本研究基於發展式領導理論，從恩威並濟的領導方式出發，撰寫腳本操弄主管使用發展式領導的情境，以情境實驗的方式驗證發展式領導模型的有效性。並在發展式領導理論具備有效性的基礎之上，進一步討論發展式領導理論的解釋機制，觀察信任作為中介變項在主管行為與部屬結果表現之間的效用，本文中對部屬結果表現的探究主要聚焦于部屬對主管的忠誠及部屬對主管的組織公民行為上。同時為發展式領導這一嶄新的理論探尋其理論適用邊界，將主管資歷作為限制條件放入情境實驗中，討論主管資歷的深淺在主管發展式領導與部屬對主管信任之間的作用。

This study is based on developmental leadership theory. With the coexistence of leader authoritarianism and benevolence, this study writes scripts to manipulate the situation that supervisors employ developmental leadership, and examines the validity of developmental leadership model with the experimental condition. Based on the validity of developmental leadership, this study further discusses the interpretative scheme of developmental leadership theory, and observe trust as mediator of behaviors of supervisors and subordinate responses. This result of subordinate responses in this study mainly focus on loyalty to supervisor and organizational citizenship behavior of subordinate. In the meanwhile, this study inquires suitable boundary for developmental leadership theory. To utilize qualification of supervisors as the limitation in the experimental condition, and discuss the function that seniority of supervisor affects between supervisory developmental leadership and subordinative trust in supervisor.

論文審定書 i
致謝 ii
中文摘要 iii
英文摘要 iv
目錄 v
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 viii
第一章 研究背景與目的 1
第二章 文獻探討 3
第一節 家長式領導 3
第二節 發展式領導 5
第三節 對主管的信任 10
第四節 部屬的結果表現 11
第五節 主管資歷 14
第三章 研究方法 15
第一節 研究樣本 15
第二節 研究設計 17
第四章 分析結果 24
第一節 操弄檢定 24
第二節 假設檢驗 25
第五章 討論與結論 29
第一節 研究結果 29
第二節 理論貢獻 31
第三節 實務貢獻 32
第四節 研究限制與未來建議 33
參考文獻 35
附錄：研究問卷 39

吳宗祐. (2008). 主管威權領導與部屬的工作滿意度與組織承諾: 信任的中介歷程 與情緒智力的調節效果. 本土心理學研究, (30), 3-63.
李爱梅, 谭清方, & 杨慧琳. (2012). “领导与下属双向信任” 的形成及其作用机制
研究. 暨南学报 (哲学社会科学版), 2, 012.
周婉茹, 周麗芳, 鄭伯壎, & 任金剛. (2010). 專權與尚嚴之辨: 再探威權領導的內 涵與恩威並濟的效果. 本土心理學研究, (34), 223-284.
周婉茹, 鄭伯壎, & 連玉輝. (2014). 威權領導: 概念源起, 現況檢討及未來方
向. 中華心理學刊, 56(2), 165-189.
林姿葶, & 鄭伯壎. (2012). 華人領導者的噓寒問暖與提攜教育: 仁慈領導之雙構 面模式. 本土心理學研究, (37), 253-302.
林姿葶, 鄭伯壎, & 周麗芳. (2014). 家長式領導二十年: 問題與解答. 本土心理學 研究, (42), 147-177.
林家五, 王悅縈, & 胡宛仙. (2012). 真誠領導與仁慈領導對組織公民行為及主管 忠誠之差異效果. 本土心理學研究, (38), 205-256.
林淑姬, 樊景立, 吳靜吉, & 司徒達賢. (1994). 薪酬公平, 程序公正與組織承諾,
組織公民行為關係之研究. 管理評論, 13(2), 87-107.
林鉦棽, 蕭淑月, & 何慧清. (2005). 社會交換理論觀點下組織支持，組織知識分享行爲與組織公民行爲相關因素之研究：以信任與關係為分析切入點. 人力資源管理學報, 5(1), 77-110.
姜定宇, & 鄭伯壎. (2003). 組織忠誠, 組織承諾, 及組織公民行爲研究之回顧與 前瞻. 應用心理研究, (19), 175-209.
姜定宇, 丁捷, & 林伶瑾. (2012). 家長式領導與部屬效能: 信任主管與不信任主
管的中介效果. 中華心理學刊, 54(3), 269-291.
施智婷, & 林鉦棽. (2012). 領導成員交換關係, 心理契約滿足與組織公民行為理 論模型驗證: 資源配置與社會資本觀點. 管理學報, 29(1), 1-16.
許金田, 胡秀華, 淩孝綦, 鄭伯壎, & 周麗芳. (2004). 家長式領導與組織公民行
36
爲的關係: 上下關係品質之中介效果. 交大管理學報, 2, 119-149.
樊景立, & 鄭伯壎. (2000). 華人組織的家長式領導: 一項文化觀點的分析. 本土心 理學研究, (13), 126-180.
鄭伯壎, & 姜定宇. (2000). 華人組織中的主管忠誠: 主位與客位概念對員工效能 的效果. 本土心理學研究, (14), 65-113.
鄭伯壎, 周麗芳, & 樊景立. (2000). 家長式領導: 三元模式的建構與測量. 本土心 理學研究, (14), 3-64.

