Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0820107-174733 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0820107-174733
論文名稱
Title
國際快遞業之競爭分析-以台灣國際快遞業者為例
A Competitive Analysis of International Express Industry: A Case Study of DHL Taiwan Corporation
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
103
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2007-06-02
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2007-08-20
關鍵字
Keywords
行銷通路、競爭分析、國際快遞業、行銷策略、消費者觀感
Marketing Channels, User Experiences, Marketing Strategy, Competitive Analysis, International Express Industry
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5689 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5689 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
當DHL在1973年率先投入台灣國際快遞市場的經營後,UPS、FedEx紛紛隨後進入台灣市場,加上原先就存在在台灣市場裡的郵局,形成激烈的競爭狀態,行經當今,競爭狀態大勢底定,DHL掌握市場上大部分市佔率,UPS、FedEx與郵局則佔剩下之市佔率之大部分,而DHL可以在國際快遞市場裡,不管是B2B市場或是B2C市場占有優勢的市佔率,當然最大的原因歸於與台灣最大的零售通路7-ELEVEN合作全面通路收貨據點,但是存在市佔率底下的隱憂則可能有因應龐大的通路所雇用的服務人員是否受到專業快遞收發訓練、通路據點是否形象專業、與國際快遞業的連接性是否有做到緊密結合等問題,都是國際快遞業在經營B2C市場中不得不注意也是最容易忽略的問題,也是影響公司內部的競爭優勢的重要來源之一。

  本研究是以進入台灣B2C市場的國際快遞業者、與國際快遞業者合作的通路商、使用過國際快遞業者的觀感,以高雄為受訪地區為主,進行一深入的訪談。國際快遞公司之行銷策略的行銷目標、產品、價格、促銷、通路;行銷通路
、合作策略、收件情況、店的位置、員工訓練、營業額;消費者觀感的使用情況、使用郵局與否、投遞過程、追蹤貨物系統、服務人員態度、價錢高低、不愉快事情、滿不滿意且是否繼續使用、推薦給其他人,等三項構面來進行詢問。

而由本研究之研究結果顯示DHL現在為B2C市場的領導者;市場市講求誰可以最接近消費者,誰就可以搶下市佔率;7-ELEVEN因為其服務的多樣性反變成DHL其要害,因為變得「不專業」;DHL的通路商常常「漏掉」顧客的物件;FedEx會看哪幾家的營業額特別高,再決定要不要在那邊設點;DHL在訓練通路商的員工時,是比FedEx來的草率;FedEx對於柯達佣金的給予是相當不吝嗇的;郵局便宜、DHL方便但不便宜、FedEx快速、UPS在國外據點很多;DHL為擁有全台灣最多通路的國際快遞公司;貨物追蹤系統,而且都會有實際情況比真實情況慢的問題;以專業度來看的話,則通路商的不專業可能就會成為致命點,以專業度的話可能在公司成立的收發站的人員比較能夠清楚的回答問題;沒有遇到什麼不愉快的事情;大都感到滿意後再去推薦給別人。

本研究最後會針對國際快遞公司給予建議且本研究應朝向哪個方向做後續的研究也在最後做一說明,希望能對於國際快遞公司在台灣的競爭發展能得到更完整的資訊與建議。
Abstract
DHL, the international air express service provider, set up its first branch in Taiwan in 1973. UPS and FedEx, followed in the forerunner’s footsteps, and joined the market as well. Together with the Chunghwa Post Corporation, these four major international express service providers have made the international express marketplace in Taiwan a very competitive environment. Until now, the competition is pretty much settled with DHL having a majority of the market share in both B2B and B2C markets. The main reason why DHL dominants the industry is due to its cooperative relationship with 7-ELEVEN, the largest convenient chain store in Taiwan. DHL customers can drop-off their shipment or packages at any 7-Eleven in Taiwan. Nevertheless, there are still underlining problems and concerns in regard to the business relationship with 7-Eleven which the company needs to pay attention to. First of all, are the 7-Eleven service personnel receiving professional training needed for DHL distribution channels? Second, is the image of 7-ELEVEN stores consistent with that of DHL? Third, is there strong connections and bonding between DHL express operations and 7-Eleven? These are some questions that are often omitted in the B2C market for the international express enterprises; and yet, these questions are the sources of the company’s internal competitive advantages.
