Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0810109-224523 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0810109-224523
論文名稱
Title
自我呈現與社會認同對網路使用者在社群網站的參與、承諾與知識貢獻之影響
The Influence of Self-Presentation and Social Identity on Internet User’s Participating, Commitment and knowledge Contribution in the Online Community
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
73
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2009-07-28
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2009-08-10
關鍵字
Keywords
參與、承諾、自我呈現、社會認同、知識貢獻
Knowledge contribution, Participation, Commitment, Social Identity, Self-Presentation
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5794 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5794 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
從早期的ARPANet、MUD、BBS、Newsgroup一直到如今的WiKi多人協同創作超文本系統以及結合搜尋功能的討論版(如Yahoo! 奇摩知識+),所使用的資訊科技不斷翻新,不過這幾種形式的社群之間卻不存在著相互取代的問題,仍並存提供網友們多元化的交流方式。

近年來網路的發展走向個人化,個人部落格、相簿、微型網誌等風行全球,社群討論版上增加許多個人化的工具(如個人顯示圖片、暱稱、檔案、等級、甚至是部落格)讓個人有更多的機會可以呈現以及表達自我。於此同時維基百科、開放式課程計畫卻反其道而行,它們以明確的宗旨吸引認同網站遠景的會員加入,並且成就了諸如全球最多語言以及條目的百科全書。因此,本研究提出自我呈現以及社會認同概念來代表「個人-社會」,探討其對於社群成員對於社群參與行為、承諾行為以及知識貢獻的影響,並且探討參與行為、承諾行為以及知識貢獻行為之間的關係。

研究發現,社群成員的參與行為對於承諾行為以及知識貢獻行為都有正向且強烈的影響,因此,參與行為可以說是其他正向行為的預測因子。此外,研究發現社群成員對於社群的認同有助於發展成員的參與行為以及承諾行為。社群成員的自我呈現渴望則對於承諾以及參與行為都具有解釋能力,惟對於知識貢獻沒有直接的影響。
Abstract
Since APRANET, the predecessor of global internet, came into being during the 1960s, the advancements of networking technologies over the decades have created online communities such as MUDs, BBS, and newsgroups that allow users in different locations to exchange messages and share information. Nowadays, there are even wiki websites that invite all users to edit any page or to create new pages, and Yahoo! Answers, a community-driven knowledge market website where users can submit their questions and answer questions asked by other users. With such a variety of digital communities, individuals choose their own favorites to interact with others.

Especially in recent years, with personal blogs, online photo albums, and micro-blogging taking the lead, more personalized features such as the display picture and user name, deep profiling, avatar and even personal page, are integrated into online discussion forums for individual users to freely present themselves. On the other hand, there are Wikipedia and MIT OpenCourseWare, both web-base collaborative projects that invite the collaboration and contributions of users identifying with their founding goals. Based on these observations, this thesis takes personal and social perceive into account. The research adopted self-presentation and social identity as the factors that can affect community member’s participation, commitment, and knowledge contribution in the online communities.

