論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
在台印尼學生的生涯選擇之研究 A Study on Career Choice of Indonesian Students in Taiwan |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
123 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2012-01-17 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2012-01-19 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
印尼學生、生涯選擇、台灣 Indonesian Student, Career Choice, Taiwan |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 5778 次,被下載 794 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5778 times, has been downloaded 794 times. |
中文摘要 |
如今,印尼經濟的迅速增強,預計將維持到隨後的十年。同時,國家仍然是在管理和專業人才的缺乏。本研究的主要內容是探討出國留學的目的,並分析影響因素,例如在台灣的印尼學生的生涯選擇。這項研究是預計能了解印尼學生的未來方向(樣本數115) 。 這項研究是由使用的調查方法。最初是用描述性統計,參考了各問項的頻率分佈。研究結果發現了很多工作印尼學生的職業選擇和影響因素。 |
Abstract |
Nowadays, the swift augmentation of Indonesia’s economy is projected to maintain well into the subsequently decade. Simultaneously, the nation is still experiencing a lack in managerial and professional personnel. The gist of this study was to investigate the purpose of study abroad and to analyze the factors that affect to the career choice of Indonesian students in Taiwan as example. This research was expected to know the directions of the Indonesian students (samples= 115 Indonesian students; population= 615 Indonesian students in Taiwan) in the future. The research was done by using the survey method. Initially the descriptive statistics was used and frequency distributions for questions were established. The result of this research was satisfied the purpose of study when it found out many factors and conditions of working had influenced on career choice of Indonesian students. |
目次 Table of Contents |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABSTRACT LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF TABLES v CHAPTER 1 1 1.1 Background Research 1 1.1.1 An overview of Indonesia 1 1.1.2 Indonesian students’ expectation on studying abroad 2 1.2 Research Motivation 3 1.3 Research Purpose 4 1.4 Significance of the Study 5 CHAPTER 2 – Literature Review 6 2.1 Career choice 6 2.1.1 Definition of career 6 2.1.2 Definition of career choice 6 2.1.3 Motivation of career choice 7 2.2 Factors Influenced on Career Choice 9 2.2.1 Individual preference influence: Purpose of study abroad 9 2.2.1.1 Learning foreign languages 9 2.2.1.2 Higher education 9 2.2.1.3 Seeking employability: learn to work 10 2.2.2 Job related factors’ influence 10 2.2.2.1 Company background and management 11 2.2.2.2 Location 12 2.2.2.3 Working terms and conditions 13 2.2.2.4 Perception to the government policy 15 CHAPTER 3: Method 16 3.1 Description of Methodology 16 3.2 Sampling 16 3.2.1 Procedure 16 3.2.2 Participants 17 3.2.3 Questionnaire design 17 3.2.3.1 Language 18 3.3 Data Collection 19 3.3.1 Instrumentation 19 3.3.2 Distribution 19 3.4 Data Analysis 20 3.4.1 Measurement 20 3.4.2 Method for statistical analysis 20 3.4.3 Demographic 21 CHAPTER 4: Results 23 4.1 Descriptive Statistics 23 4.1.1 Indonesian students’ purpose of studying abroad 23 4.1.2 Personal preferences for career development 24 4.1.3 Company background and management 24 4.1.4 Location 25 4.1.5 Working terms and conditions 27 4.1.6 Perception to the Indonesia government policy 28 4.2 Demographic vs. Purpose of study abroad 29 4.2.1 Demographic vs. To learn Chinese 30 4.2.2 Demographic vs. To gain higher degree 32 4.2.3 Demographic vs. To earn better quality education 33 4.2.4 Demographic vs. To acquire internationally recognized certificate 34 4.2.5 Demographic vs. Lower cost than other countries 35 4.2.6 Demographic vs. To gain independence and maturity 36 4.2.7 Demographic vs. To develop yourself by increasing self-confidence 37 4.2.8 Demographic vs. To expand your worldview 38 4.2.9 Demographic vs. To make friends around the world 39 4.2.10 Demographic vs.To enhance employment opportunities 40 4.2.11 Demographic vs. To advance your career 41 4.2.12 Demographic vs. To earn higher salary 42 4.3 Demographic vs. Personal preferences