團隊效能的展現以及團隊領導者所扮演的角色與功能等議題一直是團隊相關研究的重點。本研究以遠洋漁業團隊為研究主題，針對團隊特性、團隊領導與績效相關面向，探討哪些因素會影響團隊運作與團隊績效的展現，同時團隊領導又在中間發揮什麼功能以及扮演哪些角色。
本研究以高雄遠洋鮪釣漁業N公司超低溫鮪延繩釣部門之十五艘遠洋漁船為研究母體，共15名日籍船長及數名漁工、幹部，以及總公司四位中高階主管為研究對象，透過團隊、團隊領導，以及組織績效等文獻回顧，採深度訪談的方式，試圖以理論推導並且根據實務作法來找出影響組織績效之關鍵因素。
研究結果發現在組織層面與團隊層面中皆有關鍵因素其直接影響到組織績效，其中「團隊層面」在於團隊成員是否各司其職，並且努力工作；再者，團隊成員間氣氛是否融洽、關係是否和睦，以及團隊領導者是否有發揮領導功能。「組織層面」的部份也有兩項：「激勵獎酬工具」與「組織管理制度」，意即組織是否有設計適合而且具備激勵因子的獎酬制度，同時組織是否有鼓勵、支持並且提供資源給團隊。上述這些層面皆影響著組織整體績效。

In this study, we explored the antecedents, consequences, and boundaries of team effectiveness and organizational performance. Specifically, we examined the relationship between team leadership and team effectiveness, and the relationships between team and organizational performance.
We collected data from 15 ocean vessel teams and four executive & middle-level managers. The results showed that both team climate and team leaderships had a positive effect on team effectiveness. In addition, team effectiveness was positively related to organizational performance.

第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節 遠洋漁業 4
第二節 團隊 10
第三節 團隊領導 16
第四節 組織績效 22
第三章 研究方法 27
第一節 研究方法的選擇 27
第二節 研究流程與研究對象 29
第三節 深度訪談與資料蒐集 33
第四章 結果與分析 37
第一節 遠洋漁船績效 37
第二節 獎酬制度與管理作法 53
第五章 討論與建議 58
第一節 結論與討論 58
第二節 研究建議 64
參考文獻 65
附 錄 70
附錄一 日本船長基本資料 70
附錄二 個案公司超低溫遠洋漁船平均漁撈收入值 71
附錄三 船長訪談稿 72
附錄四 深度訪談逐字稿 79

中文文獻
1. 李青芬、李雅婷、趙慕芬譯，Robbins S.P.著，2001，組織行為學第九版，台北：華泰。
2. 王文科，1986，教育研究法，臺北：五南圖書出版公司。
3. 王建忠，2001，團隊領導與團隊效能：團隊內互動的中介效果，國立台灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文。
4. 林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花，2005，質性研究方法：訪談模式與實施步驟分析，身心障礙研究，3卷2期。
5. 林俊延，2010，家長式教練領導與同儕領導對團隊凝聚力和團隊效能之關係，國立臺北教育大學體育學系碩士班碩士論文。
6. 司徒達賢，1979，企業策略管理，三民書局。
7. 行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局，2008，勞工運用及管理調查，臺北市。
8. 行政院農業委員會漁業署，2004，漁業署2000年至2003年漁業輿情資料，行政院農業委員會，臺北市。
9. 行政院農業委員會漁業署，2009，委員會漁業署2008年年報，行政院農業委員會，臺北市。
10. 吳佳綺譯，Gibbs， G. R.著，2010，質性資料的分析，新北市永和區：韋伯文化國際。
11. 李建華、方文寶，1996，企業績效評估理論與實務，台北：超越。
12. 李長貴，1997，績效管理與績效評估，臺北：華泰文化。
13. 洪俊龍，2002，人力資源管理系統、智慧資本與組織績效關聯性之研究，國立中正大學會計研究所碩士論文。
14. 高銘樹，2011，高績效人力資源管理實務、網絡關係與組織績效－以廈門台商為例，國立高雄大學高階經營管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
15. 陳惠民、吳竟豪、蕭玉明、楊欣怡、鄧家仁、林純姬、紀凱莉、王翔，1998，高效率團隊。台北：科技圖書。
16. 莫藜藜，1992，深入訪談法，質化研究在社會工作界的應用論見彙編，中華民國社區發展訓練中心，102-121。
17. 黃惠絹，2011，理性與非理性因素在個人決策過程之介入，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
18. 黃涓容，2008，領導者的團隊情緒領導行為和團隊績效、團隊內衝突的關聯及其調節作用，國立中正大學心理學研究所碩士論文。
19. 黃紹彥、林有志、林琦珍、施志成，2008，「智慧資本、智慧資本附加價值與企業績效之整合分析」，臺灣管理學刊，8卷1期：27-42。
20. 簡春安編，1992，質化工作在社會工作界的運用論見彙編，社區發展研究中心。
21. 簡毓汝，2007，職能模式與企業競爭力、組織績效之研究，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
22. 盧佩秋，2003，團隊領導對集體效能與團隊表現之影響，國立政治大學心理學研究所碩士論文。
23. 鐘倫納，1993，應用社會科學研究法，臺北：台灣商務印書館。


