Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0803109-224257 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0803109-224257
論文名稱
Title
影響Enterprise 2.0之採用:以認知價值為基礎探討
The Impact Factors on Enterprise 2.0 Adoption: Based on Value-based Adoption Model
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
85
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2009-07-20
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2009-08-03
關鍵字
Keywords
價值基礎採用理論、企業 2.0、感知價值、採用意圖
Enterprise 2.0, Adopting Intention, Value-based Adoption Model, Perceived Value
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5878 次,被下載 3221
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5878 times, has been downloaded 3221 times.
中文摘要
由於以個人為導向的Web 2.0工具使用越來越普遍,也改變了以往的工作以及交友方式,而企業也逐漸意識到Web 2.0工具的好用、易用性,因此開始將Web 2.0工具如部落格(Blogs)、維基(Wikis)、標籤(Tags)等工具導入企業中使用,而其用途如使用部落格與客戶進行問與答以促進客戶關係以及利用維基管理公司知識等,因而產生了企業2.0(Enterprise 2.0)的概念。
本研究整合過去針對「價值基礎」理論的研究,並歸納出兩大影響因子來探討感知價值的產生:(1).感知利益(2).感知成本。此外,與過去研究不同的是,以往的研究注重於個人層面以及單一工具使用的觀點,而我們認為「企業2.0」是一種以組織層面以及整體平台觀點。
本研究以實證研究的方法來瞭解感知利益、成本以及感知價值對企業2.0之採用意圖的影響。我們以四個研究假設來驗證研究的架構,並利用PLS進行檢驗。研究結果發現,「感知利益」、「感知成本」都具有顯著的影響。此外,「感知價值」對「企業2.0之採用意圖」也具有相當顯著的影響。而在本篇研究中,我們除了驗證「感知價值」的確是「感知利益與成本」及「採用意圖」重要的中介變數外,也更驗證了「組織支持」對於「感知價值」及「採用意圖」有顯著的調節關係。
總而言之,本研究整合了過去在「企業2.0」的各種利益以及成本,並且提出一個更為整合且清楚的「價值基礎」架構來解釋「企業2.0之採用意圖」。本篇研究也提供給後續針對「價值基礎」理論及「企業2.0」一個研究參考的架構,也提供平台開發者一些實務上的建議。
Abstract
Enterprise 2.0 has become popular in firms. Many Enterprise 2.0 researchers and practitioners have recognized the importance of benefits and costs in using Enterprise 2.0 by individuals. However, their effects on adoption intention in enterprise contexts are not discussed. To investigate this issue, we proposed a model to understand the intention to adopt Enterprise 2.0. Three factors are identified based on value-based adoption model (VAM), namely perceived benefits, perceived costs, and perceived value. An empirical survey was conducted to collect data. 500 samples were collected within 18 days. Of which 150 was valid. This yielded a response rate of 30%. Partial Least Squares (PLS) was used to analyze the data and verify the model. The result showed that perceived value not only played an important role in mediating the relationship between perceived benefits and costs, and adoption intention but it also exerted a significant effect on intention to adopt Enterprise 2.0. Moreover, we identified major factors that may affect perceived value. We find that both perceived benefits and perceived costs have significant impacts on perceived value, and cause intention to adopt Enterprise 2.0. Implications of such finding are discussed.
