博碩士論文 etd-0704111-223234 詳細資訊


[回到前頁查詢結果 | 重新搜尋]

姓名 林朱燕(Chu Yen Lin) 電子郵件信箱 E-mail 資料不公開
畢業系所 人力資源管理研究所(Institute of Human Resource Management)
畢業學位 博士(Ph.D.) 畢業時期 99學年第2學期
論文名稱(中) 同事之背景屬性相似性與關係基礎對同事間助人行為的影響:一個中介效果與調節效果的模式  
論文名稱(英) The influence of coworkers’ relational demographic similarities and guanxi base on coworkers’ helping: a model of mediation and moderation
檔案
  • etd-0704111-223234.pdf
  • 本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
    請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
    論文使用權限

    電子論文:校內立即公開,校外一年後公開

    論文語文/頁數 中文/143
    統計 本論文已被瀏覽 5691 次,被下載 2740 次
    摘要(中) 摘 要
    本論文旨在探討與比較同事間之關係背景屬性相似性與關係基礎對同事之助人行為的影響。並針對關係背景屬性相似性與關係基礎對助人行為之預測效果,提出不同的中介機制之驗證。本論文並進一步探究個人因素包括相依我自我取向與個人傳統性如何與關係背景屬性相似性以及關係基礎產生交互作用,進而對中介歷程與助人行為產生影響。本論文共分為三個子研究,三個研究均採用腳本操弄的實驗設計結合問卷施測的方式蒐集已在業界工作之員工的資料。
    研究結果顯示,在主要效果上,不論是「同事間有無關係背景屬性相似性」與「同事間有無親戚關係」對同事之人際方面助人行為均有顯著的預測力,但對同事之工作方面助人行為並沒有顯著的預測力。在中介效果上,研究一與研究二的中介模式都有顯著的結果。研究一「對同事之喜歡程度」對「同事間有無背景屬性相似性」與「工作方面或人際方面之助人行為」的關係具有中介效果。而研究二「關係義務的認知」對「同事間有無親戚關係」與「工作方面或人際方面之助人行為」的關係亦具有中介效果。在調節效果上,研究一的調節效果不顯著;研究二的調節模式得到顯著的結果,亦即「員工的個體傳統性」調節「同事間有無親戚關係」與「關係義務的認知」的關係。研究三的結果顯示員工對於與他們具有親戚關係之同事的工作方面與人際方面助人行為,均大於與他們具有關係背景屬性相似性的同事之工作方面與人際方面助人行為。本研究針對上述結果進行討論並提出研究限制與未來研究方向。
    摘要(英) Abstract
    The purpose of this dissertation is to investigate and compare the effects of coworkers’ relational demographic similarities and guanxi base on coworkers’ helping behavior. Moreover, the mediation mechanisms of social liking between coworkers’ relational demographic similarities and helping behavior, and guanxi obligation between coworkers’ guanxi base and helping behavior were examined. Furthermore, the moderation effect of interdependent self on the relationship between relational demographic similarities and helping behavior, and the moderation effect of individual traditionality on the relationship between guanxi base and helping behavior were examined. There were three studies in this dissertation, and the data were collected by scenario experimental design combined with questionnaire survey. The subjects were working employees sampled from different industries.
    Results showed that both coworkers’ relational demographic similarities and guanxi base have significant effects on the interpersonal-related helping behavior, but not on work-related helping behavior. Moreover, the mediation effects of social liking towards coworker, and guanxi obligation were significant in both study 1 and study 2. The moderation effect was not significant in study 1, but was significant in study 2. The individual traditionality moderated the relationship of guanxi base and guanxi obligation. The results of study 3 showed that coworkers with guanxi base have stronger effect on both interpersonal-related and work-related coworkers’ helping behavior than coworkers with relational demographic similarities. The results were discussed and the limitations and suggestions for future research were proposed.
