Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0109112-094918 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0109112-094918
論文名稱
Title
自由、創造性及制度選擇–以美國跨州移民為例
Freedom, Creativity, and Institutional Selection via Migration in the 50 United States of America
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
102
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2011-12-05
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2012-01-09
關鍵字
Keywords
自由度、創造性、制度、群聚經濟、美國跨週移民
creativity, institutions, agglomeration economies, U.S. state migration, freedom
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5868 次,被下載 597
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5868 times, has been downloaded 597 times.
中文摘要
本研究採用量化研究方法分析有關美國跨州移民現狀及其因素。本研究以群聚經濟學與制度因素為基礎,評估每州之創造性與自由度。創造性及制度自由度為自變數,而國稅局2004年至2008年期間跨州移民的實證資料為本研究之依變數。 教育、氣候、人數、距離及殺人罪率之代表變項為本研究之可控變數。

本研究採用SPSS 17.0 軟體之多元線性回歸功能,分析34個模式。所有模式高達顯著的結果,其R2值皆相當高。研究結果顯示創造性與循環移民高達正顯著關係。在自由度方面,經濟自由、個人自由及整體自由皆是極顯著之循環及引力形移民之預測因素。除教育之外,所有之可控變數顯著預測移民流動。另外,本研究也創出新的整體自由變數,稱為FRASERMPFI,在自變數中表現最佳。

本研究之結果牽涉到上班組、企業家及決策單位,欲可以為未來美國之經濟發展及自由推廣之參考資料。
Abstract
This is a quantitative study aimed at analyzing the migration patterns across the fifty United States of America and the determinants thereof. This research is founded upon the theories and study of agglomeration economies and institutional factors to evaluate each state in terms of creativity and freedom. Values for creativity and institutional freedom serve as the independent variables. The dependent variable is actual state to state migration data during the 2004-2008 period from the Internal Revenue Service. Measures for education, climate, population, distance, and crime rates serve as control variables in this study.

All 34 models of this study were analyzed via multivariate linear regression using the SPSS 17.0 software package. All models were highly significant with high coefficients of determination. The results show that creativity is highly significantly and positively correlated with circulatory migration flows. Economic, personal, and overall freedom were very significant predictors of migration in terms of attraction and circulation. Apart from education, all the control variables examined were significant predictors of migration flows. This study also creates a new measure of overall freedom: the FRASERMPFI, which outperformed all other independent variables.

The results of this study have several implications for workers, businesses, and policy makers. It is hoped that the results of this study can serve as a reference for future economic growth and promotion of freedom in the U.S.
目次 Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Thesis Approval Sheet..................................................................................................................i
Acknowledgements .....................................................................................................................ii
摘要 ......................................................................................................................................... iii
Abstract .................................................................................................................................... iv
List of Tables ............................................................................................................................ vii
Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Research Background ........................................................................................................ 1
1.2 Research Motivation .......................................................................................................... 2
1.3 Research Questions............................................................................................................ 3
1.4 Thesis Structure ................................................................................................................. 4
Chapter 2: Literature Review ..................................................................................................... 5
2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 5
2.2 Theories of Migration and its Determinants ....................................................................... 5
2.3 Agglomeration Economies ............................................................................................... 10
2.4 Institutions...................................................................................................................... 15
2.5 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 22
Chapter 3: Hypothesis and Model Development ........................................................................ 23
3.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 23
3.2 Dependent Variables – Individual and Household Migration Data (lnMIGRATE) ............ 23
3.3 Independent Variables – Agglomeration Economies ........................................................ 25
3.3.1 Creativity Index Variables (CREATEA, CREATEB, CREATEDIFF, and CREATEPROD) ............................................................................................................... 25
3.4 Independent Variables – Institutions ................................................................................ 26
3.4.1 Mercatus Economic Freedom Index (MEFIA, MEFIB, MEFIDIFF, and MEFIPROD) ......................................................................................................................................... 26
