Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0802113-133055 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0802113-133055
論文名稱
Title
增量優惠或是價格折扣?探討產品類型與調節焦點對不同促銷方式偏好的影響
Bonus Pack or Price Discount? Influences of Product Type and Regulatory Focus on Preference of Promotion Type
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
98
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2013-08-20
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2013-09-03
關鍵字
Keywords
價格折扣、調節焦點、經驗品、搜尋品、產品類型、增量優惠
price discount, bonus pack, product type, search goods, experience goods, regulatory focus
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5863 次,被下載 433
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5863 times, has been downloaded 433 times.
中文摘要
實務上,常見眾多廠商採用價格折扣與增量優惠之促銷方式來提高消費者的購買意願,合適的促銷方式來為廠商帶來預期的效益。學術界在價格折扣與增量優惠之研究上,主要為提出理論說明為何一般而言,消費者較偏好增量優惠,而非價格折扣,此外,也有學者應用產品類型與心理變數來說明消費者在這兩種促銷方式的偏好選擇。而本研究則同時納入產品類型與調節焦點,來更深入探討對促銷方式的偏好選擇影響。
本研究以實驗設計法進行,操弄產品類型(搜尋品vs.經驗品)、調節焦點(預防焦點vs.促進焦點)與促銷方式(價格折扣vs.增量優惠)三項自變數,實驗一為2x2x2三因子混合設計,透過調節焦點情境設計來建立二種不同的實驗情境,產品類型與促銷方式則作為組內變數,實驗二為單因子設計,透過產品廣告設計建立二種不同的實驗情境,調節焦點則透過量表測量取得,來觀察消費者在促銷方式的偏好選擇。
研究結果指出,產品類型會影響到消費者對促銷方式的偏好選擇,購買搜尋品時,會偏好增量優惠;購買經驗品時,會偏好價格折扣。產品類型與調節焦點對促銷方式的偏好選擇存在交互作用,預防焦點的人在購買搜尋品時偏好增量優惠,購買經驗品時偏好價格折扣;促進焦點的人在購買搜尋品時偏好價格折扣,購買經驗品時則偏好增量優惠。
Abstract
In practice, it is common for many companies to adopt price discount and bonus pack. A proper promotion type can increase consumer purchase and leads product sales. Research on price discount and bonus pack focuses on using theories to explain why consumers prefer bonus pack to price discount. Besides, some scholars examined how product type and psychological variables moderated consumer preference in promotion type. Our research considered product type and regulatory focus as the psychological variable simultaneously, and investigated the interactive influences of these two variables on promotion type preference.
The present study used experimental design contained three independent variables, product type (search goods vs. experience goods), regulatory focus (prevention focus vs. promotion focus) and promotion type (price discount vs. bonus pack). The first study was a 2x2x2 mixed design. Regulatory focus was primed while product type and promotion type served as within-subjects variables. The second study was a between-subjects design in which product type was manipulated and regulatory focus was measured.
The results indicate that product type can influence promotion type preference. Consumers prefer bonus pack for search goods, but prefer price discount for experience goods. Individuals with prevention focus prefer bonus pack for a search good, but prefer price discount for an experience good. Opposite results are found with individuals with promotion focus.
目次 Table of Contents
謝辭 i
摘要 ii
Abstract iii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 前言 1
第二節 研究背景—分兩大主軸:價格折扣與增量優惠 1
第三節 研究動機 4
第四節 研究目的與問題 5
第五節 研究架構與研究流程 6
第二章 文獻探討 8
第一節 前言 8
第二節 促銷方式 8
一、對促銷方式偏好的相關研究 9
第三節 產品類型 12
一、產品類型對消費者行為的影響 13
第四節 調節焦點 14
一、長期性調節焦點 16
二、暫時性調節焦點 18
三、調節焦點適配性原則(Regulatory Fit) 18
第五節 小結 19
第三章 研究設計與方法 20
第一節 前言 20
第二節 研究假設與架構 20
一、產品類型對促銷效果的偏好選擇之影響 20
二、調節焦點對促銷效果的影響 20
三、產品類型與調節焦點存在交互作用 21
第三節 實驗的設計原理 25
一、實驗一的設計原理 25
二、實驗二的設計原理 25
第四節 前測 26
一、實驗一的事前準備 26
二、實驗二的事前準備 27
第五節 研究變數的操作型定義與衡量 27
一、實驗一 27
二、實驗二 32
第六節 研究設計 36
一、實驗一 36
二、實驗二 38
第七節 小結 39
第四章 研究結果分析 40
第一節 前言 40
第二節 實驗一 40
一、樣本背景資料 40
二、研究設計之檢驗 40
三、研究假設檢定 41
第三節 實驗二 46
一、樣本背景資料 46
二、研究設計之檢驗 47
三、研究假設檢定 48
第四節 小結 55
第五章 結論與建議 56