    關鍵字(中)
  • 相依我
  • 個人傳統性
  • 關係基礎
  • 關係背景屬性相似性
  • 關係義務的認知
  • 對同事之喜歡程度
  • 助人行為
  • 關鍵字(英)
  • guanxi base
  • relational demographic similarities
  • social liking towards coworker
  • guanxi obligation
  • interdependent self
  • individual traditionality
  • helping behavior
  • 論文目次 目 錄
    論文審定書…………………………………………………...   i
    中文摘要……………………………………………………...  ii
    英文摘要……………………………………………………..  iii
    第一章 緒論………………………………………………… 1
     第一節 研究背景…………………………………………… 1
     第二節 研究目的…………………………………………… 3
    第二章 文獻探討…………………………………………… 5
     第一節 關係背景屬性相似性與助人行為………....……… 5
     第二節 關係基礎與助人行為…………………….......…… 12
     第三節 關係背景屬性相似性與關係基礎之比較 ..……… 21
     第四節 假設推導…………………...……………………… 24
    第三章 研究一:關係背景屬性相似性與助人行為的關連性31
     第一節 研究架構與假設………………………...………… 31
     第二節 研究方法………………………...………………… 35
     第三節 研究結果…………………………...……………… 48
     第四節 結論………………………...………………………. 58
    第四章 研究二:關係基礎與助人行為的關連性…………... 59
     第一節 研究架構與假設…………………………………… 59
     第二節 研究方法…………………...……………………… 62
     第三節 研究結果…………………………...……………… 74
     第四節 結論…………………………………………...…… 86
    第五章 研究三:關係背景屬性相似性與關係基礎對助人行為 的比較87
     第一節 研究架構與假設…………………………………… 87
     第二節 研究方法………………….......…………………… 89
     第三節 研究結果……………………………...…………… 96
     第四節 結論………………………………...……………… 97
    第六章 討論與建議…………………………...…………… 98
     第一節 結果與討論………………………...……………… 98
     第二節 管理實務之意涵、研究限制與未來研究方向..… 103
    參考文獻…………………..………………………………… 105
    附錄:問卷………………………………………………….… 113
    參考文獻 參考文獻
    余英時 (1984)。 從價值系統看中國文化的現代意義。台北: 時報出版公司。
    何友輝、陳淑娟、趙志裕 (1991)。 關係取向:為中國社會心理方法論求答案。見楊國樞、黃光國 (主編)。中國人的心理與行為,49-66頁。台北:桂冠。
    周麗芳 (2002)。 華人組織中的關係與社會網絡。本土心理學研究。 18期,175-227頁。
    周麗芳 (2006)。 華人工作團隊之社會關係與成員效能:多元向度、多重網絡的探討。國立台灣大學心理系博士論文。
    金耀基 (1992)。關係和網絡的建構: 一個社會學的詮釋。見金耀基(主編)。中國社會與文化,64-85頁。香港: 牛津大學出版社。
    張國義 (2004)。員工歸類模式對甄選、晉升之影響:差序格局觀點。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所博士論文。
    喬健 (1982)。 關係芻議。見楊國樞、文崇一 (主編),社會及行為科學研究的中國化。台北:中央研究院民族學研究所。
    費孝通 (1948)。 鄉土中國與鄉土重建。上海: 觀察社。
    黃光國 (1988)。 中國人的權力遊戲。台北: 巨流圖書公司。
    黃光國 (2005)。 儒家關係主義: 文化反思與典範重建。 國立臺灣大學出版中心。
    楊中芳 (2001)。 有關關係與人情構念化之綜述。中國人的人際關係、情感與信任,3-26頁。台北: 遠流。
    楊中芳、彭泗清 (2005)。 人際交往中的人情與關係:構念化與研究方向。華人本土心理學,483-520頁。台北: 遠流。
    楊宜音 (2000)。 “自己人”: 一項有關中國人關係分類的個案研究。本土心理學研究,13期,277-322頁。
    楊國樞 (1992)。 中國人的社會取向: 社會互動的觀點。中國人的心理與行為:理念及方法篇。台北: 桂冠。
    楊國樞 (2002)。 中國人的個人傳統性與現代性:概念與測量。華人心理的本土化研究,329-376頁。台北:桂冠。
    Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications.
    Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
    Bowler, W. M. & Brass, D. J. (2006). Relational correlates of interpersonal citizenship behavior: A social network perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 70-82.
    Byrne, D. E. (1971). The attraction paradigm. Academic Publications.
    Chatman, J. A. (1991). Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 459-484.
