Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0121103-144423 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0121103-144423
論文名稱
Title
國小五年級學童性別、出生序、家庭結構、情緒、創意個人特質與其科技創造力之關係
The Relationships between Gender, Birth Order, Family Structure, Emotion, Creative Personalities and Technological Creativity of Fifth Graders
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
136
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2002-12-19
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2003-01-21
關鍵字
Keywords
個人特質、情緒、出生序、性別、家庭結構、科技創造力
gender, birth order, technological creativity, family structure, creative personalities, emorion
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5759 次,被下載 5983
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5759 times, has been downloaded 5983 times.
中文摘要
本研究旨在探討國小五年級學童在不同情緒狀態下,科技創造力表現是否有所差異,以及探討性別、出生序、家庭結構、創意個人特質與國小五年級學童科技創造力之關係。本研究以高雄市某公立國小五年級三個班級的學童為研究對象,採用準實驗研究法之不等組前後測設計,將學童依班級為單位隨機分派為實驗組一、實驗組二及控制組。實驗組一為正向情緒操弄組,施以正向之情緒導引;實驗組二為負向情緒操弄組,施以負向之情緒導引;控制組為中性情緒組,不施以任何實驗操弄。
本研究工具包括有:「情緒特質量表」、「情緒狀態量表」、「科技創意發展個人因素量表」及「科技創造力測驗」。所得之資料分別採描述統計、多變量變異數分析、多變量共變數分析、典型相關等統計方琺加以分析。
本研究主要發現如下:
一、正向情緒狀態對國小五年級學童在科技創造力表現的幫助大於負向情緒狀態,而負向情緒狀態則大於中性的情緒狀態。
二、正向情緒特質有助於學童在創意產品設計的表現。
三、男女國小五年級學童在整體科技創造力表現有顯著差異。男學童的科技概念組合顯著優於女學童;女學童則在創意產品設計稍優於男學童。
四、出生序與家庭結構對學童的科技創造力表現沒有顯著的效果
五、創意個人特質對學童在創意產品設計的表現有顯著的影響;但是,就整體的科技創造力表現而言,學童受「知識」的影響較創意個人特質深。
六、性別、出生序、家庭結構、情緒特質及創意個人特質有效聯合解釋國小五年級學童的科技創造力表現,其中以性別的解釋力最高。

最後,根據本研究主要發現提出若干意見,以供相關單位人員在教育及學術研究上做為參考。




Abstract
The Relationships between Gender, Birth Order, Family Structure, Emotion, Creative Personalities
and Technological Creativity of Fifth Graders

Pei-jen Chang

Abstract

The main purposes of this study were (a) to investigate the differences of fifth graders’ performances on technological creativity in different induced moods; and (b) to explore the relationships between gender, birth order, family structure, emotional straits, creative personalities and the fifth graders’ performances on technological creativity.
An unequal group pretest-posttest design was employed in this study. The participants consisted of 3 classes of fifth graders, randomly distributed into 3 groups: the experimental group A (n = 42) which received positive mood induction, the experimental group B (n = 33) which received negative mood induction, and the controlled group (n = 38) which didn’t received any treatment.
The employed instruments were The Questionnaire of Emotional Traits, The Questionnaire of Emotional States, The Inventory of Personal Traits to The Development of Technological Creativity, and The Test of Technological Creativity. The applied analysis methods were Descriptives, Multiple Analysis of Variance, Multivariate Analysis of Covariance, and Canonical Correlation.
The findings and conclusions of this study were as follows:
1.Induced positive moods were a better facilitator for the fifth graders’ performance on technological creativity than induced negative moods as well as neutral moods.
2.Positive emotional traits were able to promote the fifth graders’ performance on the invention of creative products.
3.Gender differences in the fifth graders’ technological creative performance were evident. While the boys’ abilities to combine technological concepts were better than the girls’, but their abilities to invent creative products were worse than the girls’.
4.Birth order and family structure had no significant effects on the fifth graders’ technological creative performance.
5.Personal traits had significant effects on the fifth graders’ performance on the invention of creative products. Among all personal traits, “knowledge” had the most significant effect on the fifth graders’ technological creative performance.
6.Gender, birth order, family structure, mood, emotional traits, and creative personalities had significant correlations, and gender had the highest correlation with technological creativity of the fifth graders.

Finally, some suggestions were proposed for teachers, relative educational institutions, parents and further study.



