Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0029118-112454 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0029118-112454
論文名稱
Title
海洋教育數位說故事科學想像力課程發展、實施與評鑑
The Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of Digital Storytelling in Marine Science Scientific Imagination Curriculum
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
181
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2017-09-22
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2018-01-29
關鍵字
Keywords
科學想像力、數位說故事、海洋教育、課程發展、設計式研究
curriculum development, digital storytelling, marine education, design-based research, scientific imagination
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5708 次,被下載 17
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5708 times, has been downloaded 17 times.
中文摘要
為了因應二十一世紀未來人才海洋教育、數位說故事,以及科學想像力的培養,本研究藉由分析、設計、實施,以及評鑑,完善海洋教育數位說故事科學想像力課程。過程中經由評估數位說故事科學想像力量表、海洋科學學習態度量表、學生作品、研究團隊課堂日誌、課堂的錄影資料,以及學生的半結構式訪談資料,瞭解國小學生在課程實施後,學生學習成效、學生學習動機,以及教與學互動上的影響。9週課程包含4週的海洋教育知識學習及5週的製作數位說故事,透過設計式研究法,不間斷地再設計、實施與評鑑,描述出課程在外來種、陸蟹、海龜、鯊魚和製作數位說故事五階段,可能面對的課程設計及再設計歷程。因此,此次的研究結果可作為未來教學現場實施時的參考。
Abstract
In order to cultivate students to meet the needs of the 21st century in developing the knowledge and skills in marine education, digital storytelling, and scientific imagination, this present study aims to develop ,analyze, design, implement and evaluate the curriculum of digital storytelling in marine science scientific imagination. Data were collected via students’ digital storytelling scientific imagination questionnaire, marine science learning attitudes questionnaire, students’ artifacts, researcher’ observations, video tapes, and students’ interviews to reveal participating students learning achievements, learning attitudes, and teacher-student interactions. Furthermore, through design-based research, nine weeks curricula comprise four weeks knowledge learning of marine education and five weeks marine digital storytelling production with five stages of redesign, implementation, and evaluation of content knowledge regarding alien species, crabs, sea turtles, and sharks. Based on the findings, suggestions are also provided for future practice of the designed curriculum of digital storytelling in marine science scientific imagination.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
論文公開授權書 ii
誌謝 iii
中文摘要 iv
英文摘要 v
目錄 vi
圖次 viii
表次 ix
第一章 緒論
 第一節  研究背景與動機 p.1
 第二節  研究目的 p.5
 第三節  名詞解釋 p.6
 第四節  研究的範圍與限制 p.9
第一章 文獻探討
 第二節  數位說故事 p.10
 第二節  科學想像力 p.18
 第三節  海洋教育 p.24
第三章 研究方法
 第一節  研究方法 p.30
 第二節  研究流程 p.32
 第三節  研究背景資料 p.38
 第四節  研究工具 p.40
 第五節  資料的處理與分析 p.46
 第六節  教學活動的設計 p.50
第四章 研究結果與討論
 第一節  海洋教育數位說故事科學想像力課程方案的實施歷程 p.56
 第二節  參與學生學習成效、學習動機,以及教與學的互動,在海洋教
      育數位說故事科學想像力課程的影響為何 p.68
 第三節  五階段的課程實施其可能面對的課程設計及再設計歷程 p.86
第五章 結論與建議
 第一節  結論 p.103
 第二節  建議 p.106
參考文獻 p.108
附錄
