本研究目的是以社會資本及知識分享之理論基礎，以我國IC設計產業中專案團隊如何利用社會資本及知識分享取得內部知識，將之應用於新產品開發與技術創新，並探討社會資本、知識分享、創新產出等三個研究變數之間相互影響的情況。本研究發現社會資本三個構面對知分享產生不同的顯著效果，顯見知識分享與創新活動皆可經由社會資本而產生促進效果，亦隱喻社會資本就像其他資本一樣，是一種以其他資源作為投入要素並可期待於未來產生效益流量的長期投資，值得IC設計產業研發團隊給予重新評價與重視。
本研究以IC設計產業研發團隊為研究對象，依工研院經資中心產業論壇之台灣IC設計產業共300家公司為母體，本研究依產品類別（邏輯設計和記憶體設計），依分層隨機抽樣共抽取30家公司，共中邏輯設計公司18家，記憶體設計公司12家，每家發放10份問卷，共計發放300份問卷。施測對象為IC設計研發團隊主管，採用網路問卷施測，共收集有效問卷103份，有效問卷回收率34.3％。 本研究之研究結果如下：
一. 社會資本、知識分享、創新績效各研究變數有顯著正向相關。
二. 不同背景變數對社會資本、知識分享、創新績效各變數有顯著差異。
三. 結構構面對認知構面有顯著正向影響。
四. 結構構面、認知構面對關係構面有顯著正向影響。
五. 結構構面、認知構面、關係構面對知識分享有顯著正向影響。
六. 知識分享對創新績效有顯著正向影響。
關鍵詞：專案團隊、社會資本、知識分享、創新績效

This research purpose is a theoretical foundation shared with social capital and knowledge share. How to utilize the social capital and knowledge share to leverage inside knowledge with the relation between the project teams to research IC design industry in Taiwan, apply it to new product development and technological uniqueness. This case will xplore how the social capitial, knowledge share and innovation performance of three research parameters interact among themselves. This research shows that three dimensions of social capital are in the different results of knowledge share, social capitial can produce the result of promoting with the innovation performance and knowledge share, also the social capital of the metaphor is that one kind regards other resources as long-term investment that invest the key element and can expect to produce the flow of benefit in the future just like other capital, is worth to pay attenation and reappraises the research in IC design industry.
Based on the IC design industry and the project team as the research object, it is the parent to grind the 300 companies of ITIS institute on the Taiwan IC design industry, this research, in accordance with the classification of the products (logic design and memory design), in accordance with dividing one floor of random samplings, 18 logic design companies and 12 memory design companies, each one company grants 10 questionnaires, 30 companies grant 300 questionnaires altogether. The research examines for the executive of project team of IC design, adopt the network questionnaire to construct examining, 103 effective questionnaires are collected altogether, effective questionnaire is 34.3% of rate of recovery. The result of study of this research is as follows:
1. There are significantly positive correlations among social capital, knowledge share, and innovation performance.
2. Different control variables has partially significant positive effect on social capital, knowledge share, and innovation performance.
3. There are significantly positive effects among the structural dimension and cognitive dimension.
4. Each structural and congnitive dimensions has a significantly positive effect on relational dimension.
5. Each structural,relation, and congnitive dimensions has a significantly positive effect on knowledge share.
6. Knowledge share has a significantly positive effect on innovation performance.
Key Words: project teams, social capital, knowledge share, innovation performance

第一章 　緒論
第一節　研究背景與動機 1
第二節　研究目的 2
第三節　研究流程 3
第二章 　文獻探討
第一節　社會資本 4
第二節　知識分享 14
第三節　創新績效 19
第四節　IC設計產業簡介 22
第三章 　研究方法
第一節　研究架構 25
第二節　構面變數之操作性定義與測量 25
第三節　研究假設 28
第四節　資料蒐集與樣本選擇 29
第五節　資料分析方法 30
第六節　量表效度與信度 30
第四章　結果分析
第一節　描述性統計與相關分析 32
第二節　背景變數與各研究變數差異情形 34
第三節　各研究變數間影響分析 37
第五章　結論與建議
第一節　研究發現 39
第二節　研究結論 41
參考文獻
中文文獻 43
英文文獻 43
附錄
問卷 47

中文文獻
張世其、李宗耀、虞孝成（2003）。我國IC設計上市公司經營效率之分析，產業論壇。5(1), 169-195.
賴彥如（2003）。台灣半導體的新希望：IC設計產業。Available at : http://www.etimag.com.tw/%A4%BA%A4%E5/%B2%C419%B4%C1/a1.htm [Jan 15, 2005]
彭茂榮（2005）。台灣IC產業之創新能量，工研院IEK-ITIS計畫。Available at : http://www.itri.org.tw/chi/components/jsp/showieknews.jsp?file=templatedataservices [Jan 15, 2005]
陳榮德 (2002)。組織內部社會網絡的行形成與影響：社會資本的觀點。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所博士論文。
榮泰生（2002）。企業研究方法。台北：五南。

