Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0722117-132049 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0722117-132049
論文名稱
Title
探討科技產業於創新研發部門之管理
To explore the management in the technology industry and its innovative R & D department
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
156
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2017-06-26
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2017-08-25
關鍵字
Keywords
科技業、研發、研發流程、創新策略、研發管理
R&D, Tech Industry, Innovative strategies, R&D process, R&D management
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5821 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5821 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
隨著整體外在環境變遷,加上科技業創新不斷之趨勢,以致市場及客戶端的需求隨著改變,許多企業為了在市場上求得一席之地,更需謹慎地觀察市場動向,逐漸投入大量的研發能量,在適當時機點推出符合市場的產品,才不至於為市場所淘汰。而過去研究偏向量化之探討,量化研究應用於科技創新研發與管理注重在某些特定人、事及情況下之行為模式及性質研究,無法有更細微的探討,因此本研究利用質化研究法更深入探討整個科技產業在創新研發流程及管理,從而將量化研究所注重的單一特質擴大為整個事件過程,讓企業在競爭環境下對研發產品或技術效率上有更高掌握度。
領導不僅是由上而下的管理內涵,透過不同管理方式,來領導團隊,而由下而上的追隨也會影響領導風格,主管的領導方式及各項能力,都是部屬仿效的榜樣,同時,領導者也必須對整體團隊人員的情況及能力特質有一定的掌握度,分配適當的工作,適時引導部屬,此外,身為領導也必須要有遠見,了解市場的變動,執行開發適當的產品之決策,以期共創美好的未來。
Abstract
With the overall environmental changes, coupled with the progress of scientific and technological innovation and the evolving needs of the market, companies need to carefully observe the market trends, and invest heavily in R&D in order to gain a spot in the marketplace. Launching the right product at the right time can help sustain the companies longer. The past researches have been largely focusing on quantitive research, where they place an importance on specific people, events and circumstances without zooming in on a deeper level. Therefore, this research is to harness the qualitative research technique to explore further on the R&D procedure and management in the technology industry, turning away from the linear qualities centered on by the quantitive research to a holistic process, with the intention to facilitate companies in their R&D and technological efficiency in the future.
Leadership is not only the art of management from the top to subordinates to lead the team through different management methods, but also the way will affect the leadership style from the subordinate to the top management. The way of leader's management and his capabilities are the good example for the subordinate learning. At the same time, leaders must also take control the situation of team personnel, the characteristics and capacity and assign appropriate work to guide the subordinates. In addition, leaders must have a vision to understand market changes to develop appropriate products in order to create a better future.
目次 Table of Contents
1 Introduction+1
1.1 General Background Information+2
1.2 Research Motive+3
1.3 Purpose of Research+5
1.4 Study Process+6
1.5 Overview of Dissertation+8
2 Literature review+9
2.1 Personality traits and Creativity+9
2.2 Leadership styles and situational Leadership+10
2.2.1 the type of leadership and the type of leadership style+13
2.2.2 the situation leadership+17
2.3 Organizational culture+22
2.3.1 Organizational culture+22
2.3.2 Organizational innovation+23
2.3.3 Organizational learning+24
2.3.4 Organizational learning culture and organizational innovation culture.26
2.4 Humanized management and Hierarchy of Needs theory+27
2.4.1 Humanized management+27
2.4.2 Maslow's hierarchy of needs+33
2.5 Innovation strategy management+35
2.5.1 Technological innovation+35
2.5.2 The opportunity to enter+37
2.5.3 Innovative sources+39
2.5.4 Type of innovation +42
3 Methodology+46
3.1 Grounded Theory+50
3.1.1 Grounded Theory Analysis+51
3.1.2 Grounded Theory in the implementation of procedure+55
3.2 Theoretical sampling+58
3.3 Data collection+64
3.4 Data analysis+66
4 Result+82
4.1 Open coding+82
4.2 Axial coding+90
4.2.1 Ability to Develop, Team Atmosphere, Contribution and Enthusiastic Incentive+97
4.2.2 Manager Background, Leadership Style+99
4.2.3 Team R&D Capability, Team Composition, Engineer Personality +100
4.2.4 Products Selection, Innovative Content and Type, Time to Enter the Market+101
4.2.5 R & D centralization Model, Team Management & Operation, Work Distribution+101
4.2.6 Future Development, Personal Growth+103
4.3 Selective coding+105
4.3.1 Situational leadership+111
4.3.2 Leading follower+112
4.3.3 Team lineup+113
4.3.4 Innovative strategy+114
4.3.5 Team efficiency+114
4.3.6 Future expectations+115
5 Discussion+118
5.1 Conclusions+118
5.2 Suggestions+121
5.2.1 Suggestion for the company+121
5.2.2 Suggestion for future research+122
6 References+124
7 Appendix+131
參考文獻 References
參考文獻

