Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0504116-121401 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0504116-121401
論文名稱
Title
政府官僚系統下領導者創新行為,信任,政治技巧與部屬創新行為之關係
The Relationship Between Leaders' Innovative Behavior,Trust,Political Skill and Subordinates' Innovative Behavior Under Government Bureaucracy Organization
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
52
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2016-05-28
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2016-06-04
關鍵字
Keywords
官僚體制、政治技巧、信任、創新行為、創新
bureaucracy, innovation, innovative behavior, trust, political skill
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5924 次,被下載 70
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5924 times, has been downloaded 70 times.
中文摘要
創新的重要性近年來逐漸受到重視,隨著經濟、環境快速的發展與變遷,「創新」一詞已不容忽略,但在政府官僚體制下,相關研究卻有限。有鑑於有效率的政府須仰賴創新達成國民需求、有效地資源分配,此外,員工的創新行為被認為是組織在動態環境中取的成功相當重要的資產。是故本研究透過探討主管創新行為與員工創新行為之關係,試圖了解主管創新行為對員工創新行為產生的影響,並進一步探討員工對主管的信任與主管的政治技巧,是否會干擾主管創新行為與員工創新行為的關係。
本研究以台灣北、中、南部政府單位為樣本發放問卷,並利用階層回歸進行假設驗證。研究結果發現,主管創新行為與員工創新行為呈顯著正向關係。此外,員工對主管的信任與主管的政治技巧會強化主管創新行為與員工創新行為的正向關係。最後,本研究亦針對本文的理論貢獻與管理意涵,加以討論之。
Abstract
For the past decade, the increasing interests in the importance of innovation has been emerged. As the economy and environment rapidly change, "innovation" is the term has not be ignored. However, there is relatively little research for this topic under the bureaucratic organization of the government. Because effective government is considered that need to depend on successful innovation to develop better ways of meeting needs and using resources in recent years. In addition, employees’ innovative behavior is considered to be an important assets that organization achieve remarkable success in dynamic environments. Therefore, the purpose of this study is focus on the relationship between supervisors’ innovative behavior and employees’ innovative behavior, trying to understand the impact of supervisors’ innovative behavior toward employees’ innovative behavior. And this study further explores whether employees’ trust in their supervisor and supervisor’ political skill moderate the relationship between supervisors’ and employees’ innovative behavior or not. The result show that supervisors’ innovative behavior is positively related to employees’ innovative behavior. Furthermore, the results also indicate that employees’ trust in their supervisor and supervisor’ political skill have the moderating effect. In the end, the theoretical and managerial implications have also been discussed.
目次 Table of Contents
第一章 緒論 ......................................................................................................... 1
第二章 文獻探討................................................................................................... 4
2.1 官僚體制 ....................................................................................................... 4
2.1.1 官僚組織與創新 ................................................................................ 4
2.1.2 官僚體制特徵與定義 ......................................................................... 5
2.1.3 後官僚體制 ........................................................................................ 6
2.2 創新行為....................................................................................................... 8
2.2.1 創新 .................................................................................................... 8
2.2.2 創新行為 ............................................................................................ 9
2.3 信任 ............................................................................................................ 10
2.3.1 信任定義 .......................................................................................... 11
2.3.2 構成信任之因素 .............................................................................. 11
2.3.3 信任對主管創新行為與員工創新行為關係的干擾效果 ................. 14
2.4 政治技巧 ..................................................................................................... 15
2.4.1 政治技巧定義 .................................................................................. 16
2.4.2 政治技巧四大構面 ........................................................................... 16
2.4.3 政治技巧對主管創新行為與員工創新行為關係的干擾效果 ......... 17
第三章 研究方法................................................................................................... 19
3.1 研究架構...................................................................................................... 19
3.2 對象與施測程序 .......................................................................................... 20
3.3 研究工具...................................................................................................... 20
3.3.1 創新行為 .......................................................................................... 20
3.3.2 信任 .................................................................................................. 21
3.3.3 政治技巧 .......................................................................................... 21
3.3.4 控制變數 .......................................................................................... 21
3.3.5 資料分析方法 .................................................................................. 21
第四章 研究結果................................................................................................... 23
4.1 描述性統計與相關分析 .......................................................................... 23
4.1.1 描述性統計 ...................................................................................... 23
4.1.2 相關分析 .......................................................................................... 24
4.2 信度分析..................................................................................................... 25
4.3 回歸分析 .............................................................................................. 27
4.3 小結 ............................................................................................................. 30
第五章 結論與建議 .............................................................................................. 31
5.1 研究討論..................................................................................................... 31
5.2 管理意涵與未來研究方向 .......................................................................... 33
v
5.3 研究限制..................................................................................................... 35
參考文獻 .................................................................................................................... 37
附錄一 ........................................................................................................................ 43
參考文獻 References
英文部分
Bommert, B. (2010). Collaborative innovation in the public sector. International public management review, 11(1), 15-33.

