Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0026115-165113 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0026115-165113
論文名稱
Title
校園霸凌防治策略:台灣中學生的觀點
Taiwanese Secondary School Students’ Perspective on Bullying Prevention and Intervention Strategies
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
47
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2015-01-21
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2015-01-26
關鍵字
Keywords
反霸凌策略、知覺有效性、Rasch測驗、霸凌防制
bullying prevention, anti-bullying strategies, perceived efficacy, Rasch model
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5776 次,被下載 697
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5776 times, has been downloaded 697 times.
中文摘要
本研究目的在於了解中學生認為有效與無效的防制霸凌策略,運用建構量表及質性訪談的方式以深化了解中學生認知的霸凌防制策略為何有效或無效。研究對象為南台灣四所國中之664位中學生(男生320位、女生344位),使用問卷調查法蒐集資料,並以Rasch技術進行量表信效度驗證。結果顯示本研究建構的量表具有良好的信效度,學生認為有效的防制霸凌策略依序為:「告訴師長」、「請導師與霸凌者嚴肅地對談」、「請導師與受害者聊一聊」。無效的防制霸凌策略則為:「直接對霸凌者說:『不要欺負他人』」、「跟受凌者當朋友」、「學校舉辦防制霸凌行為的活動」。最後針對研究限制及未來研究建議予以討論。
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore the perspectives of secondary school students on effective and ineffective bullying prevention strategies. The author developed the perceived-effectiveness on bullying prevention strategies scale (PBPS) and conducted interviews to acquire a more profound understanding of why bullying prevention strategies may be considered as effective or ineffective by secondary school students. The participants in this study were 664 secondary school students from southern Taiwan, including 320 boys (48.2%) and 344 girls (51.8%). This study used questionnaire survey to collect data, and the Rasch measurement to test reliability and validity of the scale. Results show that the PBPS scale has good reliability and validity. The bullying prevention strategies considered as effective by secondary school students were “Telling teachers and adults”, “Asking the teachers to talk with bullies seriously”, “Asking the teachers to talk with victims”. The bullying prevention strategies rated as ineffective were “Telling bullies to stop it”, “Befriending the victims”, “Attending the bullying prevention activities hosted by the school”. The limitations and suggestions of these results are discussed at the end of this study.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書……………………………………………………………… i
誌謝……………………………………………………………………... ii
中文摘要……………………………………………………………….. iii
英文摘要……………………………………………………………….. iv
第 一 章 緒論………………………………………………………... 1
第一節 研究動機與目的………………………………………...... 1
第二節 名詞釋義………………………………………………...... 2
第 二 章 文獻探討…………………………………………………... 4
第一節 反霸凌方案的介紹………………………………….......... 4
第二節 教師與學生對防制策略的觀點………………………….. 8
第 三 章 研究方法…………………………………………………. 11
第一節 研究對象…………………………………........................ 11
第二節 研究工具………………………………………………… 11
第三節 研究程序………………………………………………… 12
第四節 資料分析………………………………………………… 13
第 四 章 研究結果…………………………………………………. 15
第 五 章 討論與建議………………………………………………. 21
第一節 結果討論…………………………………........................ 21
第二節 未來建議………………………………………………… 22

參考文獻………………………………………………………………. 24
附錄……………………………………………………………………. 31
附錄一 量表編題與文獻對照表…………………………………31
附錄二 校園欺負行為預防策略評估量表(修訂前)……...……..33
附錄三 校園欺負行為預防策略評估量表(修訂後)……...……..34
附錄四 訪談大綱……...…….. ……...…….. ……...…….. ……..35
附錄四 人體試驗審查委員會同意書.…….. ……...…….. ……..36
參考文獻 References
王文中(2004)。Rasch測量理論與其在教育和心理之應用。教育與心理研究,27(4),637–694。
Ahtola, A., Haataja, A., Kärnä, A., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2012). For children only? Effects of the KiVa antibullying program on teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(6), 851–859. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.03.006
Athanasiades, C., & Deliyanni‐Kouimtzis, V. (2010). The experience of bullying among secondary school students. Psychology in the Schools, 47(4), 328–341. doi:10.1002/pits.20473
Bauer, N. S., Lozano, P., & Rivara, F. P. (2007). The effectiveness of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program in public middle schools: A controlled trial. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40(3), 266–274. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.10.005
Bauman, S., Toomey, R. B., & Walker, J. L. (2013). Associations among bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide in high school students. Journal of Adolescence, 36(2), 341–350. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.12.001
Bennett, L. J. (2009). What schools do to/for kids who have been bullied. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 11(1), 275–292.