3.4.2 Mercatus Personal Freedom Index (MPFIA, MPFIB, MPFIDIFF, and MPFIPROD) . 27
3.4.3 Mercatus Overall Freedom Index (MOFIA, MOFIB, MOFIDIFF, and MOFIPROD) . 27
3.4.4 Fraser Economic Freedom Index (FRASERA, FRASERB, FRASERDIFF, and FRASERPROD) ................................................................................................................ 28
3.5 Control Variables ............................................................................................................ 29
3.5.1 Education (EDUA, EDUB, EDUDIFF and EDUPROD) ............................................ 29
vi
3.5.2 Heating Degree Days (HDDDIFF) ............................................................................ 30
3.5.3 Annual Sunny Days (SUNNYDIFF) ......................................................................... 31
3.5.4 Population Product (lnPOPPROD) ............................................................................ 32
3.5.5 Distance (lnDISTANCE) .......................................................................................... 32
3.5.6 State Homicide Rates (MURDERDIFF) .................................................................... 33
3.5.7 MSA Homicide Rates (MSAMRDRDIFF) ................................................................ 33
3.5.8 Dummy Variables – Contiguous States (BORDER) and Shared MSA (SHAREMSA) ......................................................................................................................................... 34
3.6 Note on Terminology Used .............................................................................................. 35
3.7 Model Development ........................................................................................................ 35
Chapter 4: Data Analysis and Results ........................................................................................ 41
4.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 41
4.2 Descriptive Statistics ....................................................................................................... 41
4.3 Attraction Variables ......................................................................................................... 43
4.4 Attraction and Circulation Variables ................................................................................ 47
4.5 Push/Pull Variables ......................................................................................................... 51
4.6 New Index: FRASERMPFI.............................................................................................. 55
4.7 Correlation Matrix of Independent Variables and Summary of Analysis Outcomes .......... 59
4.8 Discussion of Results ....................................................................................................... 62
4.9 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 66
Chapter 5: Discussion, Implications, and Conclusions ............................................................... 67
5.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 67
5.2 Discussion ....................................................................................................................... 67
5.3 Implications ..................................................................................................................... 69
5.4 Limitations and Suggestions for Further Research ............................................................ 70
5.5 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................... 71
Notes ....................................................................................................................................... 73
References ............................................................................................................................... 75
Appendix ................................................................................................................................. 78
參考文獻 References
Andersson, A. E. and Andersson, D. E. (2006). The Economics of Experiences, the Arts and Entertainment. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
Ashby, N. J. (2007). Economic freedom and migration flows between U.S. states. Southern Economic Journal, 73: 677-697.
Ashby, N. J., Karabegovic, A., McMahon, F., Bueno, A., and others (2010). Economic freedom of North America. Fraser Institute.
Borjas, G. J., Bronars, S. G., Trejo, S. J. (1990). Self-selection and internal migration in the United States. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Cebula, R.J. and Alexander, G. M. (2006). Determinants of net interstate migration, 2000-2004. Regional Analysis & Policy, 36(2): 116-123.
Chun-Chung, A. J. and Henderson, V. (2006). How migration restrictions limit agglomeration and productivity in China. Journal of Development Economics, 80: 350-388.
Clark, T. N., Lloyd, R., Wong, K. and Jain, P. (2002). Amenities drive urban growth. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24(5): 493-515.
Dei Ottati, G. (1994). Trust, interlinking transactions and credit in the industrial district. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 18(6): 427-448.
Drucker, P. F. (1968). The Age of Discontinuity: Guidelines to Our Changing Society. Harper and Row, New York.
Eastwood, B. M. (2009). Creative class vs. social capital vs. economic freedom: U.S. economic growth. Applied Research in Economic Development, 6: 14-24.
Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Florida, R., Mellander, C., and Adler, P. (2011). The creative class paradigm. Forthcoming chapter of the book, Handbook of Creative Cities.
