Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0114109-095224 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0114109-095224
論文名稱
Title
經營環境、策略及經營績效間之互動關係:機會與威脅之認定
The Relationships between Business Environment, Strategy, and Performance: An Identification of Opportunities and Threats
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
70
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2009-01-13
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2009-01-14
關鍵字
Keywords
3SLS、工具變數、金控公司、威脅、機會、經營環境、公司策略、經營績效、策略管理
3SLS, Instrumental Variable, Threats, Opportunities, Performance, Financial Holding Company, Strategic management, Environments, Strategy
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5744 次,被下載 2204
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5744 times, has been downloaded 2204 times.
中文摘要
在近年來管理思潮的巨浪下,現今公司經營者除擁有較過去來得豐富的管理知識,也更著重於如何落實所學,以確實提升公司的經營績效,增強公司競爭力。然回顧過去有關公司策略的相關文獻,發現大多環繞在經營績效與公司策略間的關係,卻顯少探討公司策略與經營環境間之關係,也未曾就策略管理教科書中提及的機會(opportunities)及威脅(threats)在實際經營上如何衡量及判斷有進一步的探討,只變成一個模糊的概念,形成學術界與實務界間的一道鴻溝,這些都有待進一步探討與建構。

本文主要研究目的為擴充Ackoff (1970)之模型以描述三者間的互動關係,並以國泰金控為例,以現代計量方法配合三步驟兩方程式組來探討三者間之互動關係,並據此間接衡量出經營環境變化對經營績效之影響-即判定影響經營績效的主要環境因素,並據此衡量環境中所存在的機會與威脅。本文主要結論如下:

1.就兩步驟三方程組而言,調整後股東權益報酬率、調整後營業費用比及Tobin’s Q等三績效變數,與產品多樣化、員工人數及呆帳提存率等三策略變數,及債券投資比例、股票投資比例及不動產投資比例等三策略變數間彼此互相影響。

2.就長期而言,若以永久乘數效果來衡量策略變數對績效變數之影響,則:

(1).多元化獲利來源長期而言會使調整後股東權益報酬率、調整後營業費用比及Tobin’s Q上升,可見公司近年來積極推廣財富管理業務以增加手續費收入以及多元化獲利來源之經營方向雖未能達節省成本之目的,但卻可透過交叉行銷來提升獲利,故提供全方位產品反而有助於績效之提升,且該公司若欲降低某一項業務之獲利於以提升經營績效,則以降低保險業務效果最佳,亦即在多角化能對該公司帶來正面效益之情形下,整頓公司資源並分散於各項業務可迅速提升公司績效。此外,投資人也會對該公司多元化獲利來源之經營策略給予肯定而對股價持較正面之評價,故Tobin’s Q增加。

(2).員工人數增加不會影響所有經營績效,表增加員工人數無助於金融商品之行銷及成本之節省。究其可能的原因有二:其一是員工專業知識不足,則
唯有透過員工教育訓練提升專業知識,以利迅速達到銷售目的與效率,始能強化行銷通路,提升經營績效;其二,科技進步使得網路及電話行銷盛行,降低了對傳統行銷通路之依賴。

(3).提高呆帳提存率會使經營者在承受壓力下經營態度轉趨保守,對於資源的分配,如授信業務等趨於嚴格及謹慎,並致力於成本節省,故投資人也會對該公司股價持較正面之評價,所以Tobin’s Q是增加的。帳提存率增加會使股東權益降低、營業費用比增加及每股淨值成長率下降,表提高呆帳提存率除對當期獲利有相當的影響,因也使得經營者在承受壓力下經營態度轉趨保守,可能因此錯過一些良好的投資機會,反而損及股東權益,致未能達到資本效率化之目的。

