Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0401116-175412 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0401116-175412
論文名稱
Title
文化創意產業群聚活化凋敝社區的開創歷程:行動者網絡理論的觀點
The entrepreneuring process of cultural and creative industry clusters activate depleted communities: From the Perspective of Actor-Network Theory
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
152
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2016-01-27
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2016-06-15
關鍵字
Keywords
開創歷程、群聚、文化創意產業、凋敝社區、行動者網絡理論
entrepreneuring process, cluster, cultural and creative industry, depleted community, actor-network theory
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5874 次,被下載 219
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5874 times, has been downloaded 219 times.
中文摘要
本研究從探究凋敝社區活化的開創歷程,思考文化創意產業聚落如何促動凋敝社區重新活化。本研究以「行動者網絡理論」作為分析視角,同時納入人與非人等多重行動體的觀察,分別探討台南市安平地區發展劍獅文化產業,以及高雄市駁二藝術特區打造文化創意園區的經驗,從而發現凋敝社區能夠發展文化創意產業群聚的原因,在於「擁有一群認同文化經濟觀念的主要行動者」、「在地文化資產歷經多次轉譯」、「公部門行動者作為文化創意產業群聚網絡的發言人」、「所有行動者在網絡內綿密互動,並透過協商、試誤確認發展特定的文化創意產業群聚模式後,再分工合作吸引更多商家及觀光客,以擴大群聚效應。」等4大要件。至於凋敝社區如何發展文化創意產業?則是透過:一、「先由某個主要行動者設置活化凋敝社區的入渡要律,吸引在地公私部門行動者參與的興趣」;二、「各個行動者透過協商初步達成於凋敝社區發展文化創意產業的共識,並穩定彼此的利益」;三、「擴大召募其他行動者於凋敝社區嘗試發展文化創意產業群聚的各種可能模式」;四、「由公部門擔任共同發言人,各個行動者朝向確認的文化意產業群聚模式分工合作逐步推動,藉此擴大吸引觀光客及相關商家進駐」等4大階段的開創歷程,才得以產生產業群聚效應,進而活化凋敝社區。
Abstract
This study investigated the entrepreneuring process of the activation of depleted communities, exploring how the formation of cultural and creative industry clusters could promote such a process. The researcher adopted the actor-network theory to analyze the experiences of developing Sword Lion cultural and creative industry clusters in the An-Ping area in Tainan and Pier 2 warehouses surrounding the area’s art and culture park in Kaohsiung in order to include the multiple actants, both human and non-human.

Based on the research results, several conclusions could be drawn. Depleted communities can develop cultural and creative industry clusters because 1) major actors agreed with the cultural economy; 2) the local cultural assets have been translated many times; 3) the government actor was regarded as a spokesman for the cultural and creative industries’ cluster network; and 4) all the actors closely interacted within the network and, through negotiation, trial, and error, confirm the development of a particular cultural and creative industries’ cluster mode, then divided the labor to attract more tourists and businesses to expand the cluster effect. The depleted communities developed cultural and creative industries via specific processes. First, one of the major actors set an obligatory point of passage (OPP) to activate the depleted communities, catching the interest of both the public and private departments. Second, through negotiations, actors found a common ground for organizing cultural and creative industries in depleted communities, then stabilized each other’s profits. Third, by enrolling more actors, it is possible to identify more possibilities in organizing cultural and creative industries in depleted communities.
IV
Finally, following the government’s lead, actors followed their own division of work, attracting tourists and related industries to join the community and then reach the goal of activating depleted communities. In conclusion, the success of the activation of a depleted community was determined by whether the composition of a macro-actor network can complete through the collective translation of all actors.
目次 Table of Contents
目 錄
論文審定書 ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. i
誌謝 …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ii
中文摘要 …………………………………………………………………………………………………… iii
英文摘要 ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. iv
目錄 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. vi
圖次 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ix
表次 ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. x
第一章、緒論 …………………………………………………………………………………………… 1
第一節、研究背景與動機 ………………………………………………………………… 1
第二節、研究問題與目的 ………………………………………………………………… 3
第三節、研究場域的選擇 ………………………………………………………………… 7
第四節、研究策略與架構 ………………………………………………………………… 12
第二章、文獻整理 …………………………………………………………………………………… 16
第一節、文化創意產業在台灣的發展脈絡 …………………………………. 16
第二節、產業群聚研究 ……………………………………………………………………. 25
第三節、文化創意產業的群聚研究 ………………………………………………… 29
VII
第四節、創業與開創研究 ………………………………………………………………… 31
第五節、凋敝社區活化的相關案例 ………………………………………………… 37
第三章、研究觀點與方法 ………………………………………………………………………… 45
第一節、ANT 是什麼? ....................................................................... 45
第二章、轉譯的分析方法與批判 …………………………………………………….. 48
第三章、資料蒐集與研究流程 ……………………………………………………….. 53
第四章、安平劍獅文化創意產業的在地轉譯 …………………..……………………. 56
第一節、故事:安平地區如何發展劍獅文化創意產業群聚? ………… 56
第二節、分析:安平劍獅文化創意產業群聚的開創歷程 ……………… 64
第三節、轉譯分析的發現 ……………………………………………………………….. 72
第五章、馭二藝術特區的在地轉譯 ……………………………………………………….. 76
第一節、故事:高雄駁二倉庫群如何發展成為創意文化園區? …… 76
第二節、分析:駁二藝術特區發展文化創意產業的開創歷程 ……… 88
第三節、轉譯分析的發展 ……………………………………………………………….. 96
第六章、結論與建議 ……………………………………………………………………………… 100
第一節、文化創意產業群聚活化凋敝社區的4 大要件 ………………… 102
第二節、文化創意產業群聚活化凋敝社區的4 大階段 …………………… 109
第三節、研究貢獻 ………………………………………………………………………… 117
第四節、研究限制與建議 ……………………………………………………………….. 121
參考文獻 …………………………………………………………………………………………………. 125
VIII
中文部分 ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 125
英文部分 ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 130
參考文獻 References
中文部分

