Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0905106-115408 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0905106-115408
論文名稱
Title
學習型組織的特質、組織創新與組織績效關聯性之研究:以汽車金融服務業為例
Examining the relationship among learning organization characteristics, organizational innovation and organizational performance:with the financial services industry of the automobile as an example
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
124
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2006-06-30
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2006-09-05
關鍵字
Keywords
平衡計分卡、組織績效、組織創新、學習型組織特質
Balanced Scorecard, Learning Organization Characteristics, Organizational Innovations, Organizational Performance
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5866 次,被下載 41
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5866 times, has been downloaded 41 times.
中文摘要
Senge(1990)出版「第五項修練」一書以來,學習型組織的概念風起雲湧,深獲學術界與實務界的重視,並視它為企業競爭優勢的泉源。本研究以汽車金融服務業為例,探討學習型組織的特質在該產業中所帶來的影響,並整合各家理論學說,以其影響的因素,從企業活動(資訊蒐集)的觀點,對汽車金融服務業的組織創新和組織績效做深入的分析。

本研究主要之目的為探討學習型組織特質和組織創新之文獻,整合該二個構念之間的關係,及其對組織績效之影響,並發展建立三個構念間之理論架構。並以組織中個人的觀點,探討汽車金融服務業中學習型組織的特質對組織創新的影響探討汽車金融服務業中學習型組織的特質對組織績效的影響。探討汽車金融服務業中組織創新對組織績效的影響。

本研究以汽車金融產業做為實証研究的對象,有效分析樣本203個。本研究分別以主成份因素分析、驗證性因素分析、相關性分析、Cronbach’s α係數及LISREL 分析等方法來進行實證並驗證本研究所提出之各項假設。

本研究發現學習型組織特質對組織創新有正向且顯著的影響。組織創新程度愈高對組織績效有正向且顯著的影響。學習型組織特質透過組織創新的中介作用,間接影響組織績效;學習型組織的特質須經由組織的創新的方式才會有綜效的結果。
Abstract
The Fifth Discipline”,written by Dr. Peter M Senge in 1990, offers the prevalent concept of learning organization. Since its release, the book has generated a great deal of enthusiastic responses and much popular support from academic circles and authorities in other related areas of activity, in which people with practical experience regard the concept of learning organization as the source of enterprising competitive advantages. This research takes financial services industry of the automobile as an example, probe into the influence that learning organization characteristics brings in this industry, and combine several theory, with the factor that its influences, the view from the enterprise activity (information-collected ), organizational innovation and organizational performance to make deep analysis of the financial services industry of the automobile.

The purposes of the research are as follows:To examine material resource of both learning organization characteristics and organizational innovation. The integration of learning organization characteristics and organizational innovation is a concept that impacts the organizational performance. By applying the concept, a newly developed theoretical structure among learning organization Characteristics, organizational innovation and organizational performance is formed.Probes into the learning organization characteristics in the financial services industry of the automobile to the influence of organizational innovation. Probes into the learning organization characteristics in the financial services industry of the automobile to the influence of organizational performance. Probes into the organizational innovation in the financial services industry of the automobile to the influence of organizational performance
The sample of this study has 203 analyse samples effectively in the financial services industry of the automobile.Many quantitative methods, including principal component analysis,confirmatory factor analysis,Pearson correlation,Cronbach’s α and LISREL analysis, and used to test the hypothesis of this research.

The main findings of this research are as follows: There was significant and direct relationship between learning organization characteristics and organizational innovation. There was significant and direct relationship between organizational innovation and organizational performance.The learning organization characteristics would indirectly affect the organizational performance through the intermediate function of organizational innovation.The learning organization characteristics should have a result of synergy via the way of organizational innovation.