(4).債券投資比例上升會使所有經營績效變差,表示債券投資獲利增加之速度趕不上營業費用之增加,可見該公司資產配置之內容及比率仍有進一步改善的空間,否則資本效率性將會受到影響;此外,當債券投資比例增加時,通常是股票市場行情不佳時,故投資人也會對該公司股價持較負面的評價,故Tobin’s Q是下降的。

(5).不動產投資比例增加會使所有經營績效變好,此與一般人認為該公司善長不動產投資之印象一致;此外,當不動產投資比例增加時,通常是股票市場行情不錯時,故投資人也會對該公司股價持較正面之評價,故Tobin’s Q是增加的。

3.若以永久乘數效果來衡量環境變數對績效變數之影響,環境變數工業與服務業每人每月加班工時變動率、機電設備進口值變動率、海關出口值變動率、非農業部門就業人數變動率、失業率下跌或M1B變動率、製造業銷售值變動率上升都會使會計面經營績效變好,而這些環境變數多與一般民眾就業狀況或收入之好壞有關,此也與該公司本業主要獲利來源為個人保單銷售、消費金融業務等之現況相當一致;此外,除失業率下降外,並無其它環境變數可同時使所有績效變數變好,故顯示出公司多重績效指標間之不一致性,且失業率也是所有環境變數中影響所有績效變數最重要的一個,表視該公司經營者必需能儘量掌握失業率之變化,適時擬定因應對策。
Abstract
In recent years, corporate strategy has drawn a lot of attention in the academic an practice. However, there are fewer literatures on how to put these ideas into practice, that is, how to quantify the interrelationships between the three key elements in strategic management-performance, strategies, and environments, and how to judge and measure the opportunities and threats (O & T) when the environments change. This study is an attempt to answer these questions.

The theoretical method developed incorporates a dynamic simultaneous equations model to express the interrelationship between these three elements. The method requires the identification of O & T in a three-step procedure. Step 1 relates the strategic components to the performance measures by the management’s concept of business and philosophy of resource depolyment. Step 2 points out the suitable (unsuitable) environment circumstances for each of the scope and resource deployment elements. In Step 3, we link the results of Step 1 and Step 2 to identify and measure O & T.