for career development 43 4.3.1 Demographic vs. To pursue advanced degree 44 4.3.2 Demographic vs. To find a job that do not relate to professional majors 45 4.3.3 Demographic vs. To find a job that relates to professional majors 46 4.3.4 Demographic vs. To start your own business 47 4.3.5 Demographic vs. To continue parents’ business 48 4.4 Demographic vs. Company Background and Management 49 4.4.1 Demographic vs. Size of company 50 4.4.2 Demographic vs. Number of employees 51 4.4.3 Demographic vs. Total capital 52 4.4.4 Demographic vs. Reputation of company 53 4.4.5 Demographic vs. Company business industry 54 4.4.6 Demographic vs. Products and services 55 4.4.7 Demographic vs. Local company for domestic market only 56 4.4.8 Demographic vs. Globalize local company 57 4.4.9 Demographic vs. International company 58 4.4.10 Demographic vs. Company policy and administration 59 4.4.11 Demographic vs. Company’s value and culture 60 4.5 Demographic vs. Location 61 4.5.1 Demographic vs. In Taiwan, Indonesia or Other countries 62 4.5.2 Demographic vs. Highly densely inhabitants 64 4.5.3 Demographic vs. Fewer inhabitants 65 4.5.4 Demographic vs. Transportation support 66 4.5.5 Demographic vs. Providing entertainment place 67 4.5.6 Demographic vs. Safety place (lower criminal rate) 68 4.6 Demographic vs. Working Terms and Conditions 69 4.6.1 Demographic vs. Being paid and Notice pay 70 4.6.2 Demographic vs. Performance related pay 72 4.6.3 Demographic vs. Contracts of employment 73 4.6.4 Demographic vs. Job title 74 4.6.5 Demographic vs. Job description 75 4.6.6 Demographic vs. Job requirements 76 4.6.7 Demographic vs. Job value 77 4.6.8 Demographic vs. Promotions 78 4.6.9 Demographic vs. Changes to employment conditions 79 4.6.10 Demographic vs. Relocation of work 80 4.6.11 Demographic vs. Working time limit 81 4.6.12 Demographic vs. Flexible time 82 4.6.13 Demographic vs. Rest breaks 83 4.6.14 Demographic vs. Overtime 84 4.6.15 Demographic vs. Annual leave and holidays 85 4.6.16 Demographic vs. Time off for sickness 86 4.6.17 Demographic vs. Time to get new training 87 4.7 Demographic vs. Perception to the Indonesia Government Policy 88 4.7.1 Demographic vs. The disability of law 89 4.7.2 Demographic vs. No equal protection of the laws 90 4.7.3 Demographic vs. The invisible discrimination 91 CHAPTER 5: Conclusion and Suggestions 92 5.1 Conclusion 92 5.2 Research Limitations 96 5.3 Suggestions 97 REFERENCES 98 APPENDICES 103 Appendix A: Questionnaire Survey (English Version) 105 Appendix B: Questionnaire Survey (Indonesian Version) 109 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Age Range 21 Figure 2: Other Country 26 LIST OF TABLES Table 3-1: Basic data structure 22 Table 4-1-1: Indonesian students’ purpose of studying abroad 23 Table 4-1-2: Personal preferences for career development 24 Table 4-1-3: Company background and management 25 Table 4-1-4: Location 25 Table 4-1-5: Working terms and conditions 27 Table 4-1-6: Perception to the Indonesia government policy 28 Table 4-2-1 Demographic vs. To learn Chinese 31 Table 4-2-2 Demographic vs. To gain higher degree 32 Table 4-2-3 Demographic vs. To earn better quality education 33 Table 4-2-4 Demographic vs. To acquire internationally recognized certificate 34 Table 4-2-5 Demographic vs. Lower cost than other countries 35 Table 4-2-6 Demographic vs. To gain independence and maturity 36 Table 4-2-7 Demographic vs. To develop yourself by increasing self-confidence 37 Table 4-2-8 Demographic vs. To expand your worldview 38 Table 4-2-9 Demographic vs. To make friends around the world 39 Table 4-2-10 Demographic vs.To enhance employment opportunities 40 Table 4-2-11 Demographic vs. To advance your career 41 Table 4-2-12 Demographic vs. To earn higher salary 42 Table 4-3-1: Demographic vs. To pursue advanced degree 44 Table 4-3-2: Demographic vs. To find a job that do not relate to professional majors 45 Table 4-3-3: Demographic vs. To find a job that relates to professional majors 46 Table 4-3-4: Demographic vs. To