王毅,謝偉,段勇倩(譯),技術創新之戰略管理:第四版/(美)希林(Schilling,M.)著;,--北京:清華大學出版社,2015。

史曉偉 安陽師範學院,工商管理學院,河南,安陽,455000,魅力中國,2009,(10)F270.7。

朱柔若(譯),社會研究方法,台北市:揚智文化,2000 。

李禮孟,《設計人性化組織之芻議》,國立交通大學管理科學研究所,1991 。

吳芝儀、廖梅花(譯),紮根理論研究方法,嘉義市:濤石文化,1996 。

胡幼慧(編),質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例,台北市:巨流,1996 。

范麗娟,深度訪談,載於謝臥龍(主編),質性研究(81-126頁),台北:心理出版社,2004。

高樹軍,管理學,第十三講,領導理論,河北大學,2005。

徐宗國(譯),質性研究概論,台北市:巨流,1997。

陳向明,社會科學質的研究,台北市:五南圖書,2002 。

陳榮基,《體恤與結構的領導風格對員工工作意願的影響》,國立交通大學管理研究所碩士論文,1983。

蔡啟通,組織因素、組織成員整體創造性與組織創新之關係,管理學報,18(4),527-566,2001。

劉平,情境領導模式,一種有效和實用的員工開發工具,河北企業,2004年Z1期。

劉榮欽,《領導行為、組織氣候及工作投入關係之研究》,國立中山大學人 力資源管理研究所碩士論文,2003 。

顏彌堅,〈談人性化管理〉,《憲兵學術季刊》46 期 P13-22,1999。

Amabile, T. M., The Social Psychology of Creativity (New York: Springer-Verlag,1983); and T. M. Amabie, Creativity in Context (Boudle, CO; Westview,1996).

Arrow, K. J., 1962, “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention” in Nelson, R. R. (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and social factors, First Edition, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 609-625.

Arvanitis, S. and Woerter, M., 2009, “Firms’ transfer strategies with universities and the relationship with firms’ innovation performance,” Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 18, No. 6, 1067-1106.

Barczak, G., A. Griffin, and K. B. Kahn. “Trend and Drivers of Success in NPD Practices: Results of the 2003 PDMA Best Practices Study,” Journal of Product Innovation Management 26 (2009), pp. 3-23.

Becker, W. and Dietz, J., 2004, “R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firm-evidence for the German manufacturing industry,” Research Policy, Vol. 33, No. 2, 209-223.

Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D., 1989, “Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 1, 128-152.

Catherine, L. W. & Pervaiz, K. A. (2004). The development and validation of the organizational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. EuropeanJournal of Innovation Management, 7(4), 303-313.

Daft (2001), The acquisition, transfer and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Science, 41(10), 1750-1762.

DiBella, A. & Nevis, E. C. (1997). How Organizations Learn: An Integrated Strategy for Building Learning Capability (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational Innovation: A Meta- Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590.

Drucker, P. (1985). Innovation and Entreprenerurship. New York: Practice and Principles.

Daniel Goleman, (1995). “EQ” (Emotional Intelligence) New York: Bantam Books.

Ehie, I. C. and Olibe, K., 2010, “The effect of R&D investment on firm value: an examination of US manufacturing and service industries,” International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 128, No. 1, 127-135.

Fulmer, R. M. (1994). A Model for Changing the Way Organizations Learn. Planning Review, 22(3), 20-24.

Frensch, P. A. and Sternberg R. J, “Expertise and Intelligent Thinking: When Is It Worse to Know Better?” in Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence, vol. 5, ed. R. J. Sternberg (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1989), p. 157-158.

Hill, W. L. & Jones, R. (1998). Strategic Management Theory, 447.

Hurley, Robert F. & G. Tomas, M. Hult (1998), Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 42-45.

Hammersley M.,1989 “The Dilemma of Qualitative Method: Herbert Blumer and the Chicago Tradition.,” London and New York: Routledge.

Ho, Y. K., Keh, H. T., and Ong, J. M., 2005, “The effects of R&D and advertising on firm value: an examination of manufacturing and nonmanufacturing firms,” Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 52, No. 1, 3-14.

H. Simon, " The Architecture of Complexity," Proceedings of the American Philosophical
Society 106 (1962), pp. 467-482.

Hammersley M., (1989) “The Dilemma of Qualitative Method: Herbert Blumer and the Chicago Tradition.,” London and New York: Routledge.

Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational Learning: The Contributing Process and the Literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88-115.