Glaeser, E. L. (2000). Cities and ethics: an essay for Jane Jacobs. Journal of Urban Affairs, 22, No. 4: 473-493.
Glaeser, E. L. (2005). Review of Richard Florida‟s „The Rise of the Creative Class’. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35: 593-596.
76
Glaeser, E. L. and Gottlieb, J. D. (2009). The wealth of cities: agglomeration economies and spatial equilibrium in the United States. Journal of Economic Literature, 47, 4: 983-1028.
Greenwood, M. J. 1997. Internal migration in developed countries. In Handbook of Population and Family Economics, ed. Mark R. Rosenzweid and Oded Stark, 647-720.
Amsterdam, New York and Oxford: Elsevier Science, North-Holland.
Hayek, Friedrich A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, Vol. XXXV, No. 4: 519-530.
Herzog, H.W., Jr., A.M. Schlottmann and T.P. Boehm (1993). Migration as spatial job search: a survey of empirical findings. Regional Studies, 27: 327-340.
Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York, NY: Random House.
Jacobs, J. (1969). The Economy of Cities. New York, NY: Random House.
Kuznets, S. and Thomas, D. S. (1957). Introduction, in: E.S. Lee, A.R. Miller, C.P. Brainerd and R.A. Easterlin, eds., Population redistribution and economic growth: United States, 1870-1950, Vol. I, Methodological considerations and reference tables (American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia, PA).
Lee, E. S., (1966). A theory of migration. Demography, 3: 47–57.
Lucas, R. E., (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22: 3-42.
Machlup, F. (1962). The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Machlup, F. (1983). Knowledge: Its Creation, Distribution, and Economic Significance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Makower, H.J., Marschak, J., and Robinson, H. W. (1938). Studies in mobility of labor: a tentative statistical measure. Oxford Economic papers, 1: 83-123.
Makower, H.J., Marschak, J. and Robinson, H. W. (1939). Studies in mobility of labor: analysis for Great Britain, Part 1. Oxford Economic papers, 2: 70-97.
Molley, R., Smith, C. L., and Wozniak, A. (2010). Internal migration in the U.S.: updated facts and recent trends. The Federal Reserve Board of Governors.
Marshall, A. (1890/1920). Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.
Porter, M.E. (1994). The role of location in competition. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 1(1): 35-40.
77
Ravenstein, E.G. (1885). The laws of migration. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 48, No. 1: 167-235
Ravenstein, E.G. (1889). The laws of migration. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 52, No.2: 241-305
Rigby, D. L. and Essletzbichler, J. (2002). Agglomeration economies and productivity differences in U.S. cities. Journal of Economic Geography, 2: 407-432.
Ruger, W. P. and Sorens, J. (2009). Freedom in the 50 states: an index of personal and economic freedom. Mercatus Center, George Mason University.
Saxenian, A. (2006). The New Argonauts. Harvard University Press.
Saxenian, A. and Hsu, J.-Y. (2001). “The Silicon Valley-Hsinchu connection: technical communities and industrial upgrading”. Industrial and Corporate Change, Volume 10, 4: 893-920.
Schmid, A. A. (2004), Conflict and Cooperation: Institutional and Behavioral Economics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Smith, A. (1776/1937). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: Random House, Inc.
Taylor, J.A. (2011). Institutions, Agglomeration Economies, and Interstate Migration in the United States (unpublished Master‟s thesis). National Sun Yat-sen University.
Thünen, J. H. von (1826). Der Isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtshcaft und Nationalokonomie. Hamburg.
Tiebout, C. M. (1956). “A pure theory of local public expenditues”. Journal of Political Economy, 64: 416-24.
Vaubel (2008). Institutional Competition. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Watkins, T. and Yandle, B. (2010). Can freedom and knowledge indexes explain go-getter migration patterns? Working Paper, Mercatus Center, George Mason University.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code