目次 Table of Contents
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究動機……………………………………………1
第二節 研究目的與待答問題………………………………5
第三節 名詞釋意……………………………………………6

第二章 文獻探討
第一節 科技創造力的內涵…………………………………8
第二節 情緒的內涵………………………………………29
第三節 情緒與科技創造力………………………………39
第四節 性別、出生序、家庭與科技創造力……………46
第五節 創意個人特質與科技創造力……………………51
第六節 研究假設……………………………………… 56

第三章 研究方法
第一節 研究架構…………………………………………58
第二節 研究對象…………………………………………59
第三節 研究工具…………………………………………60
第四節 實驗設計…………………………………………64
第五節 實施過程…………………………………………65
第六節 資料分析…………………………………………66
第七節 研究限制…………………………………………67

第四章 研究結果
第一節 初步資料分析……………………………………68
第二節 情緒與科技創造力之關係………………………80
第三節 人口變項與科技創造力之關係…………………84
第四節 創意個人特質與科技創造力之關係……………88
第五節 人口變項、情緒、創意個人特質與科技創造力之關係……………………………………………………… 90


第五章 討論、結論與建議
第一節 討論………………………………………………92
第二節 結論………………………………………………103
第三節 建議………………………………………………105

參考書目
壹、中文部分……………………………………………109
貳、英文部分……………………………………………111

附 錄
附錄一 本研究所有變項之相關矩陣………………… 119
附錄二 情緒量表之編製……………………………… 120
附錄三 情緒特質量表………………………………… 126
附錄四 情緒狀態量表………………………………… 128
附錄五 科技創造力測驗……………………………… 130
附錄六 科技創意發展個人因素量表………………… 136
參考文獻 References
參考書目
壹、中文部分
丁興祥(1998)。當代傑出科技人才創造發展的社會環境:一種傳記資料分析。技術創造力研討會論文集,111-129。台北市,國立政治大學科技管理研究所。
毛連塭(1995)。創造力研究的心理學觀。創造思考教育,7,1-6。
王淑俐(1995)。青少年情緒的問題、研究與對策。台北:合記出版社。
何長珠(1996)。諮商歷程中之改變與認知—情緒之關係。高師輔導所刊,1,51-78。
吳坤銓(1997)。國小認知能力、問題解決能力與創造傾向之相關研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
吳靜吉、高泉豐、丁興祥、葉玉珠、程炳林(1992)。拓弄思語文創造思考測驗(乙式)指導及研究手冊。
吳靜吉、高泉豐、陳甫彥、葉玉珠(1993)。拓弄思語文創造思考測驗(甲式)指導及研究手冊。
李大偉、張玉山(2000)。科技創造力的意涵與教學(上)。生活科技教育,33(9),9-16。
李孟浩(無日期)。第 四 章 大 腦 和 情 緒。2001年12月16日,取自 http://www.socialwork.com.hk/psychtheory/19/Healing_Emotion_chapter04.htm
李雪禎(1996)。青少年的情緒經驗與父母教養方式之分析研究。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
李慧賢(1996)。原住民學生創造力發展及相關因素之研究。國立台灣政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
李震甌(2002)。高低學習成就學童科學問題解決能力之比較研究。屏東師範學院數理教育學系碩士論文,未出版,屏東。
林人龍(2000)。創意與實踐:在行動中思考—有關「生活科技」學習活動設計的想法與釋意。生活科技教育,33(9),17-25。
林君昱(1998)。情緒雙極性的檢驗。輔仁大學應用心理學系碩士論文,未出版,台。
林和逸(1998)。情緒狀態的覺察與引發來源類別對情緒調適的影響。私立輔仁大學應用心理學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
林孟宗(1987)。戈爾登的資優創造教學模式。資優學生創造力與特殊才能。中華民國特殊教育學會編,台北:心理。
林幸台、王木榮(1998)。威廉斯創造力測驗。台北:心理出版社。
林顯輝(1998)。具科學創造力之國小學童人格特質之研究。屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東。
洪文東(1997)。創造性思考與科學創造力的培養。國教天地,123,10-14。
洪振方(1998)。科學創造力的探討。高雄師大學報,9,290-301。
洪榮昭(1998)。試析科技創作力。2001年12月8日,取自http://sctnet.edu.tw/SIG/Download_temp/1009900800/試析科技創作力.doc
洪懿妍(2001)。世界向美走。天下雜誌,24-30。
胡宗光(2001)。國小原住民學生創造力特質及影響其創造力發展環境因素之研究─以阿美族為例。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
胡宗光(2002)。國小原住民學生創造力特質及影響其創造力發展環境因素之研究—以阿美族為例。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
張一蕃、黃登宬(1997)。日本創造力暨科技大學考察報告。科學發展月刊,26(8),948~952。
張玉山(2000)。九年一貫科技課程的訂頒與後續因應。2001年12月8日,取自http://mail.nhltc.edu.tw/~publish/35homepage/13.htm
張玉成(1993)。思考技巧與教學。台北,心理。
張春興(1989)。心理學。台北:東華。
梁家祺(2000)。創造力在科學教育上的意涵。2001年12月8日,取自http://sctnet.edu.tw/SIG/Download_temp/1009900800/創造力在科學教育上的意涵.doc
郭有遹(1983)。創造心理學。台北:正中書局。
郭有遹(1994)。發明心理學。台北:遠流。
郭有遹(2001)。文藝創造心理學。台南:復文。
陳木金(1999)。國民小學教師創造性人格特質與美育教學之關係研究。藝術學報,65,161-170。