 附錄一  家長同意書 p.117
 附錄二  施測問卷 p.119
 附錄三  第一階段教案(陸蟹) p.123
 附錄四  第二階段教案(陸蟹) p.130
 附錄五  第三階段教案(海龜) p.134
 附錄六  第四階段教案(鯊魚) p.140
 附錄七  第五階段教案(製作數位說故事) p.150
 附錄八  四象限學習單 p.156
 附錄九  複習陸蟹學習單 p.157
 附錄十  海龜的問題式學習單 p.158
 附錄十一  海龜的四格漫畫學習 p.160
 附錄十二  複習海龜學習單 p.164
 附錄十三  鯊魚的問題式學習單 p.165
 附錄十四  故事圖設計 p.168
參考文獻 References
一、中文文獻
戴昌鳳(2003)。台灣的海洋。臺北縣:遠足文化。
行政院經濟建設委員會(2004)。臺灣21世紀議程國家永續發展願景與策略綱
領。臺北:行政院經濟建設委員會。
葉俊榮(2005)。轉型與發展:台灣21世紀議程-國家永續發展願景與策略綱領。
研考雙月刊,29(5),6-18。
王大修(2006)。基隆市海洋教育課程的架構與主題設計實施經驗。海洋文化學
刊,2,201-226。
鍾生官(2006)。數位說故事在統整藝術教育之應用。國際藝術教育學刊,4(1),
33-63。
陳穎全(2007)。數位說故事教學理論應用於數位學習之探討-以國民小學自然與
活科技領域為例。私立長榮大學資訊管理學系碩士論文,未出版,臺南市。
張雅芳、朱鎮宇、徐加玲(2007)。國小教師資訊科技融入教學現況之研究。教
育資料與童書館學,44:4(Summer 2007),413-434。
教育部(2008)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要重大議題(海洋教育)。台北:教
育部。
吳靖國(2008)。海洋通識課程之內涵:知識取向的探討。通識教育學刊,2,67-84。
黃勝融(2008)。數位故事創作在國小高年級課程上的應用與個案研究-以鄉土教
學為例。國立嘉義大學教育科技研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義市。
蘇漢哲(2008)。部落格卷宗在教師專業發展的應用。國立臺灣師範大學資訊教
育所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
黃蕙君(2009)。創意數位說故事教學之成效。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
劉中薇(2010)。說故事了沒?:打動人心、實現夢想的關鍵能力。臺北市:圓
神。
藍玉如(2011)。設計式研究方法在數位學習研究的應用。載於宋曜廷(主編),
數位學習研究方法(239-269頁)。台北市:高等教育。
周祝瑛(2011)。台灣海洋教育之回顧與展望。海洋事務與政策評論,創刊號,
43-64。
鄭麗齡(2011)。運用數位說故事提升國小高年級學童語文表達能力之行動研
究。國立臺北教育大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
教育部(2012)。未來想像與創意人才培育計畫。台北:教育部。
吳靖國(2012)。當前臺灣海洋教育的關鍵問題。台灣教育評論月刊,1(12),
68-69。
教育部(2013)。教育部人才培育書。台北:教育部。
柯宏達(2013)。數位說故事運用於國小五年級社會領域教學之行動研究-以iPad
載具為例。國立交通大學理學院科技與數位學習學程碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
賴阿福(2014)。資訊科技融入創新教學之教學策略與模式。國教新知,61(4),
28-45。
梁朝雲、許育齡、林威聖(2014)。探究想像力內涵暨評測量表研發。測驗學刊,
61(1),27-50。
許育齡、梁朝雲、許盛貴(2014)。探討內在動機與自我效能為中介預測科學想
像力的學習模式。科學教育學刊,22(4),389-412。
張正杰、李宜頻、羅綸新(2014)。國小學童海洋科學素養與迷思概念之研究。
科學教育研究與發展季刊,68,25-48。
莊雪華(2015)。海洋教育數位說故事教學模式:想像力、合作學習、科學學習
態度之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(編號:MOST 104-2511-S-110-008-MY2),未出版。
王佳琪(2015)。科學想像力學習進程之驗證。國立中山大學教育研究所博士論
文,未出版,高雄市。
王欽哲(2015)。資訊科技融入教學。師友月刊,574,21-25。
郭志富(2015)。海洋科技博物館國小中年級教學膜組織研究-以海洋科學廳為
例。國立臺灣海洋大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
李筱倩 (2015)。以數位說故事活動融入技職五專通識英文課程。遠東通識學報,
9(1),51-70。
李其鴻、柯佳伶、洪偉豪、陳國川(2015)。海洋教育融入鄉土地理實察課程的
行動研究。中等教育,66(1),79-103。
教育部(2016)。2016-2020資訊教育總藍圖。台北:教育部。
紀秋雲、蔡明貴(2016)。資訊科技融入教學策略對國小高年級學童學習成效之
研究。學校行政雙月刊,103,34-60。
吳靖國(2016)。從海洋專業教育問題省思海洋普通教育的發展。台灣教育評論
月刊,5(8),89-93。
陳炯憲(2016)。攝影融入國小在地文化數位說故事課程之行動研究。國立台南
大學數位學習科技碩士論文,未出版,台南市。
鄭貴內(2016)。Scratch Jr程式設計對國小三年級邏輯推理能力影響。國立雲
林科技大學資訊科技服務管理數位學習碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,雲 林縣。
李弘善、劉湘瑤、陳麗淑、葉庭光、葉佳承(2017)。教師參與海洋環境教育專
業發展方案的投入程度:關注階層架構之運用。教育科學研究期刊,62(3),
95-124。
陳玉峯(2017)。外來種入侵步步進逼,「有效」防禦系統何時建立 銀膠菊的遺
憾。生態臺灣,55,43-51。

二、英文文獻
Ashman, G. (2014). The science fiction that doing is best. TES: Times Educational
Supplement, (5111), 40-41.
