Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0026115-161141 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0026115-161141
論文名稱
Title
校園霸凌受害者自我責備量表的發展
The Development of Bullied-Victim Self-Blame Scale
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
66
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2015-01-21
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2015-01-26
關鍵字
Keywords
參與角色、情境、校園霸凌、自我責備
participant roles, self-blame, school bullying, scenarios
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5803 次,被下載 170
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5803 times, has been downloaded 170 times.
中文摘要
由於部分被攻擊的受害者會有自我責備傾向,但現有自我責備量表不適用校
園霸凌情境,且多缺乏效度證據。本研究旨在建構校園霸凌受害者自我責備量表,
並以Rasch 技術驗證其信效度,亦探討不同角色與不同情境下的自我責備傾向是
否有所差異。
研究參與者為1,230 名五到九年級的學生(M = 12.6)。研究工具為自編「霸
凌受害者自我責備量表」(bullied-victim self-blame scale, BSBS),以Rasch 模式
中的評等量尺模式(rating scale model)進行分析。
Rasch 分析結果顯示BSBS 具有良好的信效度,量表的Cronbach α 信度為.92,
且各試題均無性別上的差異試題功能(DIF),受試者在自我責備傾向上的得分
與憂鬱有正向關聯。兼為霸凌/受害者於霸凌情境下的自我責備傾向顯著高於受
害者,然而於一般情境下卻無顯著差異。所有霸凌角色在一般情境下的自我責備
顯著高於霸凌情境。文末針對BSBS 的發展與施測方式、受害者自我責備的輔導
方式進行討論。
Abstract
Several studies have found that some victims who have been attacked many have
a tendency of self-blame. However, existing scales of self-blame are not applicable
for the situation of school bullying, and many of them lack validity. The aim of this
research is to construct the Bullied-Victim Self-Blame Scale (BSBS), and to verify the
reliability and validity by Rasch measurement. Furthermore, the different roles and
scenarios different in self-blame are analyzed and examined.
The participants in this study were 1,230 students of grades 5 to 9, with an
average age of 12.6 years. The BSBS was constructed by the researcher, and analyzed
with the rating scale model (RSM) of the Rasch model.
It was found that the BSBS has good reliability and validity. The Cronbach’s
alpha reliability figures was .92 and there was no differential item functioning (DIF)
between genders. In addition, the tendency of self-blame and depression was
positively associated. In terms of different roles, it is noted that bully/victims have a
higher self-blame in the bullying scenarios than victims, but no difference is found in
the general scenarios between bully/victims and victims. As for scenarios difference,
the tendency of self-blame in the general scenarios is significantly higher than the
bullying scenarios by all roles. The development in BSBS and the strategies for
reducing self-blame are discussed in the last section in light of these findings.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書................................................................................................................... i
誌謝.............................................................................................................................. ii
中文摘要..................................................................................................................... iii
英文摘要..................................................................................................................... iv
第一章 緒論................................................................................................................ 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 ........................................................................................ 1
第二節 名詞解釋 .................................................................................................... 3
第二章 文獻探討........................................................................................................ 5
第一節 校園霸凌 .................................................................................................... 5
第二節 自我責備 .................................................................................................. 11
第三章 研究方法...................................................................................................... 25
第一節 研究對象 .................................................................................................. 25
第二節 研究工具 .................................................................................................. 25
第三節 研究程序 .................................................................................................. 28
第四節 資料分析 .................................................................................................. 28
第四章 研究結果...................................................................................................... 31
第一節 校園霸凌受害者自我責備量表的信效度驗證 ...................................... 31
第二節 不同角色的自我責備傾向分析 .............................................................. 36
第三節 不同情境下自我責備傾向的分析 .......................................................... 37
第五章 討論、建議與限制...................................................................................... 39
參考文獻...................................................................................................................... 43
附錄一 中小學生自我狀態評估問卷.................................................................. 53
附錄二 「流行病學研究中心憂鬱量表(CES-D)中文版」使用同意書 ....... 58
參考文獻 References
一、中文文獻
Leahy, R. L. (2007)。認知治療技術(余振民、周志盈譯)。臺北市:五南。(原著出版於2003)
Corey, G. (2002)。諮商與心理治療:理論與實務(余振民、黃淑清、彭瑞祥、趙祥和、蔡藝華與鄭玄藏譯)。臺北市:雙葉書廊。(原著出版於2000)
邱皓政(2003)。量化研究與統計分析。台北市:五南。
高金桂、謝文彥(1996)。高危險群暴力傾向學生輔導手冊。台北市:教育部。
教育部(2011)。校園安全及災害事件通報作業要點。台北:教育部。
教育部(2012)。校園霸凌防治準則。台北:教育部。
二、英文文獻
Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E. P., & Teasdale, J. D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology , 87 (1), 49-74.
