Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0210114-191748 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0210114-191748
論文名稱
Title
從領導者政治技能及個人創新行為探討官僚系統下的創新績效
Exploring Innovation Performance of Bureaucratic Organization from Perspectives of Leaders’ Political Skill and Innovation Behavior
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
74
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2014-02-21
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2014-03-17
關鍵字
Keywords
公部門創新、創新績效、政治技能、創新行為、官僚制度
Bureaucracy, Individual Behavior, Political Skill, Innovation Performance, Public Sector Innovation
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5844 次,被下載 74
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5844 times, has been downloaded 74 times.
中文摘要
本研究旨在探討在這個產業環境變動迅速的現代社會,如何促進
官僚制度下的創新績效,並以公部門系統出發點,以高雄市政府作為
本研究樣本,藉由量化方式證實領導者的創新行為對於官僚組織下的
創新績效有正面影響,且領導者的政治技能對於促進官僚組織下的創
新績效有調節作用,在現今組織或多或少皆帶有官僚制度的現象下,
提供未來組織遴選領導者一個參考的指標。
Abstract
Organizational reform and organizational innovation nowadays have become a trend
not only in the public sectors but also in the private sectors. Yet, bureaucratic
structure and the principles of bureaucracy are still hardly preventable from any kind
of organizations. Therefore, this research aims at finding a balance between
bureaucracy and organizational innovation; hoping to develop a better and practicable
recommendation for today's organizations. The hypotheses in this research hence
proposed that individual innovation behavior of leaders would have positive effect on
innovation performance of bureaucratic organizations; and the ability of political skill
functions as moderator between leader innovation behavior and innovation
performance. The results prove that innovation behavior is significant and positively
related to innovation performance, product innovation performance and process
innovation performance. Additionally, the significant positive relationship between
political skill and innovation performance suggests that leaders’ political skill may
moderate the relationship between innovation behavior and innovation performance.
In this way, we can suggest that in order to compensate rigidity system of bureaucracy,
utilizing characteristics of leaders and their authorities may be a feasible way to drive
organizational reform and innovation.
目次 Table of Contents
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................ 1
1.1 Research Background and Motive ..................................................... 1
1.2 Research Objective ............................................................................ 3
1.3 Research Procedure ........................................................................... 3
CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................ 6
2.1 Bureaucracy ....................................................................................... 6
2.2 Organizational Innovation ............................................................... 11
2.3 Innovation Performance .................................................................. 20
2.4 Individual Innovative Behavior ....................................................... 24
2.5 Political Skill ................................................................................... 26
CHAPTER 3. METHODOLOGY ......................................................... 32
3.1 Research Process ............................................................................. 32
3.2 Research Framework ....................................................................... 33
3.3 Research Hypotheses ....................................................................... 34
3.4 Operational Definition and Measurement of Variables .................. 36
3.5 Method of Data Collection and Analysis ........................................ 38
CHAPTER 4. RESULTS AND ANALYSIS ........................................ 41
4.1 Descriptive Statistics ....................................................................... 41
4.2 Reliability and Factor Analysis ....................................................... 44
4.3 Correlation Analysis ........................................................................ 46
4.4 Regression Analysis ........................................................................ 47
CHAPTER 5. DISCUSSION ................................................................. 54
5.1 Discussion ........................................................................................ 54
5.2 Managerial Implication .................................................................... 55
5.3 Limitations and Future Research Directions ................................... 56
REFERENCE .......................................................................................... 58
APPENDIX .............................................................................................. 64
Questionnaire ......................................................................................... 64
參考文獻 References
Adler, P. S., & Borys, B. (1996). Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 61-89.
Ahearn, K. K., Ferris, G. R., Hochwarter, W. A., Douglas, C., & Ammeter, A. P.
(2004). Leader political skill and team performance. Journal of Management,
30(3), 309-327.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity and innovation in organizations: Harvard Business
School.
Ar, I. M., & Baki, B. (2011). Antecedents and performance impacts of product versus
process innovation: empirical evidence from SMEs located in Turkish science
and technology parks. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(2),
172-206.