目次 Table of Contents
第一章 緒 論
1.1 研究背景
1.2 研究動機與目的
1.3 研究流程
1.4 汽車金融服務業簡介
第二章 文獻探討
2.1 學習型組織
2.2 組織創新
2.3 組織績效
2.4 學習型組織特質與組織創新的關係
2.5 學習型組織特質與組織績效的關係
2.6 組織創新與組織績效的關係
第三章 研究設計
3.1 研究架構
3.2 抽樣方法
3.3 衡量變數的操作性定義與測量題項
3.4 研究假設
3.5 問卷設計
3.6 研究資料分析方法
第四章 資料統計與分析
4.1 基本資料分析
4.2 效度與信度的分析
4.3 各構面因素之間互動性之檢定
第五章 結論與建議
5.1 結論
5.2 研究貢獻與建議
參考文獻
附錄:問卷
參考文獻 References
一、 中文文獻

1.江正信 ( 2000 ) 高階經營團隊與企業決策模式、組織學習傾向、創新能力及經營績效之關係研究,成功大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
2.吳明隆( 2005 ) SPSS統計應用學習實務--問卷分析與應用統計(第2版)知城文化。
3.李宏健(1999)「利用限制理論及邊際貢獻分析決定產品組合」,管理會計、1月號,第五十一期︰P25-P40。
4.李書行( 1995 ) 務實創新的策略性績效評估,會計研究月刊,第113期,頁15-23。
5.吳安妮( 2002 ) 淺談平衡計分卡成功實施之精髓概念,會計研究月刊,第198期。
6.沈致暉( 2003 ) 組織成員對學習型組織之認知與績效認知之關聯 國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
7.周芸薇( 2000 ) 學習型組織」評鑑量表之建立,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。 
8.林益昌(1999)建構企業學習型組織之研究,國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所博士論文。
9.林義屏( 2001) 市場導向、組織學習、組織創新與組織績效間關係之研究--以科學園區資訊電子產業為例 國立中山大學企業,管理學系所究所博士論文。
10.洪榮昭、陳亞玲(1998)「企業學習型組織之探討」。人力資源發展月刊第135期。
11.張家鳳( 2001) 企業建立平衡計分卡以落實策略管理之個案研究,東吳大學企業管理學研究所碩士論文。
12.梁進祥( 1998 ) 企業導入學習型組織之研究-診斷分析系統之建構,國立政治大學企業管理學研究所碩士論文。
13.莊立民( 2002 ) 組織創新模式建構與實證之研究 ---以台灣資訊電子業為例,國立成功大學企業管理學研究所博士論文。
14.莊逸洲、黃崇哲( 2000 ) 學習型組織評鑑量表之建立,國立中央大學人力資源研究所碩士論文。
15.連雅慧 ( 2002 ) 學習系統過程之關鍵成功因素探討論文發表、
16.陳順宇 ( 2000 ) 迴歸分析,台北:華泰文化事業公司出版。
17.黃仁祈(2003)企業文化、組織學習、組織創新與企業核心能力間之關係研究,國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班。 
18.黃俊英( 1999 )「行銷研究:管理與技術」,第六版,台北:華泰文化事業公司。
19.楊碩英( 1994 )「學習型組織與管理教育」,商業職業教育季刊,57期,頁52~64。
20.蔡啟通 ( 1997 ) 組織因素、組織成員整體創造性與組織創新之關係,國立台灣大學商學研究所博士論文。
21.盧偉斯 (1996) 組織學習的理論性探究,國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。 
22.賴姿蓉(1998)組織創新對人力資源管理角色影響之研究,國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。 
23.鍾招龍(1996)我國輸出入銀行績效考核制度之研究,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
24.簡文娟(1999)新氣候評鑑量表之建立-以高科技產業為實證研究對象,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
25.呂良添(1998)創業導向、管理實務、人際網絡與組織績效關係之研究,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
26.林東清( 2003 ) 知識管理,智勝文化出版。
27.Khalil ( 2003 ), 孫善政譯,科技管理 -競爭力與價值創造的關鍵,滄海書局。
28. Kaplan 與 Norton(1996)The Balanced Scorecard:Translating Strategy Into Action, 朱道凱譯,平衡計分卡,臉譜文化出版,1999。
29.Grove, A.S.著(1996), Only The Paranoid Survive-How To Exploit
The Crisis Points That Challenge Every Company And Career, 王平原譯(1999),十倍數時代-英代爾總裁葛洛夫的觀察與解讀,台北:大塊文化。
30.Kotter, J.P., Collins, J.C., Porras, J.I., Duck, J.D., Goss,T., Pascale, R., Athos, A.,Martin, R., Strebel, P., Augustine,N.R., Schaffer, R.H., Thomson, H.A.著(1992-1997), Change -Harvard Business Review, 周旭華譯(2000),變革-哈佛商業評論,台北:天下。
31.Porter, M.E.著(1980), Competitive Strategy-Technigues For Analyzing Industries And Competitors, 周旭華譯(1998),競爭策略-產業環境及競爭者分析,台北:天下。
32.Senge, P.M.著(1990),The Fifth Discipline-The Art And Practice Of The Learning Organization, 郭進隆譯(1994),第五項修練-學習型組織的藝術與實務,台北:天下。
33.Senge, P.M., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R.B. Smith, B.J.著(1994), The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook-Strategies And Tools For Building A Learning Organzation, 齊若蘭譯(1995),第五項修練Ⅱ實踐篇上下冊-思考、演練與超越,台北:天下。
34.金偉燦(W. Chan Kim)與莫伯尼(Renee Mauborgne .Blue Ocean Strategy,黃秀媛( 2005 )譯, 藍海策略:開創無人競爭的全新市場,台北:天下。
35. Peter F. Drucker著( 2001 ) , 李田樹譯(2001),彼得•杜拉克精選(個人篇、管理篇、社會篇三書) ,台北:天下。


二、 英文文獻

1.Afuah(1998).Innovation management:strategies, implementation, and profits. New York:Oxford University Press.
