台灣企業面對全球化的趨勢、中國大陸的掘起及台灣加入WTO後，鋼鐵進口關稅調降為零稅率。再加上業者持續投入資金擴充產能，國內鋼品市場因而出現供過於求的情勢。使得台灣鋼鐵產業的經濟環境會變得越來越嚴苛。因此企業需優先作好內部改善以維持企業競爭力。
本研究採邏輯法則，本研究的目的旨在利用企業架構理論以建置架構導向生產設備管理模型，其研究結果可提供平版類鍍塗面鋼鐵產業在生產設備管理上之參考。
本研究首先建立架構導向生產設備管理模型的建置準則，並依此建置準則逐步建立架構導向生產設備管理模型的結構元素、結構元素服務、結構元素與行為合一及行為順序描述。透過此建置準則的反復推演，以達到架構導向生產設備管理模型的最佳化。
本研究從組織、人員、任務、技術、溝通介面及資源整合等六大衡量指標，驗證架構導向生產設備管理模型較非架構導向生產設備管理模型的優勢。

As the globalization trend going on, the Taiwan’s steel import tariff has been reduced to almost nil customs duties after joining in the World Trade Organization. Taken to be a result of continuous investment in enhancing and enlarging output capabilities made by local steel manufacturers, the domestic steel markets are showing a tendency to a surplus status of supply over demand. The steel companies in Taiwan are faced with much stricter economic surrounding. Therefore, it is first priority that any enterprise must do well on internal improvement in order to keep its competitiveness.
This research aims to setup Architecture-Oriented Production Equipment Management Model (AOPEMM). The results will be provided to the coated/galvanized plate steel products as reference of the Production Equipment Management.
In this research, we first set up the roadmap of Architecture-Oriented Production Equipment Management Model. In the roadmap of AOPEMM, structure element diagrams, structure element service diagrams, structure behavior coalescence diagrams, and sequence diagrams are constructed accordingly. Through repeating of this construction, we then achieve an optimization of the AOPEMM.
We compare AOPEMM with Non-Architecture-Oriented Production Equipment Management Model (NAOPEMM) using six measurement indicators, such as organization, personnel, task, technology, communication interface and integration of the resources. Strength of AOPEMM and Weakness of NAOPEMM are validated to support the argument of this research.

第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 研究方法及步驟 3
第四節 研究限制 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 生產設備管理 5
第二節 企業流程 9
一、企業流程 9
二、流程分析工具 13
三、流程導向生產設備管理模型 16
第三節 企業架構 17
一、企業架構(Enterprise Architecture , EA) 17
二、企業架構框架(Enterprise Architecture Framework, EAF) 19
第四節 架構描述語言(ARCHITECTURE　DESCRIPTION LANGUAGE; ADL) 25
第三章 架構導向生產設備管理模型建構 28
第一節 架構導向之生產設備管理模型定義 28
第二節 AOPEMM架構建構金律 31
第三節 AOPEMM建構 33
一、AOPEMM建構金律第一步驟 33
二、AOPEMM建構金律第二步驟 37
三、AOPEMM建構金律第三步驟 39
四、AOPEMM建構金律第四步驟 44
五、APOEMM架構描述 56
六、APOEMM建構金律總結 57
第四章 企業架構 V.S.企業流程生產設備管理 58
一、分析準則 58
第一節 流程導向生產設備管理模型分析 59
第二節 架構導向生產設備管理模型分析 62
一、組織 63
二、人員 64
三、任務 65
四、技術 66
五、溝通介面 67
六、資源整合 68
第三節 架構導向VS流程導向模型比較 69
第五章 結論與建議 70
第一節 研究成果及貢獻 70
第二節 後續研究建議 71
參考文獻 72
中文參考文獻 72
英文參考文獻 72
網頁參考 73

中文參考文獻
1. [高 95]，高福成，『TPM全面生產保養推進實務』，中衛發展中心出版。
2. [中06]，中冠資訊，『企業資產管理系統』，中冠資訊。
3. [鄭00]，鄭達才，『設備維護管理』，中國生產力中心。
4. [林02]，林東清，『企業資訊管理系統』，智勝文化事業有限公司。
5. [方 89]，方至民，『企業競爭優勢』，前程企管。
6. [季郭 84]，季延平、郭鴻志，『系統分析與設計』，華泰書局。
7. [趙, 05]，趙善中、趙鴻、王福田，『架構導向系統分析與設計』，博碩文化。
英文參考文獻
1. [Luke 03]，Luke Hohmann，『Beyond Software Architecture : Creating and Sustaining Winning Solutions』，Addison Wesley.
2. [Bernard 99]，Bernard H. Boar，『Constructing Blueprints For Enterprise IT Architecture』，John Wiley & Sons.
3. [William 98]，William J. Brown, Raphael C. Malveau, Haysw W. Mccormick III, Thomas J. Mowbray, John Wiley & Sons，『AntiPatterns：Refactoring Software , Architecture, and Projects in Crisis』，Robert Ipsen.
4. [Len 98]，Len Bass, Paul Clements, Rick Kazman，『Software Architecture in Practice』，Addisdon-Wesley.
5. [Ivar 99]，Ivar Jacobson, Grady Booch, James Rumbaugh，『The Unified Software Development Process 』，Addisdon-Wesley.
6.[Wernerfelt 84] ，Wernerfelt, B., 『A Resources-based View of the Firm』，Strategic Management Journal，5:171-180.
7. [Port 85] Porter, M. E. & Millar, V. E., “How Information Gives You Competitive Advantage,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 63, No. 4, July-Aug., 1985.
8. [Dave 93] Davenport, T. H. and Short, J. E., Process Innovation-Reengineering Work Through Information Technology, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1993.
9. [Dave90] Davenport, T.H., and Short, J.E. “The New Industrial Engineering: Information Technology and Business Redesign,” Sloan Management Review, Vol. 31, No. 04, Summer 1990.
10. [Bernus 95]Bernus, P. and Nemes, L., “Enterprise Integration-Engineering tools for designing the business processes of enterprise,“ Australia-Taiwan joint workshop on Materials processing technology. June 1995, pp. 151-158.
11. [Clive06]”Enterprise Architecture for integration Rapid Delivery Methods and Technologies”.
12. Hammer, Michael & Champy, James, Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution, New York: Harper Business, 1993.(楊幼蘭譯，牛頓，1994)
13. [Hamm90]Hammer, M. “Reengineering Work: Don’t Automate, Obliterate,” Harvard Business Review, 1990, p.104-112.
14. [Wast 94] Wastell, D. G., White, P., and Kawalek, P., “ A Methodology for Business Process Redesign: Experiences and Issues,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol.3, 1994, No.1, p.23-40.
15. [Naph88] Naphtali, R., “Database Design Fundamentals”, Publication. London: Prentice-Hall, 1988.
16. [Mirja06] Mirja Pulkkinen, R., “Systemic Management of Architectural Decisions in Enterprise Architecture Planning. For Dimensions and Three Abstraction Levels”, Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences - 2006.
網頁參考
1. [Web 1] http://www.opengroup.org/
2. [Web 2] http://www.microsoft.com/
3. [Web 3] http://www.ibm.com/
4. [Web 4] http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~acme/
5. [Web 5] http://www.wfmc.org/
6. [Web 6] http://www.ym.edu.tw/pnl/960907-4.doc