Auta, H. S., Emenike, C. U., & Emenike, S. H. (2017). Distribution and importance of
microplastics in the marine environment: A review of sources, fate, effects, and potential solutions. Environment International, 102, 165-176.
Barrett, H. (2005). Digital storytelling research design. Retrieved November 18, 2005,
from http://electronicportfolios.com/digistory/ResearchDesign.pdf
Benmayor, R. (2008). Digital Storytelling as a Signature Pedagogy for the New
Humanities, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 7(2), 188-204. doi: 10.1177/1474022208088648
Boubonari, T., Markos, A., & Kevrekidis, T. (2013). Greek Pre-Service Teachers'
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Environmental Behavior Toward Marine Pollution. The Journal of Environmental Education, 44(4), 232-251. doi: 10.1080/00958964.2013.785381
Brooker, R. M., Feeney, W. E., White, J. R., Manassa, R. P., Johansen, J. L., &
Dixson, D. L. (2016). Using insights from animal behaviour and behavioural ecology to inform marine conservation initiatives. Animal Behaviour, 120, 211-221.
Brown, P. (2013). A Mobius strip of scientific imagination - How deep does the
relationship between science fiction and science go? Embo Reports, 14(11), 959-963. doi: 10.1038/embor.2013.154
Burawoy, M. (2014). Sociology as a vocation: Moral commitment and scientific
imagination. Current Sociology, 62(2), 279-284.
Bu-Olayan, A. H., Thomas, & B. V. (2017). Effect of Mercury Transfer from Producer
to Consumer in a Marine Environment. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 26, 6, 2487-2494. doi: 10.15244/pjoes/74016
Callaway, H. G. (2007). Abduction, Pragmatism and the Scientific Imagination. Paper
presented at the Applying Peirce Conference on Finland
Chan, F. T., & Briski, E. (2017). An overview of recent research in marine biological
invasions. Marine Biology, 164(12), 121. doi: 10.1007/s00227-017-3155-4
Clay, T. W., Fox, J. B., Grunbaum, D., & Jumars, P. (2008). How Plankton Swim: An
Interdisciplinary Approach for Using Mathematics & Physics To Understand the Biology of the Natural World. The American Biology Teacher, 70(6), 363-370.
Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design Research: Theoretical and
Methodological Issue. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15-42.
Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of Experience and Narrative
Inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2-14
Couldry, N. (2008). “Digital storytelling, media research and democracy: Conceptual
choices and alternative future”, in K. Lundby (ed.) Digital Storytelling, Mediatized Stories. Self-representations in New Media. New York: Peter Lang , 41-60.
Cowen, T. (2013). Average is Over: Powering America Beyond the Age of the Great
Stagnation. New York, USA: Dutton.
Cudaback, C. (2008). Ocean literacy: there's more to it than content. Oceanography,
21(4), 10-11.
Dahlstrom, M. F. (2014). Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science
with nonexpert audience. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America, 111, 13614-13620. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320645111
Dogan, B., & Robin, B. R. (2009). Educational Uses of Digital Storytelling: Creating
Digital Storytelling Contest for K-12 Students and Teachers. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, 633-638.