The above methodology is applied to the case of Cathy Financial Holding Company, a Taiwan largest listed financial holding company, over the period 2002Q2-2007Q3. We use the Instrument Variables Three Stage Least Square Method (IV-3SLS) to estimate them. In addition, we also use some tests to ascertain the validity of the selected instrument variables in order to obtain the more reliable results. Our empirical results indicate that both the firm strategies and the environments play significant roles in influencing the firm’s performance. More specifically, whereas the diversification of products, and the debt allowance reservation rate are negatively associated with the cost/income ratio and positively associated with adjusted ROE and Tobin’s Q. Additionally, the managers also can increase the investment efficiency by adjusting the content of the asset allocation, especially with regard to the holding of bonds. We also extract some major environment factors such as unemployment rate that affect the firm’s performance and use the estimated results to identify and measure O & T.
目次 Table of Contents
第一章緒論 1
1.1研究動機與目的 1
1.2 研究架構 1
1.3 研究流程 3
第二章 文獻回顧 4
2.1經營環境-策略-績效相關文獻 4
2.1.1環境因素 5
2.1.2 公司策略 6
2.1.3經營績效 8
2.1.4 環境-策略-績效間之互動關係 9
2.2金融控股公司相關文獻 11
2.2.1國外文獻 11
2.2.2國內文獻 12
第三章 實證模型及方法 15
3.1 實證模型 15
3.1.1 模型架構 15
3.1.2模型函數形式 17
3.1.3 乘數效果 18
3.1.4 機會與威脅之判定 19
3.2 實證方法 20
3.2.1一般動差法 21
3.2.2兩階段及三階段最小平方法 25
3.2.3過度認定檢定 25
3.2.4個別工具變數有效性檢定 26
第四章 實證結果 27
4.1樣本公司介紹 27
4.2 變數選取 29
4.2.1.績效變數之選取 29
4.2.2策略變數之認定 30
4.2.3環境變數的認定 32
4.2.4資料來源 35
4.3 單根檢定 36
4.4第一階段工具變數迴歸結果 38
4.5工具變數有效性檢定 40
4.6 估計結果 41
4.7 系統動態穩定性及乘數效果 46
4.8第三步驟乘數效果 50
4.9機會與威脅之判定 51
第五章 結論與建議 54
5.1 結論與建議 54
5.2 未來研究方向 55
參考文獻 57
參考文獻 References
方文寶、李建華,企業績效評估理論與實務,台北:超越企管顧問股份有限公司,民85。
沈中華,金融控股公司的銀行與獨立銀行CAMEL比較:1997-1998,臺灣財務金融季刊, 第3輯第2期, 民90。
沈中華,銀行的異業合併-互補性與文化差異?,貨幣市場,第5卷第3期, 民89。
李德銘,合組金融控股公司對其子公司經營效率影響之研究,朝陽科技大學財務金融系,碩士論文,民94。
吳佩勳、利尚仁及劉忠賢,以資源基礎理論觀點分析通路品牌及競爭策略經營,科技整合管理國際研討會,民93。
吳思華,策略九說─資源說,世界經理文摘,民83。。
林子超, 我國金融控股公司特性與經營績效關係之研究, 政治大學企業管理研究所,碩士論文,民92。
林炳文,台灣地區商業銀行合併效率性之分析:資料包絡分析法之應用,台灣管理學刊,第1卷第2期,民91。
施佑靜, 台灣壽險業動態群組之實證研究-論金改對壽險業者策略與績效之影響, 台灣科技大學企業管理系,碩士論文,民95。
翁順裕, 保險業進入「銀行保險」經營的競爭優勢-資源基礎理論觀點, 保險實務與制度,第5卷第2期, 民95.
陳怡佳,金融控股公司經營績效之探討-財務面因素評估研究,中山大學財務管理學系,碩士論文,民92。
許義松,我國壽險公司經營能力分析-財務比率評價之實證研究,逢甲大學保險學研究所,碩士論文,民87。
張文武、陳蓁儀及林政緯,臺灣地區金融控股公司經營績效:經濟附加價值法,保險專刊,第22卷第2期, 民95。
張嗣聰,以DEA法探討我國金控公司行銷面與財務面經營效率,中正大學企業管理研究所,碩士論文,民93。
郭貞伶,金融控股公司經營績效評估之研究,中山大學財務管理學系,碩士論文,民90。
莊凱倫,金控整合對我國壽險公司經營策略之影響分析,台灣大學財務金融系,碩士論文,民93。
歐陽遠芬、陳碧秀,銀行的購併與經營績效-規模經濟、範疇經濟與效率之分析,台灣銀行季刊,第52卷第3期,民90。