Black, S. A., & Jackson, E. (2007). Using bullying incident density to evaluate the Olweus Bullying Prevention Programme. School Psychology International, 28(5), 623–638. doi:10.1177/0143034307085662
Black, S., Weinles, D., & Washington, E. (2010). Victim strategies to stop bullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 8(2), 138–147. doi:10.1177/1541204009349401
Boulton, M. J. (2013). The effects of victim of bullying reputation on adolescents’ choice of friends: Mediation by fear of becoming a victim of bullying, moderation by victim status, and implications for befriending interventions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114(1), 146-160. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2012.05.001
Chen, L. M., & Cheng, Y. Y. (2013). Prevalence of school bullying among secondary students in Taiwan: Measurements with and without a specific definition of bullying. School Psychology International, 34, 707–720. doi:10.1177/0143034313479694
Copeland, W. E., Wolke, D., Angold, A., & Costello, E. J. (2013). Adult psychiatric outcomes of bullying and being bullied by peers in childhood and adolescence. JAMA psychiatry, 70(4), 419–426. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.504
Cortes, K. I., & Kochenderfer-Ladd, B. (2014). To tell or not to tell: What influences children’s decisions to report bullying to their teachers?. School Psychology Quarterly, 29(3), 336.
Crothers, L. M., Kolbert, J. B., & Barker, W. F. (2006). Middle school students’ preferences for anti-bullying interventions. School Psychology International, 27(4), 475–487. doi: 10.1177/0143034306070435
Eliot, M., Cornell, D., Gregory, A., & Fan, X. (2010). Supportive school climate and student willingness to seek help for bullying and threats of violence. Journal of School Psychology, 48(6), 533–553. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2010.07.001
Esteki Azad, N., & Amiri, S. (2012). Effectiveness of Olweus Bullying Prevention Program on Iranian Boys. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, 18(3), 175–183.
Freud, S. (1894). The defence neuro-psychoses. Collected papers, 1, 59-75.
Frisén, A., & Holmqvist, K. (2010). Adolescents’ own suggestions for bullying interventions at age 13 and 16. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 51(2), 123–131. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00733.x
Frisén, A., Hasselblad, T., & Holmqvist, K. (2012). What actually makes bullying stop? Reports from former victims. Journal of Adolescence, 35(4), 981–990. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.02.001
Hanewinkel, R. (2004). Bullying in schools: How successful can interventions be. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University.
Hays, R. D., Hayashi, T., & Stewart, A. L. (1989). A five-item measure of socially desirable response set. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49(3), 629-636. doi: 10.1177/001316448904900315
Kaltiala-Heino, R., Rimpelä, M., Rantanen, P., & Rimpelä, A. (2000). Bullying at school—an indicator of adolescents at risk for mental disorders. Journal of Adolescence, 23(6), 661–674. doi:10.1006/jado.2000.0351
Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T. D., Alanen, E., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2013). Effectiveness of the KiVa Antibullying Program: Grades 1–3 and 7–9. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 535. doi:10.1037/a0030417
Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T. D., Poskiparta, E., Kaljonen, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2011). A Large‐Scale Evaluation of the KiVa Antibullying Program: Grades 4–6. Child Development, 82(1), 311–330. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01557.x
Kennedy, T. D., Russom, A. G., & Kevorkian, M. M. (2012). Teacher and administrator perceptions of bullying in schools. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 7(5), 1–12.
Kochenderfer-Ladd, B., & Pelletier, M. E. (2008). Teachers' views and beliefs about bullying: Influences on classroom management strategies and students' coping with peer victimization. Journal of School Psychology, 46(4), 431–453. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2007.07.005
Lacey, A., & Cornell, D. (2013). The impact of teasing and bullying on schoolwide academic performance. Journal of Applied School Psychology,29(3), 262–283. doi:10.1080/15377903.2013.806883
Lichtman, M. (2006). Qualitative Research in Education: A User's Guide. SAGE Publications (CA).
Limber, S. P., Nation, M., Tracy, A. J., Melton, G. B., & Flerx, V. (2004). Bullying in schools: How successful can interventions be. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University.
Low, S., & Van Ryzin, M. (2014). The moderating effects of school climate on bullying prevention efforts. School Psychology Quarterly, 29(3), 306.
Lund, E. M., Blake, J. J., Ewing, H. K., & Banks, C. S. (2012). School counselors' and school psychologists' bullying prevention and intervention strategies: A look into real-world practices. Journal of School Violence, 11(3), 246-265. doi:10.1080/15388220.2012.682005
Maines, B., & Robinson, G. (1994). The no blame approach to bullying.
Maslow, A. H., Frager, R., & Cox, R. (1970). Motivation and personality (Vol. 2). J. Fadiman, & C. McReynolds (Eds.). New York: Harper & Row.
McNamara, T. F. (1996). Measuring second language performance. London: Longman.