As hypothesized, community member’s participation can motivates their commitment and knowledge contribution to the community. Furthermore, community member's identification with the online communities fosters their participation and commitment while community member’s self-presentation, reflecting the degree of their participation and commitment though, has no direct relation in making any knowledge contribution to online communities.
目次 Table of Contents
第一章 緒論 - 1 -
第一節 研究背景與動機 - 1 -
第二節 研究問題與目的 - 3 -
第二章 文獻探討 - 4 -
第一節 認同 (IDENTITY) - 4 -
2.1.1 認同的定義 - 4 -
2.1.2 認同的分類 - 6 -
2.1.3 線上社群的認同 - 7 -
第二節 自我呈現 (SELF-PRESENTATION) - 9 -
2.2.1 自我概念的意涵 - 10 -
2.2.2 自我呈現 - 12 -
2.2.3 網路中的自我呈現 - 13 -
第三節 承諾 (COMMITMENT) - 14 -
2.3.1 承諾的類型 - 15 -
第四節 參與 (PARTICIPATION) - 17 -
第五節 知識貢獻 (KNOWLEDGE CONTRIBUTION) - 18 -
第三章 研究方法 - 20 -
第一節 研究架構 - 20 -
第二節 研究假設 - 21 -
3.2.1 參與、承諾與貢獻 - 21 -
3.2.2 自我呈現、社會認同的影響 - 22 -
第三節 研究變項及操作型定義 - 23 -
3.3.1 自我呈現 (Self-Presentation) - 23 -
3.3.2 社會認同 (Social Identity) - 24 -
3.3.3 參與 (Participation) - 25 -
3.3.4 承諾 (Commitment) - 26 -
3.3.5 知識貢獻 (Knowledge Contribution) - 27 -
第四節 研究設計 - 27 -
3.4.1 研究對象及抽樣方法 - 27 -
3.4.2 問卷設計 - 28 -
第五節 資料分析方法 - 28 -
3.5.1 敘述性統計 - 28 -
3.5.2 因素分析 - 29 -
3.5.3 信度分析 - 29 -
3.5.4 相關分析 - 29 -
3.5.5 路徑分析 - 29 -
第四章 資料分析與解釋 - 30 -
第一節 敘述性統計 - 30 -
4.1.1 人口特徵 - 30 -
第二節 因素分析 (FACTOR ANALYSIS) - 34 -
第三節 信度分析 (RELIABILITY ANALYSIS) - 37 -
第四節 相關分析 (CORRELATION ANALYSIS) - 38 -
第五節 路徑分析 (PATH ANALYSIS) - 39 -
4.5.1 知識貢獻影響因素 - 40 -
4.5.2 承諾影響因素 - 41 -
4.5.3 參與影響因素 - 43 -
第六節 分析結果 - 44 -
第五章 結論與建議 - 46 -
第一節 研究結論 - 46 -
第二節 研究建議 - 47 -
第三節 研究限制 - 48 -
參考文獻 - 49 -
中文文獻 - 49 -
英文文獻 - 52 -
附錄一、正式問卷 - 61 -
參考文獻 References
中文文獻
朱文禎、陳哲賢(2007)。探討虛擬社群之知識分享行為:以線上遊戲社群為例。電子商務研究,5(1),55-80。

李茂政(2007)。人際溝通新論-原理與技巧。台北市:風雲論壇。

李美枝、李怡青(2003)。我群與他群的分化:從生物層次到人的層次。本土心理 學研究,20,3-38。

吳筱玫(2003)。網路傳播概論。台北市:智勝。

吳盛、林東清(2007)。以計劃行為理論探討資訊人員的知識分享行為。資訊管理學報,14(2),75-100。

吳齊殷、莊庭瑞(2004)。超連結網絡分析:一項分析網路社會結構的新方法。資訊社會研究,6,127-148。

吳明隆、塗金堂(2008)。SPSS與統計應用分析。台北:五南。

邱皓政(2008)。量化研究與統計分析-SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。台北:五南。

施嵐芳(2005)。虛擬社群認同及網路社會支持對主觀幸福感的影響。台灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。

姜定宇、鄭伯壎(2003)。組織忠誠、組織承諾、及組織公民行為研究之回顧與前瞻,應用心理研究,19,175-209。

張火燦、劉淑寧(2002)。從社會網絡理論探討員工知識分享。人力資源管理學報,2(3),101-113。

時蓉華(1996)。社會心理學。台北市:東華。

郭為藩(1996)。自我心理學。台北市:師大書苑。

許孟祥、詹佳琪(2002)。虛擬社群之知識分享、知識品質及夥伴關係品質對網路社群成員滿意度之影響。資訊管理學報,9(1),1-20。

黃厚銘(2002)。網路上探索自我認同的遊戲。教育與社會研究,2,65-106。

鄭瑞澤(1987)。社會心理學。台北市:中國行為科學社。

資勤學(2006)。以動機歷程整合模式探討虛擬社群知識分享行為之研究。高雄第一科技大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄。

戴拉邁特、梅伊(Delamater,J.D.& Myers,D.J.)著(2007)。社會心理學(Social Psychology)(陸洛譯)。台北市:心理。

高夫曼(Goffman,E.)著(1992)。日常生活中的自我表演(The presentation of self in every life)(徐江敏、李姚軍譯)。台北市:桂冠。(原作1959出版)

葛林伯格(Greenberg, J.)著(2000)。組織行為(Managing Behavior In Organizations)(張善智、謝馥蔓譯)。台北市:學富。

梭羅(Thurlow,C.)、藍傑(Lengel,L.) & 湯尼克(Tomic,A.)著(2006)。電腦中介傳播-人際互動與網際網路(Computer Media Communication-Social
interaction and the internet)(謝光萍,吳怡萱譯)。台北市:韋伯。

