Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0113115-153601 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0113115-153601
論文名稱
Title
價值基礎策略觀點之公、私部門夥伴關係的價值共創: 以文創產業之駁二藝術特區為例
Value Co-creation in Public-Private Partnerships with Value-Based Strategy: Empirical Evidence of Culture Creative Industry from Pier 2 Art Center
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
119
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2015-01-29
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2015-02-13
關鍵字
Keywords
文化創意產業、社會困境、價值基礎策略、共創、公、私部門夥伴關係(PPPs)
Cultural and creative industry, Social dilemma, Value-based strategy, Co-creation, Public-private partnerships (PPPs)
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5954 次,被下載 393
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5954 times, has been downloaded 393 times.
中文摘要
公、私部門組織的合作夥伴關係(PPPs)已成為現代組織管理中不可或缺的研究趨勢,然而,對於如何設計、管理與評估PPPs使其有助於政府機構、企業組織與公民社會進行價值建構,卻是管理領域的挑戰與持續發展的問題。本研究認為公、私部門間的合作夥伴關係將因公共性、異質性、集體行動等特質,無可避免的將衍生個別組織為自利而損及公利的社會困境問題。但是,透由價值基礎策略的觀點,若公、私部門間可以價值共創平台為基礎,則可以利用溝通對話、資訊透明度、資訊可及性與相互協商等創造機制,有效解決因PPPs所產生的社會困境問題,從而創造雙方均可接受,甚至更大的價值。本研究以我國文創產業之駁二藝術特區為研究田野,分析公部門與私部門間之PPPs所產生的合作、共享、價值判斷等三種社會困境;在價值共創平台下的運作下,成功創造經濟價值與社會價值,並以此提出管理理論與實務上的意涵。
Abstract
There has been a surge in research of public-private partnerships (PPPs). However, the understanding of how to develop, manage and assess PPPs in order to co-create value for governmental and business organizations and the society remains constrained. We contend that the characteristics of publicness, heterogeneity and collective actions in PPPs will inevitably result in situations that self-interests of individual organizations are placed above the public welfare; such phenomena are seen as “social dilemmas.” From a perspective of value-based strategy, we further argue that, social dilemmas between public and private organizations can be reduced using a platform that provides information accessibility and transparency, with which mutual dialogue and negotiation is facilitated; we term it as a “value co-creation platform”. Drawing on a case study of Pier 2 Art Center’s cultural innovation, we identified and analyzed three types of social dilemmas occurring in the cross-sector partnerships between Bureau of Cultural Affairs Kaohsiung City Government and operators of Pier 2 Art Center: cooperating dilemma, sharing dilemma and evaluating dilemma. We found these dilemmas were mitigated in the value co-creation platform, successfully generating economic and social value. The findings permit us to develop theoretical and managerial implications.
目次 Table of Contents
目錄
論文審定書............................................................................i
誌謝 .....................................................................................ii
中文摘要...............................................................................iii
英文摘要 ............................................................................iv
第一章 緒論..........................................................................1
第一節 研究背景與研究動機...................................................1
第二節 研究目的與研究問題...................................................8
第三節 研究範圍與研究田野..................................................12
第四節 研究章節安排............................................................14
第二章 文獻探討..................................................................15
第一節 公私部門夥伴關係(PPPs)與社會困境(SD)....................16
第二節 價值基礎策略(Value-Based Strategy, VBS).................29
第三節 VSB in PPPs:公私部門伙伴關係的價值共創..............39
第三章 研究方法與個案介紹.................................................52
第一節 研究方法與個案選擇..................................................52
第二節 研究資料收集.............................................................57
第三節 文創產業與駁二藝術特區...........................................62
第四章 個案分析與研究發現………………………….................69