2.Aiken & Hang( 1979 ). ”The organic organization and innovation.” Sociology, 5:63-82.
3.Amabile(1996).“Assessing the work environment for creativity, " Academy of Management Journal, 39(5) :pp.1154-1184.
4.Andrew S. Grove(1996).Only the Paranoid Survive : How to Exploit the Crisis Points That Challenge Every Company and Career.
5.Anthony & Govindarajan(1998).Strategic Human Resource Management.Harcourt Brace & Company.
6.Argyris and Schon ( 1978 ). Organizational learning : A theory of Action Perspective , M.A.: Addison-Wesley.
7.Bennett & O’Brien(1994).“The Building Blocks of The Learning Organization”, Training, 31(6), pp.41-49.
8.Berry(1998).“Learning ‘nest practices’ generates revenue”, HRMagazine,43(7), pp.146-152.
9.Bessant ( 1996 ). Mastering Data Mining: The Art and Science of Customer Relationship Management. New York: John Wiley, Inc.
10.Calvert( 1994 ). “Grasping the learning organization”, Training & Development, 48(6), pp.38-43.
11.Chacke, G. K.(1988).Technology Management- Application to Corporate Markets and Military Missions, NY: Praeger.
12.Charles,W.L. & Gareth,R.Jones (1998). Strategic Management Theory:An Integrated Approach, Houghton Mifflin Company.
13.Choi, F. S. & Mueller ( 1992 ). International Accounting,N.Y.:Prentice-Hall,Inc.
14.Clark,J.&Guy,K. Innovation and Competitiveness:A Review,Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10 (3),pp.363-395.
15.Constantine Kontoghiorghes, Susan M. Awbrey,Pamela L. Feurig( 2005 ). Examining the Relationship Between Learning Organization Characteristics and Change Adaptation, Innovation, and Organizational Performance.Human Resource Development Quarterly,vol. 16, no.2,Summer.p185-206
16.Damanpour ( 1991 ). Examining the Relationship Between Learning Organization Characteristics and Change Adaptation, Innovation, and Organizational Performance.
17.Damanpour, F. and Evan, W. M.( 1984 ). “Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of organizational lag.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 29:392-409.
18.Dolan, S. ( 1995 ). “A different use of natural resources”, People Management,1(20), pp.36-40.
19.Drucker, P. F.(1985). Innovation and Entrepreneurship-Practice and Principles, Harper & Row, New York.
20.Eccles, R. B. ( 1991 ). Creating A Comprehensive System To Measure Performance , Management Accounting , Vol.,74,No.4, pp.41-44.
21.Edmondson,A. & B.Moingeon (1998)."From organizational learning to the learning organization ,"vol.29,Ess.1,pp.5-20.
22.Fiol, C. Marlene and Marjorie A. Lyles ( 1985 ). “Organizational Learning,” Academy of Management Review, Vol.10, Iss.4, pp.803-813.
23.Fornell & Larcker( 1981 ). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errors, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(2), p.39-50.
