Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0725104-183326 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0725104-183326
論文名稱
Title
個人玩興與團隊玩興氣氛對團隊創造力績效之影響
The Affect of Personal Playfulness and Team Playfulness Climate on Team Creativity Performance
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
80
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2004-07-20
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2004-07-25
關鍵字
Keywords
團隊玩興氣氛、個人玩興、團隊創造力績效
Team playfulness climate, Personal playfulness, Team creativity performance
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5777 次,被下載 6067
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5777 times, has been downloaded 6067 times.
中文摘要
在今日以知識為基礎的經濟體系下,人的重要性再度被突顯出來,人力資源所提供的創造力成為核心競爭力的來源,然而隨著企業型態的改變,人們對工作的態度卻日趨僵化,長時間的工作型態與過大的工作量,使得人們感覺在工作壓力下喘不過氣來,於是工作場所中的玩興逐漸受到重視,玩興指的是一種在工作或學習中所展現的主動自發性、想像力、情緒的表達力,及好玩有趣、樂在其中的態度,會受外在環境變化所影響而產生改變。
而團隊可以納入具備不同知識技能及功能背景的成員,以符合執行任務本身的需要,往往是組織解決問題與創新的行動單位,因此團隊的玩興狀態對於整體的創造力或工作表現也有舉足輕重的影響,每天一同工作的團隊成員,在其互動下所共同建立的自主及愉快輕鬆的氣氛,能使人知覺到工作有趣而且感覺受到支持,而勇於嘗試挑戰。因此本研究由個人角度出發,探討個人玩興、團隊玩興氣氛與團隊創造力績效之關係,經過實證研究後,本研究之主要發現如下:
1.個人玩興對團隊玩興氣氛有顯著正向影響
2.團隊玩興氣氛對團隊創造力績效有顯著正向影響
3.個人屬性中,年齡、手足人數、畢業學校類別及社團經驗皆會影響個人玩興之表現
Abstract
Under the knowledge-based economics, the roles of labors are considered important once again. The human creativity has become the main source of core competence. However, as the development of enterprises brings on a new economic type, the man-hours and work loading also increases with the development of enterprises. When people are overworked, there comes pressure, fatigue and illness. Therefore, more and more people are talking about the playfulness of jobs, which refers to the spontaneity, imagination, emotional expression, and the attitude of having fun and being involved and interested in the work, all these will change with the variation of the external environment.
Meanwhile, teams also play an important role in the organization. For the action unit to solve the problems of the organization and promote innovation, teams are constituted by members with various knowledge, skill and background. Hence, the team playfulness climate is also crucial to the creativity and performance of the organization. The team playfulness climate represents the share climate of autonomy and pleasure, which is built by those team members who work together day by day, such climate can get these people to feel interested and feel supported about their jobs, and so they won’t be afraid to try new challenges.
This study is taken from a personal viewpoint to test the model of the relationship between personal playfulness, team playfulness climate and team creativity performance. The evidence of this research is based on the questionnaires given out to the students who took the course “The Discovery and Application of Creativity” which was held by the Consulting Division in Ministry of Education. Below are the discoveries of this thesis:
1. Personal playfulness positively influences team playfulness climate.
2. Team playfulness climate positively influences team creativity performance.
3. Personal playfulness has significant difference on age, the number of brothers and sisters one has, academic background, and club experience.
