綠色政策設立之用意在於保護環境，但是常常會被誤認為維護環境品質的同時犧牲了經濟的考量。高雄市政府由2002年起開始建立濕地廊道，至今已經累積21個濕地將高雄市大都會區串聯起綠色廊道，本研究藉由透過綠色政策探討經濟發展，針對高雄市區不同區域之滯洪池、濕地進行分析。本研究區為分布於高雄市三民區本和里生態滯洪池、三民區寶業里滯洪池溼地與三民區川東里中都濕地公園，透過特徵價格法比較設置前後之地價浮動，並針對各區域使用民眾進行問卷調查，瞭解都市滯洪池建設與改善空間，透過各區域之正面影響將濕地管理納入永續都市發展政策，以達到永續經營之概念。

Green policy is meant to protect the environment. However, it is often misleading that preserving the environment means sacrificing economic development. This study is to examine the economic developments in the three urban wetlands in Kaohsiung that has increase in land value, increased residential housing development in the proximity through land readjustment projects and thus increased residential population. Land value, instead of housing prices are utilized since historical records are more complete, in the proximity of the urban wetlands are examined and analyzed through the hedonic pricing method. This data is compared with housing prices in the proximity to further establish the argument that urban wetlands have positive influence. Further, population as well as disposable income per household increase in the proximity will be examined as indication of economic growth. Surveys conducted in the proximity of three urban wetlands concluded that such public good is indication of positive municipal policy to protect the environment, which should be strongly included in future urban planning.
Keywords: municipal green policy, urban wetland, land readjustment (LR), land value, hedonic pricing method.

Table of Contents 目錄
Thesis Approval Form論文審定書………………………………………………………i
Dedication 誌謝…………………………………………………………………..……...ii
中文摘要 ……………………………………………………………………………... iii
Abstract ……………………………………………………………………………….. iii
Table of Contents 目錄………………………………………………………………. iv
Figures 圖目錄………………………………………………………………………. vi
Tables 表目錄………………………………………………………………………. viii
CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION 緒論................................................................................ 1
1.1 Aim and objectives 研究動機與目的................................................................. 1
1.2 Research Approach & format 研究方法與流程................................................ 2
CHAPTER 2-REFERENCE REVIEW 文獻回顧................................................................. 3
2.1 Urban Planning Policy 都市計畫政策.............................................................. 3
2.1.1 Role of Land Readjustment (LR) 市地重劃之角色.................................. 3
2.1.2 Land Readjustment (LR) projects in Kaohsiung City 高雄市市地重劃.... 5
2.2 Wetland Protection 濕地保育發展 ............................................................. 10
2.2.1 Wetland Protection in Taiwan 台灣濕地保育發展................................... 13
2.2.2 Wetland Protection in Kaohsiung City 高雄濕地保育發展..................... 15
2.2.3 The Kaohsiung “Wetland Corridor Project” 高雄市濕地生態廊道計畫16
2.3 Non-market Valuation Framework Review 非市場財貨價值評估法探討..... 18
2.3.1 Travel-Cost Method 旅行成本法............................................................. 20
2.3.2 Hedonic Pricing Method 特徵價格法....................................................... 20
2.3.3 Contingent Valuation Method 條件評估法............................................... 21
2.3.4 Conclusion on Research method 研究方法結論.................................... 23
CHAPTER 3- RESEARCH METHOD 研究方法............................................................... 24
3.1-Wetland cases in Kaohsiung 研究區域介紹.................................................... 24
v
3.1.1 Site #1- The Ben-he Village Flood Detention Wetland 案例一：本和里生
態滯洪池............................................................................................................ 25
3.1.2 Site #2- The Bau-ye Flood Detention Wetland 案例二：寶業里滯洪池濕地
............................................................................................................................ 25
3.1.3 Site #3- The Jhong-dou Wetland Park 中都濕地公園.............................. 26
3.2-Research Method 研究方法............................................................................. 29
3.2.1 Definition and evaluation of survey 問卷定義與衡量方法..................... 29
3.2.2 Survey Design 問卷設計.......................................................................... 29
3.2.3 Carry out the Main Survey 問卷發放....................................................... 30
3.3- Data Analysis & Findings 資料分析&結果................................................... 30
3.3.1 Analysis of the land value 地價變化分析................................................. 30
3.3.2 Analysis of the survey results 問卷結果分析........................................... 37
CHAPTER 4-CONCLUSION &SUGGESTIONS 結論與建議............................................ 42
4.1- Conclusion 研究結論...................................................................................... 42
4.1.1 Urban development 都市發展.................................................................. 42
4.1.2 Wetland and Ecology sustainability 永續生態與濕地............................. 43
4.2 Implications and Suggestions on urban wetland policy and management 都市
溼地發展政策與管理建議/ ................................................................................. 43
參考文獻 / BIBLIOGRAPHY......................................................................................... 45
APPENDICES 附錄........................................................................................................ 50
1. Expert Interview sample 專家問卷樣本........................................................ 50
2. Mass Survey samples 大眾問卷樣本............................................................. 51
3. Mass Survey Results & Analysis 大眾問卷結果分析.................................... 55
3.1 Site #1-The Ben-he Village Flood Detention Wetland 案例一：本和里生態滯
洪池........................................................................................................................ 55
3.2 Site #2-The Bau-ye Flood Detention Wetland 案例二：寶業里生態池溼地60
3.3 Site #3-The Jhong-dou Wetland Park 案例三：中都溼地公園.................... 65

