Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0730116-024443 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0730116-024443
論文名稱
Title
長打還是短打好?探討議題重要性與產品類別對長短期善因行銷效果之影響
Swat or Bunt? Influences of Time Duration, Cause Importance and Product Type on Cause-Related Marketing
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
169
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2016-08-15
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2016-08-30
關鍵字
Keywords
廠商自利動機、廣告效果、產品類別、議題重要性、善因行銷、活動時間
advertising effectiveness, product type, Cause-related marketing, time duration, cause importance
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5859 次,被下載 82
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5859 times, has been downloaded 82 times.
中文摘要
近來企業社會責任備受重視,善因行銷因而成為廣受企業喜愛的行銷手法,其優點在於能夠創造三贏:為慈善議題提供支持、替企業達成行銷目的,以及使消費者感覺良好。善因行銷立意良善,卻也由於企業利益牽扯其中而易受到各方質疑,若內容未經謹慎設計,效果將備受打折。因此,本研究意在探討善因行銷之內容設計,並以行銷人員可掌控的活動時間為主軸,探討在不同議題重要性與產品類別之情境下,所可能產生的行銷效果。

本研究採實驗設計方法,並以兩個實驗來驗證假設。實驗一為活動時間(短期v.s長期)、議題重要性(首要議題v.s次要議題)及產品類別(實用性產品v.s享樂性產品)的2x2x2三因子設計;實驗二將活動時間再細分為三類(短期v.s中期v.s長期),配合議題重要性(首要議題v.s次要議題)、產品類別(實用性產品v.s享樂性產品)做出3x2x2的三因子設計,兩個實驗皆以消費者所產生之品牌態度與購買意圖作為依變數的衡量。

實驗結果顯示活動時間、議題重要性與產品類別間會產生三維交互作用進而影響善因行銷廣告效果。長期的活動時間較適合實用性產品與首要議題的搭配,或是享樂性產品與次要議題的搭配;短期的活動時間則使享樂產品搭配首要議題有較佳的效果。研究結果也發現,消費者觀看廣告後所產生的廠商自利動機歸因是影響上述三維交互作用對善因行銷效果負面影響的中介機制。
Abstract
As moral consciousness raises, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has become essential and Cause-Related Marketing (CRM) has turned prevalent among marketers. It is believed that CRM creates win-win-win situation for participants: social causes are supported, sales goals are reached, and consumers feel better making purchases. However, when consumers become skeptical about a company’s motive, CRM backfires. Therefore, this research aims to explore how factors such as time duration, cause importance and product type can influence the effectiveness of CRM.

This research uses experimental design and conducts two experiments. The first experiment is a 2 (time duration: short vs. long) x 2 (cause importance: primary cause vs. secondary cause) x 2 (product type: utilitarian vs. hedonic) factorial design, while the second adopts 3 (time duration vs: short vs. medium vs. long) x 2 (cause importance: primary cause vs. secondary cause) x 2 (product type: utilitarian vs. hedonic) factorial design. Attitudes toward the brand and purchase intention serve as dependent measures in this research.

The results reveal a three-way interaction of time duration, cause importance and product type on advertising effectiveness. Long time duration works better for a utilitarian product bundled with a primary cause or for a hedonic product with a secondary cause. Short time duration is more effective for a hedonic product with a primary cause. Consumers’ attribution to the company’s egoistic motive is found to be the underlying mechanism to explain the negative effects behind the phenomena above.