Atuahene‐Gima, K., Slater, S. F., & Olson, E. M. (2005). The Contingent Value of
Responsive and Proactive Market Orientations for New Product Program
Performance*. Journal of product innovation management, 22(6), 464-482.
Avineri, S. (1968). The social and political thought of Karl Marx (Vol. 619):
Cambridge University Press.
Blau, P. M. (1955). The dynamics of bureaucracy: A study of interpersonal relations
in two government agencies: University of Chicago Press.
Blau, P. M. (1956). Bureaucracy in modern society.
Blazevic, V., & Lievens, A. (2004). Learning during the new financial service
innovation process: antecedents and performance effects. Journal of Business
Research, 57(4), 374-391.
Chandy, R. K., & Tellis, G. J. (1998). Organizing for radical product innovation: the
overlooked role of willingness to cannibalize. Journal of Marketing Research,
474-487.
Cooper, J. R. (1998). A multidimensional approach to the adoption of innovation.
Management Decision, 36(8), 493-502.
Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi‐dimensional framework of
organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of
Management Studies, 47(6), 1154-1191.
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of
determinants and moderators. Academy of management journal, 34(3),
555-590.
Damanpour, F., Szabat, K. A., & Evan, W. M. (1989). The relationship between types
of innovation and organizational performance. Journal of Management Studies,
26(6), 587-602.
De Jong, J. (2007). Individual innovation: the connection between leadership and
employees’ innovative work behavior.
Douglas, C., Ferris, G. R., & Perrewe, P. L. (2005). Leader political skill and authentic
leadership. Authentic leadership theory and practice: Origins, effects and
development, 139-154.
Drucker, P. F. (1999). Innovation and entrepreneurship: HarperCollins.
Ferris, G. R., Treadway, D. C., Kolodinsky, R. W., Hochwarter, W. A., Kacmar, C. J.,
Douglas, C., & Frink, D. D. (2005). Development and validation of the
political skill inventory. Journal of Management, 31(1), 126-152.
Ferris, G. R., Treadway, D. C., Perrewé, P. L., Brouer, R. L., Douglas, C., & Lux, S.
(2007). Political skill in organizations. Journal of Management, 33(3),
290-320.
Fischer, F. (1994). Critical studies in organization and bureaucracy: Temple
University Press.
Galunic, C., & Rodan, S. (1997). Resource recombinations in the firm: knowledge
structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation: INSEAD.
Gouldner, A. W. (1950). Studies in leadership.
Grey, C. (2007). Bureaucracy and post-bureaucracy. Introducing Organizational
Behaviour and Management.
Gumusluoglu, L., & Ilsev, A. (2009). Transformational leadership, creativity, and
organizational innovation. Journal of Business Research, 62(4), 461-473.
Höpfl, H. M. (2006). Post-bureaucracy and Weber's “modern” bureaucrat. Journal of
Organizational Change Management, 19(1), 8-21.
Hall, R. H. (1963). The concept of bureaucracy: An empirical assessment. American
Journal of Sociology, 32-40.
Hall, R. H., & Tittle, C. R. (1966). A Note on Bureaucracy and Its" Correlates".
American Journal of Sociology, 267-272.
Harris, K. J., Kacmar, K. M., Zivnuska, S., & Shaw, J. D. (2007). The impact of
political skill on impression management effectiveness. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 92(1), 278.
Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present.
Public money and management, 25(1), 27-34.
Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., Chen, C.-h., & Sacramento, C. A. (2011). How does
bureaucracy impact individual creativity? A cross-level investigation of team
contextual influences on goal orientation–creativity relationships. Academy of
management journal, 54(3), 624-641.
King, N., & Anderson, N. (2002). Managing innovation and change: A critical guide
for organizations: Cengage Learning EMEA.
Kleysen, R. F., & Street, C. T. (2001). Toward a multi-dimensional measure of
individual innovative behavior. Journal of intellectual Capital, 2(3), 284-296.