目次 Table of Contents
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 研究流程 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節 個人玩興 4
第二節 團隊玩興氣氛 10
第三節 團隊創造力 14
第三章 研究設計與實施 25
第一節 研究架構及研究假設 25
第二節 變項定義與測量 26
第三節 資料蒐集方法與樣本特性分析 29
第四節 量表信效度分析 32
第五節 資料分析方法 37
第四章 結果分析 39
第一節 個人玩興於個人屬性上之差異分析 39
第二節 各研究變項之相關分析 46
第三節 個人玩興、團隊玩興氣氛與團隊創造力績效之影響性分析 48
第五章 結論與建議 53
第一節 研究結果 53
第二節 研究建議 56
第三節 研究限制及後續研究建議 58
參考文獻 60
附錄 67
參考文獻 References
中文部分

王保進(2002)。視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。台北市:心理。
王思峰(2002)。由個人創新到群體創新:創造力的多層面理論。創造力與創意 設計師資培育計畫書-商學類計畫書。台北:教育部顧問室-人文社會科學 中程教育改進計畫。
王精文(2001)。創造力與績效之關係。創造力與創意設計師資培育計畫書-商 學類計畫書。台北:教育部顧問室-人文社會科學中程教育改進計畫。
何金銘(2001)。統計法輯要。台南市:台灣復文。
何金銘(2003)。羅吉斯迴歸:一種非線性機率模型。未出版之手稿,國立中山 大學人力資源管理研究所。
余嬪、吳靜吉(2003)。業精於勤、荒於嬉?談成人的玩興與組織玩興氣氛。在 政治大學管理學院編,2003創造力實踐歷程研討會論文集(頁318-341)。 台北:政治大學。
余嬪、吳靜吉、林偉文、楊潔欣(2003)。成人玩興量表與組織玩興氣氛量表之 發展。中國測驗學會測驗學刊,50(1),73-110。
吳向前(2002)。看見未來辦公室-更Fun也更Free,要Wired也要Wild。數位 時代雙週刊,42。上網日期:民國93年6月24日。網址http://www.bnext.com.tw
/mag/2002_09_15/2002_09_15_249.html
吳明隆(2000)。SPSS統計應用實務。台北市:松崗。
吳靜吉、丁興祥、邱皓政(2002)。創造力的發展與實踐。應用心理研究,15。
邱皓政(2003)。組織創新的人格基礎。創造力與創意設計師資培育計畫書-商 學類計畫書。台北:教育部顧問室-人文社會科學中程教育改進計畫。
邱皓政(2003)。組織創新的認知歷程。創造力與創意設計師資培育計畫書-商 學類計畫書。台北:教育部顧問室-人文社會科學中程教育改進計畫。
張玉玲、余嬪(1999)。大學生休閒內在動機、休閒阻礙、休閒無聊感與自我統 合之關係研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導學報,23,83-111。
教育部(2001)。創造力與創意設計師資培育計畫書-商學類計畫書。台北:教 育部顧問室-人文社會科學中程教育改進計畫。
教育部創造力教育中程發展計畫入口網-新聞室(2004年3月27日)。教育部 「創意的發想與實踐巡迴課程」十三所學校課程大會串,創意關不住。上網 日期:2004年4月20日。網址:
http://www.creativity.edu.tw/modules/news/article.php?storyid=191
郭誌光(2001)。個人創造力、組織創新氣候、及組織創新績效之關係-台北市 廣告公司的實證研究。碩士論文,國立中正大學勞工研究所,嘉義。
陳以亨(2003)。工作團隊創新氣氛、團隊工作品質,組織創新能力及創新績效 之相關研究(國科會專題研究計畫成果報告,NSC91-2416-H-110-037)。高 雄市:國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所。
曾婉芬(2003)。研發主管管理才能與部門績效之研究。碩士論文,國立中山大 學人力資源管理研究所,高雄。
曾敬梅(2002)。研究生玩興、幽默、創意態度,所知覺系所創造氛圍與創造力 的關係。碩士論文,國立政治大學教育研究所,台北。
黃奕光(2003)。Asian創造力-為什麼西方人比東方人有創造力。(Why Asians are less creative than Westerners?)(王蕆真譯)。台北市:臺灣培生教育。(原作 2001年出版)
劉秀娟(1994)。幼兒玩性與社會性遊戲之研究。碩士論文,文化大學兒童福利 研究所,台北。
蘇國興(2004)。台北市國小教師工作壓力、運動行為與身心健康之相關研究。 碩士論文,台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所,台北。
Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1993)。快樂,從心開始。(Flow-The psychology of optimal experience.)(張定綺譯)。台北市:天下遠見。(原作1990年出版)
Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1998)。生命的心流。(Finding flow:The psychology of engagement with everyday life.)(陳秀娟譯)。台北市:天下遠見。(原作1997 年出版)
Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1999)。創造力。(Creativity)(杜明城譯)。台北市:時報 文化。(原作1996年出版)
Goleman, D., Kaufman, P., & Ray, M.(1998)。創意精靈。(The Creative Spirit.)(周 怜利譯)。台北縣新店市:中天。(原作1992年出版)
Neuman, W. L.(2002)。當代社會研究法-質化與量化途徑。(Social research methods: Qualitative and Quantitative approaches.)(王佳煌、潘中道、郭俊賢、 黃瑋瑩譯)。台北市:學富文化。(原作2000年出版)
Sternberg, R. J. & Lubart, T. I.(1999)。不同凡想:在一窩蜂文化中開拓創造力。 (Defying the Crowd:Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity.)(洪 蘭譯)。台北市:遠流。(原作1995年出版)


英文部分

Aguilar, T. E. (1985). Social and environmental barriers to playfulness. In J. L. Frost, & S. Sunderlin, (Eds.), When Children Play(pp. 73-76). Weaton, MD: Association for Childhood Education International.