特克(Turkle, S.)著(1998)。虛擬化身-網路世代的身分認同(譚天,吳佳真譯) 台北市:遠流。(原作1995出版)

史都華(Stewart,T.A.)原著(1998)。智慧資本-資訊時代的企業利基。(宋偉航 譯)。台北:智庫

韋伯(Weber,A.L.)著(1995)。社會心理學(Social Psychology)(趙居蓮譯)。台北市:桂冠。(原作1992出版)












英文文獻
Algesheimer, R., Dholakia U.M., & Herrmann, A.(2005).The social influence of brand community:evidence from eurepean car clubs. Journal of marketing,69, 19-34.

Amichai-Hamburger,Y.(2005).Internet minimal group paradigm. CyberPsychology and behavior,8(2), 140-142.

Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (1994). Social psychology: The heart and the mind. New York: HarperCollins.

Andersen, P.H. (2005), Relationship marketing and brand involvement of professionals through web-enhanced brand communities: the case of Coloplast, Industrial Marketing Management, 34(1), 39-51.

Anderson, E., & Weitz, B.(1992).The use of pledge to build and sustain commitment in distribution channels. Journal of marketing research,Feb, 18-34.

Bagozzi, R. P.,& Dholakia(2002).Intentional social action in virtual communities. Journal of interactive marketing,16(2), 2-21.

Bergami,M.,& Bagozzi,R.P.(2000).Self-categorization,affective commitment and
group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. British Journal of social Psychology, 39, 555-577.

Bhattacharya, C. B., Rao, H., & Glynn, M. A.(1995). Understanding the bond of Identification: An investigation of its correlates among art museum members, Journal of marketing, 59, 46-57.

Casalo, L. V., Flavian, C. & Guinalíu,M. (2008). Promoting Consumer's Participation
in Virtual Brand Communities: A New Paradigm in Branding Strategy. Journal
of Marketing Communications,14(1), 19-36.

Chiu,C.M., Hsu,M.H. & Wang, T.G.(2006).Understanding knowledge sharing
in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42, 1872-1888.

Cooley,C.H.(1902).Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribner’s.

Davenport, T.H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Dholakia, U.M., Bagozzi, R.P. & Pearo, L. K.(2004). A social influence model of consumer participation in network- and small-group-based virtual communities. International journal of research in marketing, 21, 241-263.

Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P., & Ouwerkerk, J. W.(1999). Self-categorisation, commitment to group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of social Psychology, 29, 371-389.

Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B. & Heion, R. D.(2006).Self-presentation in online personals
---the role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success
in internet dating. Communication research, 33(2), 152-177.

Hagel III, J. & Armstrong, A. G.(1997). Net Gains:Expanding Markets through Virtual Communities. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational context. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121-140.

Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J.,& White, K.M.(1995).A tale of two theories:a critical comparison on identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(4), 255-269.

Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1985). Interpersonal attraction, social identification and psychological group formation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 51-66.

Jenkins, R.(1996).Social identity.NY:Routledge.

Jones, E. E. (1990). Interaction goals and strategic self-presentation. In Edward E. Jones, Interpersonal perception (pp. 167-200). New York: Freeman.

Gupta, S., & Kim (2007). Developing the commitment to Virtual community: the balanced effects of cognition and affect. Information resources management Journal, 20(1), 28-45

Kane, A.A., Argote, L., & Levine J.M.(2005).Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organizational behavior and human decision processes,96(1),56-71.

Kang,I.; Lee,K.C., Lee, S., and Choi,J.(2007).Investigation of online community voluntary behavior using cognitive map.Computers in human behavior, 23(1),111-126

Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B.C.Y., & Wei,K.W.(2005).Contributing knowledge to electronic repositories:an Empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 113-143.

Karasawa, M. (1991). Toward an assessment of social identity: The structure of group identification and its effects on in-group evaluations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 293-307.

Kim, H. W., & Chan, H.C.(2007). Why people pay for digital items? Presentation desire of online identity. 11th Pacific-Asia conference on Information Systems.

Koh, J., & Kim, Y. G.(2004). Knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an e-business perspective. Expert systems with application, 26, 155-166.