參考文獻 References
一、 中文部分
許芳毓，都市植生破碎度與綠化策略之研究-以台南市為例，國立成功大學碩士論文，2005。

「波光綠影相約高雄濕地—探索高雄濕地生態廊道與親水空間」，高雄市政府工務局養護工程處，2013年11月5日。 Shimmering Light from Kaohsiung Wetlands-Exploring Kaohsiung Ecological Corridor and Waterfronts. Bureau of Kaohsiung City Government, November 5th, 2013.

「高雄市濕地生態廊道」，高雄市政府工務局養護工程處，2013年9月。Kaohsiung Wetland Ecological Corridor: The Happy and Vigorous Ecological Capital of our Wetlands. Maintenance Office of the Public Works, Bureau of Kaohsiung City Government, September, 2013.

張弘毅，「台灣濕地保育政策與實務」，科學發展，2014年5月，497期，12-17頁。

張瑞益(2004)， 「3. 條件評估法」，編訂工業區公共服務評價之研究。21- 頁。(Chang, Duan-Yi)

高雄市政府養工處，「推動高雄市濕地生態廊道」，台灣濕地雜誌85期，2012年6月29日，11-21頁。

陳森森，「滯洪池多功能效益之展現—以高雄市本和里為例」，「生態濕地在高雄」研討會論文集，2006年8月9日。

《國家重要濕地保育計畫100-105年(99年7月1日核定) 》
《濕地保育法》(內政部營建署)(102年7月3日頒布)

林庚達技師，〈「寶業滯洪公園」讓高市民有感改善防治「淹水」作為〉。技師報Engineers Times, no. 858 (2013.5.18)。

葉幼華編，「聽濕地在唱歌：城市的生態復育手冊」，高雄市政府工務局、新自然主義，2006年。

「濕地永續管理之法令及政策工具」。科學人雜誌2008年1月號，第 71 期。(內政部營建署網頁-專題報導)

吳瑞川、鍾孟勳、王彥清(2010)〈高雄濕地生態廊道的啟發〉《高市文獻》第23卷，第三期：118-135。

碩博士論文
趙子潔(2016)，都市綠色建設對土地價值之影響：以高雄市新創濕地為例，
國立中山大學，海洋環境及工程學系，碩士論文。

二、 英文部分
Arrow, Kenneth; Bolin, Bert; Costanza, Robert; Dasgupta, Partha; et al. (Apr 28, 1995) “Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment.” Science, New Series, Vol. 268, No. 5210: 520.