第一節 駁二藝術特區中夥伴關係的發展 ..........................71
第二節 PPPs的社會困境與價值共創......................................87
第三節 公私部門夥伴關係的社會困境.....................................87
第四節 集體價值共創模式.....................................................92
第五章 結論與建議...............................................................99
第一節 理論意涵..................................................................99
第二節 實務意涵.................................................................103
第三節 研究限制與未來方向..................................................104
參考文獻..............................................................................106

圖目錄

圖一 PPPs與SD的發生歷程....................................................26
圖二 VBS in PPPs之觀念性的研究架構....................................47
圖三 公私部門夥伴關係價值共創平台........................................51
圖四 駁二藝術特區初期空間使用示意圖.....................................68
圖五 駁二「好漢玩字節」即興演出............................................93
圖六 公私部門對駁二的價值共創平台.........................................98

表目錄

表一 價值基礎的策略思維............................................................38
表二 組織研究之治理課題的理論取向...........................................46
表三 本研究訪談對象..................................................................58
表四 本研究文件分析標的............................................................60
表五 我國文化創意產業營業額......................................................62
表六 文建會五大創意文化園區之規劃............................................63
表七 駁二藝術特區經營對象與經營期............................................67
表八 駁二藝術特區發展歷程..........................................................70
表九 駁二藝術特區公私部門活動與社會困境...................................91
參考文獻 References
參考文獻
中文部分
王武森(2007),高雄市現代畫學會召開"駁二藝術特區願景座談會"全記錄 http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/kaokart1987/article?mid=-2&prev=267&l=f&fid=1
行政院文化建設委員會(2003),閒置空間再利用六個試辦點調查研究及評估期末報告。台北市:行政院文化建設委員會。
林欽榮(2006),城市空間治理的創新策略: 三個台灣首都城市案例評析: 台北• 新竹• 高雄。新自然主義:台北。
吳毓星 (2011),台灣文化創意產業未來發展之探討,華人前瞻研究。第 7 巻第 1 期,頁113-119。
胡幼慧、姚美華(1996),一些質性方法上的思考,胡幼慧主編,質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例,巨流:台北市。
高雄市文化局(2003),高雄市駁二藝術特區永續營運規劃,城市記憶公關顧問有限公司,高雄市。
張可婷譯,Boeije, H. 著(2013),質性研究分析方法,韋伯文化:台北市。
張珃君(2005),台灣地區藝術村經營管理之研究。國立中山大學藝術管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
黃琡媛(2008),都市文化園區建構之制度化---以華山文化園區、駁二藝術特區為例。國立台北大學都市計劃研究所未出版碩士論文。
彭以惠(2011),台灣文化產業園區發展經驗:以高雄市駁二藝術特區為例。
國立中山大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
楊燕枝、吳思華(2005),文化創意產業的價值創造形塑之初探,行銷評論,第二卷,第三期,第313-338頁。
樹德科技大學院長(2005),樹德科技大學駁二藝術特區93、94 年營運結案報告,樹德科技大學。
潘淑滿(2003),質性研究的理論與應用,心理:台北市。
蘇志徹(2007),高雄市現代畫學會召開"駁二藝術特區願景座談會"全記錄 http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/kaokart1987/article?mid=-2&prev=267&l=f&fid=1
英文部分
Agarwal, R., Croson, R., & Mahoney, J. T. 2010. The role of incentives and communication in strategic alliances: an experimental investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 31(4): 413-437.
Amit, R. & Zott, C. 2001. Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (2): 493-520.
Andrews, K. R. 1971. The concept of corporate strategy. Homewood, IL: Irwin
Ansoff, H. I. 1965. Corporate strategy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bansal, P., & Corley, K. 2011. The coming of age for qualitative research: Embracing the diversity of qualitative methods. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 233-237.
Barnes, C. M., Hollenbeck, J. R., Jundt, D. K., DeRue, S., & Harmon, S. J. 2011. Mixing individual incentives and group incentives: Best of both worlds or social dilemma? Journal of Management, 37: 1611-1635.
Bejerot,E. &Hasselbladh, H. 2013. Forms of intervention in public sector organizations: Generic traits in public sector reforms, Organization Studies, 34(9): 1357-1380.
Bennett, J. & Iossa, E. 2006.Delegation of contracting in the privateprovision of public services.Review of Industrial Organization, 29(1-2): 75-92.