Ali, A., Toner, B.B., Stuckless, N., Gallop, R. Diamant, N.E., Gould, M.I., & Vidins, E.I. (2000). Emotional abuse, self-blame and self-silencing in women with irritable bowel syndrome. Psychosomatic Medicine, 62(1), 76-82.
Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27-51.
Ballard, M., Tucky, A., & Remley, T.P. Jr. (1999). Bullying and violence: A proposed prevention program. NASSP Bulletin, 38-47.
Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice- Hall.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psycho- logical Review, 84, 191-215
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bauman, S., Toomey, R., & Walker, J. (2013). Associations among bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide in high school students. Journal of Adolescence, 36(2), 341-350
Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press.
Beck, A.T., Rush, A.J., Shaw, B.F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford.
Berger, K.S. (2007). Update on bullying at school: Science forgotten? Developmental Review, 27, 91-92
Butler, L., Miezitis, S., Friedman, R., & Cole, E. (1980). The effect of two school-based intervention programs on depressive symptoms in preadolescents. American Educational Research Journal, 17, 119.
Caravita S., Di Blasio P. & Salmivalli C. (2010). Early adolescents’ participation in bullying: Is ToM involved? Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(1), 138 –170.
Cascardi, M., & O’Leary, K. D. (1992). Depressive symptomatology, self-esteem, and self-blame in battered women. Journal of Family Violence, 7(4), 249-259.
Chen, L. M., & Cheng, Y. Y. (2013). Prevalence of school bullying among secondary students in Taiwan: Measurements with and without a specific definition of bullying. School Psychology International, 34, 707–720.
Doi:10.1177/0143034313479694
Chen, L. M., Cheng, Y. Y., Wu, P. J., & Hsueh, H. I. (in press). Educators’ implicit perspectives of wisdom: A comparison between interpersonal and intrapersonal perspectives. International Journal of Psychology.
Chen, L. M., Liu, K. S., & Cheng, Y. Y. (2012). Validation of the perceived school bullying severity scale. Educational Psychology, 32, 169–182.
doi: 10.1080/01443410.2011.633495
Cheng, Y. Y., Chen, L. M., Liu, K. S., & Chen, Y. L. (2011). Development and psychometric evaluation of the school bullying scales: A Rasch measurement approach. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71(1), 200–216.
Cheng, Y. Y., Chen, L. M., Ho, H. C., & Cheng, C. L. (2011). Definitions of school bullying in Taiwan: A comparison of multiple perspectives. School Psychology International, 32, 227–243. doi: 10.1177/0143034311404130
Cheng, Y. Y., Wang, W. C., & Ho, Y. H. (2009). Multidimensional Rasch analysis of a psychological test with multiple subtests: A statistical solution for the bandwidth-fidelity dilemma. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 69, 369-388.
Chien, C. P., & Cheng, T. A. (1985). Depression in Taiwan: Epidemiological survey utilizing CES-D. Psychiatria et Neurologia Japonica, 87(5), 335-338.
Clarke, E. A., & Kiselica, M. S. (1997). A systemic counseling approach to the problem of bullying. Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, 31, 310-326.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.
Connor, D. F. (1998). Overt categorical aggression in referred children and adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 67 (1), 66–73.
Cornell, D. G., & Brockenbrough, K. (2004). Identification of bullies and victims: A comparison of methods. Journal of School Violence, 3, 63-87. doi:10.1300/J202v03n02_0563
Dewey, C., Anne, G., Huang, F., & Fan, X. (2013). Perceived prevalence of teasing and bullying predicts high school dropout rates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 138-149.
Dodge K.A., & Coie, J.D. (1987). Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children’s peer groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1146–1158.
Dollard, J., Doob, L. W., Miller, N. E., Mowrer, O. H., & Sears, R. R. (1939). Frustration and aggression. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Enright, R. D., & The Human Developmant Study Group. (1996). Counselimg within the forgiveness triad: On forgiving, receiving forgiveness, and self-forgiveness. Counseling and Values, 40, 107-126.