英文文獻
1. Adair, J.. 1987. Effective team building. Gower Publishing Company.
2. Ainger, A., R. Kaura & R. Ennals. 1995. Executive guide to business success though human-centered systems. New York: Springer.
3. Ainger, A., R. Kaura & R. Ennals. 1995. Business success through human-centred systems. London: Springer Verlag.
4. Ancona, D. G. & D. F. Caldwell. 1997. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 634-995.
5. Barrick, M. R., G. L. Stewart, M. J. Neubert & M. K. Mount. 1998. Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3): 377-391.
6. Bird, C. P. & D. W. Beechler. 1995. Links between business strategy and human resource management strategy in U.S. based Japanese subsidiaries: an empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(1): 23-46.
7. Cross, R. & L. Baird. 2000. Technology is not enough: Improving performance by building organizational memory. Sloan Management Review Association, 41(3): 69-78.
8. Dalton, D., W. Todor, M. Spendolini, G. Fielding & L. Porter. 1980. Organization structure and performance: A critical review. Academy of Management Review, 49-64.
9. Delaney, J. T. & M. A. Huselid. 1996. The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal. 39(4): 949-969.
10. Dyer, L. & T. Reeves. 1995. Human Resource strategies and firm performance: What do we know and where do we need to go?. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 6: 656-670.
11. Early, P. C. & E. Mosakowski. 2000. Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 43(1): 26-49.
12. Ends, E., & C. Page. 1977. Organization Team Building. Winthrop: Cambridge, Massachussetts.
13. Fleishman, E.A.. 1953. The description of supervisory behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 37(1): 1-6.
14. Fortuin, L.. 1988. Performance indicators—why, where, and how. European Journal of Operational Research, 34: 1-9.
15. Gladstein, D. L.. 1984. Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 499-517.
16. Greenberg & Liebman 1990. Incentives: The missing in strategic performance. Journal of Business Strategy, 8-11.
17. Hackman J. R.. 1986. Psychology and work: Productivity change and employment. Washington. D. C.: American Psychological Association.
18. Hackman, J. R.. 1987. The design of work team. In J. W. Lorsh (Ed.). Handbook of organizational behavior, 315-342. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
19. Hackman, J. R.. 1990. Groups that work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20. Hasenfeld, Y.. 1983.. Human service organization, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
21. Hodgetts, R.M.. 1991. Organizational behavior: Theory and practice, New York: Macmillian.
22. Hollander, E.P. & J.W. Julian. 1969. Contemporary trends in the analysis of the leadership process. Psychological Bulletin, 71:387-397.
23. Hooijberg, R., R.C. Bullis & J.G. Hunt. 1999. Behavioral complexity and the development of military leadership for the twenty-first century, In J.G. Hunt, G.E. Dodge, & L. Wong(Eds.), Out-of-the-box leadership: Transforming the twenty-first army and other top-performing organizations (111-130), Stamford, CT: JAI.
24. Huselid, M. A.. 1995. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 635-672.
25. Jacobs, T.O. & E. Jaques. 1990. Military executive leadership, In K. E. Clark and M. B. Clark (Eds.), Measures of Leadership, West Orange, NJ: Leadership Library of America: 281-295.
26. Jehn, K. A. & P. P. Shah. 1997. Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of mediating processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(4): 775-790.