Leach, D. K. (2005). The Iron Law of What Again? Conceptualizing Oligarchy Across
Organizational Forms*. Sociological Theory, 23(3), 312-337.
McKenna, S., Garcia-Lorenzo, L., & Bridgman, T. (2010). Managing, managerial
control and managerial identity in the post-bureaucratic world. Journal of
management development, 29(2), 128-136.
Miller, H. T. (2011). Is Bureaucracy No Longer the Technically Superior Form of
Organization? Administrative Theory & Praxis, 33(3), 447-452.
Miller, S. M. (1963). Max Weber: Selections from his work: New York: Thomas Y.
Crowell.
Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government:
Harvard university press.
Moss Kanter, R. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective and
social conditions for innovation in organization. Research in Organizational
Behavior, eds. Staw BM and Cummings LL, 10.
Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration,
application, and innovation. Psychological bulletin, 103(1), 27.
Mumford, M. D., & Licuanan, B. (2004). Leading for innovation: Conclusions, issues,
and directions. The leadership quarterly, 15(1), 163-171.
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and
contextual factors at work. Academy of management journal, 39(3), 607-634.
Olsen, J. P. (2006). Maybe it is time to rediscover bureaucracy. Journal of Public
Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 1-24.
Osborne, S. P. (2002). Voluntary organizations and innovation in public services:
Routledge.
Perrow, C., Reiss, A. J., & Wilensky, H. L. (1986). Complex organizations: A critical
essay (Vol. 3): McGraw-Hill New York.
Prajogo, D. I., & Sohal, A. S. (2003). The relationship between TQM practices,
quality performance, and innovation performance: an empirical examination.
International journal of quality & reliability management, 20(8), 901-918.
Rickards, T., & Moger, S. (2006). Creative leaders: a decade of contributions from
Creativity and Innovation Management Journal. Creativity and Innovation
Management, 15(1), 4-18.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1961). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits,
capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (Vol. 55): Transaction Books.
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path
model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of management
journal, 37(3), 580-607.
Small, O. (2004). medium-sized enterprises in Turkey: issues and policies: Paris:
OECD.
Somers, J., & Gregory, R. Max Weber, John Stuart Mill and New Public Management
in New Zealand: Reconsidering the PoliticalBureaucratic Nexus.
Song, X. M., & Parry, M. E. (1997). The determinants of Japanese new product
successes. Journal of Marketing Research, 64-76.
Tang, J., Pee, L., & Iijima, J. (2013). Investigating the effects of business process
orientation on organizational innovation performance. Information &
Management, 50(8), 650-660.
Treadway, D. C., Hochwarter, W. A., Kacmar, C. J., & Ferris, G. R. (2005). Political
will, political skill, and political behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior,
26(3), 229-245.
Walker, R. M. (2006). Innovation type and diffusion: an empirical analysis of local
government. Public Administration, 84(2), 311-335.
Walker, R. M., Jeanes, E., & Rowlands, R. (2002). Measuring Innovation–Applying
the Literature‐Based Innovation Output Indicator to Public Services. Public
Administration, 80(1), 201-214.
Weber, M. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, trans. AM
Henderson and Talcott Parsons (New York, 1947), 341-342.
Windrum, P. (2008). Innovation and entrepreneurship in public services. Innovation in
public sector services: entrepreneurship, creativity and management, 3-22.
Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role
of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of management
journal, 53(2), 323-342.
江宗賢. (2007). 觀照公部門便捷服務的創新與品質提升作法-以數位學習為例.
研考雙月刊, 31 (4), 73-87.
李仲彬. (2013). 政府創新的類型與分佈: 我國地方政府 1999-2010 年間的觀
察.
孫本初. (2001). 公共管理. 臺北: 智勝文化公司
.
張惇涵. (2012). 我國政府服務之創新機制研究. 臺灣大學政治學研究所學位論文(2012 年).
曾民賢. (2002). 公部門創新管理之研究----以大肚鄉戶政事務所為例.
曾冠球. (2009). [求實際] 或 [趕流行]?---公部門組織創新採行之研究—以台北市政府網路申辦服務為例.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code