Aaker, D. A. and R. Jacobson. 1987. The Role of Risk in Explaining Differences in Profitability. Academy of Management Journal. 30.
Ackoff, R. L., 1970, A Concept of Corporate Planning, Wiley-Interscience.
Agrawal, A. and C. R. Knoeber. 1996. Firnn Performance and Mechanisms to ControlAgency Problems between Managers and Shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 31.
Allen, L. and J. Jagtiani. 2000. The Risk Effects of Combining Banking, Securities, and Insurance Activities. Journal of Economics and Business. 52.
Aly, H. Y., R. Grabowski, C. Pasurka., and N. Rangan. 1990. Technical, Scale, and Allocative Efficiencies in U.S. Banking: An Empirical Investigation. Review of Economics and Statistics. 72.
Anderson, T. W. and H. Rubin. 1949. Estimation of the Parameters of a Single Equation in a Complete System of Stochastic Equations”. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 20.
Ansoff, I., 1965. Corporate Strategy: An Analytic Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion, McGraw-Hill.
Baum, C., M. E. Schaffer, and S. Stillman, 2003. Instrumental Variables and GMM: Estimation and Testing. Stata Journal, 3.
Berger, A. N., D. B. Humphery, and L. B. Pulley, 1996. Do Consumers Pay for One-stop Banking?Evidence from an Alternative Revenue Function. Journal of Banking and Finance. 20.
Berger, A. N., S. D. Bonime, and D. M. Covitz, D. M., Hancock. 2000.Why are Bank Profits so Persistent?The Roles of Product Market Competition, Information Opacity and Regional Macroeconomic Shocks. Journal of Banking and Finance. 24.
Bower, J. L. 1982. Business Policy in the 1980’s. Academy of Management Journal. 7.
Boyd, J. H. 1993. Bank Holding Company Mergers with Nonbank Financial Firms: Effects on the Risk of Failure. Journal of Banking and Finance. 17.
Braney ,J. 1991. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management. 17.
Breusch T. S., and A. R. Pagan, 1979. A Simple Test for Heteroskedasticity and Random Coefficient Variation. Econometrica, 47.
Breusch, T., H. Qian, P. Schmidt and D. Wyhoswski, 1999. Redundancy of moment conditions. Journal of Econometrics, 91.
Burns, T. and G. M., Stalker. 1961. The Management of Innovation. Tavistock.
Chang, S. C. and C. F. Wang, 2007. The Effect of Product Diversification Strategies on the Relationship between International Diversification and Firm Performance. Journal of World Business. 42.
Chatterjee, S. and J. Singh. 1999. Are Tradeoffs Inherent in Diversification Moves?A Simultaneous Model for Type of Diversification and Mode of Expansion Decisions. Management Science. 45.
Cook, R.D., and S. Weisberg, 1983. Diagnostics for Heteroscedasticity in Regression. Biometrika, 70.
Cool, K., and D. Schendel, 1987. Strategic Group Formation and Performance; U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry, 1963-1982. Management Science, 33.
Cooper, E. W. 2008. Monitoring and Governance of Private Banks. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, forthcoming.
Cragg, J. G., and S. G. Donald, 1993. Testing Identifiability and Sppecification in Instrumental Variables Models. Econometric Theory, 9.
Cumby, R.E., and J. Huizinga, 1992. Testing the Autocorrelation Structure of Disturbances in Ordinary Least Squares and Instrumental Variables Regressions. Econometrica, 60.
Davidson, R., and J. G.. Mackinnon, 2004. Econometric Theory and Methods, Oxford University Press.
Dess, G., and G. Bread, 1984. Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments. Administrative Science Quartely, 29.
Elliot, G., T. R , and J. H. Stock, 1996. Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root. Econometrica, 64.
Eppink, D. J., 1981. Future Research: Is It Used?. Long Range Planning, 14.
Fahey, L., W. R. King, and V. K. Narayana, 1981. Environmental Scanning and Forecasting in Strategic Planning – The State of the Art. Long Range Planning, 14.
Ferguson, W. L., and D. L., Deephone, 2000. Do Strategic Groups Differ in Reputation ?. Strategic Management Journal, 21.
Fiegenbaum, A., and H. Thomas, 1993. Industry and Strategic Group Dynamics: Competitive Strategy in the Insurance Industry, 1970-1984. Journal of Management Studies, 30.
Fiegenbaum, A., and H. Thomas, 1990. Strategic Groups and Performance: the U.S Insurance Industry, 1970-1984. Strategic Management Journal, 11.