目次 Table of Contents
第壹章 緒論+1
第一節 前言+1
第二節 研究背景+1
第三節 研究動機+4
第四節 研究目的與問題 +5
第五節 研究架構+6
第貳章 文獻回顧+8
第一節 前言+8
第二節 善因行銷概述+8
第三節 善因行銷活動時間+13
第四節 善因行銷議題重要性+17
第五節 產品類別+20
第六節 小結+22
第參章 研究設計與方法+23
第一節 前言+23
第二節 研究假設與架構 +23
第三節 兩個實驗的建立 +27
第四節 小結+27
第肆章 實驗一設計與分析+29
第一節 前言+29
第二節 研究變數操作型定義與衡量+29
第三節 研究設計+33
第四節 實驗一結果分析+38
第五節 小結+52
第伍章 實驗二設計與分析+53
第一節 前言+53
第二節 研究變數操作型定義與衡量+53
第三節 研究設計+54
第四節 實驗二結果分析+62
第五節 小結+76
第陸章 結論與建議+78
第一節 前言+78
第二節 研究結果討論+78
第三節 研究貢獻+82
第四節 研究限制+84
第五節 未來研究與建議+85
第六節 小結+88
參考文獻+89
附錄一 實驗一問卷(1)+97
附錄一 實驗一問卷(2)+100
附錄一 實驗一問卷(3)+103
附錄一 實驗一問卷(4)+106
附錄一 實驗一問卷(5)+109
附錄一 實驗一問卷(6)+112
附錄一 實驗一問卷(7)+115
附錄一 實驗一問卷(8)+118
附錄二 實驗二問卷(1)+121
附錄二 實驗二問卷(2)+124
附錄二 實驗二問卷(3)+127
附錄二 實驗二問卷(4)+130
附錄二 實驗二問卷(5)+133
附錄二 實驗二問卷(6)+136
附錄二 實驗二問卷(7)+139
附錄二 實驗二問卷(8)+142
附錄二 實驗二問卷(9)+145
附錄二 實驗二問卷(10)+148
附錄二 實驗二問卷(11)+151
附錄二 實驗二問卷(12)+154
參考文獻 References
Andreasen, Alan R. (1996), “Profits for Nonprofits: Find a Corporate Partner,” Harvard Business Review, 74 (6), 9-55.
Barkah (2015), “The Influence of Affinity for the Cause, Cause Proximity and Company-Cause Fit on Customer Loyalty with Skepticism as Intervening Variable,” European Journal of Business and Management, 7 (10), 182-91.
Barone, Michael J., Anthony D. Miyazaki, and Kimberly A. Taylor (2000), “The Influence of Cause-Related Marketing on Consumer Choice: Does One Good Turn Deserve Another?” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (2), 248-62.
Becker-Olsen, Karen L., B. Andrew Cudmore, and Ronald Paul Hill (2006), “The Impact of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Business Research, 59 (1), 46-53.
Berger, Ida E., Peggy H. Cunningham, and Robert V. Kozinets (1999), “Consumer Persuasion through Cause-Related Advertising,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 26, eds. Eric J. Arnould and Linda M. Scott, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 491-97.
Bester, Shirley and Mlenga G. Jere (2012), “Cause-Related Marketing in an Emerging Market: Effect of Cause Involvement and Message Framing on Purchase Intention,” Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management, 19 (4), 286-93.
Brink, Douwe van den, Gaby Odekerken‐Schröder, and Pieter Pauwels (2006), “The Effect of Strategic and Tactical Cause‐Related Marketing on Consumers' Brand Loyalty,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23 (1), 15-25.
Broderick, Anne, Amandeep Jogi, and Tony Garry (2003), “Tickled Pink: The Personal Meaning of Cause Related Marketing for Customers,” Journal of Marketing Management, 19 (5-6), 583-610.
Bronn, Peggy S. and Albana B. Vrioni (2001), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Cause-Related Marketing: An Overview,” International Journal of Advertising, 20 (2), 207-22.
Chéron, Emmanuel, Florian Kohlbacher, and Kaoru Kusuma (2012), “The Effects of Brand-Cause Fit and Campaign Duration on Consumer Perception of Cause-Related Marketing in Japan,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29 (5), 357-68.
Chang, Chun‐Tuan (2008), “To Donate or Not to Donate? Product Characteristics and Framing Effects of Cause‐Related Marketing on Consumer Purchase Behavior,” Psychology & Marketing, 25 (12), 1089-110.
Chang, Chun-Tuan (2012), “Missing Ingredients in Cause-Related Advertising,” International Journal of Advertising, 31 (2), 231-56.
Chang, Chun-Tuan (2011), “Guilt Appeals in Cause-Related Marketing,” International Journal of Advertising, 30 (4), 587-616.
Chang, Chun-Tuan and Zhao-Hong Cheng (2015), “Tugging on Heartstrings: Shopping Orientation, Mindset, and Consumer Responses to Cause-Related Marketing,” Journal of Business Ethics, 127 (2), 337-50.
Chao, Paul, Sangeeta Singh, Lene Kristensen, and Erika Villaseñor (2009), “Overcoming Skepticism Towards Cause Related Claims: The Case of Norway,” International Marketing Review, 26 (3), 312-26.