    Chen, C. C., Chen, X. P., & Meindl, J. R. (1998). How can cooperation be fostered? The cultural effects of individualism-collectivism. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 285-304.
    Chen, C. C., Chen, Y. R., & Xin, K. (2004). Guanxi practices and trust in management: A procedural justice perspective. Organization Science, 200-209.
    Chen, X., & Peng, S. (2008). Guanxi dynamics: Shifts in the closeness of ties between Chinese coworkers. Management and Organization Review, 4(1), 63-80.
    Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., Wu, T. Y., Huang, M. P., & Farh, J. L. (2004). Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 89-117.
    Chiaburu, D. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2008). Do peers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of coworker effects on perceptions, attitudes, OCBs, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1082-1103.
    Chou, L. F., Cheng, B. S., Huang, M. P., & Cheng, H. Y. (2006). Guanxi networks and member's effectiveness in Chinese team: The mediated effects of trust networks. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9(2), 79-95.
    Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23(3), 239-290.
    Davis, D. (1981). Implications of interaction versus effectance as mediators of the similarity-attraction relationship. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, (17), 96-116.
    Den Hartog, D. N., De Hoogh, A. H. B., & Keegan, A. E. (2007). The interactive effects of belongingness and charisma on helping and compliance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1131-1139.
    DeRue, D. S., & Hollenbeck, J. R. (2007). The search for internal and external fit in teams. Perspectives on Organizational Fit, 259-285.
    Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the big five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 192-203.
    Elfenbein, H. A., & O'Reilly III, C. A. (2007). Fitting in: The effects of relational demography and person-culture fit on group process and performance. Group & Organization Management, 32(1), 109-142.
    Fan, Y. (2002). Questioning guanxi: Definition, classification and implications. International Business Review, 11(5), 543-561.
    Farh, J., Hackett, R. D., & Liang, J. (2007). Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational support-employee outcome relationships in China: Comparing the effects of power distance and traditionality. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 715-729.
    Farh, J. L., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S. C. (1997). Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 421-444.
    Farh, J. L., Tsui, A. S., Xin, K., & Cheng, B. S. (1998). The influence of relational demography and guanxi: The Chinese case. Organization Science, 9(4), 471-488.
    Farh, J. L., Zhong, C. B., & Organ, D. W. (2004). Organizational citizenship behavior in the People's Republic of China. Organization Science , 241-253.
    Foa, E. B., & Foa, U. G. (1976). Resource theory of social exchange. Contemporary Topics in Social Psychology, 99-131.
    Glaman, J. M., Jones, A. P., & Rozelle, R. M. (1996). The effects of co-worker simiilarity on the emergence of affect in work teams. Group & Organization Management, 21(2), 192-215.
    Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. J. Deary, F. De Fruyt & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, ed., pp. 7-28). The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
    Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161-178.
    Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on group functioning. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 1029-1045.
    Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Sage Publications, Inc.
    Hsu, F. L. K. (1981). Americans and Chinese: Passage to differences. University of Hawaii Press.
    Hui, C., Lee, C., & Rousseau, D. (2004). Psychological contract and organizational citizenship behavior in China: Investigating generalizability and instrumentality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 311-321.
    Jackson, S., May, K., & Whitney, K. (1995). Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations. In R. Guzzo, & E. Salas (Eds.), Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision making teams (pp. 204–226).
    Jacobs, J. B., & Bruce, K. (1980). The concept of guanxi and local politics in a rural Chinese cultural setting. Social Interaction in Chinese Society, New York, NY, 209-236.
    Kram, K. E., & Isabella, L. A. (1985). Mentoring alternatives: The role of peer relationships in career development. The Academy of Management Journal, 28(1), 110-132.
    Ladd, D., & Henry, R. A. (2000). Helping coworkers and helping the organization: The role of support perceptions, exchange ideology, and conscientiousness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(10), 2028-2049.
    MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Fetter, R. (1991). Organizational citizenship behavior and objective productivity as determinants of managerial evaluations of salespersons' performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(1), 123-150.
    Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253.
    Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. The Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 402-433.
    Mitchell, J. C. (1969). Social networks in urban situations. Univ. Press.