目次 Table of Contents
Chapter1 Introduction 1
Chapter2 Theoretical Foundation and Literature Review 4
2.1 Relative research on Enterprise 2.0 4
2.2 Value-based Adoption Model 12
2.3 Perceived Value and Value-based Adoption Model 12
2.4 Perceived Benefits, Perceived Costs, and Innovation Diffusion Theory 15
Chapter3 The Research Model and Hypotheses 19
3.1 Research Model 19
3.2 Research Hypotheses 20
3.2.1 Perceived Benefits of Enterprise 2.0 20
3.2.2 Perceived Costs of Enterprise 2.0 24
3.2.3 Organizational Support 25
3.3 Control Variables 28
Chapter4 Research Analysis 29
4.1 Subject 29
4.1.1 Sampling 29
4.1.2 Demographic Analysis 29
4.2 Measure Development 31
4.2.1 Pilot study 33
4.2.2 Non Response Bias 33
4.2.3 Questionnaire Internal Reliability 34
4.3 Measurement Model 38
4.3.1 Common Method Variance 38
4.3.2 Second Order of Perceived Benefits and Perceived Costs 40
4.3.3 Reliability and Validity 41
4.4 Structural Model 46
4.4.1 Main model 46
4.4.2 Analysis of Moderating Effect 47
4.4.3 Analysis of Mediating 50
4.4.4 Robustness analysis 52
Chapter5 Discussion and Implication 53
5.1 Discussion 53
5.2 Theoretical Contributions 55
5.3 Practical Contributions 56
5.4 Limitation and Suggestions for Future Study 57
5.5 Conclusion 57
References 58
Appendix 67
參考文獻 References
Alam, S. S., A. Khafibi, A. Mohd. Ismail Sayyed, and H. B. Ismail. "Factors Affecting e-Commerce Adoption in the Electronic Manufacturing Companies in Malaysia," International Journal of Commerce & Management (17:1), 01, 2007, pp. 125-139.
Avolio, B. J., D. A. Waldman, and F. J. Yammarino. "Leading in the 1990s: The Four is of Transformational Leadership," Journal of European Industrial Training (15:4), 1991, pp. 9-16.
Baker, J., A. Parasuraman, D. Grewal, and G. B. Voss. "The Influence of Multiple Store Environment Cues on Perceived Merchandise Value and Patronage Intentions," Journal of Marketing (66:2), 2002, pp. 120-141.
Baron, R. M., and D. A. Kenny. "The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (51:6), 1986, pp. 1173-1182.
Campbell, D. T., and D. W. Fiske. "Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix," Psychological Bulletin (56:2), 1959, pp. 81-105.
Carl Frappaolo and Dan Keldsen. "Enterprise 2.0: Agile, Emergent & Integrated," AIIM Market Intelligence, March, 2008.
Carte, T. A., and C. J. Russell. "In Pursuit of Moderation: Nine Common Errors and their Solutions," MIS Quarterly, 2003, pp. 479-501.
Carter, L., and F. Bélanger. "The Utilization of e-Government Services: Citizen Trust, Innovation and Acceptance Factors," Information Systems Journal (15:1), 01, 2005, pp. 5-25.
Chang, T. Z., and A. R. Wildt. "Price, Product Information, and Purchase Intention: An Empirical Study," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (22:1), 1994, pp. 16-27.
Chen, Z., and A. J. Dubinsky. "A Conceptual Model of Perceived Customer Value in e-Commerce: A Preliminary Investigation," Psychology and Marketing (20:4), 2003.
Chin, W. W. "The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling," Modern Methods for Business Research (295), 1998, pp. 336.
Chin, W. W., B. L. Marcolin, and P. R. Newsted. "A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-Mail emotion/adoption Study," Information Systems Research (14:2), 2003, pp. 189-217.
Choudhury, V., and E. Karahanna. "The Relative Advantage of Electronic Channels: A Multidimensional View," MIS Quarterly (32:1), 03, 2008, pp. 179-200.
Churchill Jr, G. A. "A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs," Journal of Marketing Research, 1979, pp. 64-73.
Davies, S. The Diffusion of Process Innovations, Cambridge University Press, 1979.
Davis, F. D. "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology," MIS Quarterly (13:3), 09, 1989, pp. 319-340.
DeLone, W. H. "Firm Size and the Characteristics of Computer use," MIS Quarterly, 1981, pp. 65-77.
Demopoulos, T. "What no One Ever Tells You about… Blogging and Podcasting," Kaplan Publishing, 2007, pp. 153-154.
Dewett, T., N. Whittier, and S. D. Williams. "Internal Diffusion: The Conceptualizing Innovation Implementation," Competitiveness Review (17:1), 03, 2007, pp. 1-16.