24.Galbraith, J. R. & LawlerⅢ, E. E. ( 1993 ). Organizing for the Future: the New Logic for Managing Complex Organizations, C.A.: Jossey Bass.
25.Galer & Heijden ( 1992 ). “The Learning Organization: How Planners Create Organizational Learning”, Marketing Intelligence and Planning,10(6), pp.5-12
26.Garvin, D. A. ( 1993 ). “Building a Learning Organization”, Harvard Business Review, 71(4), pp. 78-91.
27.Gattiker,U.E. & Larwood,L.(1990). Predictors for career achievement in the corporate hierarchy, Human Relations,(8),pp.703-726.
28.George P.Huber ( 1991 ) . Learning Organizations Come Alive. Training & Development,. 50 ( 1996 ),35-45.
29.Gobeli, David H. & Daniel J. Brown,(1987). "Analyzing Product Innovations," Research Management.
30.Gordon, J. ( 1996 ). Organization: Organization Behavior, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
31.Grant, R. M. ( 1996 ) . ‘Toward a Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17 (Winter Special Issue), pp.109-122.
32.Han, Jin K., Namwoon Kim, and Rajendra K. Srivastava(1998). “Market Orientation and Organizational Performance: Is Innovation a Missing Link? ,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.62, Iss.4, pp.30-45.
33.Helleloid, D. and Simonin, B.( 1994 ). “Organizational Learning and a Firm’s
Core Cometence,” in Hamel, Gary, and Heene A(ed.), Competence-Based Competition, New York: John Wiely and Sons, pp.213-240.
34.Henderson, R. M. and K. B. Clark ,(1990). “Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies & the Failure of Established Firms", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.35, pp.9-30.
35.Henson ( 2001 ). Analyzing Product Innovations," Research Management, Vol.30.
36.Holt(1983)Holt. K.( 1988 ).The role of the user in product innovation.Technovation,Vol.12,No.5,Jun.ion.Technovation,Vol.12,No.5,Jun.
37.Hurley,Robert F. and G. Tomsa,M.Hut(1998)."Innovation,market orientation, and organizational learning : An integration and empirical examination, "Journal of Marketing ,New York,Vol.62,Iss.3,pp.42-45.
38.Jashapara, A. ( 1993 ). “The Competitive Learning Organization: A Quest for Holy Grail”, Management Decision, 31(8), pp.5-15.
39.Kanter, R. M.(1988).“The Middle Managers as Innovator,"Harvard Business Review, 61, pp.95-105.
40.Kim, H., Kim, J., Lee, Y., & Lee, I. (2003). “Post-Adoption Behavior of Mobile
Internet Users: An Empirical Validation with a Structural Equation Model,”Working
Paper, [Online].Available: http://hci.yonsei.ac.kr/publications.htm. (Feb.15, 2003).
41.Kimberly(1981). Organizational Innovation: The Influence of Individual, Organizational, and Contextual Factors on Hospital Adoption of Technological and Administrative Innovations,” Academy of Management Journal,vol.24, pp.689-713.
42.Kovach,J.W.(1997).Invest in learning, Executive Excellence,14(2),p.11.
43.Levitt B.&March J.(1988).“Organizational Learning", Annual Review of Sociology,14, pp.319-340.
44.Lyon and Ferrier(2002).Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development, Strategic Management Journal, 13(Special), 111-125.
45.Marquardt, M. J. ( 1996 ). Building The Learning Organization: a system approach to quantum improvement and global success, London: McGraw-Hill.
46.Marquardt, M. J. & Reynolds, A. ( 1994 ). The Global Learning Organization,N.Y.: IRWIN.
47.Marquish, D. G.(1982). The Anatomy of Successful Innovation, Winthro Publishers, Cambridge.
48.Massarik, F. ( 1990 ). “Chaos and Change: Examining the Aesthetics of Organization Development”, in Fred Massarik (eds), Advances in Organization Development, N.J.: Ablex.
49.Meyers, D. L. & Hook, J. ( 1994 ). “Harmonizing control and accountability with empowerment and innovation”, International Journal of Government Auditing, 21(1), pp.10-12.
50.Mike Pedler, John Burgoyne, and Tom Boydell. ( 1991 ). The learning company: A Strategy for Sustainable Development. London: Mcgraw-Hill.