于國華(2003)。文化,創意,產業--十年來臺灣文化政策中的「產業」發展。典藏今藝術,第128期,頁46-49

文化部(2015)。文化創意產業包括哪些範疇?取自:文化部網站,網址:http://cci.culture.tw/cci/cci/faq_detail.php?sn=1&type=&p=1

王元山(1990)。九份由城聚落空間結構及社區成形之研究。中原大學建築研究所未出版碩士論文。

李天鐸編著(2011)。文化創意產業讀本:創意管理與文化經濟。台北:遠流。

行政院(2002)。挑戰2008:國家發展重點計畫(2002~2007)。台北:行政院。
行政院文化建設委員會(2002)。文化創意產業第一期(92-96年)發展計畫。台北:行政院文化建設委員會。

行政院文化建設委員會(2007)。創意台灣--文化創意產業發展方案。台北:行政院文化建設委員會。

行政院文化建設委員會(2008)。文化創意產業發展第二期(97-100年)計畫。台北:行政院文化建設委員會。
行政院文化建設委員會(2009)。文化創意產業發展第二期(97-102年)修正計畫。台北:行政院文化建設委員會。
行政院文化建設委員會(2010)。文化創意產業發展第二期(97-102年)第二次修正計畫(核定本)。台北:行政院文化建設委員會。

交通部觀光局(2013)。中華民國101年國人旅遊狀況調查報告。台北:作者。

吳昭明(1999)。延平街事件大事紀。台北:傳文。

吳連賞(2005)。高雄市港埠發展史。高雄:高雄市文獻委員會。

邱大昕(2011)。為什麼馬殺雞?視障按摩歷史的行動網絡分析。台灣社會研究,83,5-36。

邱誌勇(2011)。文化創意產業的發展與政策概觀。載於李天鐸編著,文化創意產業讀本:創意管理與文化經濟(31-56頁)。台北:遠流。

林文源(2007)。論行動者網絡理論的行動本體論。科技、醫療與社會,4,65-108。

林宏濤譯(2009)。啟蒙的辯證。台北:商周。Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W.(1979). Dialectic of Enlightenment.