Drew, J. (2015). Using Technology to Expand the Classroom in Time, Space, and
Diversity. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 55(5), 926-932. doi: 10.1093/icb/icv044
Duveskog, M., Tedre, M., Sedano, C. I., & Sutinen, E. (2012). Life Planning by
Digital Storytelling in a Primary School in Rural Tanzania. Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 225-237.
Eriksen M, Lebreton L. C. M., Carson H. S., Thiel M., Moore C. J., Borerro, J. C.,
Galgani, F., Ryan, P. G., & Reisser, J. (2014). Plastic Pollution in the World's Oceans: More than 5 Trillion Plastic Pieces Weighing over 250,000 Tons Afloat at Sea. Plos ONE 9 , e111913
Gaertner, M., Wilson, J. R. U., Cadotte, M. W., MacIvor, J. S., Zenni, R. D., &
Richardson, D. M. (2017). Non-native species in urban environments: patterns, processes, impacts and challenges. Biological Invasions, 19(12), 3461-3469. doi: 10.1007/s10530-017-1598-7
Greenfield, P. M. (2009). Technology and Informal Education: What Is Taught, What
Is Learned. Science, 323(5910), 69-71.
Gregori-Signes, C. (2014). Digital storytelling and multimodal literacy in education.
Porta Linguarum, 22, 237-250.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y., & Stefanich, G. (2000). Imagination in Science Education.
Contemporary Education, 71(4), 23.
Heidarieh, M., Maragheh, M. G., Shamami, M. A., Behgar, M., Ziaei, F., & Akbari, Z.
(2013). Evaluate of heavy metal concentration in shrimp (Penaeus semisulcatus) and crab (Portunus pelagicus) with INAA method. SpringerPlus, 2(72). doi : 10.1186/2193-1801-2-72
Ho, H. C., Wang, C. C., & Cheng, Y. Y. (2013). Analysis of the Scientific Imagination
Process. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 68-78. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2013.04.003
Hudson, R. (2015). Similarities between Scientific and Dramatic Prose. Journal of
Chemical Education, 92(5), 781-783. doi:10.1021/ed500091a
ISTE (2016). ISTE Students for Students. Retrieved from
http://www.iste.org/docs/Standards-Resources/iste-standards_students-2016_one-sheet_final.pdf?sfvrsn=0.23432948779836327
Katarzyte, M., Hille, S., & Terlecka, R. (2017). Promoting marine science:
International science camp as a platform. Marine Policy, 84, 76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.07.003
Kate, Y. (2013). Against storytelling of scientific results. Nature Methods, 10(11),
1045. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2699
Kidd, J. (2006). Digital Storytelling at the BBC: the reality of innovative audience
participation. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=3E718A947D02335FCF083357D4496CE8?doi=10.1.1.664.5002&rep=rep1&type=pdf
King, N. (2007). Developing Imagination, Creativity, and Literacy through
Collaborative Storymaking: A Way of Knowing. Harvard Educational Review, 77(2), 204-227.
Kotsopoulos, D., & Cordy, M. (2009). Investigating imagination as a cognitive space
for learning mathematics. Educational Studies In Mathematics, 70(3), 259-274. doi:10.1007/s10649-008-9154-0
Lai, A. F., Lai, H. Y., Chuang, W. H., & Wu, Z. H. (2015). Developing a mobile
learning management system for outdoors nature science activities based on 5e learning cycle. Paper presented at the International Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS) International Conference on e-Learning , Spain.
Landriscina, F. (2017). Computer-Supported Imagination: The Interplay Between
Computer and Mental Simulation in Understanding Scientific Concepts. In Levin, I. & Tsybulsky, D. (Eds.), Digital Tools and Solutions for Inquiry-Based STEM Learning (pp.33-60). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
Lascelles, B. G., Taylor, P. R., Miller, G. R., Dias, M. P., Oppei, S., Torres, L., Hedd,
A., Le Corre, M., Phillips, R. A., Shaffer, S. A., Weimerskirch, H., & Small, C. (2016). Applying global criteria to tracking data to define important areas for marine conservation. Diversity and Distributions, 22(4), 422-431. doi: 10.1111/ddi.12411
Lee, H. C., Ting, K. H., Chang, Y., Lee, M. T., & Liu, W. H. (2016).