This study aims to provide an in-depth interview with international express corporations in the B2C market, channel providers that cooperates with the international express corporations, and the international express customers in Kaohsiung. In terms of international express corporations, the question focuses mostly on the company’s marketing strategies including marketing target, product, price, promotion and channels. In terms of channel providers, the center of attention focuses on marketing channels, cooperation strategies, receiving status, and store locations. In terms of customer impressions, the interview focuses mainly on the issues of user experiences, delivery process, package tracking systems, attitudes of service personnel, prices, service satisfactions and whether recommendations are made to other people.
The research findings suggested that DHL is still the leader of the B2C marketplace in Taiwan. Those companies that are closer to their customers win the market share. As for 7-Eleven, by providing product and service diversity, the company actually becomes a concern for DHL for being “unprofessional”. It is found that DHL distribution channels often lose packages during the delivery process. FedEx decided on its distribution channel locations based on the channels’ profit incomes. In terms of employee training for distribution channels, FedEx provides a more complete program than DHL. If a comparison is made with these express companies’ advantages, the Chunghwa Post Corporation provides cheap services; DHL has the most distribution channels in Taiwan; FedEx provides the fastest international express services; and UPS has the most complete distribution channels around the world. The key factor to international express success is the degree of professionalism. The distribution channel personnel must be able to provide clear and precise answers and services in order to gain customer satisfaction or even recommendations to potential new customers.
In conclusion, this paper will provide some suggestions and future study suggestions for both the researchers and international express companies. And hopefully provide some valuable information and suggestions to international express companies for their future competitive developments.
目次 Table of Contents
致謝辭-----------------------------------------------------------Ⅰ
論文摘要---------------------------------------------------------Ⅱ
ABSTRACT------------------------------------------------------Ⅳ
目錄-------------------------------------------------------------Ⅵ
表目錄-----------------------------------------------------------Ⅶ
圖目錄-----------------------------------------------------------Ⅷ
第一章 緒論------------------------------------------------1
第一節 研究背景-------------------------------------------1
第二節 研究動機-------------------------------------------2
第三節 研究目的-------------------------------------------2
第四節 研究範圍-------------------------------------------2
第二章 文獻探討與目前競爭狀況介紹--------------------------3
第一節 國際快遞業-----------------------------------------3
第二節 目前競爭狀況---------------------------------------9
第三節 競爭分析與競爭優勢文獻回顧------------------------13
第四節 通路文獻------------------------------------------22
第五節 小結----------------------------------------------28
第三章 研究方法-------------------------------------------29
第一節 質性研究------------------------------------------29
第二節 研究架構及內容------------------------------------30
第三節 資料收集------------------------------------------32
