Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-1126113-002231 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-1126113-002231
論文名稱
Title
薪酬委員會之組成與運作對組織績效的影響
The Effects of Compensation Committee Composition and Operation on Organizational Performance
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
45
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2013-12-20
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2013-12-26
關鍵字
Keywords
薪酬委員會運作、薪酬委員會、薪酬委員會組成、組織績效
Compensation Committee, composition of the compensation committee, operation of the compensation committee, organizational performance
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5817 次,被下載 969
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5817 times, has been downloaded 969 times.
中文摘要
薪酬委員會為公司董事會下設置的專門委員會,在公司治理扮演了相當重要的監督角色。而我國目前設置薪酬委員會制度尚不久,為進一步瞭解其成員背景、組成與運作方式與組織績效之間的關係,因此本研究以代理理論為基礎,探討薪酬委員會的組成 (含委員人數、獨立性與專業知識)是否會影響公司的績效表現 (含EPS、ROA、ROE),並探討薪酬委員會運作成效 (含開會次數與成立時間)是否會產生干擾效果。本研究coding公開資訊觀測站資料庫及台灣經濟新報 (TEJ)資料庫中民國101年度之薪酬委員會及財務資料,以當年度國內上市及上櫃公司為研究樣本,計有942筆資料。
研究發現:開會次數與成立時間確實會干擾薪酬委員會組成與組織績效的關係。其中,開會次數越多時,委員專業度與ROE有正向關係;但開會次數越多時,委員獨立性與組織績效的關係則轉為負向關係。另外,本研究發現,薪酬委員會成立的時間越長,委員獨立性對組織績效EPS的正向關係更強;但成立越久的薪酬委員會,其人數與EPS的關連性轉為不顯著。本研究亦針對結果之相關意涵,加以探討之。
Abstract
The compensation committee has played an important role on corporate governance in terms of effective management of top-manager compensation.
However, compensation committee system has just been applied in Taiwanese companies; the empirical evidence for the effect of compensation committee on organizational performance is still neglected. Therefore, the present study explores whether the composition of the compensation committee (including the number of members, independence and expertise) influence the company's performance (including EPS, ROA and ROE) and examines the moderating effects of the operation of the compensation committee (including the meeting frequency and the time of committee establishment). In present study, the author coded the objective data regarding compensation committee composition and operation as well as the financial data from the databases of Market Observation Post System (MOPS) and Taiwan Economic Journal (TEJ) in 2012, there are 942 database as listed and OTC companies in that year.
The results of the hierarchical regression analysis showed that the meeting frequency and the time of committee establishment moderate the relationship between compensation committee composition and organizational performance. Specifically, when the compensation committee members meet more frequently, the expertise of committee members had a positive relationship with ROE. In addition, when the committee has been established for longer time, the independence of committee members is positively related to EPS. Implications of the research findings were further discussed.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
誌謝 ii
摘要 iii
Abstract iv
目錄 v
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vi
第一章 緒論 1
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節 薪酬委員會的理論基礎 4
第二節 薪酬委員會組成與組織績效之關係 5
第三節 薪酬委員會運作成效對其組成與組織績效關係之干擾效果 8
第三章 研究方法 10
第一節 研究架構 10
第二節 研究樣本 10
第三節 研究工具 11
第四節 資料分析方式 15
第四章 研究結果 16
第一節 敘述性統計 16
第二節 薪酬委員會的成員獨立性及專業度對組織績效之影響 20
第三節 薪酬委員會開會次數對其組成與組織績效關係之干擾效果 21
第四節 薪酬委員會成立時間對其組成與組織績效關係之干擾效果 24
第五節 補充分析 25
第五章 討論與建議 28
第一節 理論貢獻 28
第二節 管理意涵 31
第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 32
參考文獻 34
參考文獻 References
一、 中文文獻
王育偉 (2004)。公司治理機制與經理人異動關係之研究。朝陽科技大學企業管理學系碩士論文,未出版,台中。
王繼和 (2004)。公司治理機制與經營績效之關係研究-以台灣上市櫃電子公司為例。國立雲林科技大學財務金融系碩士論文,未出版,雲林。
李思瑩 (2003)。高階經理人薪酬的揭露程度與公司治理。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園。
李怡瑩 (2011)。高階經理人薪酬與公司績效關係─薪酬委員會及專門委員會之調節效果。國立高雄應用科技大學商務經營研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
吳品萱 (2013)。薪酬委員會品質、高階經理人誘因薪酬與企業績效關聯性之研究。國立台北大學會計學系碩士論文,未出版,台北。
周盈萱 (2012)。探討薪酬委員會組成及品質與代理問題之關聯性。國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
周翊慈(2013)。薪酬委員會組成對企業高階管理者薪酬之影響。中國文化大學會計學系碩士論文,未出版,台北。
紀乃文、張火燦 (2006)。人力資源主管角色、人力資源部門績效指標與組織績效關係之研究。人力資源管理學報,6(3),71-93。
張麗娟(2010)。 從董事會結構、公司治理與企業存活率看財務危機之區別預測能力。中華管理評論學報,13(1),1-25。
陳沂芳(2013)。薪酬委員會品質之決定因素 -以高階主管、董監超額薪酬角度探討。國立東華大學會計與財務碩士學位學程碩士論文,未出版,台東。
陳宣礽 (2013)。研發投資、薪酬委員會與經營績效。東吳大學會計學系碩士論文,未出版,台北。
黃勻萱(2013)。薪酬委員會之設置對高階主管薪酬與公司治理、公司績效間關聯性之影響。中原大學會計研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園。
黃家齊 (2003)。人力資本投資系統、創新策略與組織績效─多種契合觀點的驗證,管理評論,22(1),99-126。
劉政淮 (2006)。公司治理之價值攸關性研究。國立台北大學企業管理學系碩士論文,未出版,台北。
蔡昌憲 (2011)。評我國強制設置薪酬委員會之立法政策— 從經濟分析及美國金融改革法談起。中研院法學期刊,11,249-340。
薛明玲 (2010)。公開發行公司設置薪酬委員會與落實公司治理專題演講。台北市。
鄧穎懋、李秀玲 (2012)。薪酬委員會之功能及運作模式─評析證劵交易法第14 條之6。朝陽商管評論,11(1),69-85。
雅虎奇摩新聞(2011年7月27日)。上市櫃薪酬委員爆人才荒。中時電子報。檢自http://tw.news.yahoo.com/上市櫃薪酬委員-爆人才荒-193411533.html
 
二、 英文文獻
 Abbott, L.J., Parker, S. & Peters, G.F. (2004). Audit Committee Characteristics and Restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(1), 69-87.