Eron, L. (1987). The development of aggressive behavior from the perspective of a developing behaviorism. American Psychologist, 42(5), 435-442.
FeldmanHall, O., Mobbs, D., Evans, D., Hiscox, L., Navardy, L., & Dalgleish, T. (2012). What we say and what we do: The relationship between real and hypothetical moral choices. Cognition, 123 (3), 434-441
Frazier, A. P. & Schauben, J. L. (1994). Stressful life events and psychological adjustment among female college students. Measuremnt & Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 27(1), 1-12.
Frazier, P. A. (1990). Victim attributions and post-rape trauma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 298-304.
Friedman, L. C., Romero, C., Elledge, R., Chang, J., Kalidas, M., Dulay, M. F., Lynch, G. & Osborne, C. K. (2007). Attribution of blame, self-forgiving attitude and psychological adjustment in women with breast cancer. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 30(4), 351-357.
Gilbert, P., & Miles, J. N. V. (2000). Sensitivity to social put-down: It's relationship to perceptions of social rank, shame, social anxiety, depression, anger and self-other blame. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 757-774.
Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., & Hauser, M. (2011). Bullies have enhanced moral competence to judge relative to victims, but lack moral compassion. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 603–608.
Graham, S. & Juvonen, J. (1998). Self-blame and peer victimization in middle school: An attributional analysis. Developmental Psychology, 34(3), 587-599.
Griffin, R. S., & Gross, A. M. (2004). Childhood bullying: Current empirical findings and future directions for research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9(4), 379–400.
Hepburn, L., Azrael, D., Molnar, B., & Miller, M. (2012). Bullying and suicidal behaviors among urban high school youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51(1), 93–95.
Huesmann, L. R., & Eron, L. D. (1984). Cognitive processes and the persistence of aggressive behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 10, 243-251.
Jago, A. G., & Vroom, V. H. (1978). Predicting leader behavior from a measure of behavioral intent. Academy of Management Journal, 21(4), 715–721.
Janoff-Bulman, R. (1979). Characterological versus behavioral self-blame: Inquiries into depression and rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1798-1809.
Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992). Happystance. A review of Subjective Well-Being: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Contemporary Psychology, 37,162-163.
Janoff-Bulman, R., & Wortman, C. B. (1977). Attributions of blame and coping in the "real world": Severe accident victims react to their lot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 351-363.
Jimerson, S., Swearer, S. M., & Espelage, D. L. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective. New York: Routledge.
Kenney, J. S. (2002). Victims of crime and labeling theory: A parallel process. Deviant Brhavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23, 235-265.
Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Williams, D. A. (1987). Self-blame, compliance, and distress among burn patients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(1), 187-193.
Kyriakides, L., Kaloyirou, C. & Lindsay, G. (2006). An analysis of the Revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire using the Rasch measurement model. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 781–801.
Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. Plenum: New York.
Linacre, J. M. (2006). A user’s guide to WINSTEPS Rasch model computer program. Chicago, IL: Winsteps.
Lutwak, N. & Panish, J.P., & Ferrari, J.R. (2003). Shame and guilt: Characterlogical vs. behavioral self-blame and their relationship to fear of intimacy. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 909-916.
Malcarne, V.E., Compas, B. E., Epping-Jordan, J. E., & Howell, D. C. (1995). Cognitive factors in adjustment to cancer: Attributions of self-blame and preceptions of control. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 18, 401-417.
Messias, E., Kindrick, K., & Castro, J. (2014). School bullying, cyberbullying, or both: correlates of teen suicidality in the 2011 CDC Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Comprehensive Psychiatry Journal, 55(5), 1063-1068.
doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.02.005
Meyer, C. & Taylor, S. (1986). Adjustment to rape, Journal of Personality and Social, 50, 1226-1234.
Miller, D.T., & Porter, C.A. (1983). Self-blame in victims of violence. Journal of Social Issues, 39(2), 139-152.
Mok, M. M. C., Wang, W. C., Cheng, Y. Y., Leung, S. O., & Chen, L. M. (2014). Prevalence and behavioural ranking of bullying and victimisation among secondary students in Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Macao. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23, 757–767.
Monahan, J. (1981). The clinical prediction of violent behavior. Washington, DC: Government Printing House.
Nesel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among US youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. JAMA, 285(16), 2094-2100.
Nixon, C. D., & Singer, G. H. (1993). Group cognitive-behavioral treatment for excessive parental self-blame and guilt. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 97, 665-372.
