Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0116106-134042 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0116106-134042
論文名稱
Title
社區行動的菁英參與和社會資本
Elite Participation and Social Capital In Community Action
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
193
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2005-12-17
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2006-01-16
關鍵字
Keywords
社會資本、社會網絡、社區行動、社區菁英
social network, social capital, community elite, community action
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5663 次,被下載 25
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5663 times, has been downloaded 25 times.
中文摘要
摘要
本論文的研究問題是以社會資本論為理論基礎,社區行動作為社會資本論理論命題驗證的產出。研究的目的乃在探討鄉村社區菁英的社會資本以及社會資本在社區行動參與上的應用與影響。在分析的策略上,是以社區角色作為指標,測量鄉村社區菁英在社會資本程度以及社區行動參與程度的差異。
在操作的部分,社會資本是以兩個面向來測量,包括人脈關係、社會網絡以及由認識、信任和支持所形成的社區網絡橋樑者的社會資本。社區行動參與程度的測量則是以社區發展為議題的社區行動為依變項,以社區角色作為自變項,測量鄉村社區菁英在社區行動參與程度的差異。
本研究以高雄都會區邊緣三個鄉村社區—大社鄉、仁武鄉及燕巢鄉為研究區域,共成功施測76個鄉村社區菁英樣本。並且,以社區角色為指標區分鄉村社區菁英為鄉公所主管、地方民選首長、中小學校長、社會團體負責人及社區發展協會理事長五類進行比較分析。
本論文的研究發現主要可以分成四個部分:第一、鄉村社區菁英在社會網絡的社會資本這個面向的測量結果顯示因社區角色的不同而有所差異,以地方民選首長表現最佳;第二、不同社區角色的鄉村社區菁英在參與社區行動的程度有部分差異,但整體社區行動參與狀況則無顯著差異;第三、社會網絡是一種社會資本的形式,但是要成為社會資本的形式必須要有行動的配合讓社會網絡成為一個可流動的資源。並且,運用社會網絡作為社會資本影響社區行動,則會因社區角色的不同而有所差異;第四、鄉村社區菁英對社區橋樑者的社區菁英的認識、信任與支持會影響鄉村社區菁英社區行動的參與,亦即社區橋樑者所具備的社會資本會影響鄉村社區菁英社區行動參與的程度。




關鍵字:社會資本 社區角色 社會網絡 社區行動 社區菁英
Abstract
Abstract
This study is based on social capital theory and we made used of the concept of community action as the output of the proposition of social capital theory. The purposes of the study are to discuss rural community elites’ social capital and the application of social capital theory in the participation of community action. In the strategies of analysis, we used community role as an indicator to measure the level of social capital and the participation of community action, and then present the differentiation of rural community elites.
In practice operation, social capital could be measuring with two dimensions, including social tie, social network and the social capital of the bridge role (cognitions, trust, and support). The measurement of the participation of community action is based on the concept of community development. And we made use of the indicator—community role to measure the differentiation of rural community elites participation in community action.
This study was conducted in three rural communities in the edge of Kaohsiung Metropolitan—Tashe town, Jenwu town, and Yenchao town.76 valid samples were surveyed .We also made use of the community role as an indicator to separate the rural community elites into five categories, as a comparison and analysis. And this includes: the township office administrators, the local representative, primary school principles, the leaders of social groups, and the directors of community development association.
There are four main findings in this study: First, the results to experiment shows that there are some differentiations between the community role of rural community elites in the concepts of social network and the social capital, especially it expressed significantly on the local representative.
Second, there are some differentiations when the rural community elites take part in different extent of their community action. But there is no differentiation between the participation of the whole community action.
Third, social network is a form of social capital. However, in order to become a form of social capital must work with actions. It causes resources mobility in social network. Also, there will be some differentiations between the community roles if it makes use of social network as social capital by affecting community action.
The final one, as the cognitions, trust, and support to the bridge roles of the community by rural community elites, causes their participation of community action. In other words, the social capital owned by the bridge roles affects the degree of rural community elites’ participation of community action.
Keyword: social capital, community elite, social network, community action
目次 Table of Contents
社區行動的菁英參與和社會資本
目錄
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3