Barbier, E.B., M. Acreman, and D. Knowler. 1997. “Economic Valuation of Wetlands: a Guide for Policy Makers and Planners.” Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, Switzerland.

Boyer, Tracy and Stephen Polasky. 2004. Valuing Urban Wetlands: A Review of Non-market Valuation Studies. Wetlands. Vol. 24, No. 24, December: 744-755.

Chichilnisky, G. and G. Heal. 1998. “Economic returns from the biosphere.” Nature 391:629-630.

Chou, Tsu-Lung. 2010. “Chapter 4 - Institutional evolution and the challenge of urban planning in post-industrial Taiwan.” Planning in Taiwan: Spatial Planning in the Twenty-First Century. Edited Roger Bristow. New York: Routledge: 74-96.

Dahl, T. E. 2000. Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States 1986 to 1997. U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA.

Davidson, Nick C. 2014. “How much wetland has the world lost? Long-term and recent trends in global wetland area.” Marine and Freshwater Research 65(10) 934-941.

Doss, C. R. and S.J. Taff. 1996. “The influence of wetland type and wetland proximity on residential property values.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 21: 120-129.

Earnhart, D. 2001. “Combining revealed and stated preferences methods to value environmental amenities at residential locations.” Land Economics 77:12-29.

Hammitt, James K., Jin-Tan Liu and Jin-Long Liu (2001). Contingent valuation of a Taiwanese wetland. Environment and Development Economics, 6, pp. 259-268.

King, D. 1998. “The dollar value of wetlands: trap set, bait taken, don’t swallow.” National Wetlands Newsletter 20:7-11.

Mahan, B.L., S. Polasky, and R. Adams. 2000. “Valuing urban wetlands: a property price approach.” Land Economics 76:100-113.

Pullan, R.A. 1988. A Survey of Past and Present Wetlands of the Western Algarve. Department of Geography, University of Liverpool, UK.

Shaw, Samuel, Gordon C. Fredine, 1956. Wetlands of the United States: Their extent and values to Waterfowl and other wildlife. Washington D.C. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of River Basin Studies, Circ. 39. 67pp.

Sorensen, A. 2000. “Land readjustment and metropolitan growth: an examination of suburban land development and urban sprawl in the Tokyo metropolitan area.” Progress in Planning, 53(4), 217-330.


Tiner, R.W. 1984. Wetlands of the United States: Current Status and Trends. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C.

Ramsar Convention. 1996. Strategic plan 12997-2002. Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, Switzerland.

Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. “Wetlands: a global disappearing act.” Fact Sheet No. 3, Feb. , 2015..

Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. “Towards the wise use of urban and peri-urban wetlands.” Briefing notes BN no. 6. Dec. 2013.

Zamora, P.M. 1984. Philippine Mangroves: Assessment Status, Environmental Problems, Conservation and Management Strategies. In Soepadmo, E., Rao, A.N., MacIntosh, D.J. (eds.). Asian Symposium on Mangrove Environment: Research and Management 25-29, August 1980. Kuala Lumpar, Malaysia.

三、 相關網站
中華民國統計資料網 National Statistics, ROC: http://statdb.dgbas.gov.tw
內政部地政司Department of Land Administration, Ministry of Interior, ROC: http://www.land.moi.gov.tw
行政院主計總處Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, ROC: http://www.dgbas.gov.tw
高雄市生物多樣性資料庫 Kaohsiung City Biodiversity Database: http://ksbiodiv.ksepb.gov.tw
高雄市政府地政局土地開發處 Land Development Office, Land Administration Bureau, Kaohsiung City Government:
http://landevp.kcg.gov.tw
高雄市政府都市發展局Urban Development Bureau, Kaohsiung City Government: http://urban-web.kcg.gov.tw
高雄市政府工務局養護工程處 Maintenance Office, Public Works Bureau, Kaohsiung City Government: http://pwbmo.kcg.gov.tw/05_service/05_02.asp
Ramsar website: http://www.ramsar.org