Chernev, Alexander (2004), “Goal-Attribute Compatibility in Consumer Choice,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14 (1), 141-50.
Cone (2010), “2010 Cause Evolution Study,” available at http://www.coneinc.com, retrieved on August 12, 2016.
Cone, Carol L., Mark A. Feldman, and Alison T. DaSilva (2003), “Causes and Effects,” Harvard Business Review, 81 (7), 95-101.
Cone, Carol L. (2002), Corporate Citizenship Study: The Role of Cause Branding. Boston: Cone.
Cornwell, Bettina T. and Leonard V. Coote (2005), “Corporate Sponsorship of a Cause: The Role of Identification in Purchase Intent,” Journal of Business Research, 58 (3), 268-76.
Crowe, Ellen, and Higgins E. Tory (1997), “Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations: Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 117-132.
Cui, Yanli, Elizabeth S. Trent, Pauline M. Sullivan, and Grace N. Matiru (2003), “Cause-Related Marketing: How Generation Y Responds,” International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 31 (6), 310-20.
Demetriou, Marlen, Ioanna Papasolomou, and Demetris Vrontis (2010), “Cause-Related Marketing: Building the Corporate Image While Supporting Worthwhile Causes,” Journal of Brand Management, 17 (4), 266-78.
Docherty, Sylvie and Sally Hibbert (2003), “Examining Company Experiences of a UK Cause‐Related Marketing Campaign,” International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8 (4), 378-89.
Drumwright, Minette E. (1996), “Company Advertising with a Social Dimension: The Role of Noneconomic Criteria,” Journal of Marketing, 60 (4), 71-87.
Dwyer, Robert F., Paul H. Schurr, and Sejo Oh (1987), “Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships,” Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 11-27.
Ellen, Scholder P., Lois A. Mohr, and Deborah J. Webb (2000), “Charitable Programs and the Retailer: Do They Mix?” Journal of Retailing, 76 (3), 393-406.
Ellen, Scholder P., Deborah J. Webb, and Lois A. Mohr (2006), “Building Corporate Associations: Consumer Attributions for Corporate Socially Responsible Programs,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34 (2), 147-57.
Folkes, Valerie S. (1984), “Consumer Reactions to Product Failure: An Attributional Approach,” Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (4), 398-409.
Folse, Judith Anne Garretson, Ronald W. Niedrich, and Stacy L. Grau (2010), “Cause-Relating Marketing: The Effects of Purchase Quantity and Firm Donation Amount on Consumer Inferences and Participation Intentions,” Journal of Retailing, 86 (4), 295-309.
Forehand, Mark R. (2000), “Extending Overjustification: The Effect of Perceived Reward-Giver Intention on Response to Rewards,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 85 (6), 919-31.
Friestad, Marian and Peter Wright (1994), “The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts,” Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (1), 1-31.
Galan-Ladero, Mercedes M., Clementina Galera-Casquet, Victor Valero-Amaro, and M. Jesus Barroso-Mendez (2013), “Does the Product Type Influence on Attitudes toward Cause-Related Marketing?” Economics and Sociology, 6 (1), 60-71.
Gierl, Heribert and Verena Huettl (2010), “Are Scarce Products Always More Attractive? The Interaction of Different Types of Scarcity Signals with Products' Suitability for Conspicuous Consumption,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27 (3), 225-35.
Graff, Jenny (2003), Cause-Related Marketing: Relevance and Application in British Cancer Charities-A Case Study Approach, Munich: GRIN Verlag.
Grau, Landreth S., Judith A. Garretson, and Julie Pirsch (2007), “Cause-Related Marketing: An Exploratory Study of Campaign Donation Structures Issues,” Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 18 (2), 69-91.
Gupta, Shruti and Julie Pirsch (2006), “A Taxonomy of Cause-Related Marketing Research: Current Findings and Future Research Directions,” Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 15 (2), 25-43.
Gupta, Shruti and Julie Pirsch (2006), “The Company-Cause-Customer Fit Decision in Cause-Related Marketing,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(6), 314-326.
Hajjat, Mahmood M. (2003), “Effect of Cause-Related Marketing on Attitudes and Purchase Intentions: The Moderating Role of Cause Involvement and Donation Size,” Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 11 (1), 93-109.