第二章 文獻回顧與理論探討 5
第一節 社區的概念 5
第二節 社區行動理論 12
第三節 社區菁英的概念 18
第四節 社會網絡理論 21
第五節 社會資本理論 28
第六節 其他相關理論的探討 37

第三章 研究架構與方法 44
第一節 研究架構 44
第二節 研究策略 45
第三節 研究問卷設計 47
第四節 調查研究過程 51

第四章 鄉村社區菁英社會資本與社區行動
參與現況分析 61
第一節 鄉村社區菁英基本背景資料 61
第二節 社區角色與基本背景資料 65
第三節 鄉村社區菁英之人脈關係與社會網絡的分析 81
第四節 鄉村社區菁英的人脈關係與社區行動之相關分析 84
第五節 鄉村社區菁英的社會網絡與社區行動參與程度
之相關分析 97
第六節 鄉村社區菁英對社區橋樑者的認識、信任和支
持程度之比較 94
第七節 橋樑者的社會資本與社區行動之相關 99
第八節 鄉村社區菁英之社區行動參與程度的相關分析 101
第九節 鄉村社區菁英的社區行動參與程度及項目的比較108

第五章 鄉村社區菁英在社區行動中社會資本之建構 116
第一節 鄉村社區菁英與社區組織的人脈關係之綜合分析 116
第二節 社會網絡作為社會資本與社區行動的相關 119
第三節 社會資本模型建構之分析 125

第六章 結論與建議 128

參考文獻 133
參考文獻 References
參考文獻

一、中文書籍
Coleman J. S. 鄧方譯(1999),社會理論的基礎,北京:社科文獻。
Fukuyama F. 李宛蓉譯 (2004),信任,台北:立緒。
李宗派(2003),現代社會工作:一門助人之專業,台北市:合記。
周業謙 周光淦(1998),社會學辭典,台北:貓頭鷹。
陳介玄(1994),協力網絡與生活結構:台灣中小企業的社會經濟分析,台北:聯經。
蔡明哲(1987),社會發展理論—人性與鄉村發展取向,國立編譯館主編,台北:巨流圖書公司。
蔡宏進(1989),鄉村社會學,台北:三民書局。
楊懋春(1983),人文區位學,台北:三民書局。
楊素迷(1993),大社工業區與大社鄉的互動關係,中山大學中山學術研究所碩士論文。
詹秀員(2002),社區權力結構與社區發展功能,台北:洪葉出版社。
熊瑞梅(1999),「團體與組織」,社會學與台灣社會,台北:巨流。


二、中文期刊論文
林瑞欽(1995),「社區意識凝聚之道」,社會福利,(118),9-17。
林鶴玲 鄭陸霖(2001),「台灣社會運動網路經驗:一個探索性的分析」,台灣社會學刊,(25),111-156。
李宗勳(2002),「社會資本與社區安全之初探,中國行政評論」,11(3),1-44。
李宗勳(2003),「全球化」、「社會資本」下的政府再造-兼論海峽兩岸政府職能之轉換,國政研究報告092-211號。
陳東升 陳端容(2002),「跨族群政治討論網絡的形成」,台灣社會學,(4),119-157。
周玉(2003),「影響內部社會網絡資源的因素分析」,中共福建省委黨校學報,(11),34-38。
陳欣欣(2005),領袖角色與社會資本累積關係之比較研究-以高雄市三個社區為案例,國立中山大學中山學術研究所博士論文。
黃明月等人(2003),台北市社區發展協會現況調查研究,台北市政府社會局委託研究計劃。
黃毅志(2002),「林南的社會資本(Social Capital)理論對於台灣教育社會學研究之啟發」,台灣教育社會學研究,2(2),153-163。
蘇麗瓊 田基武(2004),「新故鄉營造計劃與社區營造條例草案」,社區發展季刊,(107),5-15。
藍佩嘉(2000),「人際網絡與經濟活動的辯證:傳銷商的網絡建構、行動意義與權力關係」,台灣社會學研究,(4),1-50。
邊燕杰(2003),「評林南的社會資本(Social Capital):社會結構與行動的理論」,台灣社會學,(5),257-261。
盧禹璁(2005),社會資本的整合與分散,中山大學中山學術研究所博士論文。
顧忠華(1999),社會信任、社會資本與非營利組織,非營利組織與社會信任研討會,政治大學。
熊瑞梅 周顏玲(2002),求職方法、社會網絡和就業:中國和台灣製造業男女員工的比較,第一屆華人社會的比較研究學術研討會,東海社會學系。
熊瑞梅,邱瑜瑾(1995),「都市政治精英的社會資源與社會圈」,台灣社會學研究的回顧與前瞻論文集,台中:東海大學社會系。