林炎旦主編(2011)。文化創意產業理論與實務。台北:師大書苑。

林孟龍、彭成煌、朱純孝、周漢興(2012)。旅遊地與民宿意象對觀光客的重要度分析。臺灣觀光學報,9,93-111。

高雄市文化局(2003)。高雄市駁二藝術特區永續營運規畫。高雄:城市記憶公關顧問有限公司。

夏學理(2008)。文化創意產業概論。台北:五南。

張黎文主持、台北市古風史蹟協會執行(1993)。九份口述歷史與解說資料之建立。台北市:行政院文化建設委員會(未出版)。

黃琡媛(2008)。都市文化園區建構之制度化---以華山文化園區、駁二藝術特區為例。國立台北大學都市計劃研究所未出版碩士論文。

許柔婷、林佩瑩、李仲謀(2002)。產業轉移與地方興衰—以九份地區為例。地理教育,28,133-152。

陳柔安(譯)(2011)。文化產業不只是群聚典範(A. C. Pratt原著)。載於李天鐸(編著),文化創意產業讀本:創意管理與文化經濟,頁175-200。台北:遠流。

陳瑞麟(2010)。科學哲學:理論與歷史。台北:群學。

郭曜棻、蔡鴻濱(2003)。往日情懷:九份意象之壟斷性休閒價值。5月15日,發表於「休閒、文化與綠色資源」理論、政策與實務論壇,台北市,台灣。

曾玉崑(編著)(1999)。高雄發展史(講義)。台北:國立空中大學。

曾梓峰(2002)。追求非成長的再發展-永續取向的德國魯爾工業區再發展。發表於9月,International Symposium on the Sustainable Management Mechanism for Industrial Parks,台南:國立成功大學,台灣。

曾梓峰(2003)。文化創意的生產基地─德國魯爾12號礦區改造策略。發表於7月21日,文化創意產業地方巡迴論壇,台中:長榮桂冠酒店國際會議廳,台灣。

馮春萍(2003)。德國魯爾工業區持續發展的成功經驗。石油化工技術經濟,2,47-52。

廖美莉(2000)。九份再發展之研究:聚落再發展理論之建構。國立台北大學都市計畫研究所未出版碩士論文。

蔡金安(編著)(2008)。劍獅的故鄉安平。台南:開朗雜誌。

蔡志豪(2015)。價值基礎策略觀點之公、私部門夥伴關係的價值共創:以文創產業之駁二藝術特區為例。國立中山大學企業管理學系未出版博士論文。

蔡敦浩、陳可杰(2002)。質化研究在管理研究上的應用─三個個案的說明。商管科技季刊,3(1),43-55。

蔡敦浩、王慧蘭、劉育忠(2011)。敘說探究的第一堂課。台北市:鼎茂。

蔡敦浩、劉育忠、洪榮志(2013)。從對立到合作:文化商品生成中的社會創業。輔仁管理評論,20(1),81-104。

劉育忠、蔡敦浩、洪榮志(2015)。文化產業群聚如何促動凋敝社區再生發展─行動者網絡理論的觀點。產業與管理論壇,17(2),30-53。

賴世懷(2005)。社區參與地方觀光永續發展之研究—以九份地區為例。國立台北大學公共行政暨政策學系未出版碩士論文。

賴炳樹、白仁德(2009)。發展文化創意產業作為都市再生政策之研究。建築與規劃學報,10(1),15-32。

顏瑞田(2015.01.31)。駁二文創擬引BOT活水16億。取自:中時電子報,網址:http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20150131000122-260210

英文部分

Aldrich, H. E. (2001). Who Wants to be an Evolutionary Theorist: Remarks on the Occasion of the Year 2000 OMT Distinguished Scholarly Career Award Presentation. Journal of Management Inquiry, 10, 115-27.

Amin, A., & Robins, K. (1990). Industrial districts and regional development: Limit and possibilities. In F. Pyke, G. Becattini, & W. Sengenberger (Eds.), Industrial districts and inter-firm co-operation in Italy (185-219). Geneva, Switzerland: ILO.

Asheim, B. T., & Coenen, L. (2005). Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters. Research Policy, 34(8), 1173-1190.

Asheim, B. T., & Gertler, M. S. (2005). The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (291-317). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press,.

Bahrml, H., & Evans, S. (1995). Flexible re-cycling and hight-technology entrepreneurship. Calfornia Management Review, 37(3), 62-89.

Bassett, K., Griffiths, R., & Smith, I. (2002). Cultural industries, cultural clusters and the city: The example of natural history firm-making in Bristol. Geoforum, 33(2), 165-177.

Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28 (1), 31-56.

Becattini, G. (1990). The marshallian industrial district as a socioeconomic notion. In F. Pyke, G. Becattini, & W. Sengenberger (Eds.), Industrial districts and inter-firm co-operation in Italy (37-51), Geneva, Switzerland: ILO.