Heijden (2004). K. V. (2004). Can internally generated futures accelerate organizational learning? Futures, 36,145-159.

Kotter, J. & Heskett, J. (1992). Corporate culture and performance. New York: Free Press.

Kilmann, R. H., Saxton M. J. & Serpa, R. (1985). Gaining Control of the Corporate
Culture. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Lyles, M. A., 1988, “Learning Among Joint Venture Sophisticated Firms”, MIRSpecical
Issue, 28, 85-97.

Lynn, B. E. (1999). Culture and intellectual capital management: a key factor in successful ICM implementation. International Journal of Technology Management, 18, 590-603.

Lev, B. and Sougiannis, T., 1996, “The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 21, No. 1, 107-138.

Lubart, T. I., “Product-Centered Self-Evaluation and the Creative Process, ”unpublished doctoral dissertation (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1944); and Sternberg and Lubart, “The Concept of Creativity.”

L. Fleming and O. Sorenson, " Navigating the Technology Landscape of Innovation," Sloan Management Review 44, no. 2 (2003), p. 15; and M. A. Schilling, "Towards a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity," Academy of Management Review 25 (2000), pp. 312-334.

Maslow, A.H. (1962). Toward a psychology of being. New York, NY: Van Nostrand.

Maslow, A.H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review 50 (4) 370-96.

Martins, E. C. & Terblanche, F. (2003). Building organizational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6(1), 64-74.

Muffatto, M. (1998). Corporate and individual competencies: how do they match the
innovation process? International Journal of Technology Management, 15, 836-853.

Osland, J. S., Kolb D. A. & Rubin, I. M. (2000). Organizational Behavior: An Experiential Approach (7th Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Paul Hersey and Kenneth H. Blanchard, (1988). “Management of Organization behavior” Utilizing Human Resources. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Pandit, M. R., (1996) “The Creation of Theory: A Recent Application of the Grounded Theory Method,” The Qualitative Report, Vol.2, No.4

P. Golder and G. Tellis,"Pioneer Advantage: Marketing Logic or Marketing Legend?” Journal of Marketing Research 30(May1993), pp.158-170.

Robbins, S. P. 1988. Essentials of Organizational behavior (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.


R. Agarwal, "Technological Activity and survival of Firms, "Economics Letters 52 (July 1996), pp. 101-108; R. Agarwal, " Survival of Firms over the Product Life Cycle, "Southern Economic Journal 63, no.3 (1997), pp. 571-584; and R. Agarwal and G. Michael, "The Evolution of Markets and Entry, Exit, and Survival of Firms, "Review of Economics and Statistics 78 (November 1996), pp. 489-498.

R. L. Daft and S. W. Becker, Innovation in Organizations (New York: Elsevier, 1978); T. D. Duchesneau, S. Cohn, and J. Dutton, A Study of Innovation in Manufacturing: Determination, Processes and Methodological 'Issues, vol. 1 (Social Science Research Institute, University of Maine, 1979); and J. Hage, Theories of Organization (New York: Wiley Interscience, 1980).

R. Henderson and K. Clark, Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms," Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1990), pp. 9-30.

Robbins, S. P. (2001). Organizational Behavior: Concepts, Controversies and Applications (9th Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Stata, R. (1989). Organizational Learning: The Key to Management Innovation. Sloan Management Review, 30(3), 63-74.

Strauss, A. & J. Corbin, (1990) “Basics of Qualitative Research-Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques”, Sage Publications.

Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday Dell Publishing.

Sinkula, J. M., Baker, W. E. & Noordewier, T. (1997). A Framework for Market-Based Organizational Learning: Linking Values, Knowledge, and Behavior. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 25(4), 305-318.

Tsai, K. H. and Wang, J. C., 2007, “Inward technology licensing and firm performance: a longitudinal study,” R&D Management, Vol. 37, No. 2, 151-160.

Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T. and D. Roos, The Machine That Changed the World (New York: Rawson Associates,1990).

Weiling Ke & Kwok Kee Wei (2006). Organizational Learning Process: Its Antecedents and Consequences in Enterprise System Implementation. Journal of Global Information Management, 14(1), 1-22.

W. Robinson and M. Sungwook, "Is the First to Market the First to Fail? Empirical Evidence for Industrial Goods Businesses,” Journal of Marketing Research 39 (2002), pp.120-128.

Zhao, H., Tong, X., Wong, P. K., and Zhu, J., 2005, “Types of technology sourcing and innovative capability: an exploratory study of Singapore manufacturing firms,” The Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol. 16, No. 2, 209-224.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.238.121.7
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.238.121.7
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 永不公開 not available

QR Code