start your own business 47 Table 4-3-5: Demographic vs. To continue parents’ business 48 Table 4-4-1: Demographic vs. Size of company 50 Table 4-4-2: Demographic vs. Number of employees 51 Table 4-4-3: Demographic vs. Total capital 52 Table 4-4-4: Demographic vs. Reputation of company 53 Table 4-4-5: Demographic vs. Company business industry 54 Table 4-4-6: Demographic vs. Products & services 55 Table 4-4-7: Demographic vs. Local Company for domestic market only 56 Table 4-4-8: Demographic vs. Globalize local company 57 Table 4-4-9: Demographic vs. International Company 58 Table 4-4-10: Demographic vs. Company policy and administration 59 Table 4-4-11: Demographic vs. Company’s value and culture 60 Table 4-5-1-1: Demographic vs. In Taiwan 62 Table 4-5-1-2: Demographic vs. In Indonesia 63 Table 4-5-1-3: Demographic vs. Other Countries 63 Table 4-5-2: Demographic vs. Highly densely inhabitants 64 Table 4-5-3: Demographic vs. Fewer inhabitants 65 Table 4-5-4: Demographic vs. Transportation support 66 Table 4-5-5: Demographic vs. Providing entertainment place 67 Table 4-5-6: Demographic vs. Safety place (lower criminal rate) 68 Table 4-6-1-1: Demographic vs. Being paid 71 Table 4-6-1-2: Demographic vs. Notice pay 71 Table 4-6-2: Demographic vs. Performance related pay 72 Table 4-6-3: Demographic vs. Contracts of employment 73 Table 4-6-4: Demographic vs. Job title 74 Table 4-6-5: Demographic vs. Job description 75 Table 4-6-6: Demographic vs. Job requirements 76 Table 4-6-7: Demographic vs. Job value 77 Table 4-6-8: Demographic vs. Promotions 78 Table 4-6-9: Demographic vs. Changes to employment conditions 79 Table 4-6-10: Demographic vs. Relocation of work 80 Table 4-6-11: Demographic vs. Working time limit 81 Table 4-6-12: Demographic vs. Flexible time 82 Table 4-6-13: Demographic vs. Rest breaks 83 Table 4-6-14: Demographic vs. Overtime 84 Table 4-6-15: Demographic vs. Annual leave and holidays 85 Table 4-6-16: Demographic vs. Time off for sickness 86 Table 4-6-17: Demographic vs. Time to get new training 87 Table 4-7-1: Demographic vs. The disability of law 89 Table 4-7-2: Demographic vs. No equal protection of the laws 90 Table 4-7-3: Demographic vs. The invisible discrimination 91 |
參考文獻 References |
Arthur, N. 2004. Show off your international experience, paper presented at the National Consultation on Career Development (NATCON), Ottawa, January Ashforth, B., & Mael, F. 1989. Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, vol. 14: 20-39. Bank Indonesia, 2008. 2008 Economic report on Indonesia. ISSN 0522-2572. Borchert, M, 2002. Career choice factors of high school students. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Wisconsin-Stout, Menomonie. Brown, P., Hesketh, A., & William, S. 2003. Employability in a knowledge-driven economy. Journal of Education and Work, 16(2): 107-126. Burr, R., & Cordery, J. L. 2001. Self-management efficacy as a mediator of the relation between job design and employee motivation. Human performance 14(1): 27-44 Carbery, R., & Garavan, T. 2005. Organizational restructuring and downsizing: Issues related to learning, training, and employability of survivors. Journal of European Industrial and Training, 29(6): 488-508. Care, N. S. 1984. Career choice. Ethics, 94(2): 282-302. Coupland, C. 2002. Career definition and denial: A disclosure analysis of graduate trainees accounts of career. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64 (3): 515-532. Dick, T. P., & Rallis, S. F. 1991. Factors and influences on high school students' career choices. Research in Mathematics Education, 22(4): 281-292. Dlabay, L. R., & Slocum, J. W. Jr. 1989. How to pack your career parachute, Addison- Wesley, 1989. Douglas, E. J., & Dean, A. S. 2002. Self-employment as a career choice: Attitudes, entrepreneurial intentions, and utility maximization. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(3): 81-90. Drucker, P. F. 2002. Knowledge work. Executive excellence, 19(10): 12. England, G. W. 1967. Organizational goals and expected behavior of American managers. Academy of Management Journal, vol. 10: 107-117. England, G. W. 1975. The manager and his values: An international perspective from the United States. Japan. India and Australia. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger. Enz, C. 1988. The role of value congruity in intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 33: 284-304. Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. 1990. What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, vol. 33: 233-258. Fonseca, R., Garcia, L., Paloma, Pissarides, & Christopher A., 2001. Entrepreneurship, start-up costs and employment. European Economic Review, Elsevier, 45(4-6): 692-705. Forslid, R., & Ottaviano, G. I. P. 2003. An analytically solvable core-periphery model. Journal of Economic Geography, vol. 3: 229-240. Gatewood, R. D., Gowan, M. A., & Lautenschlager, G. J. 1993. Corporate image, recruitment image, and initial job choice decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36(2): 414-427. Gianakos, I. 1999. Pattern of career choice and career decision making self-efficacy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 54: 244-258. Hall, D. T. 2002, Careers in and out of organization. Sage Publication, Inc. Harrison, C. 1989. Career development in the workplace. Retrieved from ERIC. No. ED 308-399: 11. Hanson, C. 1977. Career development responsibilities of managers. Personnel Journal, 56(9): 443-465. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Synderman, B. B. 1993. The motivation to work, 45-119. Hillage, J., & Pollard, E. 1998. Employability: Developing a framework for policy analysis. Department for Education and Employment: London. Holland, J. L. 1996. Exploring careers with a typology. American Psychologist, vol. 51: 397-406. Jacoby, S. 1999. Are career jobs headed for extinction? California Management Review, 42(1): 123-45. Jordaan, J. 1963. Exploratory behavior: The formation of self and occupational concepts, 42-78. Judge, T. A., & Bretz, R. D. 1992. The effect of work value on job choice decision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77: 261-271. Leana, C. R. 2002. The changing organizational context of careers. In D. C. Feldman (Ed.), Work careers: A developmental perspective: 274–293. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Locke, E. A. 1976. The nature and consequences of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 1297-1349. Chicago: Chicago: Rand-McNally. London, M, Schreibman, A, Hausser, M, Larkum, ME and Segev, I. 2002. The information efficacy of a synapse. Nat. Neurosci, 5(4):332-340. Martin, J., & Siehl, C. 1983. Organizational culture and counterculture: An uneasy symbiosis. Organizational Dynamics, 12(1): 52-64. McLeish, A. 2002. Employability skills for Australian small and medium sized enterprises. Department of Education, Science and Training: Canberra. Nworah, F. N. 1997. An analysis of factors that influence career choice among secondary school students in Onitsha educational zone. M.Ed Project (Unpublished) Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Awka. Onoyase, D., & Onoyase, A. 2009. The relationship between personality types and career choice of secondary school students in federal government colleges in Nigeria. Anthropologist, 11(2): 109-115. Peng, A. 1996. The impact of career education course on beliefs and career decision making among Business College students in Taiwan. Dissertation Abstract International, 58(8): 33405 – A. Pham, J. 2009. A study on career choice of Vietnamese students in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Sun Yat-sen University: Taiwan. Ranis, Gustav and Stewart, F. 1999. The Asian crisis and human development. IDS Bulletin, 30(1): 109-119. Rea, L. M., & Parker, R. A. 1992. Design and conducting survey research. Jossey-Bass Publishers. Roger, H., & Martyn, R. 2000. Who wants to be an entrepreneur? Young adult attitude to entrepreneurship as a career. Career development, 279-287. Rynes, S. L. 1991. Recruitment, job choice, and post-hire consequences: A call for new research directions. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, vol. 2 (2nd ed.): 399-444. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists. Sanders, J., & de Grip, A. 2004. Training, tasks flexibility and the employability of low- skilled workers. International Journal of Manpower, 25(1): 73-89. Schein, E. G. 1978. Career dynamics: Matching individual and organizational needs. Addison-Wesley and Reading, Mass. Schein, E. 1985. Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Shipp, E. 1999. Factors influencing the career choices of African American collegians: Implications for minority teacher recruitment. The Journal of Negro Education, 68(3): 343-351. Sims, R. R. 1983. ‘Kolb's experiential learning theory: A framework for assessing person-job interaction. The Academy of Management Review, 8(3): 501-508. Stacey, A. J. 1963. Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, vol. 67: 422-436. Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. 1991. Motivation and work behavior, 574-579. Sullivan, S. E. 1999. The changing nature of careers: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 25(3): 457-484. Super, D. E. 1988. Vocational adjustment: Implementing a self concept. Career Development Quarterly, vol. 36: 351-357. Soeharto, 2002. Human development and the urban informal sector in Bandung, Indonesia: The poverty issue. New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies, 115-133. Spence, J. T. 1985. Achievement American style: The rewards and costs of individualism. American Psychologist, vol. 40: 1285-1295. Steers, R. M., & Porter L. W. 1991. Motivation and work behavior, 5th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme), 1990. Human Development Report, New York: Oxford: Oxford University Press. Vroom, V. H. 1964. Work and motivation. New York: Wiley Vroom, V. H. 1995. Work and motivation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Weiner, Y. 1988. Forms of value systems: A focus on organizational effectiveness and cultural change and maintenance. Academy of Management Review, vol. 13: 534- 545. Website Bureau of International Cultural and Educational Relations R.O.C (國際文化教育專業處). From: http://www.edu.tw/BICER/news.aspx?news_sn=3087&pages=5&site_content_sn =6202 CIA The World Factbook, 2009. From: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/id.html Deloitte & Touche, 2007, Generation Y. From: http://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom- Ireland/Local%20Assets/Documents/ie_M_generation_y_pr_0807_draft2.pdf Higgins, C. 2010. Factors that affect career choice. From: (eHow contributor): http://www.ehow.com/list_6751002_factors-effect-career-choices.html J.A.Young, 2006. Choosing a career that matches your personality. From: (Doityourself.com2006): http://www.doityourself.com/stry/choosingacareer Kendra Y. Mims, 2010. Family factors influencing career choices. From: (eHow contributor): http://www.ehow.com/about_6559441_family-factors- influencing-career-choices.html McGrimmon, L. 2008. Career Choices - How to Choose Your Ideal Career. From: (Article/.net):http://www.articleslash.net/Business/Careers- Employment/297367__Career-Choices-How-to-Choose-Your-Ideal-Career.html Ministry of Manpower and Transmigration of the Republic of Indonesia. From: http://www.nakertrans.go.id/? Ministry of National Education (MONE) Republic of Indonesia. From: http://www.kemdiknas.go.id/ Rose, J. 2007. Increasing career motivation. From: (Suite 101®.com): http://www.suite101.com/blog/joni188/increasing_career_motivation The McNamara-O'Hara Service Contract Act (SCA). From: http://www.dol.gov/compliance/laws/comp-sca.htm The World Bank. From: http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/EASTASIAPACI FICEXT/INDONESIAEXTN/0,,menuPK:224605~pagePK:141159~piPK:141110 ~theSitePK:226309,00.html United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). From: http://hdr.undp.org/en/ |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |