在如今及未來可見劇烈變動的商業環境中，不論是何種產業或單位，在資訊科技的決策上都需扮演更積極的角色以期從中獲益，要如何有效的運用資訊科技，則有賴良好的資訊科技治理機制。
本研究主要針對資訊科技治理成熟度、資訊科技治理決策方式、策略校準、組織績效四者進行實證性的研究，以確立這些構面間的相互關係。本研究依據過往文獻中所主張之構面關係，以實證的方式驗證資訊科技治理成熟度、資訊科技治理決策方式、策略校準、組織績效四者間之關係，以作為未來企業實施資訊科技治理之依據。
透過實證資料的蒐集與研究假說的統計驗證分析，本研究驗證了資訊科技治理成熟度與策略校準及組織績效的正向關係、資訊科技治理決策方式（集中化程度）與策略校準的正向關係、資訊科技治理決策方式（專業化程度）對於策略校準及組織績效的影響、策略校準的中介效用等重要議題。
本研究的實證結果在目前資訊科技治理實證研究缺乏的情況下，將能提供未來相關學術研究堅實的研究基礎。在實務貢獻方面，本研究之結論可供未來欲實施資訊科技治理之企業作為參考，落實良好的資訊科技治理並進而提升組織績效。

In modern dynamic business environment, every enterprise needs to emphasize more on IT in order to increase the benefit. The well-performed IT governance is the key to effectively apply IT resource.
This research focus on the following dimension: IT governance maturity, IT Governance Archetype, Strategic alignment and Organization performance. Accoridng to the literature, an empirical research was performed to examine the relation among these four dimensions.
Through the empirical research, this research verify the significant positive relation among IT governance maturity, strategic alignment and organization performance. Also among IT governance Archetype (the level of centralized) and strategic alignment.
As for IT governance Archetype (the level of professionalize), there is significant positive relation between IT governance Archetype (the level of professionalize) and stragic alignment and significant negative relation between IT governance Archetype (the level of professionalize) and organization performance.

第一章　緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機 3
第三節 研究問題與目的 4
第二章　文獻探討 5
第一節 資訊科技治理（IT governance） 5
第二節 資訊科技治理成熟度（IT Governance Maturity） 15
第三節 資訊科技治理決策方式（IT Governance Archetype） 20
第四節 策略校準（Strategic alignment） 28
第三章　研究架構與方法 36
第一節 研究架構 36
第二節 研究假說 40
第三節 操作性定義及測量工具 41
第四節 資料蒐集與分析方法 49
第四章　資料分析與討論 52
第一節 樣本基本資料描述 52
第二節 信效度分析 59
第三節 研究模型驗證 66
第四節 研究假說檢定 70
第五章　結論與建議 71
第一節 研究結論 71
第二節 研究貢獻 73
第三節 研究限制 75
第四節 未來研究方向 76
參考文獻 77
附錄－研究問卷 82

1.Ask, U., Bjornsson, H., Johansson, M., Magnusson, J., & Nilsson, A. (Eds.). (2007).
2.Avison, D., Jones, J., Powell, P., & Wilson, D. (2004). Using and validating the strategic alignment model (Vol. 13, pp. 223-246): Elsevier.
3.Banker, R. D., Chang, H., & Pizzini, M. J. (2004). The balanced scorecard: Judgmental effects of performance measures linked to strategy (Vol. 79, pp. 1-23): JSTOR.
4.Bodnar, G. H. (2003). IT governance (Vol. 18, pp. 27-32): WARREN GORHAM & LAMONT INC.
5.Bourdariat, J. (2001). Corporate Governance and ICT: a Marriage of Reason (Vol. 6, pp. 23-26): INFORMATION SYSTEMS AUDIT AND CONTROL ASSOCIATION.
6.Broadbent, M. (Ed.) (2002).
7.Broadbent, M. (2003). The right combination.
8.Brown, C. V., & Magill, S. L. (1994). Alignment of the IS Functions with the Enterprise: Toward a Model of Antecedents (Vol. 18, pp. 371-403): The Society for Information Management and The Management Information Systems Research Center of the University of Minnesota.
9.Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L. M., & Yang, S. (Eds.). (1998). Association for Information Systems.
10.Chan, Y. E., Huff, S. L., Barclay, D. W., & Copeland, D. G. (1997). usiness Strategic Orientation, Information Systems Strategic Orientation (Vol. 8, pp. 125).
11.Chan, Y. E., & Reich, B. H. (2007). IT alignment: what have we learned? (Vol. 22, pp. 297-315): Nature Publishing Group.
12.Chan, Y. E., Sabherwal, R., & Thatcher, J. B. (2006). Antecedents and Outcomes of Strategic IS Alignment: An Empirical Investigation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(1), 27-47.
13. Choi, F. D. S. (1992). Mueller. 1992. What is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Application? (Vol. 78, pp. 98-104).
14. Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella Jr, A. A. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data (Vol. 28, pp. 371-382): JSTOR.
15. De Haes, S., & Van Grembergen, W. (2004). IT Governance and its Mechanisms (Vol. 1, pp. 27-33): INFORMATION SYSTEMS AUDIT AND CONTROL ASSOCIATION.
16. De Haes, S., & Van Grembergen, W. (2009). An exploratory study into IT governance implementations and its impact on business/IT alignment (Vol. 26, pp. 123-137): Taylor & Francis.
17. Delaney, J. T., & Huselid, M. A. (1996). The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance (pp. 949-969): JSTOR.
18. Dhillon, G. (Ed.) (2000). Published by the IEEE Computer Society.
19. Duffy, J. (2002). IT Governance and business value part 2: Who’s responsible for what (Vol. 27807).
20. Dyer, L., & Reeves, T. (1995). Human resource strategies and firm performance: what do we know and where do we need to go? (Vol. 6, pp. 656-670): Routledge.
21. Fiedler, F. E. (1996). Research on leadership selection and training: One view of the future (Vol. 41): Cornell University, Johnson Graduate School.
22. Gellings, C. (Ed.) (2007).
23. Grady, M. W. (1991). Performance measurement: implementing strategy (Vol. 72, pp. 49-53).
24. Guldentops, E. (2004). Governing Information Technology through COBIT? (pp. 269-309).
25. Heier, H., & Borgman, H. P. (2007). Examining the relationship between IT governance software and business value of IT: evidence from four case studies: IEEE Computer Society.
26. Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, N. (1992). Strategic alignment: a
model for organizational transformation through information technology (pp. 97-117): NewYork: Oxford University Press.
27. Hoffman, J. J., Cullen, J. B., Carter, N. M., & Hofacker, C. F. (1992). Alternative methods for measuring organization fit: technology, structure, and performance (Vol. 18, pp. 45): South Manage Assoc.
28. Hoque, Z., & James, W. (2000). Linking balanced scorecard measures to size and market factors: impact on organizational performance (Vol. 12, pp. 1-18).
29. Hussin, H., King, M., & Cragg, P. (2002). IT alignment in small firms (Vol. 11, pp. 108-127): Palgrave Macmillan.
30. ITGI, I. T. (2001). Governance Institute (Vol. 2).
31. Kaplan, R. S., & David, P. (1992). Norton (1992), he Balanced Scorecard easures That Drive Performance.? (pp. 71-79).
32. Kearns, G. S., & Lederer, A. L. (2003). A resource-based view of strategic IT alignment: How knowledge sharing creates competitive advantage (Vol. 34, pp. 1-29): John Wiley & Sons.
33. Khaiata, M., & Zualkernan, I. A. (2009). A Simple Instrument to Measure IT-Business Alignment Maturity (Vol. 26, pp. 138-152): Taylor & Francis.
34. Korac-Kakabadse, N., & Kakabadse, A. (2001). IS/IT governance: Need for an integrated model (Vol. 1, pp. 9-11): Emerald, 60/62 Toller Lane, Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD 8 9 BY, UK.
35. Lin, W. T., & Shao, B. (2006). The business value of information technology and inputs substitution: the productivity paradox revisited (Vol. 42, pp. 493-507): Elsevier.
36. Luftman, J., & Brier, T. (1999). Achieving and sustaining business-IT alignment (Vol. 42, pp. 109-122): UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA.
37. Luftman, J., & Kempaiah, R. (2008). Key issues for IT executives 2007 (Vol. 7, pp. 99-112).
38. Luftman, J., Kempaiah, R., & Nash, E. (2006). Key issues for IT executives 2005 (Vol. 5, pp. 81-99).
39. Luftman, J. N., Bullen, C. V., Liao, D., Nash, E., & Neumann, C. (2004).
Managing the information technology resource: Pearson Education.
40. Millett, S. M. (1990). The strategic management of technological R&D: an ideal process for the 1990s (Vol. 5, pp. 153-163): Inderscience Publishers.
41. Peterson, R. (2004). Crafting information technology governance (Vol. 32, pp. 1-24): Taylor & Francis.
42. Peterson, R. R. (2003). Integration strategies and tactics for information technology governance (pp. 37-80).
43. Ross, J. W., & Weill, P. (2002). Six IT decisions your IT people shouldn't make (Vol. 80, pp. 84-95).
44. Salle, M. (2004). IT Service Management and IT Governance: review, comparative analysis and their impact on utility computing.
45. Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R. W. (1999). Arrangements for information technology governance: a theory of multiple contingencies (pp. 261-290): JSTOR.
46. Schwarz, A., & Hirschheim, R. (2003). An extended platform logic perspective of IT governance: managing perceptions and activities of IT (Vol. 12, pp. 129-166): Elsevier.
47. Shpilberg, D., Berez, S., Puryear, R., & Shah, S. (2007). Avoiding the alignment trap in information technology (Vol. 49, pp. 51-58).
48. Solano, J., De Ovalles, M. P., Rojas, T., Padua, A. G., & Morales, L. M. (2003). Integration of systemic quality and the balanced scorecard (Vol. 20, pp. 66-81): Taylor & Francis.
49. Tallon, P. P., & Kraemer, K. L. (2002). Investigating the relationship between strategic alignment and IT business value: the discovery of a paradox: IGI Global.
50. Tallon, P. P., Kraemer, K. L., & Gurbaxani, V. (2000). Executives' perceptions of the business value of information technology: a process-oriented approach (Vol. 16, pp. 173): ME Sharpe, Inc.
51. Tan, F. B., & Gallupe, R. B. (2006). Aligning business and information systems thinking: a cognitive approach (Vol. 53, pp. 223-237).
52. Van Der Zee, J. T. M., & De Jong, B. (1999). Alignment is not enough:
integrating business and information technology management with the balanced business scorecard (pp. 137-156): JSTOR.
53. Van Grembergen, W., De Haes, S., & Guldentops, E. (2003). Structures, processes and relational mechanisms for IT governance (pp. 14-36).
54. Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches (Vol. 11, pp. 801-814): JSTOR.
55. Webb, P., Pollard, C., & Ridley, G. (Eds.). (2006).
56. Weill, P. (2004). Don't just lead, govern: How top-performing firms govern IT (Vol. 3, pp. 1-17).
57. Weill, P., & Broadbent, M. (1998). Leveraging the new infrastructure: how market leaders capitalize on information technology: Harvard Business Press.
58. Willson, P., & Pollard, C. (2009). Exploring IT governance in theory and practice in a large multi-national organisation in Australia (Vol. 26, pp. 98-109): Taylor & Francis.
59. Yeniyurt, S. (2003). A literature review and integrative performance measurement framework for multinational companies (Vol. 134, pp. 142).