Trans-Disciplinary Education for Sustainable Marine and Coastal Management: A Case Study in Taiwan. Sustainability, 8(11), 1096. doi: 10.3390/su8111096
Liang, C., & Chang, C. C. (2014). Predicting scientific imagination from the joint
influences of intrinsic motivation, self-efficacy, agreeableness, and extraversion. Learning & Individual Differences, 31, 36-42. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2013.12.013
Lunn, M., & Noble, A. (2008). Re-visioning science "Love and Passion in the
Scientific Imagination": Art and science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 793-805. doi: 10.1080/09500690701264750
Lu, S. J., & Liu, Y. C. (2015). Integrating augmented reality technology to enhance
children’s learning in marine education. Environmental Education Research,
21(4), 525-541. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2014.911247
Malita, L., & Martin, C. (2010). Digital Storytelling as web passport to success in the
21st Century. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Science, 2(2), 3060-3064.
Moo, J. (2015). Climate Change and the Apocalyptic Imagination: Science, Faith, and
Ecological Responsibility. Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science, 50(4), 937-948. doi:10.1111/zygo.12222
Mun, J., Mun, K., & Kim, S. W. (2015). Exploration of Korean Students' Scientific
Imagination Using the Scientific Imagination Inventory. International Journal of Science Education, 37(13), 2091-2112. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2015.1067380
Nam, C. W. (2017). The effect of digital storytelling on student achievement, social
presence, and attitude in online collaborative learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(3), 412-427.
Ohler, J. (2006). The World of Digital Storytelling. Educational Leadership, 63(4),
44-47.
Osborne, J. (2013). The 21st century challenge for science education: Assessing
scientific reasoning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 265-279. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2013.07.006
Oslund, P. (2014). Eismitte in the Scientific Imagination: Knowledge and Politics at
the Center of Greenland. American Historical Review, 119(5), 1657-1658. doi: 10.1093/ahr/119.5.1657
Ozverir, I., Osam, U. V., & Herrington, J. (2017). Investigating the Effects of
Authentic Activities on Foreign Language Learning: A Design-based Research Approach. Journal Of Educational Technology & Society, 20(4), 261-274.
Pan, Y. J., Kao, J. C., & Yu, T. C. (2016). Design and Implementation of Marine
Information System, and Analysis of Learner's Intention Toward. Eurasia
Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(5), 1221-1229.
doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2016.1508a
Pita, C., Eleftheriou, M., Fernandez-Borras, J., Goncalves, S., Mente, E., Santos, M.
B., Seixas, S., & Pierce, G. J. (2015). Generic skills needs for graduate employment in the aquaculture, fisheries and related sectors in Europe. Aquaculture International, 23(3), 767-786. doi: 10.1007/s10499-014-9843-x
Raymo, C. (1992). Dr. Seuss and Dr. Einstein: Children's books and scientific
imagination. Horn Book Magazine, 68(5), 560-567.
Ren, F. J., Li, X. J., Zhang, H. L., & Wang, L. H. (2012). Progression of Chinese . Students' Creative Imagination from Elementary through High School.
International Journal of Science Education, 34(13), 2043-2059. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.709334
Ribeiro, S. P. M. (2016). Developing intercultural awareness using digital storytelling.
Language and Intercultural Communication, 16(1), 69-82. doi: 10.1080/14708477.2015.1113752
Riccomini, D. R. (2015). Computer Simulation, Rhetoric, and the Scientific
Imagination: How Virtual Evidence Shapes Science in the Making and in the
News, Technical Communication, 62(1), 77-78.
Robin, B. R. (2008). Digital Storytelling: A Powerful Technology Tool for the 21st
Century Classroom, Theory Into Practice. 47(3), 220-228. doi: 10.1080/00405840802153916
Robin, B.R. (2016). The Power of Digital Storytelling to Support Teaching and
Learning, Digital Education Review, 30, 17-29.
Rowlands, S. (2011). Discussion article: Disciplinary boundaries for creativity.