Chen Y, Friedman R, Yu E, et al. Supervisor–Subordinate Guanxi: Developing a Three‐Dimensional Model and Scale[J]. Management and Organization Review, 2009, 5(3): 375-399.
Chen X P, Eberly M B, Chiang T J, et al. Affective trust in Chinese leaders linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance[J]. Journal of Management, 2014, 40(3): 796-819.
Chan S C H, Huang X, Snape E, et al. The Janus face of paternalistic leaders: Authoritarianism, benevolence, subordinates' organization‐based self‐ esteem, and performance[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2013, 34(1): 108-128.
Dirks K T, Ferrin D L. Trust in leadership: meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice[J]. 2002.
Farh J L, Cheng B S. A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations[M]//Management and organizations in the Chinese context. Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2000: 84-127.
Farh J L, Cheng B, Chou L, et al. Authority and Benevolence: Employee’s Responses to Paternalistic Leadership in China[C]//Academy of Management Annual
37
Meeting, August 6-11, New Orleans. 2004.
Farh J L, Liang J, Chou L, et al. Paternalistic leadership in Chinese Organizations: Research progress and future research direction[M]//Leadership and management in China: Philosophies, theories, and practices. 2008.
Gillespie N A, Mann L. Transformational leadership and shared values: The building blocks of trust[J]. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2004, 19(6): 588-607.
McAllister D J. Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations[J]. Academy of management journal, 1995, 38(1): 24-59.
Netemeyer R G, Maxham III J G, Pullig C. Conflicts in the work–family interface: Links to job stress, customer service employee performance, and customer purchase intent[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2005, 69(2): 130-143.
Pellegrini E K, Scandura T A. Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research[J]. Journal of management, 2008, 34(3): 566-593.
Paternalistic leadership and its effectiveness: Evidence from Chinese organizational teams[J]. Journal of psychology in Chinese societies (Hong Kong), 2002, 3(1): 85-112.
Redding G. The spirit of Chinese capitalism[M]. Walter de Gruyter, 1990. Wang A C, Cheng B S. When does benevolent leadership lead to creativity?
The moderating role of creative role identity and job autonomy[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2010, 31(1): 106-121.
Wang, A. C. (2017). Developmental leadership: How Chinese leaders integrate control and care to cultivate subordinates. Paper accepted for presentation at the 2017 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, Georgia.
38
Westwood R. Harmony and patriarchy: The cultural basis for'paternalistic headship'among the overseas Chinese[J]. Organization studies, 1997, 18(3): 445-480.
Whitener E M, Brodt S E, Korsgaard M A, et al. Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior[J]. Academy of management review, 1998, 23(3): 513-
530.
Williams L J, Anderson S E. Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors[J]. Journal of management, 1991, 17(3): 601-617.
Wu T Y, Hu C, Jiang D Y. Is subordinate's loyalty a precondition of supervisor's benevolent leadership? The moderating effects of supervisor's altruistic
personality and perceived organizational support[J]. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2012, 15(3): 145-155.
Yukl G. An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories[J]. The leadership quarterly, 1999, 10(2): 285-305.