第一節 前言 56
第二節 研究結果討論 56
一、在面對不同促銷方式時,產品類型對促銷方式的選擇會有影響 56
二、在面對不同促銷方式時,調節焦點與促銷方式的選擇會有影響 57
三、在面對不同促銷方式時,產品類型與調節焦點對於促銷方式選擇影響上存在交互作
用 57
第三節 研究貢獻 58
一、理論貢獻 58
二、方法貢獻 58
三、實務貢獻 59
第四節 研究限制 59
一、調節焦點的操弄 59
二、調節焦點的衡量 60
三、選擇行為作為促銷方式選擇影響 60
第五節 未來研究建議 60
一、以其他變數當作促銷效果的衡量 60
二、考量價格折扣幅度與增量優惠幅度之影響 60
三、產品分類衍生出來的議題 61
四、價格促銷訊息包裝 61
五、個人差異變數 61
第六節 小結 61
參考文獻 63
附錄一 實驗一正式問卷 68
附錄二 實驗二正式問卷 82
參考文獻 References
周宇貞、何修慧、賴岳炫 (2008)。調節焦點與產品屬性對訊息說服效果之影響。行政院國家
科學會委員會專題研究成果報告,未出版。
許皓崴 (2012)。「時間」是不同的!探討不同時間觀點下心理模擬與產品類別對消費者行為的
影響。國立中山大學碩士論文。
Aaker, J. L., and Lee, A. Y. (2001), “ “I” Seek Pleasures and “We” Avoid Pain: The Role of
Self-Regulatory Goals in Information and Persuasion,” Journal of Consumer Research,
28(1), 33-49.
Bloom, P. N. and Pailin J. E. (1995), “Using Information Situations to Guide Marketing
Strategy,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 12, 19-27.
Brockner, J., Paruchuri, S., Idson, L. C., and Higgins, E. T. (2002), “Regulatory Focus and
The Probability Estimates of Conjunctive and Disjunctive Events,” Organizational
Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87(1), 5-24.
Campbellm, L. and Diamond W. D. (1990), “Framing and Sales Promotion: The
Characteristics of A Good Deal,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 7(4), 25-31.
Carver, C. S., and White, T. L. (1994), “Behavioral Inhibition, Behavioral Activation, and
Affective Responses to Impending Reward and Punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales,”
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 319-333.
Chandon, P., Wansink, B., and Laurent, G. (2000), “A Benefit Congruency Framework of
Sales Promotion Effectiveness,” Journal of Marketing, 64(4), 65-81.
Chang, C. T. (2012), “Missing Ingredients in Cause-related Advertising: The Right Formula
of Execution Style and Cause Framing,” International Journal of Advertising, 31(2),
231-256.
Chang, C. T., and Yen, C. T. (2013), “Missing Ingredients in Metaphor Advertising: The
Right Formula of Metaphor Type, Product Type, and Need for Cognition, ” Journal of
Advertising, 42(1), 80-94.
Chen, H., Marmorstein, H., Tsiros, M. and Rao, A. R. (2012), “When More Is Less: The
Impact of Base Value Neglect on Consumer Preferences for Bonus Packs over Price
Discounts,” Journal of Marketing, 76(4), 64-77.
Chernev, A. (2004), “Goal-Attribute Compatibility in Consumer Choice,” Journal of
Consumer Psychology, 14(2), 141-150.
Copeland, M. (1923), “Relation of Consumers' Buying Habits to Marketing Methods,”
Harvard Business Review, 1(2), 282-289.
Dhar, R., and Wertenbrock, K. (2000), “Consumer Choice Between Hedonic and Utilitarian
Goods,” Journal of Marketing Research, 37(1), 60-71.
Diamond, W. D., and Sanyal, A. (1990), “The Effect of Framing on the Choice of
Supermarket Coupons” Advances in Consumer Research, 17(1), 488-493.
Dutta S., Biswas, A, and Grewal D. (2011),“Regret From Postpurchase Discovery of Lower
Market Prices: Do Price Refunds Help?,”Journal of Marketing, 75, 124-138.
Friedman, R. S., and Forster, J. (2001), “The Effects of Promotion and Prevention Cues on
Creativity,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1001-1013.
Guiltinan, J. P. (1987), “The Price Bundling of Services: A Normative Framework,” Journal of
Marketing, 51(2), 74-85.
Haws, K. L., Dholakia, U. M. and Bearden, W. O. (2010),“An Assessment of Chronic
Regulatory Focus Measures.”Journal of Marketing Research, 47(4), 967-982.
Higgins, E. T. (1987), “Self-Discrepancy: A Theory Relating Self and Affect,” Psychological
Review, 94(3), 319-340.
Higgins, E. T. (1997), “Beyond Pleasure and Pain” American Psychology, 52(4), 1280-1300.
Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O. N., and Taylor, A.
(2001), “Achievement Orientations From Subjective Histories of Success: Promotion
Pride Versus Prevention Pride,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 3-23.
Hirschman, E. C. and Holbrook, M. B. (1982), “Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts,
Methods and Propositions,” Journal of Marketing, 46(2), 92-101.
Huang, P., Lurie, N. H., and Mitra, S. (2009), “Searching for Experience on The Web: An
Empirical Examination of Consumer Behavior for Search and Experience Goods,”
Journal of Marketing, 73(2), 55-69.
Jacoby, J. and Kaplan L. B. (1972), “The Components of Perceived Risk, ” Association for
Consumer Research, 382-393.
Jain, P. S., Mathur, P., and Maheswaran, D. (2009), “The Influence of Consumers' Lay
Theories on Approach/Avoidance Motivation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 46(1),
56-65.
Kees, J., Burton, S. and Tangari, A. H. (2010), “The Impact of Regulatory Focus, Temporal
Orientation, and Fit on Consumer Responses to Health-Related Advertising,” Journal of
Advertising, 39(1), 19-34.
Kotler, P. (2000), “Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and
Control,” 10th ED, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Lin H. F., and Shen, F. (2012), “Regulatory Focus and Attribute Framing,” International
Journal of Advertising, 31(1), 169-188.
Liu H. H. (2010), “Impact of Regulatory Focus on Ambiguity Aversion,” Journal of Behavioral
Decision Making, 24(4), 412-430.
Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., and Kunda, Z. (2002), “Motivation by Positive and Negative
Role Models: Regulatory Focus Determines Who Will Best Inspire US.,” Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 854-864.
Lowe, B. (2010), “Consumer Perceptions of Extra Free Product Promotions and Discounts:
The Moderating Role of Perceived Performance Risk” Journal of Product & Brand
Management, 19(7), 496-503.
Micu, C. C., and Chowdhury, G. T. (2010), “The Effect of Message's Regulatory Focus and
Product Type on Persuasion,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 18(2), 181-190.
Mishra, A. and Mishra, H. (2011), “The Influence of Price Discount Versus Bonus Pack on
the Preference for Virtue and Vice Foods” Journal of Marketing Research, 48(1),
196-206.
Nelson, P. (1970), “Advertising as Information,” Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 729-754.
Ong, S. B., Ho, F. N., and Tripp, C. (1997),“Consumer Perceptions of Bonus Pack: an
Exploratory Analysis,”Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14(2), 102-112.
Ostrom, A., and Iacobucci, D. (1995), “Consumer Trade-Offs and The Evaluation of
Services,” Journal of Marketing, 59(1), 17-28.
Pham, M. T., and Avnet, T. (2004), “Ideals and Oughts and The Reliance on Affect Versus
Substance in Persuasion,” Journal of Consumer Research, 30(1), 503-518.
Ramanathan , S., and Dhar, S. K. (2010), “The Effect of Sales Promotions on the Size and
Composition of The Shopping Basket: Regulatory Compatibility from Framing and
Temporal Restrictions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 47(3), 542-552.
Sheh, J., Higgins, E. T., and Friedman, S. R. (1998), “Performance Incentives and Means:
How Regulatory Focus Influences Goal Attainment,” Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 74(2), 285-293.
Sinha I., and Smith M. F. (2000), “Consumers' Perceptions of Promotional Framing of
Price,” Psychology & Marketing, 17(3), 257-275.
Thaler, R. (1985), “Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice,” Marketing Science, 4(3),
199-214.
Wan, Y., Nakayama, M., and Sutcliffe, N. (2010), “The Impact of Age and Shopping
Experiences on The Classification of Search, Experience, and Credence Goods in
Online Shopping,” Information System E-Bus Manage,10(4), 135-148.
Weather, D., Sharma, S., and Wood, S. L. (2007), “Effects of Online Communication
Practices on Consumer Perceptions of Performance Uncertainty for Search and
Experience Goods,” Journal of Retailing, 83(4), 393-401.
Winterich, K. P., and Barone, M. J. (2011), “Warm Glow or Cold, Hard Cash? Social
Identify Effects on Consumer Choice for Donation Versus Discount Promotions,” Journal
of Marketing Research, 48(5), 855-868.
Wright, A. A., Jon, G., and Lynch, J. R. (1995), “Communication Effects of Advertising
versus Direct Experience When both Search and Experience Attributes Are Present,”
Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 708-718.
Zhou, R., and Pham, M. T. (2004), “Promotion and Prevention Across Mental Accounts:
When Financial Products Dictate Consumers' Investment Goals,” Journal of Consumer
Research, 31(1), 125-135.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code