Hayes, Andrew F. (2013), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, New York: The Guilford Press.
Higgins, Edward T. (1998), “Promotion and Prevention: Regulatory Focus as a Motivational Principle,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 30, ed, Mark P. Zanna, New York: Academic Press, 1-46
Hoeffler, Steve and Kevin L. Keller (2002), “Building Brand Equity through Corporate Societal Marketing,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21 (1), 78-89.
Hou, Jundong, Lanying Du, and Jianfeng Li (2008), “Cause's Attributes Influencing Consumer's Purchasing Intention: Empirical Evidence from China,” Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 20 (4), 363-80.
Jones, Edward E. and Keith E. Davis (1965), “From Acts to Dispositions the Attribution Process in Person Perception,” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 219-66.
Lafferty, Barbara A. (1996), “Cause-Related Marketing: Does the Cause Make a Difference in Consumers' Attitudes and Purchase Intentions Toward the Product?” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 24, eds. M.Brucks and D. MacInnis, Tuscon, AZ: Association for Consumer Research, 113.
Lafferty, Barbara A. and Diane R. Edmondson (2009), “Portraying the Cause Instead of the Brand in Cause-Related Marketing Ads: Does It Really Matter?” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 17 (2), 129-44.
Lafferty, Barbara A. and Ronald E. Goldsmith (2005), “Cause-Brand Alliances: Does the Cause Help the Brand or Does the Brand Help the Cause?” Journal of Business Research, 58 (4), 423-29.
Lafferty, Barbara A., Ronald E. Goldsmith, and G. Tomas M. Hult (2004), “The Impact of the Alliance on the Partners: A Look at Cause-Brand Alliances,” Psychology & Marketing, 21 (7), 509-31.
Landreth, Stacy (2002), “For a Good Cause: The Effect of Cause Importance, Cause Proximity, Congruency and Participation Effort on Consumer’s Evaluation of Cause Related Marketing,” Doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University.
Lichtenstein, Donald R., Minette E. Drumwright, and Bridgette M. Braig (2004), “The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Customer Donations to Corporate-Supported Nonprofits,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (4), 16-32.
Lynn, Michael (1991), “Scarcity Effects on Value: A Quantitative Review of the Commodity Theory Literature,” Psychology & Marketing, 8 (1), 43-57.
Mayo, John W. and Catherine H. Tinsley (2009), “Warm Glow and Charitable Giving: Why the Wealthy Do Not Give More to Charity?” Journal of Economic Psychology, 30 (3), 490-99.
Miller, Beth A. (2002), “Social Initiatives Can Boost Loyalty,” Marketing News, 36 (21), 14-5.
Mohr, Lois A., Doǧan Eroǧlu, and Pam Scholder Ellen (1998), "The Development and Testing of a Measure of Skepticism toward Environmental Claims in Marketers' Communications," Journal of Consumer Affairs, 32 (1), 30-55.
Mohr, Lois A., Deborah J. Webb, and Katherine E. Harris (2001), “Do Consumers Expect Companies to Be Socially Responsible? The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Buying Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35 (1), 45-72.
Mullen, Jennifer (1997), “Performance-Based Corporate Philanthropy: How "Giving Smart" Can Further Corporate Goals,” Public Relations Quarterly, 42 (2), 42-8.
Obermiller, Carl and Eric R. Spangenberg (1998), “Development of a Scale to Measure Consumer Skepticism toward Advertising,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7 (2), 159-86.
Pandelaere, Mario, Barbara Briers, and Christophe Lembregts (2011), “How to Make a 29% Increase Look Bigger: The Unit Effect in Option Comparisons,” Journal of Consumer Research, 38 (2), 308-22.
Penner, Louis A., John F. Dovidio, Jane A. Piliavin, and David A. Schroeder (2005), “Prosocial Behavior: Multilevel Perspectives,” Annual Review Psychology, 56 (1), 365-92.
Polonsky, Michael J. and Greg Wood (2001), “Can the Overcommercialization of Cause-Related Marketing Harm Society?” Journal of Macromarketing, 21 (1), 8-22.
Pracejus, John W. and G. Douglas Olsen (2004), “The Role of Brand/Cause Fit in the Effectiveness of Cause-Related Marketing Campaigns,” Journal of Business Research, 57 (6), 635-40.