27. Jessup, H. R.. 1990. New roles in team leadership. Training and Development Journal, 44: 79-83.
28. Jessup, H.R.. 1992. The road to results for teams. Training and Development Journal, 46(9): 65-68.
29. Katzenbach, J.R. & D.K. Smith. 1993. The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Boston: Harvard Business School.
30. Keys, J.B. & J. Wolfe. 1988. Management education and development: Current issues and emerging trends. Journal of Management, 16:307-336.
31. Kotter, J.P.. 1990. What leaders really do. Harvard Business Review, May-June: 103-111.
32. Lawler, E. E., III, Mohrman, S. A., & Ledford, G. E., Jr. 1995. Creating high performance organizations: Practices and results of employee involvement and total quality management in Fortune 1000 companies. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33. Le Pine, J. A., M. A. Hanson, W. C. Borman & S. J. Motowidlo. 2000. Contextual performance and teamwork: Implications for staffing. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 19: 53-90.
34. Schminke M. & Deborah W.. 1999. Group processes and performance and their effects on individuals' ethical frameworks. Journal of Business Ethics, 18(4): 367 - 381.
35. Mohrman, S. A., S. G. Cohen & A. M. Mohrman. 1995. Designing team-based organizations: New forms for knowledge work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36. Parker, G. M.. 1990. Team players and teamwork: The new competitive business strategy, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
37. Patton, M. Q.. 1990. Qualitative evaluation and research methods, Newbury Park, London, New Delhi: Sage.
38. Phillips, C., C. Palfrey. & P. Thomas. 1994. Evaluating health and social care: The Macmillan Press LTD.
39. Posey, P. & J. Klein. 1990. Revitalizaing manufacturing: Text and cases. Irwin: Homewood.
40. Quick, T.L.. 1992. Successful team building, New York: American Management Association.
41. Salas, E., T. L. Dickinson, S. A. Converse & S. I. Tannenbaum. 1992. Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.). Teams: Their training and performance. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
42. Schminke, M. & D. Wells. 1999. Group process and performance and their effects on individuals’ ethical frameworks. Journal of Business Ethics, 18: 367-381.
43. Shaw, J. B. & E. Barrett-Power. 1998. The effects of diversity on small work group processes and performance. Human Relations, 51(10): 1307-1325.
44. Shonk, J.H.. 1982. Working in Teams: a practical manual for improving work. New York: Amacom.
45. Song, X. M., Montoya-Weiss & J. B. Schmidt. 1997. Antecedents and consequences of cross-functional cooperation: A comparison of R&D, manufacturing, and marketing perspectives. Journal of Production Innovation Management, 14: 35-47.
46. Stewart, G. L., C. C. Manz, & H. P. Sims. 1999. Team work and group dynamics. New York: Wiley.
47. Thomas, J. B., & P. D. M. Kenneth. 1996. Diagnosing whether an organization is truly ready to empower work teams: A case study. Human Resource Planning, 19: 38-47.
48. Yammarino, F.J., F. Dansereau & C.J. Kennedy. 2001. A multiple-level multidimensional approach to leadership: Viewing leadership through an elephant’s eye. Organizational Dynamics, 29(3):149-163.
49. Yukl, G.. 1999. An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. Leadership Quarterly, 10(2): 285-305.
50. Yukl, G.. 2002. Leadership in organizations, 5th ed., Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
51. Venkatraman, N. & V. Ramanujam. 1986. Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4): 801-814.
52. Wang, W. Y. & C. F. Chang. 2004. Intellectual capital and performance in causal models-evidence from the information technology industry in Taiwan. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6(2): 222-236.
53. Watson, W. E., K. Kumar, & L. K. Michaelsen. 1993. Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3): 590-602.
54. Wenger, E.. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, meaning, and identity, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
55. Wenger, E.C. & W.M. Snyder. 2000. Communities of Practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, January-February: 139-145.
56. Wimmer, Roger D. & J. R. Dominick. 1994. Mass media research, An Introduction, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
57. Zaccaro, S. J. & M. A. Marks. 1999. The roles of leaders in high-performance teams. In E. Sundstrom & Associates (Eds.), Supporting work team effectiveness: Best management practices for fostering high performance (95–125). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.