三、英文書目

Adler, P. S. & Kwon, Seok-woo (2000). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27:17-40.

Autar S. Dhesi (2000). Social Capital and Community Development. Community Development Journal, 35(3), 199-214.

Bridges, William P. & Wayne J. Villemez. (1986). Informal Hiring and Income in the Labor Market. American Sociological Review 51: 574-582.

Bourdieu, Pierre (1986). The Forms of Capital. 241-258 in Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, John G. Richardson, (ed.). New York: Greenwood Press.

Bourdieu, Pierre (1992). Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

Bridger J. and Luloff, A.E. (1999). Toward and Interactional Approach to Sustainable Community Development. Journal of Rural Studies, 15:377-387.

Briggs, Xavier de Souza. (1997). “Social Capital and the Cities: Advice to Change Agents.” National Civic Review, 86(2), 111-118.

Burt, Ronald (1987). Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence. American Journal of Sociology 92.

Burt, Ronald S. (2001). Structural Holes versus Network Closure as Social Capital. 31-56 in Social Capital: Theory and Research, Nan Lin , Karen Cook, and Ronald Burt, eds. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

Claude, L., J. Bridger and A.E. Luloff. (2000). Community Well-Being and Local Activeness. 39-45 in Schaeffer and Loveridge (eds.), Small Town and Rural Economic Development: A Case Studies Approach. Westport, CT: Praeger.

Christenson, James A. and Jerry W. Robinson, Jr. (1989). Community Development in Perspective. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.

Coleman, James S. (1988). Social Capital and the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94: 95-119.

Coleman, James S., Elihu Katz, and Herbert Menzel. (1957). The Diffusion of Innovation Among Physicians. Sociomerty, 20:253-70.

Coleman, James S. (1994). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: The Belknop Press of Harvard University Press.

Cook K. S. (2001). Trust in Society. Russell Safe Foundation: New York.

Cutrona, C. E., &Russel, D. W. (1990). Type of social support, and specific stress: Toward a theory of optimal matching. In B. R. Sarason, I. G. Sarason, & G. R. Pierce. (Eds.), Social support: An interactional view, 319-366. New York: John Wiley&Sons.

Dhesi A. S. (2000). Social capital and community development. Community Development Journal, 35(3), 199-214.

Edward O. Laumann (1966). Prestige and Association in Urban Community. The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc. New York.

Fukuyama, Francis. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Properity. New York: The Free Press.

Fukuyama, Francis. (1999). The GreatDisruption: Human Nature and the Reconstitution of Social Order. New York: Touchstone.

Kaufman, H. (1959). An interaction approach to community development. in Focus on Community, edited by F. Fear and H. Schwarzweller. Greenwich, CT: JAP Press.

Giarchi G. G. (2001). Caught in the net: A critical examination of the use of the concept of ‘network’ in community development studies Community Development Journal 36(1), 63-71.

Goldsworthy J. (2002). Resurrecting a model of integrating individual work with community development and social action. Community Development Journal, 37(4), 327-337.

Hall, Peter A. (1999). Social Capital in Britain. British Journal of Political Science, 29, 417-461.

Harvard Downs. Anthony (1957). An Economic Theory Of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

Hurlbert J. S., J. J. Beggs, and Haines V.A. (1991). Social Networks and Social Capital in Extreme Environment. Social Capital: Theory and Research. Nan Lin K. Cook R. S. Burt et al., New York: Aldine De Gruyte.