Nunnally, J. C., (1978), Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
O’Neill, M., & Kerig, P. K. (2000). Attributions of self-blame and perceived control as moderators of adjustment in battered women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 1036-1049.
Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Olweus, D. (1996a). Bully/victim problems at school: Facts and effective intervention. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 5(1), 15-22.
Olweus, D. (1996b). The revised Olweus bully/victim questionnaire. Bergen, Norway.
Olweus, D. (2007). The Olweus bBullying questionnaire. Center City, MN: Hazelden (www.violencepreventionworks.org).
Olweus, D., & Breivik, K. (2014). Plight of victims of school bullying: The opposite of well-being. In A. Ben-Arieh, F. Casas, I. Frønes, & J.E. Korbin (Eds.), Handbook of Child Well-Being, (pp.2593-2616). New York: Springer Netherlands.
doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-9063-8_100
Olweus, D., & Limber, S. P. (2007). What is bullying? Definitions, statistics and Iinformation on bullying. www.olweus.org/public/bullying.page.
O'Moore, M., & Kirkham, C. (2001). Self-esteem and its relationship to bullying behaviour. Aggressive Behavior, 27(4), 269-283.
Perren, S., Ettekal, I., & Lada,G. (2013). The impact of peer victimization on later maladjustment- mediating and moderating effects of hostile and self-blaming attributions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54(1), 46-55.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02618.x
Peterson, C., Schwartz, S.M., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1981). Self-blame and depressive symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 253-259.
Price, J.M., & Dodge, K.A. (1989). Reactive and proactive aggression in childhood: Relations to peer status and social context dimension. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 17 (4), 455–471.
Prinstein, M. J., Cheah, C. S. L., & Guyer, A. E. (2005). Peer victimization, cue interpretation, and internalizing symptoms: Preliminary concurrent and longitudinal findings for children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34, 11–24.
Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401.
Robers, S., Kemp, J., & Truman, J. (2013). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2012 (NCES 2013-036/NCJ 241446). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, and Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Washington, DC. Retrieved from: http://nces.ed.gov
Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1–15.
Schneider, S. K., O'Donnell, L., Stueve, A., & Coulter, R. W. S. (2012). Cyberbullying, school bullying, and psychological distress: A regional census of high school Sstudents. American Journal of Public Health, 102(1), 171-177.
Solberg, M., & Olweus, D. (2003). Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 239–268.
Steffgen, G. & König, A. (2009). Cyber bullying: The role of traditional bullying and empathy. In B. Sapeo, L. Haddon, E. Mante-Meijer, L. Fortunati, T. Turk & E. Loos (Eds.), The good, the bad and the challenging. Conference Proceedings (Vol. II). Brussels: Cost office.
Tan, F. (2013). Bullying, victim, and aggressor: Past experience versus current behavior. Undergradute Journal of Psychology at Berkeley, 7, 59-68.
Taylor, S. E. (1989). Positive illusions: Creative self-deception and the health mind. New York: Basic Books.
Tearasahjo, T., & Salmivalli, C. (2003). She is not bullied: The discourse of harassment in student groups. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 134-154.
Ullman, S. E. (1996). Social reactions, coping strategies, and self-blame attributions in Adjustment to sexual assault. Psychology of Woman Quarterly, 20, 505-526.
Wang, W. C. (2008). Assessment of differential item functioning. Journal of Applied Measurement, 9(4), 1-22.
Weinberg, N. (1995). Does apologizing help? The role of self-blame and making amends in recovery from bereavement. Health & Social Work, 20(4), 294 -300 .
Wolfe, E. W. & Smith, E. V. Jr. (2007). Instrument development tools and activities for measure validation using Rasch models: PartⅡ- validation activities. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8(2), 204-234.
Wong, C. T., Cheng, Y. Y., & Chen, L. M. (2013). Multiple perspectives on the targets and causes of school bullying. Educational Psychology in Practice, 29(3), 278-292.
Wortman, C. B., & Dintzer, C. (1978). Is an attributional analysis of the learned helplessness phenomenon viable? A critique of the Abramson-Seligman-Teasdale formulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 75–80.
Would Health Organization (2002). Would report on violence and health. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Chi-square fit statistics. Rasch Measurement Transactions,8, 370.
Wu, M., & Adams, R. (2007). Applying the Rasch model to psycho-social measurement: A practical approach. Melbourne: Educational Measurement Solutions.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code