Fisher, F. M., and J. J. McGowon, 1983. On the Misuse of Accounting Rate of Return to Infer Monopoly Profit. American Economic Review, 73.
Geringer, J. M., S. Tallman, and D. M. Olsen. 2000. Product and International Diversification among Japanese Multinational Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 21.
Ginsberg, A. 1988. Measuring and Modelling Changes in Strategy:Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Directions. Strategic Management Journal, 9.
Goddard, J., P. Molyneux, J. Wilson, and M. Tavakoli. 2004a. Dynamic of Growth and Profitability in Banking. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking . 36.
Goddard, J., P. Molyneux, J. Wilson, and M. Tavakoli. 2004b. The Profitability of European Banks: A Cross-sectional and Dynamic Panel Analysis. Manchester School. 72.
Goddard, J., P. Molyneux, J. Wilson, and M. Tavakoli. 2007, European Banking:A Overview. Journal of Banking and Finance, 31.
Godfrey, L. G., 1978. Testing for Multiplicative Heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 8.
Granger, C. W. J. and P. Newbold. 1974. Spurious Regression in Econonmetrics. Journal of Econometrics. 2
Grant, R., A. P. Jammine, and H. Thomas. 1988. Diversity, Diversification, and Profitability among British Manufacturing Companies, 1972-84. Academy of Management Journal. 31.
Greenley., G. E., and G. R Foxall, 1997. Multiple Stakeholder Orientation in UK Companies and the Implications for Company Performance. Journal of Management Studies , 34.
Hahn, J., and J. Hausman, 2002. Notes on Bias in Estimators for Simultaneous Equations Models. Economics Letters, 75.
Hall, A. R., 2005. Generalized Method of Moments, Oxford University Press.
Hansen L., J. Heaton, and A. Yaron, 1996. Finite Sample Properties of Some Alternative GMM Estimators. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 14.
Hansen, L., 1982. Large Sample Properties of Generalized Methods of Moments Estimators. Econometrica, 50.
Hart, B. H., 1967. Strategy. Praeger.
Haung, T. H., and M. H. Wang. 2001. Measuring Scale and Scope Economics in Multiproduct Banking: A Stochastic Cost Function Frontier Approach. Applied Economics Letters. 8.
Hayashi F., 2000. Econometrics. Princeton University Press.
Hitt, M. A., R. E. Hoskisson and H. Kim. 1997. International Diversification:Effects on Innovation and Firm Performance in Product-diversified Firm. Academey of Management Journal. 40.
Hofer, C., and D. Schendel, 1978. Strategy Formation: Analytical Conception. West Publishing.
Hoskisson, R.E., M. A. Hitt, R. A. Johnson and D. D. Moesel. 1993. Construct Validity of and Objective(Entropy) Categorical Measure of Diversification Strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 40.
Hopkins W. E., and S. A. Hopkins, 1997. Strategic Planning – Financial Performance Relationships in Banks: A Casual Examination. Strategic Management Journal, 18.
Jacobson, R. 1990. Unobservable Effects and Business Performance. Marketing Science. 9
Jeremy C. S., David J. K. Jr., Timothy, B. P., and G. T. M. Hult, 2007. Firm, Strategic Group, and Industry Influences on Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28.
Keats B. W., and M. A. Hitt, 1988. A Casual Model of Linkages among Environmental Dimensions, Macro Organizational Characteristics, and Performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 31.
Kleibergen, F., and R. Paap, 2006. Generalized Reduced Rank Tests Using the Singular Value Decomposition. Journal of Econometrics, 127.
Kohers, T. and M. H. Haung, and N. Kohers. 2000. Market Perception of Efficiency in Banking Holding Company Mergers. Review of Financial Economics. 9.
Kotha, S., and A. Nail, 1995. Strategy and Environment as Determinants of Performance: Evidence from the Japanese Machine Tool Industry. Strategic Management Journal, 16.
Lo, S. F. and W. M. Lu. 2006. Does Size Matter?Finding the Profitability and Marketability Benchmark of Financial Holding Companies. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research. 23.
Makadok, R. 1999.Interfirm Differences in Scale Economics and the Evollution of Market Shares. Strategic Management Journal, 20.
