Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0812105-022716 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0812105-022716
論文名稱
Title
從差序管理行為探討高階團隊的形成與績效
How top management team form and its effectiveness:the chaxu geju management behavior view
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
83
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
黃振聰
Huang,Jen-Jsung
口試委員
Advisory Committee
陳以亨
I-Heng Chen
口試日期
Date of Exam
2005-07-29
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2005-08-12
關鍵字
Keywords
團隊效能、差序格局、員工歸類
chaxu geju, team effectiveness, criterion of categorization
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5680 次,被下載 3244
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5680 times, has been downloaded 3244 times.
中文摘要
本研究以北、中、南部地區650所學校為實證對象,收集120對團隊領導人與團隊成員對偶資料,探討團隊領導人對於團隊成員的差序格局:關係、忠誠、及才能三個對成員歸類的標準,是否影響團隊效能。另依照團隊領導人主觀上的認定,將團隊成員區分為自己人和外人,在團隊效能的研究中分別從團隊層次〈團隊績效、合作滿意度、團隊承諾〉個人層次〈個人自評績效、督導滿意度〉的定義中,分別進行員工歸類模式對團隊效能的探討。
研究結果顯示:團隊領導人會依據關係格局、忠誠格局、及才能格局主觀的將團隊成員區分為自己人和外人。但最後發現,團隊領導人的員工歸類模式對團隊效能並未產生顯著性影響。另外團隊領導人主觀上的認定自己人和外人,在團隊效能的判別上亦未達顯著效果。
Abstract
We tested the hypothesis that top management team’s effectiveness and Chaxu Geju have an positive effect relationship. Our analysis was base on data from 650 schools , including 120 pairs of team leaders and their team's members .To survey whether the leader's Chaxu Geju which is Guanxi , loyalty and talent has positive effect on team's effectiveness. The first result shows, Team leader will divide team members into insiders and outsiders according to Chaxu Geju . Finally, indicated leader’s criterion of categorization didn’t significant affect the top management team’s effectiveness. The two group insiders and outsiders are the same .
目次 Table of Contents
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究背景………………………………………………1
第二節 研究動機………………………………………………2
第三節 研究目的………………………………………………3

第二章 文獻探討
第一節 團隊與團隊績效………………………………………5
第二節 華人組織中的差序格局………………………………17
第三節 差序管理概念…………………………………………22

第三章 研究方法
第一節 研究架構………………………………………………30
第二節 研究對象………………………………………………31
第三節 研究工具………………………………………………35
第四節 資料分析方法…………………………………………40

第四章 結果分析
第一節 團隊變項、員工歸類隊團隊績效之相關分析………42
第二節 自己人─外人歸類標準………………………………45
第三節 團隊變項、員工歸類隊團隊績效之預測效果………47
第四節 自己人─外人差異與團隊績效的分析………………49

第五章 討論與建議
第一節 分析結果討論…………………………………………53
第二節 研究限制………………………………………………57
第三節 未來研究方向…………………………………………58
第四節 管理實務上的意涵……………………………………60
參考文獻 References
參考文獻
中文參考書目
Gittell J.H著,李芳齡譯、 (2003),關係與績效。台北:美商麥格羅•希爾公司,頁217~223、263。

Neuman W.L著,王佳煌、潘忠道譯, (2002),當代社會研究法,台北:學富
文化事業,頁250。

Robbin S.P著,李青芬、李雅婷、趙慕芬編譯、 (2002), 組織行為學。台北:華泰出版社,頁284-290。

方至民、曾志弘、鐘憲瑞 (1999) ,高階經營團隊特性與財務能力對企業研發支出影響之研究-以台灣上市電子產業公司為例, 科技管理研討會論文集,國立中山大學。

危芷芬(2000),華人的關係類型與人際義務。台灣大學心理研究所博士論文。

江正信(2000),高階經營團隊與企業策略決策模式、組織學習傾向、創新能力及經營績效之關係研究。國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。

