的策略與成功關鍵,貿易週刊,1690期,1996,P18-21。
27.郭進隆譯,第五項修練:學習型組織的藝術與實務,三版,(Peter M. Senge, 1994),天下,2005。
28.陶蕃瀛譯,組織結社-基層組織領導者手冊,Si Kahn著,心理,1996。
29.張火燦,策略型人力資源管理,揚智文化,1997。
30.經濟部中小企業處編印,2004,中小企業白皮書。
31.經濟部中小企業處編印,2006,創新關鍵-中小企業成功升級案例。
32.鄭榮郎,傳統產業向上提昇的轉型策略,能力雜誌,540期,2001,P77-80。
33.顧淑馨譯,競爭大未來,(Gary Hamel & C.K. Prahalad, 1995),智庫,2004。

英文文獻
1.Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), P33-46.
2.Argyris, C. and Schon, D. (1978), Organizational Learning: a Theory of Action Perspective, New York: Addision-Wesley.
3.Adams, J. D. (1984), Transforming Work, Miles Review Press, Alexandria, VA.
4.Argyris, Chris (1997), Double Loop Learning In Organization, Harvard Business Review, 55(5), P115-125.
5.Bibeault, Donald B. (1982), How Managers Turn Losers into Winners, McGraw-Hill Book Company.
6.Badaracco, Joseph L. (1991), The Knowledge Link: How Firms Compete Through Strategic Alliances. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
7.Chandler, A. D. (1962), Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise, Boston MA: MIT press.
8.Chalofsky, N. & Lincoln, C. (1983), Up the HRD Ladder Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
9.Camp, R. (1989), Benchmarking: the search for industry best practices that lead to superior performance, Quality Press, Milwaukee.
10.Christopher A. Bartlett & Sumantra Choshal (1994), Changing the Role of Top Management: Beyond Strategy to purpose, Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review.
11.Calantone, R. J., S. T. Cavusgil & Y. Zhao (2002), Learning orientation, firm innovation capability and firm performance, Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), P515-524.
12.Drucker, Peter. F. (1974), Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices, New York: Harper & Row.
13.Drucker, Peter. F. (1980), Managing in Turbulent Times, New York: 121 Harper & Row.
14.Donald B. Bibeault (1978), Survey of Eighty-one Turnaround Company Chief Executives, April.
15.Donald B. Bibeault (1982), Corporate Turnaround, How managers turn Losers into Winners, McGraw-Hill Book Company.
16.Drucker, Peter. F. (1993), Post Capitalist Society, Harper Collins, New York.
17.Dixon, N. (1993), Organizational Learning, Ottawa: Conference Board of Canada Report. Dec, P93-111.
18.Donald. N. Sull (1999), Why Good Companies Go Bad, Harvard Business Review, Boston, Jul/Aug, 77(4), P42-51.
19.Edmondson, A. (1999), The View through a Different Lens: Investigating Organizational Learning at the Group Level of Analysis, Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Organizational Learning Lancaster, New York.
20.Ebers, M. (1997), Explaining Inter-Organizational Network Formation, The Formation of Inter-Organizational Networks: 3-40 Oxfort University Press, New York.
21.Edmondson, A. & Moingeon, B. (1998), From organizational learning to the Learning Organization, Management Learning, 29(1), P5-20.
22.Garratt, B. (1990). An Old Idea that Has Come of Age, People Management, 1(19), P25-28.
23.Gherardi, S. and Nicolini, D. (2000), The Organizational Learning of Safety in Communities of Practice, Journal of Management, 9(1), P7-18.
24.Hofer, C. & Schendel, D. (1978). Strategy Formation: Analytical Concepts, West Publishing Co.
25.Huber, G. P. (1991), Organizational Learning: the Contributing Processes and the Literatures, Organization Science, 2(1), P88-115.
26.Hill, E. W. L. & Jones, G. R. (2001), Strategic Management Theory, 5th ed., Houghton Mifflin Company.