英文文獻
Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27 (1), 17-40.
Aldridge, S., Halpern, D., & Fitzpatrick, S. (2002). Social capital: What is it, and what does it imply for policy. Performance and Innovation Unit. Available at : http://www.number-10.gov.uk/su/social%20capital/socialcapital.pdf [Aug 12, 2004].
Arenius, P., & Mantere, S. (2004). Language of strategy in the creation of social capital. Working paper No. 2004/1, Institute of Strategy and International Business, Helsinki U. of Technology. Available at : http://www.tuta.hut.fi/library /working_paper/pdf/Arenius_Mantere_2004.pdf [August 25, 2004]
Baum, J., & Ingram, P. (2000). Interorganizational learning and network organization: Toward a behavioral theory of the interfirm. Rotman Working Paper Series, 2000-04. Available at : http://www.rotman.utoronto.ca /bicpapers/2000.htm [Jan 15, 2005]
Beugelsdijk, S., Noorderhaven, N. G., & Koen C. I. (2003). Organizational culture, alliance capabilities and social capital. Paper for the workshop Social capital and Economic Development on the occasion of the 75th anniversary of the University of Tilburg. Available at : http://spitswww.uvt.nl/web/fsw /lustrum/papers /beugelsdijknoorderhavenkoen.pdf [Aug 25, 2004]
Borgatti, S., & Foster P. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991–1013.
Bovenberg, A. L. (2002). Norms, values and technological change. De Economist, 150, 521-553.
Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Pre-print for a chapter in Research, Organization Behavior, 22, 15-31.
Chaminade, C., & Roberts, H. (2002). Social capital as a mechanism: Connecting knowledge within and cross firms. 3rd European Conference on Organizational Knowledge, Learning and Capabilities (OKLC).
Cooke, P., & Clifton, N. (2002). Social capital, and small and medium enterprise performance in the United Kingdom. Paper Prepared for Workshop on Entrepreneurship in the Modern Space-Economy: Evolutionary and Policy Perspectives.
Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Combridge, MA. : Harvard College Press.
Gelauff, G. (2003). Social capital: An indispensable asset in the knowledge-based economy. Paper for the workshop Social capital and Economic Development on the occasion of the 75th anniversary of the University if Tilburg.
Healy, T., & Côté, S. (2001). The well-being of nations: The role of human and social capital. The Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, OECD.
Hendriks, P. (1999). Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process Management, 6(2), 91-100
Kemppainen, M., Timonen, H., & Yrjönen, S. (2003). Social capital: A theoretical framework and views on social capital in organizations. Working Paper, Helsinki U. of Technology.
Kohtamäki, M. (2003). The nature of trust in inter-organizational relationships: In search of dimensions of trust. An Unpublished Licentiate Thesis. Department of Management, Vaasa: University of Vaasa.
Kostova, T. (1999). Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24 (2), 308-324.
Landry, R., Amara, N., & Lamari, M. (2001). Social capital, innovation and public policy. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2(1). Available at : http://www.isuma.net /v02n01/landry/landry_e.shtml [Aug 2, 2004].
Landry, R., Amara, N., & Lamari, M. (2002). Does social capital determine innovation? To what extent? Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 69, 681–701.
Liao, J., & Welsch, H. (2003). Social capital and entrepreneurial growth aspiration: A comparison of technology- and non-technology-based nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14, 149–170.
Maskell, P. (2001). Social capital, innovation and competitiveness. Business Studies working paper 2001-2, ISSN 1397-3843. Available at : http://www.ebms.it/SS/ documents/maskell
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organization advantage. Academy of Management Reviw, 23, 242–266.
Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company, New York : Oxford University press.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York : Mcgraw-Hill.
O’Dell, C., & Grayson, C.J. (1998). If only we knew what we know: Identification and transfer of interal best practices, California Management Review, 40(3), 154-173.
Rauch, J. E. (2001). Business and social networks in international trade. Journal of Economic Literature, XXXIX (December ), 1177–1203.
Senge, P. (1997). Sharing knowledge, Executive Excellence, 14 (11), 17–18.
Senge, P. (1998). Sharing knowledge, Executive Excellence, 15 (6), 11–12.
Sorama, K., Katajamäki, A., & Varamäki, E. (2004). Cooperation between SMES: Social capital and learning perspective. NCSB 2004 Conference, 13th Nordic Coference on Small Business Research.
Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intra-firm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41 (4), 464–476.
Westlund, H. (2003). Implications of social capital for business in the knowledge economy: Theoretical considerations. Working Paper, the “ International Forum on Economic Implication of Social Capital “.
Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: Implications for develop-ment theory, research, and policy. The World Bank Research Observer, 15 (2), 193-198.
World Bank (2000). What is social capital? Available at : http://www.worldbank.org /poverty/scapital/whatsc.htm [Aug 14, 2004]
Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., & Sapienza, H. J. (2001). Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (6-7), 587-613.