Hunter F. (1995). Community Power Structure. The University of North Carolina Press.

Joseph A. Connor (2003). Community support organizations: Enabling citizen democracy to sustain comprehensive community impact. National Civic Review, 92(2), 113-129.

Koch M. (2002). Requirements for community support systems-modularization, integration and ubiquitous user interfaces. Behavior & Information Technology, 21(5), 327-332.

Granovetter M. (1973). The Strength Of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology 78. Nan Lin, J. C. Vaughn, and W. M. Ensel (1981) .Social Resources and Occupational Status Attainment. American Sociological Review , 46(4), 393-405.

Mark Granovetter and Richard Swedberg (1992). Economic Action, Social Structure, and Embeddedness. The Sociology of Economic Life. Westview Press.

Mubangizi B. C. (2003). Drawing on social capital for community economic develoment: Insight from a South African rural community. Community Development Journal, 38(2), 140-150.

Nancy S. Huber (1998). Leading From Within Developing Personal Direction. Krieger Publishing Company. Malabar, Florida.

Lin, Nan (2000). Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. UK: Cambridge Uni. Press.

Lin, Nan, Cook, K. Burt, R. S.(2001). Building a Network Theory of Social Capital, Social Capital: Theory and Research., UK: Cambridge Uni. Press.

Lin, Nan (2001). Building a Network Theory of Social Capital. 3-29. In Social Capital: Theory and Research, Lin, Nan , Karen Cook, and Ronald Burt, eds. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

Paxton, Pamela. (1999). Is Social Capital Declining in the United States? A Multiple
Indicator Assessment. American Journal of Sociology 105 (1):88-127.

Portes, A. (2000). Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology. edited by Lesser E. L., Knowledge and Social Capital:Foundations and Applications, Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann Publications.

Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Roch (1997). Institutional Arrangements and the Creation of Social Capital: The Effects of Public School Choice. American Political Science Review , 91(1), 82-93.

Roger V. Gould (1989). Power and Social Structure in Community Elites. Social Force, 68(2), 531-552.

Ronald S. Burt (1992). Structural Holes versus Network Closure as Social Capital. Social Capital: Theory and Research. Nan Lin K.Cook R.S.Burt et al.

Rose, Richard. (1998). Getting Things Done in an Anti-Modern Society: Social Capital Networks in Russia. Social Capital Initiative Working Paper, 6, 1-23. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.

Sandefur,R. L. ,Laumann E.O. (1998). A Paradigm for Social Capital Rational&Society, 10(4), 481-501.

Sharp, J. S. (2001). Locating the Community Field: A Study of Interorganizational Network Structure and Capacity for Community Action. Rural Sociology, 66 (3):403-424.

Smith, David Horton. (1994). Determinants of Voluntary Association Participation and Volunteering: A Literature Review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 23:243-263.

Sugiyama, L. S. and Sugiyama, M. S. (2003). Social Role, Prestige, and Health Risk-Social Niche Specialization as a Risk-Buffering Strategy. Human Nature, 14(2), 165-190.

Susan Letvak, (2002). The Importance of Social Support for Rural Mental Health. Issue in Mental Health Nursing, 23, 249-261.

Wegener, Bernd.(1991). Job Mobility and Social Ties: Social Resources, Prior Job, and Status Attainment. American Sociological Review, 56, 60-71.

Wellman, Barry and Kenneth Frank. (2001). Network Capital in a Multilevel World: Getting Support from Personal Communities. 233-276 in Social Capital: Theory and Research, Nan Lin, Karen Cook, and Ronald Burt, eds. New York: Aldine de Gruyter

Wilkinson, K.P. (1970). Phases and Roles in Community Action. Rural Sociology 35, 54-68.

Worsley P. (1987). New Introductory Sociology, London: Penguin.

Zekari, Andrew A. (1999). Community-ness of a Major Economic Development Effort in a Biracial Community of Alabama. Journal of Rural Studies 15 (2):159-169.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內一年後公開,校外永不公開 campus withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.83.32.226
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.83.32.226
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code