51.Mills, D.Q., & Friesen, B.(1992). “The Learning Organization”,European Management Journal, June 1992, pp.146-156.
52.Mulholland, Paul, Zdenek Zdrahal and John Domingue ( 2001 ).“A methodological approach to supporting organizational learning,” International Journal of Human - Computer Studies [H.W. Wilson - AST], Vol.55, Iss.3, pp. 337-367.
53.Noe R.A., ( 1999 ). Employee Training & Development, Singapore:McGraw-Hill.
54.Nanda, A. ( 1996 ). Resources, Capabilities and Competencies. In B. Moingeon & A. Edmondson (Eds.) Organisational Learning and Competitive Advantage.(p93-120). London: SAGE Publications.
55.Pedler, M., Tom Boydell, John Burgovne ( 2002 ). A Manager’s Guide to Self Development. London:McGraw-Hill.
56.Pedler, M., Burgoyne, J. & Boydell, T. ( 1991 ). The Learning Company: A Strategy for Sustainable Development, London:McGraw-Hill.
57.Pedler( 1992 ) A Strategy for Sustainable Development. London: McGraw-Hill.
58.Peter Drucker(1985). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. New York:Practice and Principles.
59.Rabbins, S.P.( 1994 ). Organization Behavior: Concepts, Controversies and Applications,Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:Prentice-Hall.
60.Robert,Ross,Kleiner( 1994 ). Case Study Research- Design And Methods,London: Sage Publications.
61.Roth(1999). The Learning Initiative At The AutoCo Epsilon Program 1991-1994, Cambridge MIT.
62.Schwandt, David R. and Michael J. Marquardt ( 2001 ). “From world-class theories to global best practices,” Sage Publications, Inc., U.S.
63.Shrivastava,P.(1981). A typology of organizational learning systems. The Journal of Management Studies,20(1),pp.7-28.
64.Sinkula, J. M., Baker, W. E., & Noordewier, T. ( 1999 ). A framework for market-based organizational learning: Linking values, knowledge and behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(4): 305-318.
65.Stambaugh, D. M. ( 1995 ). “Creating the learning organization – an essential ingredient for attaining customer loyalty”, CPCU Journal, 48(1), pp.35-49.
66.Stata,R.(1989). Organizational learning:the key to management innovation. Sloan Management Review,30(3).pp.63-74.
67.Subramanian and Nilakanta( 1996 ).“Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.58, January, pp.35-45.
68.Swieringa, J. & Wierdsma, A. ( 1992 ). Becoming a Learning Organization: Beyond the Learning Curve , M.A.: Addison-Wesley.
69.Szilagyi A.O. ( 1981 ). “Management and Performance”, California, Goodyear Publishing Company Inc.
71.Tobin, D. R. ( 1993 ). Re-educating the Corporation: Foundations for the Learning Organization, V.T.: Oliver Wight.
71.Tompkins, J. A. ( 1997 ). “Peak-to-peak performance”, Executive Excellence,14(5), pp.17-18.
72.Tucker,B.Robert(2001)."Innovation:the new core competency,"Strategy & Leadership,Chicago,Vol.29,Iss.1,pp.11-14.
73.Tushman, Michael L. & D. A. Nadler,( 1986 ). "Organizing for Innovation," California Management Review, Vol.28, pp.74-92.
74.Watkins, K. E. & Marsick, V. J. ( 1993 ). Sculpting the learning organization,San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
75.Wick, C. W. & Leon, L. S. ( 1995 ). “From ideas to action: Creating a learning organization”, Human Resource Management, 34(2), pp.299-311.
76.Winslow, C.D. & Bramer, W. L. ( 1994 ). Future Work: Putting Knowledge to Work in the Knowledge Economy, N.Y.: Macmillan.
77.Yamin, Shahid and Gunasekaran, A. and Mavondo, Felix T.,(1999). “Innovation index and its implications on organizational performance: A study of Australian manufacturing companies.”International Journal of Technology Management, Geneva, 17(5):495-503.
78.Zahra, Shaker A., Stephanie de Belardino, and W. Randy Box(1988).“Organizational Innovation: Its Correlates and its Implications for Financial Performance,”International Journal of Management, June, pp.133-142.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內公開,校外永不公開 restricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 18.191.88.249
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 18.191.88.249
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code