Creative Education, 2(1), 47-55. doi: 10.4236/ce.2011.21007
Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Learning 21st-century skills requires
21st-century teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 8–13
Sadik, A. (2008). Digital storytelling: a meaningful technology-integrated approach
for engaged student learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(4), 487-506. doi: 10.1007/s11423-008-9091-8
Sarukkai, S. (2010). Many Faces: Reimagining the Moon. Leonardo, 43(3), 216-217.
Schlesinger, R. (2016). Shores of Knowledge: New World Discoveries and the
Scientific Imagination. Journal of American History, 102(4), 1165-1166. doi: 10.1093/jahist/jav760
Selig, E. R., Turner, W. R., Troeng, S., Wallance, B. P., Halpern, B. S., Kaschner, K.,
Lascelles, B. G., Carpenter, K. E., & Mittermeier, R. A. (2014). Global Priorities for Marine Biodiversity Conservation. Plos ONE, 9(1), 1-11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082898
Sezen-Barrie, A. (2016). A Cultural-Historical Study of Children Learning
Science: Foregrounding Affective Imagination in Play-Based Setting. Science Education, 100(1), 179-181. doi:10.1002/sce.21200
Siew, N. M. (2017). Fostering Students' Scientific Imagination in STEM through an
Engineering Design Process. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 75(4), 375-393.
Smeda, N., Dakich, E., & Sharda, N. (2014). The effectiveness of digital storytelling
in the classrooms: a comprehensive study. Smart Learning Environments, 1(6), 1-21. doi: 10.1186/s40561-014-0006-3
Susana, M. C., & Macknik, S. L. (2017). Finding the plot in science storytelling in
hopes of enhancing science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America, 114(31), 8127-8129. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1711790114
The Design-Based Research Collective (2003). Design-Based Research: An Emerging
Paradigm for Educational Inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8. doi: 10.3102/0013189X032001005
Tran, L. U., Payne, D. L., & Whitley, L. (2010). Research On Learning And Teaching
Ocean And Aquatic Sciences. NMEA Special Report #3: The Ocean Literacy Campaign, 22-26.
Tsoi, K. H., Chan, S. Y., Lee, Y. C., Ip, B. H. Y., & Cheang, c. C. (2016). Shark
Conservation: An Educational Approach Based on Children’s Knowledge and Perception toward Sharks. Plos ONE, 11(9), e0163406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163406
Vasudevan, L., Schultz, K., & Bateman, J. (2010). Rethinking Composing in a Digital
Age: Authoring Literate Identities Through Multimodal Storytelling. Written Communication, 27(4), 442-468. doi: 10.1177/0741088310378217
Vigneri, R., Malandrino, P., Giani, F., Russo, M., & Vigneri. (2017). Heavy metals in
the volcanic environment and thyroid cancer. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 457, 73-80.
Wang, C. C., Ho, H. C., & Cheng, Y. Y. (2014). Development of the scientific
imagination model: A concept-mapping perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 106-119. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2014.04.001
Wang, C. C., Ho, H. C., & Cheng, Y. Y. (2015). Building a learning progression for
scientific imagination: A measurement approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity,
17, 1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2015.02.001
West, D., & Heath, D. (2011). Theoretical pathways to the future: Globalization, ICT
and social work theory and practice. Journal of Social Work, 11(2), 209-221. doi: 10.1177/1468017310386835
White,I., & Lorenzi, F. (2016). The development of a model of creative space and its
potential for transfer from non-formal to formal education. International Review of Education, 62(6), 771-790. doi: 10.1007/s11159-016-9603-4
Wright, S. L., & Kelly, F. J. (2017). Plastic and Human Health: A Micro Issue?
Environmental Science & Technology, 51(12), 6634-6647. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b00423.
Yang, Y. T. C., & Wu, W. C. H. (2012). Digital storytelling for enhancing student
academic achievement, critical thinking, and learning motivation: A year-long experimental study. Computer & Education, 59(2), 339-352.
Zhang, W., Zhang, S., Wang, J., Wang, Y., Mu, J., Wang, P., Lin, X., & Ma, D. (2017).
Microplastic pollution in the surface waters of the Bohai Sea, China. Environmental Pollution, 231, 541-548. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.058
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code