Amabile, T. M. (1983a). Social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357-377.
Amabile, T. M. (1993). What does a theory of creativity require? Psychological Inquiry, 4(2), 179-237.
Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39-58.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby & J., Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 930-967.
Anderson, N. R. & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(3), 235-258.
Anonymous (1989). All work and no play… Isn’t even good for work. Psychology Today, 23(2), 34-38.
Barnett, L. A. (1990). Playfulness: Definition, design, and measurement. Play and Culture, 3, 319-336.
Barnett, L. A. (1991a). Characterizing playfulness: Correlates with individual attributes and personality traits. Play and Culture, 4, 371-393.
Berg, D. H. (2001). The power of a playful spirit at work. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 24(2), 57-61.
Boyer, W. A. R. (1997). Sensory Experience: A Means of Enhancing Playfulness and Creativity for Preschool Children. Retrieved March 15, 2004, from University of Victoria: http://www.educ.uvic.ca/connections/Conn96/02Boyer.html
Carnevale, P. J., & Probst, T. M. (1998). Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving and categorization. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 74, 1300-1309.
Clarke, S. G., & Haworth, J. T. (1995). ‘Flow’ experience in the daily lives of sixth-form college students. British Journal of Psychology, 85, 511-523.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Happiness and creativity. The Futurist, 31(5), 8-12
Eileen, P. K. (2000). When sparks fly: Igniting creativity in groups. The Academy of Management Executive. 14(1), 157-159.
Ekvall, G., & Ryhammar, L. (1999). The creative climate: Its determinants and effects at a Swedish university. Creativity Research Journal, 12(4), 303-310.
Ford, C. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management, 21(4), 1112-1142.
Ghani, J. A., & Deshpande, S. P. (1994). Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human-computer interaction. The Journal of Psychology, 128(4), 381-391.
Glenn, M. A. & Webster, J. (1992). The adult playfulness scale: An initial assessment. Psychological Reports, 71, 83-103.
Hoegl, M. & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization Science,12(4), 435-449.
Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J., & Ekvall, G. (1999). Situational outlook questionnaire: A measure of the climate for creativity and change. Psychological Reports, 85, 665-674.
Jehn, K. A. (1997). A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 530-557.
Kirton, M. (1989). Adaptors and innovators: styles of creativity and problem-solving. New York: Routledge.
Kolb, D. M., & Glidden, P. A. (1986). Getting to know your conflict options: Using conflict as a creative force. Personnel Administrator, 31, 77-90
Kurtzberg, T. R., & Amabile, T. M. (2001). From Guilford to creative synergy: Opening the black box of team-level creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3)(4), 285-294.
Lieberman, N. J. (1977). Playfulness: Its relationship to imagination and creativity. New York: Academic Press.
Martocchio, J. J., & Webster, J. (1992). Effects of feedback and cognitive playfulness on performance in microcomputer software training. Personnel Psychology, 45(3), 553-578.
Mayer, R. E. (1999). Fifty years of creativity research. In Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), Handbook of Creativity. (p.449). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Novak, T. P., Hoffman, D. L., & Yung (2000, winter). Measuring the customer experience in online environments: A structural modeling approach. Marketing Science, 19(1), 22-44.
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634.
Runco, M. A. (1993). Operant theories of insight, originality, and creativity. The American Behavioral Scientist, 37(1), pp.54.
Russ, S. W. (2003). Play and creativity: Developmental issues. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 291-303.
Simonton, D. K. (2004). Dr. Simonton’s Home page. Genius, Creativity, and Leadership. Retrieved June 23, 2004, from http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/Simonton/
Starbuck, W. H. & Webster, J. (1991). When is play productive? Accounting, Management, and Information Technology, 1(1), 71-90.
Sternberg, R. J. & Lubart, T. I. (1993). Investing in Creativity. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 229-232.
Stiglitz J. E. (2004). The human face of globalization. Across the Board, 41(2), p.9.
Taggar, S. (2001). Group composition, creative synergy, and group performance. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35(1), 261-286.
Taylor, S. I. (1992). The relationship between playfulness and creativity of Japanese preschool children. Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
Thomas, K. W. (1992). Conflict and negotiation processes in organizations. In M. Dunette & L. Hough(Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology(pp. 651-718). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Webster, J., & Martocchoio, J. J. (1992, June). Microcomputer playfulness: Development of a measure with workplace implications. MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 201-226.
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organization creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321.
Woszczynski, A. B., Roth, P. L., & Segars, A. H. (2002). Exploring the theoretical foundations of playfulness in computer interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 369-388.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code