 Aiken, L. S. & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
 Baxter, P. & Cotter, J. (2009). Audit committees and earnings quality. Accounting and Finance, 49, 267–290.
 Bedard, J., Chtourou S. M. & Courteau, L. (2004). The effect of audit committee expertise, independence and activity on aggressive earnings management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 23(2), 13-35.
 Bowen, W. G. (1994). Inside the boardroom. New York: Willey.
 Chen, Y.M., Moroney, R. & Houghton, K. (2005). Audit committee composition and the use of an industry specialist audit firm. Accounting and Finance, 45, 217–239.
 Chi, N. W. & Lin, Y. Y. (2011). Beyond the High-Performance Paradigm: Exploring the Curvilinear Relationship between High-Performance Work Systems and Organizational Performance in Taiwanese Manufacturing Firms. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 49(3), 486-514.
 Datta, D. K., Guthrie, J. P. & Wright, P. M. (2005). Human resource management and labor productivity: does industry matter? Academy of Management Journal, 48, 135-145.
 Ezzamel, M. & Watson, R. (1998). Market comparison earnings and the bidding-up of executive cash compensation: evidence from the United Kingdom. Academy of Management Journal, 41(2), 221-231.
 Felo, A. J., Krishnamurthy S. and Solieri S.A. (2003). Audit Committee Characteristics and the Perceived Quality of Financial Reporting: An Empirical Analysis. Working paper (Graduate School of Professional Studies, Penn State University, Great Valley, Malvern PA)
 Guest, R. H. (1962). Managerial succession in complex organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 68(1), 47-54.
 Helmich, D. L. (1974). Organization growth and succession patterns. Academy of Management Journal, 17, 771-775.
 Huselid, M. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635-872.
 Jensen, M. C. & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
 Jung, Y. (1991). Multinationality and profitability. Journal of Business Research, 23(2), 179-87.
 Kang, W. S., Wright, S. & Kilgore, A. (2008). Audit Committee Effectiveness and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from Low and Mid Tier Australian Firms. Anaheim, CA: American Accounting Association.
 Lilling, M. S. (2006). The link between CEO compensation and firm performance: Does simultaneity matter? Atlantic Economic Journal, 34, 101-114.
 Lin, J. W., Li, J. F. & Yang, J. S. (2006). Emerald Article: The effect of audit committee performance on earnings quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21 (9), 921-933.
 Mangel, R. & Singh, H. (1993). Ownership structure, board relationships and CEO compensation in large U.S. corporation. Accounting and Business Research, 23, 339-350.
 Menon, K. & William, J. (1994). The use of audit committees for monitoring. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 13, 121-139.
 O’Reilly, C. A., Main, B. G. & Crystal, G. S. (1988). CEO Compensation as Tournament and Social Comparison: A Tale of Two Theories. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(2), 257-274.
 Singh, H. & Harianto, F. (1989). Top Management Tenure, Corporate Ownership Structure and the Magnitude of Golden Parachutes. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 143-156.
 Sun, J. & Cahan, S. (2009). The Effect of Compensation Committee Qualityon the Association between CEO Cash Compensation and Accounting Performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(2), 193-207.
 Tirole, J. (1986). Hierarchies and Bureaucracies: On the Role of Collusion in Organizations. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 2(2), 181-214.
 Vafeas, N. (2003). Further Evidence on Compensation Committee Composition as a Determinant of CEO Compensation. Financial Management, 53-70.
 Vafeas, N. & Afxentious, Z. (1998). The association between the SEC’s 1992 compensation disclosure rule and executive compensation policy changes. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 17(1), 27-54.
 Venkatraman, N. & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801-814.
 Wright, P.M. & Haggerty, J. J. (2005). Missing variables in theories of strategic human resource management: time, cause, and individuals. Management Revue, 16, 164-174.
 Yang, J. S. & Krishnan, J. (2005). Audit committees and quarterly earnings management. International Journal of Auditing, 9(3), 201-19.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code