Ma, M., & Agarwal, R.(2007).Through a glass darkly: Information technology design, Identity verification, and knowledge contribution in online community. Information Systems Research, 18(1), 42-67.

Mason, R.(1994). Using communication media in open and flexible learing. London:Kogan Page.

McAlexander, J.H., Schouten, J.W., Koenig, H.F. (2002), Building brand community, Journal of Marketing, 66 (1), 38-55.

McFarland, S. L.& Wayne, S. J. (1993). Commitment and employee behavior: Comparison of affective commitment and continuance commitment with perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(5), 774-780.

Mill,H.(1995). The presentation of self in electronic life: Goffman on the internet. Paper presented at the embodied knowledge and virtual space conference,
Goldsmiths’ college, University of London. Retrieved March 1,2004,from
http://ess.ntu.ac.uk/miller/cyberpsych/goffman.htm

Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., and Deshpande, R.(1992).Relationships between prodders and user of market research:the dynamics of trust within and between organizations. Journal of marketing research,Aug,314-328.

Mowday, R.T., Steers, R.M., & Porter L.W.(1979) The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of vocational behavior, 14:224-247.

Nunnally (1978), J.C. (1978) Psychometric theory (2ed ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. MA:Lexington Books.

Organ, D. W.(1990). The Motivational Basis of Organizational Citizenship Behavior,in B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings , Research in Organizational Behavior, Greenwich, CT:JAI Press, 12, pp.43-72.

Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2000). Refining the cognitive redefinition of the group: Deindividuation effects in common bond vs. common identity groups. In T. Postmes, R. Spears, M. Lea & S. Reicher (Eds.), Side effects centre stage: Recent developments in studies of de-individuation in groups (pp. 63-78). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: KNAW.

Postmes, T., Spears, R., Sakhel, K., & de Groot.,D.(2001). Social influence in computer-mediated communication:the effects of anonymity on group bfhavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(10), 1243-1254.

Ren, Y., Robert, K. & Kiesler, S.(2007).Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities.Organization studies, 28(3), 377-408.

Rheingold, H.(1993) The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Sassenberg, K.(2002).Common bond and common identity groups on the internet: Attachment and normative behavior in on-topic and off-topic chats. Group dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(1), 27-37.

Spears,R., Postmes, T.,Lea,M. & Wolbert,A.(2002).When are net effects gross products? The power of influence and the influence of power in
computer-mediated communication. Journal of social Issues, 58(1), 91-107.

Sohn, D., & Leckenby, J. D.(2007). A Structural solution to communication dilemmas in a virtual community. Journal of communication, 57, 435-449.

Tajfel, H.(1970).Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223(5), 96-102.

Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149-178.

Tajfel, H., &Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of social conflict.In W. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.). CA: Brooks/Cole.

Taylor, J. C.(2002). Teaching and learning online:The workers, the lurker and the shirkers. Paper presented at the 2002 Conference on Research in Distance &
Adult learning in Asia.

Thorbjornsen, H., Pedersen, P.E., & Nysveen H.(2007).“This is who I am”: identity Expressiveness and the theory of planned behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 24(9), 763-785.

Tuner, J. C.(1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. CT: JAI Press.

Tuner, J. C., Hogg, M. A.,Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D. and Wetherell, M. S.(1987). Rediscovering the social group:A self-categorization theory. Oxford:Blackwell.

Tuner, J. W., Grube, J. A., & Meyers, J.(2001).Developing an optimal match within online communities:an expliration of CMC support communities and traditional support. Journal of Comminication, 51, 231-251.

Organ, D. W. & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel
Psychology, 48, 775-802.

Van den Hooff, B. and Van Weenen, F. D. L. (2004) .Committed to share: commitment and CMC use as antecedents of knowledge sharing , Knowledge and Process Management, 11(1), 13-24.

Wasko, M.M. & Faraj, S(2005).Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge in electronic networks of practice. Mis Quarterly, 29(1), 33-57.

Wasko, M. M., Faraj, S., & Teigland, R.(2004). Collective action and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. Journal of the association for information systems, 5(11-12), 493-513.

Weeks, J. (1990). Identity: Community culture, difference. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

Wiertz, C., & De Ruyter, K. (2007). Beyond the Call of Duty: Why Customers Participate in Firm-hosted commercial online communities. Organization studies, 28(3), 347-375.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外均不公開 not available
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.141.8.247
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.141.8.247
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code