Boland, J.R. & Tenkasi,R.V. 1995. Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organization Science, 6(4): 350-372.
Bowman, C. & Ambrosini, V. 2000. Value creation versus value capture: Towards a coherent definition of value in strategy. British Journal of Management, 11(1): 1-15.
Bowman, C. & Ambrosini, V. 2001. “Value” in the resource-based view of the firm: A contribution to the debate. Academy of Management Review, 26: 501-502.
Boyne, G. A. 2002. Public and private management: What’s the difference?, Journal of management studies, 39(1): 97-122
Bridoux, F., Coeurderoy, R., & Durand, R. 2011.Heterogeneous motives and the collective creation of value, Academy of Management Review, 36(4):711-730.
Bridoux, F.&Stoelhorst, J. W.. 2013. Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives, Strategic Management Journal, (forthcoming).
Brinkerhoff, D. W. & Brinkerhoff, J.M. 2011. Public-private partnerships: Perspectives on purposes, publicness, and good governance, Public Administration and Development, 31(1): 2-14.
Carroll, G. R. 1993. A sociological view on why firms differ. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (4): 237-249.
Cooke, P. & De Propris, L. 2011. A policy agenda for EU smart growth: the role of creative and cultural industries, Policy Studies, 32:4, 365-375.
Cuccurullo, C. &Lega, F. 2013.Effective strategizing practices in pluralistic settings:the case of Academic Medical Centers, Journal of Management and Governance, 17:609-629.
Dyer, W. G., & Wilkins, A. L. 1991. Better stories, not better constructs, to generate better theory: A rejoinder to Eisenhardt. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 613-619.
Florida, R. (2010). The Great Reset. HarperCollins Publishers: New York.
Glachanta, J-M, &Saussier, S. 2006. Introduction, Review of Industrial Organization, 29(1-2): 1-2.
Grönroos, C. & Voima, P. 2013. Critical service logic: making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2): 133-150.
Hargrave, T. J. & Van De Ven, A. H. 2006. A Collective action model of institutional innovation, Academy of Management Review, 31(4): 864-888.
Jia, N. 2014. Are collective political actions and private political actions substitutes or complements? Empirical evidence from China’s private sector. Strategic Management Journal, 35(2): 292-315.
Kivleniece, I. & Quelin, B. V. 2012.Creating and capturing value in public- private ties: aprivate actor’s perspective. Academy of Management Review, 37(2): 272-299.
Klein, P. G., Mahoney, J. P., McGahan, A. M., &Pitelis, C. N. 2012. Who is in charge? A property rights perspective on stakeholder governance. Strategic Organization, 10(3): 304-315.
Klein, P. G., Mahoney, J. P., McGahan, A. M., &Pitelis, C. N. 2013.Capabilities and strategic entrepreneurship in public organizations.Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7: 70-91.
Kollock, P. 1998. Social dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology, 24: 183-214.
Kooiman, J.1993. Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions, Newbury Park. California: Sage.
Koschmann, M. A., Kuhn, T. R., &Pfarrer, M. D. 2012. A communicative framework of valuein cross-sector partnerships.Academy of Management Review, 37 (3): 332-354.
Kroeger, A. & Weber, C. 2014. Developing a conceptual framework for comparing social value creation. Academy of Management Review, forthcoming.
Lawrence, T.B. & Phillips, N. 2002. Understanding culture industries. Journal of Management Inquiry, 11(4): 430-411.
Liebrand, W.B.G. 1983. A classification of social dilemma games. Simulation & Games, 14(2): 123-138.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. London: Sage.
Lownde,V.& Skelcher, C. 2002.The Dynamics of Multi-organizational Partnerships: an Analysis of Changing Modes of Governance. in Stephen P. Osborne (ed.), Public Management: Critical Perspectives, Volume Ⅱ. London & New York: Routledge.
Mahoney, J. T., McGahan, A. M. &Pitelis, C. N. 2009.Perspective- The interdependence of private and public interests.Organization Science, 20 (6): 1034‐1052.