Bell, G. G. (2005). Cluster, networks, and firm innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 286-295.

Beinhocker, E. D. (1999). Robust Adaptive Strategies. Sloan Management Review,40(3), 95-106.

Boland, J. R., & Tenkasi, R. V. (1995). Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organization Science, 6(4), 350-372.

Boschma, R., & Lambooy, J. (1999). Evolutionary economics and economic geography. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 9(4), 411-429.

Bourdieu, P. (1983). The field of cultural production or the economic world reversed. Poetics, 12(4-5), 311-356.

Brown, S., & Capdevila, R. (1999). Perpetuum mobile: substance, force and the sociology of translation. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.). Actor network theory and after (26-50). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Bruner, J. (1986). Actual mind, Possible worlds. MA: Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Busenitz, L., West, G. P., Shepherd, D., Nelson, T., Chandler, G. N., & Zacharakis, A. (2001). Entrepreneurship in Emergence: Fifteen Years of Entrepreneurship Research in Management Journals. Paper presented at the Academy of Management meetings, Washington, D.C.

Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge (196-233). London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Callon, M. (1991). Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monste. Essays on power, technology and domination (132-161). London, UK: Routledge.

Callon, M. (1999). Actor-network theory: The market test. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.). Actor network theory and after (1-14). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the Big Leviathan: How Actors Macrostructure Reality and How Sociologists Help Them to Do So. In K. K. Cetina & A. Cicourel (Eds.). Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro and Macro-sociologies (277-303). London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Camagni, R. (1991). Introduction: From the local millieu to innovation through cooperation networks. In R. Camagni (Ed.), Innovation networks: Spatial perspectives (1-9). London, UK: Belhaven Press.

Casson, M. (2005). Entrepreneurship and the theory of the firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 58 (2), 327–348.

Castañer, X., & Campos, L. (2002). The determinants of artistic innovation: Bringing in the role of organizations. Journal of Cultural Economics, 26(1), 29-52.

Caves, R. E. (2000). Creative Industries: Contracts between Art and Commerce, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Chung, L. H, and Gibbons, P. T. (1997). Corporate entrepreneurship: The roles of ideology and social capital. Group and Organization Management, 22(l),10–30.

Cope, J. (2005). Researching Entrepreneurship through Phenomenological Inquiry. International Small Business Journal, 23(2), 163–189.

Cornwall, J. R. (1998). The entrepreneur as a building block for community, Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 3, 141-148.

Crossland, P. and Smith, F. I. (2002). Value Creation in Fine Arts: A System Dynamics Model of Inverse Demand and Information Cascades. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 417-434.

Deamer, I., & Earle, L. (2004). Industrial and Commercial Training. Searching for Entrepreneurship, 36 (3), 99-103.

Drake, G. (2003). This place gives me space: Place and creativity in the creative industries. Geoforum, 34(4), 511-524.

Fletcher, D. (2006). Entrepreneurial processes and the social construction of opportunity. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 18(5), 421–440.

Florida, R. (2010). The Great Reset. Harper Collins Publishers: New York.

Gartner, W. B. (1988). “Who is an Entrepreneur ?” Is the Wrong Question. American Journal of Small Business, 12(4), 11-32.

Gherardi, S., & Nicolini, D. (2005). Actor-networks: Ecology and Entrepreneurs. In B. Czarniawska, & T. Hernes. (Eds.), Actor-Network Theory and Organizing: 14-30, Demark: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.

Grabher, G. (2001). Ecologies of creativity: The village, the group, and the heterarchic organization of the British advertising industry. Environment and Planning A, 33, 351-374.

Guth, W.D. & Ginsberg, A., (1990). Corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal, 11(Special Issue), 5–15.

Hemingway, C. A. (2005). Personal values as a catalyst for corporate social entrepreneurship, Journal of Business, 60 (3), 233–249.

Hitt, M. A., Nixon, R. D., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kochhar, R. (1999). Corporate entrepreneurship and cross-functional fertilization: Activation, process and disintegration of new product design team. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3),145–167.

Hjorth, D., & Steyaert, C. (2004). “Introduction” in Hjorth, D. and Steyaert, C. (Eds.). Narrative and Discursive Approaches to Entrepreneurship, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, 1-8.

Hjorth, D., & Steyaert, C. (Eds.) (2009). The Politics and Aesthetics of Entrepreneurship, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Jeffcutt, P., & Pratt, A. (2002). Managing creativity in the cultural industries. Creativity and Innovation Management, 11 (4), 225-233.