Dillman, D. A. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method, Wiley New York, 1978.
Dion-Hinchcliffe. "The State of Enterprise 2.0," ZDNet, 2007.
———. "Ten Ways to Take Advantage of Web 2.0," Web 2.0 Journal, 2006.
Dodds, W. B., K. B. Monroe, and D. Grewal. "Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers' Product Evaluations," Journal of Marketing Research, 1991, pp. 307-319.
Dosi, G. "Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation," Journal of Economic Literature (26:3), 09, 1988, pp. 1120.
Eisenberger, R., F. Stinglhamber, C. Vandenberghe, I. L. Sucharski, and L. Rhoades. "Perceived Supervisor Support: Contributions to Perceived Organizational Support and Employee Retention," Journal of Applied Psychology (87:3), 2002, pp. 565-573.
Fornell, C., and F. L. Bookstein. "Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory," Journal of Marketing Research, 1982, pp. 440-452.
Gary, M. "Enterprise 2.0 - the Benefits and Challenges of Adoption," KPMG International, 2007.
Grewal, D., K. B. Monroe, and R. Krishnan. "The Effects of Price-Comparison Advertising on Buyers' Perceptions of Acquisition Value, Transaction Value, and Behavioral Intentions," The Journal of Marketing, 1998, pp. 46-59.
Havenstein, H. "Advocates Overcoming IT Resistance to Web 2.0," Computerworld, 2007.
Holbrook, M. B. "Introduction to Consumer Value," Consumer Value: A Framework for Analysis and Research, 1999, pp. 1-28.
Hoover, N. "Social Experiment," InformationweekSept. 24, 2007.
Hsu, P. F., K. L. Kraemer, and D. Dunkle. "Determinants of E-Business use in US Firms," International Journal of Electronic Commerce (10:4), 2006, pp. 9-45.
Iacovou, C., I. Benbasat, and A. Dexter. "Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology," Management Information Systems Quarterly (19:1), 1995, pp. 21.
Jacques Bughin, James Manyika, Andy Miller, and Michael Chui. "Building the Web 2.0 Enterprise," The McKinsey Quarterly (2008:July), 2008, pp. 10.
Johnson, E. J., and J. W. Payne. "Effort and Accuracy in Choice," Management Science, 1985, pp. 395-414.
Jöreskog, K. G., and D. Sörbom. LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language, Scientific Software, 1993.
Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. "Prospect Theory: N Analysis of Decisionunder Risk," Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1979, pp. 263-291.
Kerin, R. A., A. Jain, and D. J. Howard. "Store Shopping Experience and Consumer Price-Quality-Value Perceptions," Journal of Retailing (68), 1992, pp. 376-376.
Kim, H. W., H. C. Chan, and S. Gupta. "Value-Based Adoption of Mobile Internet: An Empirical Investigation," Decision Support Systems (43:1), 2007, pp. 111-126.
Kimberly, J. R., and M. J. Evanisko. "Organizational Innovation: The Influence of Individual, Organizational, and Contextual Factors on Hospital Adoption of Technological and Administrative Innovations," Academy of Management Journal (24:4), 12, 1981, pp. 689-713.
Lewis, W., R. Agarwal, and V. Sambamurthy. "Sources of Influence on Beliefs about Information Technology use: An Empirical Study of Knowledge Workers," MIS Quarterly, 2003a, pp. 657-678.
———. "Sources of Influence on Beliefs about Information Technology use: An Empirical Study of Knowledge Workers," MIS Quarterly2003b, pp. 657-678.
Mansfield, E. Industrial Research and Technological Innovation: An Econometric Analysis, RS Means Company, 1968.
McAfee, A. "Cases 2.0," 2007.
———. "Enterprise 2.0: The Dawn of Emergent Collaboration," MIT Sloan Management Review, 2006.
———. "Some Questions You might Get Asked," Harvard Business School Faculty BlogsJune 30, 2008.