McCarter, M.W., Rockmann, K.W. & Northcraft, G.B. 2010. Is it even worth it? The effect of loss prospects in the outcome distribution of a public goods dilemma. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 111:1-12.
McCarter, M.W., Mahoney, J.T., & Northcraft, G.B. 2011. Testing the waters: How collective real options manage the social dilemma of strategic alliances. Academy of Management Review, 36(4): 621-640.
Metcalfe, L. & Lapenta, A. 2014. Partnership as strategic choices in public management. Journal of Management Governance, 18: 51-76.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London: Sage.
Monge, P. R., Fulk J., Kalman M. E. &Flanagin, A. J. 1998. Production of collective action in alliance- based interorganizational communication and information systems. Organization Science, 9(3), 411-433.
Myers, M. D. 2009. Qualitative Research in Business and Management. Los Angeles: Sage.
Osborne, S. P. & Strokosch, K. 2013. It takes two to tango? Understanding the co-production of public services by integrating the services management and public administration perspectives, British Academy of Management, 24: S31-S47.
Pettigrew, A. M. 1997. What is a processual analysis? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(4), 337-348.
Pitelis, C. N. 2009. The co-evolution of organizational value capture, value creation and sustainable advantage, Organizaion Studies, 30(10): 1115-1139.
Pitelis, C. 2012. Clusters, entrepreneurial ecosystem co-creation, and appropriability: a conceptual framework. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(6), 1359–1388.
Pitelis, C. N. & Teece, D. J. 2009. The (new) nature and essence of the firm, European Management Review, 6(1): 5–15.
Porter, M.E. 1996. What is a strategy? Harvard Business Review, (November-December): 61-78.
Prahalad,C.K. & Ramaswamy, V.2004. The Future of Competition: Co-creating Unique Value with Customers, Harvard Business School Press.
Priem, R. L., Butler, J. E. & Li, S. 2013. Toward reimagining strategy research: Retrospection and prospection on the 2011 AMR decade award article, Academy of Management Review, 38(4): 471-489.
Ramírez, R. 1999. Value co-production: Intellectual origins and implications for practice and research, Strategic Management Journal, 20(1): 49-65.
Rangan, S., Samii, R. & Van Wassenhove L. N. 2006. Constructive partnerships: when alliances between private firms ang public actors can enable creative strategies. Academy of Management Review. 31(3): 738-751.
Rufín, C.,& Rivera-Santos, M. 2012. Between commonweal and competition: Understanding the governance of public-private partnerships.Journalof Management, 38 (5):1634-1654.
Strauss, A. L. 1987. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Venkataraman, S., Sarasvathy, S.D., Dew N., & Forster, W.R. 2012. Reflection on the 2010 AMR decade award: Whither the promise? Moving forward with entrepreneurship as a science of the artificial. Academy of Management Review, 37: 21-33.
Wang, B. C., Liu, S. C., & Chou, F. Y. 2010. National Policy and Promotion Model of Cultural and Creative Industry in Taiwan. International Journal of Business Research, 10(1), 121-132.
Waring, J., Currie, G. & Bishop, S. 2013. A contingent approach to the organization and management of public-private partnerships: An empirical study of English health care. Public Administration Review, 73(2): 313-326.
Williams, R. 1985. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Oxford University Press: London.
Yang, Y., Hou, Y. & Wang, Y. 2013. On the development of public-private partnerships in transitional economics: An explanatory framework. Public Administration Review, 73(2): 301-310.
Yin, R. K. 2003. Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
York, J. G., Sarasvathy, S. D. & Wicks, A. C. 2013. An entrepreneurial perspective on value creation in public-private ventures. Academy of Management Review, 38(2): 307-315.
Zajac, E. J., & Olsen, C. P. 1993. From transaction cost to transactional value analysis: Implications for the study of interorganizational strategies. Journal of Management Studies, 30 (1): 131‐145.
Zeng, M. & Chen, X.P. 2003. Achieving cooperation in multi-partner strategic alliances: A social dilemma approach to partnership management. Academy of Management Review, 28(4): 587-605.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code