Meltzer, H., Vostanis, P., Ford, T., Bebbington, P., & Dennis, M. S. (2011). Victims of bullying in childhood and suicide attempts in adulthood. European Psychiatry, 26(8), 498–503. doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2010.11.006
Moss, P. (2004). Say something. Tilbury House.
Murray-Harvey, R., Skrzypiec, G., & Slee, P. T. (2012). Effective and ineffective coping with bullying strategies as assessed by informed professionals and their use by victimised students. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 22(1), 122–138. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2012.5
Nickerson, A. B., Mele, D., & Princiotta, D. (2008). Attachment and empathy as predictors of roles as defenders or outsiders in bullying interactions. Journal of School Psychology, 46(6), 687-703. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2008.06.002
Olweus, D. (1978). Aggression in the schools: Bullies and whipping boys. Hemisphere.
Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying: What we know and what we can do.
Olweus, D. (2005). A useful evaluation design, and effects of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program. Psychology, Crime & Law, 11(4), 389–402. doi:10.1080/10683160500255471
Olweus, D., & Limber, S. P. (2010). Bullying in school: Evaluation and dissemination of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 80(1), 124–134. doi:10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01015.x
Paul, S., Smith, P. K., & Blumberg, H. H. (2012). Comparing student perceptions of coping strategies and school interventions in managing bullying and cyberbullying incidents. Pastoral Care in Education, 30(2), 127–146. doi:10.1080/02643944.2012.679957
Rock, P. F., & Baird, J. A. (2012). Tell the teacher or tell the bully off: children's strategy production for bystanders to bullying. Social Development, 21(2), 414–424. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00627.x
Sairanen, L., & Pfeffer, K. (2011). Self-reported handling of bullying among junior high school teachers in Finland. School Psychology International, 32(3), 330–344. doi: 10.1177/0143034311401795
Salmivalli, C., & Poskiparta, E. (2012). KiVa antibullying program: Overview of evaluation studies based on a randomized controlled trial and national rollout in Finland. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 6(2), 293–301.
Salmivalli, C., & Voeten, M. (2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviour in bullying situations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28(3), 246–258. doi:10.1080/01650250344000488
Salmivalli, C., Voeten, M., & Poskiparta, E. (2011). Bystanders matter: Associations between reinforcing, defending, and the frequency of bullying behavior in classrooms. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 40(5), 668–676. doi:10.1080/15374416.2011.597090
Sherer, Y. C., & Nickerson, A. B. (2010). Anti‐bullying practices in American schools: Perspectives of school psychologists. Psychology in the Schools,47(3), 217–229. doi: 10.1002/pits.20466
Skrzypiec, G., Slee, P., Murray-Harvey, R., & Pereira, B. (2011). School bullying by one or more ways: Does it matter and how do students cope?. School Psychology International, 32(3), 288–311. doi: 10.1177/0143034311402308
Smith, J. D., Schneider, B. H., Smith, P. K., & Ananiadou, K. (2004). The effectiveness of whole-school antibullying programs: A synthesis of evaluation research. School Psychology Review, 33(4), 547–560.
Smith, P. K., Howard, S., & Thompson, F. (2007). Use of the Support Group Method to tackle bullying, and evaluation from schools and local authorities in England. Pastoral Care in Education, 25(2), 4–13. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0122.2007.00402.x
Thompson, F., & Smith, P. K. (2011). The use and effectiveness of anti-bullying strategies in schools. Research Brief DFE-RR098.
Trach, J., Hymel, S., Waterhouse, T., & Neale, K. (2010). Bystander responses to school bullying: A cross-sectional investigation of grade and sex differences. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 25(1), 114–130. doi:10.1177/0829573509357553
Ttofi, M., & Farrington, D. (2009). What works in preventing bullying: Effective elements of anti-bullying programmes. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 1(1), 13–24. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17596599200900003
Turner, M. G., Exum, M. L., Brame, R., & Holt, T. J. (2013). Bullying victimization and adolescent mental health: General and typological effects across sex. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(1), 53-59. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2012.12.005
Wang, W. C. (2008). Assessment of differential item functioning. Journal of Applied Measurement, 9, 387-408.
Wolfe, E. W., & Smith Jr, E. V. (2006). Instrument development tools and activities for measure validation using Rasch models: part II--validation activities. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8(2), 204–234.
Yoon, J., Sulkowski, M. L., & Bauman, S. A. (2014). Teachers’ Responses to Bullying Incidents: Effects of Teacher Characteristics and Contexts. Journal of School Violence, (just-accepted).
Young, S. (1998). The support group approach to bullying in schools. Educational Psychology in Practice, 14(1), 32–39. doi:10.1080/0266736980140106
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code