Johnstone, H., & Lionais, D. (2004). Depleted communities and community business entrepreneurship: Revaluing space through place. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16(3), 217-233.

Kloosterman, R. C. (2004). Recent employment trends in the cultural industries in Amsterdam, Rotterdam, the Hague and Utrecht: A first exploration. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 95 (2), 243-252.

Kirzner, I. (1973). Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago, USA, University of Chicago Press.

Kong, L. (2005). The sociality of cultural industries: Hong Kong’s cultural policy and film industry. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 11(1), 61-76.

Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (1988). The pasteurization of France (A. Sheridan & J. Law, Tran.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Law, J. (1999). After ANT: Complexity, naming, and topology. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.). Actor network theory and after (1-14). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Law, J. (2004). After method. New York: Routledge.

Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics. London, UK: Macmillan.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London: Sage.

Morris, M.H., Kuratko, D.F., & Covin, J.G. (2008). Corporate entrepreneurship and innovation. Mason, OH: Thomson/South-Western Publishers.

Neuman, W. L. (2006). Social research methods : qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston : Pearson.

Peredo, A. M., & Chrisman, J. J. (2006). Toward a Theory of Community-Based Enterprise, Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 1-50.

Piore, M. J., & Sabel, C. F. (1984). The second industrial divide: Possibilities for prosperity. New York: Basic Books.

Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. London: Macmillan.

Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77-90.

Power, D. (2002). “ Cultural industries" in Sweden: An assessment of their place in the Swedish economy. Economic Geography, 78, 103-127.

Rantisi, N. M. (2002). The competitive foundations of localized learning and innovation: The case of women’s garment production in New York City. Economic Geography, 78 (4), 441-462.

Rantisi, N. M. (2004a). The ascendance of New York fashion. International Urban and Regional Research, 28 (1), 86-106.

Rantisi, N. M. (2004b). The designer in the city and the city in the designer. In D. Power & A. J. Scott (Eds.). Cultural industries and the production of culture (pp. 91-109), London, UK: Routledge.

Rindova, V., Barry, D., & Ketchen, D. J. (2009). Entrepreneurship as Emancipation. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 477-491.

Ripsas, S. (1998). Towards an Interdisciplinary Theory of Entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 10(2), 103-115.

Santagata, W. (2004). Creativity, fashion and market behavior. In D. Power & A. J. Scott (Eds.), Cultural industries and the production of culture (75-90). London, UK: Routledge.

Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Schumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Scott, A. J. (1996). The craft, fashion, and cultural-product industries of Los Angeles: Competitive dynamic and policy dilemma in a multi-sectoral image-producting complex. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 86 (2), 306-323.

Scott, A. J. (1997). The cultural economy of cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 21(2), 323-329.

Scott, A. J. (1999). The cultural economy: Geography and the creative field. Media, Culture and Society, 21(6), 807-817.

Scott, A. J. (2004a). Cultural-products industries and urban economic development: Prospects for growth and market contestation in global context. Urban Affairs Review, 39 (4), 461-490.

Scott, A. J. (2004b). On Hollywood: The place, the industry. New York, NY: Princeton University Press.

Selya, R. M. (1994). Taiwan as a service economy. Geoforum, 25 (3), 335-322.

Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1) , 217-226.

Steyaert, C. (2007). “Entrepreneuring” as a Conceptual Attractor? A Review of Process Theories in 20 Years of Entrepreneurship Studies. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 19, 453-477.

Steyaert, C., & Katz, J. (2004). Reclaiming the Space of Entrepreneurship in Society: Geographical, Discursive and Social Dimensions. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 16 (3), 179-196.

Storper, M. (1997). The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy. New York: Guilford.

UNESCO. (2000). What do we understand by Cultural industries? Culture trade and globalization, Montreal and Paris: UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2005). International Flows of Selected Cultural Goods and Services, 1994-2003, Montreal and Paris: UNESCO.

Van De Ven, A. H., (2007). Engaged Scholarship:A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Wang, B. C., Liu, S. C., & Chou,F. Y. (2010). National Policy and Promotion Model of Cultural and Creative Industry in Taiwan. International Journal of Business Reserarch, 10(1), 121-132.

Weick, K. E. (1979). The Social Psychology of Organizing. MA: Addison-Wesley.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code