Rains, Dawn (2003), “Corporate Philanthropy Versus Sponsorship and Cause-Related Marketing,” in Theater Communication Group, INC.: Theater Communication Group, INC., 1-10.
Rifon, Nora J., Sejung M. Choi, Carrie S. Trimble, and Hairong Li (2004), “Congruence Effects in Sponsorship: The Mediating Role of Sponsor Credibility and Consumer Attributions of Sponsor Motive,” Journal of Advertising, 33 (1), 30-42.
Ross, John K., Larry T. Patterson, and Mary Ann Stutts (1992), “Consumer Perceptions of Organizations That Use Cause-Related Marketing,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20 (1), 93-97.
Ross, John K., Mary Ann Stutts, and Larry Patterson (2011), “Tactical Considerations for the Effective Use of Cause-Related Marketing,” Journal of Applied Business Research, 7 (2), 58-65.
Roy, Rajat and Piyush Sharma (2015), “Scarcity Appeal in Advertising: Exploring the Moderating Roles of Need for Uniqueness and Message Framing,” Journal of Advertising, 44 (4), 349-59.
Sheikh, Sana-ur-Rehnab and Rian-Beise Zee (2011), “Corporate Social Responsibility or Cause-Related Marketing? The Role of Cause Specificity of CSR,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28 (1), 27-39.
Skitka, Linda J. (1999), “Ideological and Attributional Boundaries on Public Compassion: Reactions to Individuals and Communities Affected by a Natural Disaster,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25 (7), 793-808.
Snyder, Charles R. (1992), “Product Scarcity by Need for Uniqueness Interaction: A Consumer Catch-22 Carousel?” Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13 (1), 9-24.
Strahilevitz, Michal (1999), “The Effects of Product Type and Donation Magnitude on Willingness to Pay More for a Charity-Linked Brand,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8 (3), 215-41.
Strahilevitz, Michal and John G. Myers (1998), “Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentives: How Well They Work May Depend on What You Are Trying to Sell,” Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (4), 434-46.
Subrahmanyan, Saroja (2004), “Effects of Price Premium and Product Type on the Choice of Cause-Related Brands: A Singapore Perspective,” Journal of Product & Brand Management, 13 (2), 116-24.
Sundar, Srinivasan (2007), “Cause Related Marketing: Tactic or Strategy,” International Marketing Conference on Marketing & Society, 4: Citeseer, 8-10.
Till, Brian D. and Linda I. Nowak (2000), "Toward Effective Use of Cause-Related Marketing Alliances," Journal of Product & Brand Management, 9 (7), 472-84.
Trimble, Carrie S. and Nora J. Rifon (2006), "Consumer Perceptions of Compatibility in Cause‐Related Marketing Messages," International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 11 (1), 29-47.
Vanhamme, Joëlle, Adam Lindgreen, Jon Reast, and Nathalie V. Popering (2012), "To Do Well by Doing Good: Improving Corporate Image through Cause-Related Marketing," Journal of Business Ethics, 109 (3), 259-74.
Varadarajan, Rajan P. (1986), “Horizontal Cooperative Sales Promotion: A Framework for Classification and Additional Perspectives,” Journal of Marketing, 50 (2), 61-73.
Varadarajan, Rajan P. and Anil Menon (1988), “Cause-Related Marketing: A Coalignment of Marketing Strategy and Corporate Philanthropy,” Journal of Marketing, 52 (3), 58-74.
Vilela, Alexandra M. and Michelle R. Nelson (2016), “Testing the Selectivity Hypothesis in Cause-Related Marketing among Generation Y: When Does Gender Matter for Short- and Long-Term Persuasion?” Journal of Marketing Communications, 22 (1), 18-35.
Webb, Deborah J. and Lois A. Mohr (1998), “A Typology of Consumer Responses to Cause-Related Marketing: From Skeptics to Socially Concerned,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 17 (2), 226-38.
Youn, Seounmi and Hyuksoo Kim (2008), “Antecedents of Consumer Attitudes toward Cause-Related Marketing,” Journal of Advertising Research, 48 (1), 123-37.
Zaichkowsky, Judith Lynne (1985), "Measuring the Involvement Construct," Journal of Consumer Research, 12 (3), 341-52.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code