林明村(2002),直屬主管之差序格局對領導行為與領導效能影響之研究。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。

施達郎(1987),儒家倫理與權威管理,中國式管理研討會論文集。香港:香港中文大學。

徐瑋伶(2004),華人企業領導者之差序式管理─海峽兩岸企業組織之分析。台灣大學心理學研究所博士論文。

張國義(2004),員工歸類模式對甄選、晉升之影響:差序格局觀點。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所博士論文。

郭明秀(2000),高階經營團隊與組織運作、競爭優勢、競爭策略及經營績效之關係研究。國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。

張安琪(1997),部門相依性、信任與部門間合作關係的研究—以家用電器業部門為例。銘傳管理學院管理科學研究所碩士論文。
彭泗清、楊中芳(2001),交往關係的影響因素與發展過程,中國人的人際關係、情感與信任。台北:遠流出版公司, 頁185~186。

彭文賢(1993),組織績效與結構存續的因果連結。人文及社會科學集刊,6(1),頁1-35。

黃英忠(1997),人力資源管理。台北:三民書局,頁156-202。

黃懿慧(2003),關係取向:理論模式初探。本土心理學研究,18期,頁99-104。

喬健 (1982),關係芻議。社會學及行為科學研究的中國化。台北:中央研究院民族學研究所。

費孝通(1948),。鄉土中國與鄉土重建。上海:觀察社。

楊國樞(2004),華人文化與組織領導:由現象描述到理論驗。本土心理學研究,
22期,頁195-251。

楊中芳(2001),人際關係與人際情感的構念化,收錄於中國人的人際關係、情感與信任。台北;遠流出版公司,頁185-187;頁338~339;頁354-357。

楊宜音 (2000),自己人:一項有關中國人關係分類的個案研究。本土心理學研究,頁276-316。

趙必孝、黃良志、溫金豐(2001),研發團隊的管理。科技業人力資源管理,頁69-87。

樊景立(1995),我對差序格局與華人組織行為的看法。本土心理學研究,3期,頁230。

鄭伯壎、郭建志、徐瑋伶、及胡秀華(2003),「人治主義、家長是領導及部屬效能:中介模式的驗證」。教育部資助華人本土心理學研究追求卓越計劃之研究報告,計畫編號89-H-FA01-2-4-4。

鄭伯壎(1995),差序格局與華人組織行為。本土心理學研究,3期,頁142-219。

鄭伯壎、樊景立(2001),初探華人社會的社會取向:台灣與大陸之比較研究。中華心理學刊,43(2),頁207。

鄭伯壎、周麗芳、樊景立(2000),家長式領導:三元模式的建構與測量。本土心理學研究,14期,頁142-219。



英文參考書目
Agote, L., & McGrath, J.E., (1993).Group process in organizations: Continuity and
change . In C. L. Cooper & I.T. Roberson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology . New York: Wiley ,8,333-389.

Argyle, M., & Henderson, M. (1984). The rules of friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1, 211-237.

Basu, T., & Green, S. G. (1995). Subordinate performance, leader-subordinate compatibility, and exchange quality in leader-member dyads: A field study. Journal of Academy of Management Journal, 14, 177-190.

Bantel, K. A., (1994). Strategic planning openness: The role of top team demography, Group & Organization Management, 19(4),406-424.

Bantel, K. A. & S. E. Jackson, (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top management make a difference? , Strategic Management Journal, 10(Special Issue),107-124.

Brock, T. C. (1965). Communicator-recipient similarity and decision change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 650-654.

Child, J. (1984). Organization: A guide to problems and practice. London: Harper & Row.

Christopher C.A. Chan, Cecil Pearson, Lanny Entrekin. ( 2003) .Examining the effects of internal and external team learning on team performance.

Cohen, S. G., & Ledford, G. E. (1994). The effectiveness of self-managing teams:
A quasi-experiment. Human Relations, 47,13-43.

Clark, M. S. & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal
relationships. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12-24.

Cunningham, J. Barton (1977). Approaches to the Evaluation of Organizational Effectiveness. Academy of Management Review. 2(4), 463-474.