McGillicuddy, S. "Wikis and Blogs Transforming Workflow," Search, CIO.Com, 2006.
Michael Platt. "Web 2.0 in the Enterprise," The Architecture Journal, 2007.
Mike Reid, Christian Gary, and Craig Honick. "Online Social Networks- Virtual Communities, Enterprises , and Information Professionals," Searcher, June, 2008.
Moore, G. C., and I. Benbasat. "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research (2:3), 09, 1991, pp. 192-222.
Orlikowski, W. J. "Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations," Organization Science, 2000, pp. 404-428.
Petrick, J. F. "Development of a Multi-Dimensional Scale for Measuring the Perceived Value of a Service," Journal of Leisure Research (34:2), 2002, pp. 119-134.
Pfeiffer, H. K. C. The Diffusion of Electronic Data Interchange, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. Secaucus, NJ, USA, 1992.
Premkumar, G., K. Ramamurthy, and S. Nilakanta. "Implementation of Electronic Data Interchange: An Innovation Diffusion Perspective," Journal of Management Information Systems (11:2), 1994, pp. 157-186.
Rogers, E. M. "Diffusion of Innovations, 3rd," 1983.
Ross Dawson. "Implementing Enterprise 2.0 in the Real World," February, 2009.
Sheth, J. N., B. I. Newman, and B. L. Gross. Consumption Values and Market Choices: Theory and Applications, South-Western Pub., Cincinnati, 1991.
Sweeney, J. C., and G. N. Soutar. "Consumer Perceived Value: The Development of a Multiple Item Scale," Journal of Retailing (77:2), 2001, pp. 203-220.
Sweeney, J. C., G. N. Soutar, and L. W. Johnson. "Retail Service Quality and Perceived Value A Comparison of Two Models," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services (4:1), 1997, pp. 39-48.
Teo, H., K. Wei, and I. Benbasat. "Predicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages: An Institutional Perspective," MIS Quarterly, 2003, pp. 19-49.
Thaler, R. "Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice," Marketing Science, 1985, pp. 199-214.
Tourangeau, R., L. J. Rips, and K. A. Rasinski. The Psychology of Survey Response, ASA, 2000.
Von Neumann, J., and O. Morgenstern. "Theory of Games and Economic Behavior," 1944.
Wang, J. C., and K. H. Tsai. "Factors in Taiwanese Firms' Decisions to Adopt Electronic Commerce: An Empirical Study," The World Economy (25:8), 2002, pp. 1145-1167.
Wikipedia contributors. "Blog," Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. (2009:18 February 06:31 UTC), 18 February 2009 06:13 UTC.
———. "RSS," Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. (2009:18 February 06:46 UTC), 15 February 2009 16:53 UTC.
———. "Social Network Service," Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. (2009:18 February 06:45 UTC), 17 February 2009 14:06 UTC.
———. "Tags," Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. (2009:18 February 06:41 UTC), 17 February 2009 08:55 UTC.
———. "Wiki," Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. (2009:18 February 06:28 UTC), 15 February 2009 04:20 UTC.
Woodruff, R. B. "Customer Value: The Next Source for Competitive Advantage," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (25:2), 1997, pp. 139-153.
Wu, I. -., and K. -. Wu. "A Hybrid Technology Acceptance Approach for Exploring e-CRM Adoption in Organizations," Behaviour & Information Technology (24:4), 2005, pp. 303-316.
Yi, M. Y., K. D. Fiedler, and J. S. Park. "Understanding the Role of Individual Innovativeness in the Acceptance of IT-Based Innovations: Comparative Analyses of Models and Measures," Decision Sciences (37:3), 08, 2006, pp. 393-426.
Zeithaml, V. A. "Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence," The Journal of Marketing, 1988, pp. 2-22.
Zuckerman, E. W., and Ray E. Reagans. "Networks, Diversity, and Performance: The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Units," Research Paper (1585), October, 1999.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內立即公開,校外一年後公開 off campus withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code