Mintzberg, H., 1978. Patterns in Strategy Formulation. Management Science, 24.
Nair, A., 2001. Does Group Membership Matter ? Evidence from the Japanese Steel Industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22.
Newy, W. K., and K. D. West, 1987. A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Matrix. Econometrica, 55.
Newy, W. K., and K. D. West, 1994. Automatic Lag Selection in Covariance Matrix Estimation. Review of Economic Statistics, 61.
Newy, W. K., and K. D. West, 1987. Hypothesis Testing with Efficient Method of Moments Estimation. International Economic Review, 28.
Ng, S., and P. Perron, 1995. Unit Root Tests in ARMA Models with Data-dependent Methods for the Selection of the Truncation Lag. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74.
Pagan, A. R., and D. Hall, 1983. Diagnostic Tests as Residual Analpysis. Econometric Reviews, 2.
Palepu, K. 1986. Diversification Strategy, Profit Performance and the Entropy Measure. Strategic Management Journal. 6.
Porter, M. E., 1980. Competitive Strategy:Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. Free Press.
Porter, M. E., 1985. Competitive Strategy:Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance . Free Press.
Prevost, A. K., P. R. Ramesh and H. Mahmud. 2002. Determinants of Board Composition in New Zealand: A Simultaneous Equations Approach. Journal of Empirical Finance. 9.
Rhyne, L.C., 1986. The Relationship of Strategic Planning to Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7.
Robins, J. A. and M. F. Wiersema. 1995. A Resource-based Approach to the Multibusiness Firm: Empirical Analysis of Portfolio Interrelationships and Corporate Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal. 16.
Romanelli, E. and M. L. Tushman, 1986. Inertia, Environments, and Strategic Choices: Aquasi-experimental Design for Competitive-longitudinal Research. Management Science. 32.
Rumelt, R. 1974. Strategy, Structure and Economic Performance. Havard University Press.
Sargan, J., 1997, in J. D. Sargan, ed., Testing for Misspecification after Estimation Using Instrumentapl Variables, In Contribution to Econometricsc.Vol.1, Cambridge University Press.
Schendel, D., and G. R. Patton, 1978. A Simultaneous Equation Model of Corporate Strategy. Management Science, 24.
Shea, J., 1997. Instrumental Relevance in Multivariate Linear Models: A Simple Measure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79.
Snow, C. C., and D. C. Hambrick, 1980. Measuring Organizational Strategies: Some Theoretical and Methodological Problems. The Academy of Management Journal, 5.
Staiger, D., and J. H. Stock, 1997. Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments. Econometrcia, 65.
Stevenson, H.H., M.J. Roberts, and H.I. Grousbeck,. 1985. New Business Ventures and the Entrepreneur. Irwin.
Homewood, IL.
Stiroh, K. J., and A. Rumble, 2006. The Dark Side of Diversification: The Case of US Financial Holding Companies. Journal of Banking and Finance, 30.
Stock J. H., and J. H. Wright, 2000. GMM with Weak Identification. Econometrica, 68.
Stock, J. H., and M. Yogo, 2005. Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression, in D. W. Andrews, and J. H. Stock Eds., In Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg, Cambridge University Press.
Tallman, S. and J. T. Li. 1996. The effects of International Diversity and Product Diversity on the Performance of Multinational Firms. Academy of Management Journal. 39.
Utterback, J. M., 1979. Environmental Analysis and Forecasting , in D. Schendel, and C. Hofer Eds., Strategy Management: A New View of Business Policy and Planning, Little, Brown and Company.
Venkatraman, N. and V. Ramanujam, 1986. Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: a Comparison of Approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 11.
Wiener, N. and T. Mahoney. 1981. A Model of Corporate Performance as a Function of Environmental, Organizational, and Leadership Influences. Academy of Management Journal. 24.
Yu, P. Y. and B. V. Luu. 2003. The Impact of Financial Liberalization on the Taiwanese Banking Industry. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting. 20.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內外都一年後公開 withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code