第四章 資料分析-------------------------------------------39
第一節 公司訪談問卷資料整理------------------------------39
第二節 零售業的訪談資料整理與討論------------------------41
第三節 使用過之消費者訪談記錄整理與討論------------------51
第四節 小結----------------------------------------------61
第五章 結論與建議-----------------------------------------64
第一節 結論----------------------------------------------64
第二節 建議----------------------------------------------67
第三節 研究限制------------------------------------------68
參考文獻--------------------------------------------------------69
附錄一 國際快遞公司訪談問卷-------------------------------------72
附錄二 通路商訪談問卷-------------------------------------------75
附錄三 消費者訪談問卷-------------------------------------------84
參考文獻 References
第一部分:中文文獻
1.「2006年台灣全區消費者心目中理想品牌」,管理雜誌第379期。
2.方至民,2000,企業競爭優勢,前程企業管理有限公司。
3.方世榮譯,2003,行銷管理學(11),Philip Kotler,東華書局。
4.呂大衛,1993,「我國民營國際快遞業先驅者優勢與競爭對比研究」,國立交通大學碩士論文。
5.利翠珊,1995,「夫妻互動歷程之探討—以台北地區年輕夫妻為例的一項初探性研究」,本土心理學研究。
6.林宗華,2004,「國際快遞業的兩岸業務競爭策略探討」,明志技術學院碩士論文。
7.吳芝儀、李奉儒譯(Michael Quinn Patton著,1999),質的評鑑與研究,台北桂冠。
8.柯建裕,1998,「國際快遞服務之顧客服務策略研究模式」,國立台灣大學碩士論文。
9.胡幼慧主編,1996,質性研究-理論、方法及本土女性研究實例,台北巨流出版社。
10.周泰華,2007,行銷研究方法與個案(Marketing Research Methods and Cases),高雄復文圖書出版社。
11.高淑清,2002,「教育研究(二)質性教育研究」,載於楊國賜編,新世紀的教育學概念(頁516-576),台北學富文化。
12.徐宗國譯,1997,質性研究概論,Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin合著,巨流圖書有限公司。
13.張清溪等合著,1995,經濟學理論與實務,作者自行出版。
14.黃桂芬,2004,「探討顧客服務要素應用在國際快遞業作業流程改善之研究」,國立台北大學碩士論文。
15.黃營杉等,1990,企業政策,國立空中大學。
16.銳智,2006,聯邦快遞非常攻略,如意文化事業。
17.蔣明晃、柯建裕,1999,「國際快遞業顧客服務策略模式之研究」,管理與系統,第六卷,第三期,255~280。
18.蕭富峰,2006,行銷策略,華泰文化。
第二部分:英文文獻 
1.Aaker, D., (1989),「Managing Assets and Skills:The Key to a Sustainable Competitive Advantage」,California Management Review,Winter 91-106
2.Anselm Strauss & Juliet Corbin(1997),「Basics of Qualitative Research:Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques」
3.Bucklin Louis P.(1966),「A Theory of Distribution Channel Structure」,Berkeley:Institute of Business and Economic Research,University of California
4.Bloom, Paul N.; Kotler, Philip. (Nov-Dec1975),「Strategies for high market-share companies」,Harvard Business Review
5.Chen, M:J(1996),「competitor Analysis and Interfirm Rivalry:Toward a Theoretical Integration」,Academy of Management Review,21:100-134
6.Coyne,Kevin P.(1986),「Sustainable Competitive Advantage- What it is ,what it isn’t」,Business Horizons,Jan-Feb,pp.54-61
7.Jan B. Heide(1994),「Interorganizational Governance in Marketing Channels」,Journal of Marketing
8.Philip Kotler & Kevin Lane Keller(2006),Marketing management 12th ,Pearson Education
9.Richard G.Hamermesh, M. J. Anderson Jr., & J. E. Harris(May-June1978),「Strategies for Low Market- Share Businesses」,Harvard Business Review
10.Roger J. Best(2004),「Marketing Management,3rd ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ」,Pearson Education,p.150
11.Rowland T. Moriarty and Ursula Moran(Nov-Dec 1990),「Marketing Hybrid Marketing Systems」,Harvard Business Review
12.Michael Porter,「Competition Strategy」,Ch7

第三部分:網站資料
1.中華郵政全球資訊網(http://www.post.gov.tw/post/index.jsp)
2.DHL(2006),內部資料
3.DHL網站(http://www.dhl.com.tw/)
4.FedEX網站(http://www.fedex.com/tw/)
5.TNT網站(http://www.tnt.com/country/zh_tw.html)
6.UPS網站(http://www.ups.com/content/tw/zh/index.jsx)
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外均不公開 not available
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 18.221.187.121
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 18.221.187.121
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code