Daellenbach, U. S. ; A. M. McCarthy & T. S. Schoenecker, (1999). Commitment to innovation: The impact of top management team characteristics, R&D Management, 29(3), 199-208.

Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. (1999). The impact of relational demography on the quality of leader-member exchanges and employees’ work attitudes and well-being. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 72(2), 237-341.

Frank LaFasto, Carl Larson (2001).When teams work best: 6000 team members and leaders tell what it takes to success, 33-42. Team Performance Management, 9( 7-8), 174-181.

Gampion, M.A., Mesker, G.J. & Higgs, A.C. (1993), “Relationships between work group characteristics and effectiveness: implications for designing effective work groups”, Personnel Psychology, 46,823-825.

Goodman, P. S., (1986).Impact of task and technology on group performance. In P.S. Goodman (ED.), Designing Effective Work Groups, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass,120-167.

Harvard Business Review. (2003), Coming Up Short on Nonfinancial Performance Measurement, November, 88-89.

Hays, R. B. (1988). Friendship. In S. Duck(Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, reseach and interventions. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Hambrick, D. C. & Phyllis, A. M., (1984). Upper Echelons: The Organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9 (2), 193-207.

Herod, D. M., (1978).Improving the performance effectiveness of groups through a task-contingency selection of intervention strategies. Academy of Management Review, 3,315-325.

Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review , 23(3),531-546.

Keck, S. L.,(1997). Top management team structure differential effects by environmental context. , Organization Science, 8(2), 143-156.
Kilmann, R. H. and R. P. Herder (1976). Toward a systemic methodology effectiveness.
Academy of Management Review. 1(3),81-98.

Korsgaard, M. A., Schweiger, D. M., & Sapienza, H. J. (1995). Building commitment, attachment, and trust is strategic decision-making teams.

Kelley,H. H.(1979). Personal relationships: Their structure and processes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1996). Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in Organizations, Thousant oaks: CA: Sage ,114-139.

Liden, R. C.,Wayne, S. J. & Stilwell, D.(1993). A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 662-674.

Levinger, G .(1974). A three-level approach to attraction: Toward an understand of pair relatedness. In T. L. Huston (Ed.), Foundations of interpersonal attraction (pp.99-120). New York: Academic Press.

M.A. Campion, E.M. Paper, and G.J. Medsker, Relations Between work team characteristics and effectiveness, 430.

McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (1), 24-59.

Murry, Alan I., (1989). Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance , Strategic Management Journal, 10, 125-142.

McGrath, J.E.,(1984) .Group interaction and performance. Englewood cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in Organizations, California, 331-356.

Riordan. (2000). Relational demography within groups: Past developments, contradictions, and new directions. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 19, 131-173.

Rodin, M. J. (1982). Non-engagement, failure to engage, and disengagement. In S. W. Duck(Ed.), Personal relationships 4: Dissolving personal relationships. New York: Academic Press.

Stewart, G. L., & Barrick, M.R.,(2000). Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Academy of Management Journal,43(2),135-148.

Stewart , I. N., & Peregoy, P. L.(1983). Catastrophe theory modeling in psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 336-362.

Scott, W. R. (1981). Developments in organization theory, 1960-1980, American Behavioral Scientist. 24(3),407-422.

Stewart, G. L., Manz, C.C., & Sims, H. P., Jr. (1999). Team work and group dynamics. New York: Wiley.

Tyler, T. R. & Degoey, P. (1996). Trust in organizational authorities: The influence of motive attributions on willingness to accept decisions.

In R.Wollack, S., Goodale, J. G., Wijting, J. P., & Smith, P. C.(1971). Development of the survey of work values. Journal of Applied Pscyhology, 55(4), 331-338.

William, K. Y. & O’Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 77-140.

Wiersema, M. F. & K. A. Bantel, (1992) . Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. , Academy of Management Journal, 76, 825-837.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2005-08-12
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2005-08-12


QR Code