Borins, S. (2002). Leadership and innovation in the public sector. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 23(8), 467-469.

Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management decision, 47(8), 1323-1335.

Bhattacharya, R., Devinney, T. M., & Pillutla, M. M. (1998). A formal model of trust based on outcomes. Academy of management review, 23(3), 459-472.

Carmeli, A., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2009). Trust, connectivity, and thriving: Implications for innovative behaviors at work. The Journal of Creative Behavior,43(3), 169-178.

Clegg, C., Unsworth, K., Epitropaki, O., & Parker, G. (2002). Implicating trust in the innovation process†. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75(4), 409-412.

Černe, M., Jaklič, M., & Škerlavaj, M. (2013). Authentic leadership, creativity, and innovation: A multilevel perspective. Leadership, 9(1), 66-67.

Dirks, K. T. (1999). The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. Journal of applied psychology, 84(3), 445.

De Jong, J. P., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2007). How leaders influence employees' innovative behaviour. European Journal of innovation management, 10(1), 41-55.

Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity(No. D10 301 c. 1/c. 2). New York: Free press.

Fagerberg, J. (2004). Innovation: a guide to the literature. Paper to be presented at the Workshop “The Many Guises of Innovation: What we have learnt and where we are heading”, Ottawa, October 23-24.2003, organized by Statistics Canada.

Ferris, G. R., Treadway, D. C., Perrewé, P. L., Brouer, R. L., Douglas, C., & Lux, S. (2007). Political skill in organizations. Journal of Management, 33(3), 290-320.

Ferris, G. R., Treadway, D. C., Kolodinsky, R. W., Hochwarter, W. A., Kacmar, C. J., Douglas, C., & Frink, D. D. (2005). Development and validation of the political skill inventory. Journal of Management, 31(1), 126-152.

Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public money and management, 25(1), 27-34.

Josserand, E., Teo, S., & Clegg, S. (2006). From bureaucratic to post-bureaucratic: the difficulties of transition. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19(1), 54-61.


Johnson, P., Wood, G., Brewster, C., & Brookes, M. (2009). The Rise of Post-Bureaucracy Theorists' Fancy or Organizational Praxis?. International sociology, 24(1), 37-41.

McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of management journal,38(1), 24-59.

Michaelis, B., Stegmaier, R., & Sonntag, K. (2009). Affective commitment to change and innovation implementation behavior: the role of charismatic leadership and employees’ trust in top management. Journal of Change Management, 9(4), 399-404.

Mulgan, G., & Albury, D. (2003). Innovation in the public sector.

Madjar, N., & Ortiz-Walters, R. (2009). Trust in supervisors and trust in customers: Their independent, relative, and joint effects on employee performance and creativity. Human Performance, 22(2), 128-140.

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of management review, 20(3), 709-730.

Naranjo-Gil, D. (2009). The influence of environmental and organizational factors on innovation adoptions: Consequences for performance in public sector organizations. Technovation, 29(12), 810-811


Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of management journal, 37(3), 580-603

Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2003). Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: Evidence from Korea. Academy of management Journal, 46(6), 703-714.

Tan, H. H., & Tan, C. S. (2000). Toward the differentiation of trust in supervisor and trust in organization. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs,126(2),241-254

Treadway, D. C., Hochwarter, W. A., Ferris, G. R., Kacmar, C. J., Douglas, C., Ammeter, A. P., & Buckley, M. R. (2004). Leader political skill and employee reactions. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(4), 493-513.

Wei, L. Q., Liu, J., Chen, Y. Y., & Wu, L. Z. (2010). Political skill, supervisor–subordinate guanxi and career prospects in Chinese firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47(3), 437-454.

Yukl, G. (2002), Leadership in Organizations, 5th ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323-342.

Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107-128.

Zhou, J., & Hoever, I. J. (2014). Research on workplace creativity: A review and redirection. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 1(1), 334-335.


中文部分

王麗蕉、廖彩惠 (2007)。韋伯官僚理論與檔案來源原則之映證。圖書與資訊學刊第60期。77-89ISSN 1023-2125

林千芩、李國隆、葉劭緯、周宇超. (2007) 。技術創新及其重要性。Journal of Data Analysis, 2(1), 51-60.

洪贊凱, & 曾鈺雯. (2012). 從印象管理觀點探討組織個體政治技巧與建言行為之關係. Journal of Human Resource Management Vol, 12(2), 1-23.

陳菁雯 (2006)。新興民主國家的危機與轉機:行政官僚與政務官員的博奕互動。中華人文社會學報, (4), 152-169.

黃哲彬 (2008)。後科層體制對學校行政革新之啟示。學校行政, (55), 48-69.

鄭仁偉, & 黎士群. (2001). 組織公平, 信任與知識分享行為之關係性研究. <人力資源管理學報>(台灣), 1(2), 69-79.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code