27.Joyce Wycoff & Tim Richardson (1995), Transformation Thinking, Berkley Publishing Group.
28.Jonathan D. Day (2000), Corporate transformation without a crisis, The McKinsey Quarterly, New York, Iss.4, P116-128.
29.Kimberly, J. R. & Quinn (1984), Managing Organizational Transition, Homewood, Illinois: Jessey Base Inc.
30.Kotter, J. P. (1990), A force for change: How leadership differs from management, New York: Free Press; London: Collier Macmillan, P18.
31.Lavy A. & Merry U. (1944), Organizational Transformation: Revitalizing Organization for a Competitive World, Jessey-Bass Inc.
32.Luthans, D., Rubach, J. & Marsnik, P. (1995). Going Beyond Tital Quality: The Characteristics, Techniques, and Measures of Learning Organization, The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3(1), P24-44.
33.McLagan, P. (1989). Models for HRD Practice, Alexandria, American Society for Training and Development.
34.McGill, M., Slocum, C. & Lei, D. (1992), Management Practices in Learning Organizations, Organizational Dynamics, 20(2), P5-17.
35.Marsick, V. J. & O’Neil J. (1999), The many faces of action learning. Management learning, 30(2), P159-176.
36.Molleman, E. and Broekhuis, M. (2001), Sociotechnical systems: Towards an organizational learning approach, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 18(3, 4), P271-294.
37.Nevis, E. C., DiBella, A. J. & Gould, J. M. (1995), Understanding Organizations as Learning Systems, Sloan Management Review, 36(2), P73-86.
38.Ocasio, W. (1997), Towards an attention-based view of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.18, P187-206.
39.Porter, M. E. (1980), Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, New York: The Free Press.
40.Porter, Michael E. (1985), Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York: The Free Press.
41.Prahalad, C. K. and Gary Hamel (1990), The core competence of the corporation, Harvard Business Review, Boston, 68(3), P79-91.
42.Robbins, Donna M. (1990), Trainees Know about Training Trainers, Training and Development Journal, Alexandria, October, 44(10), P12-14.
43.Roth, A. V. & Marucheck, A. S. & Kemp, A. and Trimble, D. (1994), The Knowledge Factory for Accelerated Learning Practices, Planning Review, 22(3) P26-32.
44.Redding, J. (1997), Hardwiring the learning organization, Training & Development, 51(8), P61-67.
45.Roux-Dufort, Christophe & Emmanuel Metais (1999), Building core competencies in crisis management through organizational learning, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol.52, P113-127.
46.Senge, P. M. (1990), The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of The Learning Organization, New York, USA: Doubleday.
47.Senge, Peter. M. (1994), Learning to Alter Mental Models, Executive Excellence, 11(3), P16-28.
48.Swieringa, J. & Wierdsma, A. (1992), Becoming a Learning Organization: Beyond the Learning Curve, Addison-Wesley , M.A..
49.Shaw, R. B. and D.N.T. Perkins (1992), Teaching organizations to learn: The power of productive failures In D. A. Nadler, M. S. Gerstein, and R. B. Shaw (Eds.), Organizational architecture, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, P175-191.
50.Shaheen George T. (1994), Approach to Transformation, Chief Executive, March, P2-5.
51.Sinkula, J. M., Baker, W. E. & Noordewiers, T. (1997), A framework for market-based Organizational learning; linking Values, Knowledge and behavior, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(4), P305-318.
52.Snyder, William M. and Thomas G. Cummings (1998), Organization learning disorders: Conceptual model and intervention hypotheses, Human Relations, 51(7), P873-895.
53.Watkins, K. E. & Marsick, V. J. (1993), Sculpting the learning organization, San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
54.Yukl, Gray A. (1989), Leadership in Organizations, 2nd Ed., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentic-Hall Inc.

網站
1.陳署光,陳子觀點,56期,2000年7月16日,P21-P23。
來源:http://www.ieatpe.org.tw/magazine/56e.htm
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外均不公開 not available
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.144.248.8
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.144.248.8
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code