    Mollica, K. A., Gray, B., & Trevino, L. K. (2003). Racial homophily and its persistence in newcomers' social networks. Organization Science , 123-136.
    Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books/DC Heath and Com.
    Organ, D. W., & Konovsky, M. (1989). Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1), 157-164.
    Park, S. H., & Luo, Y. (2001). Guanxi and organizational dynamics: Organizational networking in Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(5), 455-477.
    Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544.
    Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.
    Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185-227.
    Raabe, B., & Beehr, T. (2003). Formal mentoring versus supervisor and coworker relationships: Differences in perceptions and impact. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24((3)), 271-293.
    Riordan, C. M. (2000). Relational demography within groups: Past developments, contradictions, and new directions. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 19, 131-174.
    Settoon, R. P., & Mossholder, K. W. (2002). Relationship quality and relationship context as antecedents of person-and task-focused interpersonal citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 255-267.
    Sherony, K. M., & Green, S. G. (2002). Coworker exchange: Relationships between coworkers, leader-member exchange, and work attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 542-548.
    Shore, L. M., Coyle-Shapiro, J. A. M., Chen, X. P., & Tetrick, L. E. (2009). Social exchange in work settings: Content, process, and mixed models. Management and Organization Review, 5(3), 289-302.
    Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 580-591.
    Slocombe, T. E., & Bluedorn, A. C. (1999). Organizational behavior implications of the congruence between preferred polychronicity and experienced work‐unit polychronicity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(1), 75-99.
    Spreitzer, G. M., Perttula, K. H., & Xin, K. (2005). Traditionality matters: An examination of the effectiveness of transformational leadership in the United States and Taiwan. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(3), 205-227.
    Swann, W., Polzer, J. T., Seyle, D. C., & Ko, S. J. (2004). Finding value in diversity: Verification of personal and social self-views in diverse groups. Academy of Management Review, 29(1), 9-27.
    Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup conflict. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychologyof intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
    Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96(3), 506-520.
    Tsai, W. C., Chen, C. C., & Liu, H. L. (2007). Test of a model linking employee positive moods and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1570-1583.
    Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., & O'Reilly III, C. A. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 549-579.
    Tsui, A. S., & Farh, J. L. (1997). Where guanxi matters: Relational demography and guanxi in the Chinese context. Work and Occupations, 24(1), 56-79.
    Tsui, A. S., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. The Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 402-423.
    Tsui, A. S., Porter, L. W., & Egan, T. D. (2002). When both similarities and dissimilarities matter: Extending the concept of relational demography. Human Relations, 55(8), 899-929.
    Tsui, A. S., Xin, K. R., & Egan, T. D. (1995). Relational demography: The missing link in vertical dyad linkage. Diversity in Work Teams: Research Paradigms for a Changing Workplace, 97-129.
    Turban, D. B., & Jones, A. P. (1988). Supervisor-subordinate similarity: Types, effects, and mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(2), 228-231.
    Turban, D. B., Jones, A. P., & Rozelle, R. M. (1990). Influences of supervisor liking of a subordinate and the reward context on the treatment and evaluation of that subordinate. Motivation and Emotion, 14(3), 215-233.
    Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. The Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108-119.
    Waismel‐Manor, R., Tziner, A., Berger, E., & Dikstein, E. (2010). Two of a kind? Leader–Member exchange and organizational citizenship behaviors: The moderating role of Leader–Member similarity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(1), 167-181.
    Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Traupmann, J. (1978). Equity and premarital sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(1), 82-92.
    Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601-617.
    Xin, K. R., & Pearce, J. L. (1996). Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1641-1658.
    Zhang, Z., Wan, D., Jia, M., & Gu, L. (2009). Prior ties, shared values, and cooperation in public-private partnerships. Management & Organization Review, 5(3), 353-374.
    口試委員
  • 彭台光 - 召集委員
  • 周麗芳 - 委員
  • 鄭伯壎 - 委員
  • 鐘昆原 - 委員
  • 陳世哲 - 委員
  • 陳以亨 - 委員
  • 任金剛 - 指導教授
  • 口試日期 2011-06-22 繳交日期 2011-07-04

    [回到前頁查詢結果 | 重新搜尋]


    如有任何問題請與論文審查小組聯繫