陳仙舟、黃俊宏(無日期)。科技創造力教育之初探。2001年12月8日,取自http://sctnet.edu.tw/SIG/Download_temp/1009900800/科技創造力教育之初探.doc
陳石貝(1994)。陳序。載於郭有遹(著)發明心理學。台北:遠流。
陳昭儀(2000)。傑出理化科學家之人格特質及創造歷程之研究。師大學報:科學教育類,45(1),27-45。
陳美岑(2000)。高職實用技能班美髮技術科創造思考教學方案之實施成效。國立台灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
陳曼玲(2002)。師生創造力教部創意出招。2002年1月3日,取自http://www.cdn.com.tw/live/2002/01/03/text/910103e4.htm
陳淑惠(1996)。中小學生創造力發展及其相關因素之研究。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,台北。
陳龍安(1998)。創造思考教學的理論與實際。台北:心理出版社。
陳龍安(2000)。創意思考教學。台北:師大書苑有限公司。
陸祖昆(1988)。創造心理學。台北:五洲出版社。
黃天枝(2000)。高工建築科學生專業創造能力素養及其相關因素之研究。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
黃光國(2001,12月)。科學哲學與學術創造力。發表於國立中山大學政治經濟研究所,高雄。
黃素秋(1998)。國小自然科教學班級氣氛與創造表現之評量研究。國立台南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台南。
楊智先(2000)。教師工作動機、選擇壓力、社會互動與創造力之關係。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,台北。
葉玉珠(2000)。創造力發展的生態系統模式及其應用於科技與資訊領域之內涵分析。教育心理學報,32(1),95-121。
葉玉珠(2002)。國小中高年級學童科技創造力發展與其主要影響生態系統之動態關係。國科會九十年度計畫NSC90-2511-S-110-006。
詹秀美(1980)。影響創造力的環境因素。資優教育季刊,34,15-20。
劉 方(2000)。高中生負向情緒經驗之分析研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東。
劉鶴龍(1996)。資訊電子產業科技人員與非科技人員創造力之研究。國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
鄭昭明(1993)。認知心理學:理論與實踐。台北:桂冠。
謝婉如(2001)。音樂科情意教學與國中生情緒之關係研究。國立台灣師範大學音樂研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
謝榮桂(1998)。高科技研發人員創造力人格評鑑量表與系統之建立—以資訊與半導體業為例。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,中壢。
簡惠燕(2000)。國小學童在科學問題解決過程中創造力與後設認知之相關研究。屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東。


貳、英文部分
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The Social Psychology of Creativity. NY.: Pringer-Verlag.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-67.
Amibile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M., and Turken, U. (1999). A Neuropsychological Theory of Positive Affect and Its Influence on Cognition. Psychological Review, 106(3), 529-550.
Averiall, J. R. (1999). Creativity in the dimain of emotion. In T. Dalgleish, & M. Power (Ed.). Handbook of Cognition and Emotion, Chap.36, 765-781.
Barrett, L. F. & Russell J. A. (1998). Independence and Bipolarity in the Structure of Current Affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 967-984.
Brenner, E. (2000). Mood Induction in Children: Methodological Issues and Clinical Implications. Review of General Psychology, 4(3), 264-283.
Cropley, A. J. (2000). Defining and measuring creativity: Are creativity tests worth using? Roeper Review, 23(2), 72-80.
Csikszenmihalyi, M. (1996/1999). Creativity. 杜明城(譯)。創造力。台北:時報文化。
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Social, culture, and person: a system view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (p.325-339). NY. : Cambridge University Press.
Davis, G.A. (1986). Creativity is forever (2nd ed.). Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt.
Dunlop, F. (1984). The Education of Feeling and Emotion. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Ekman, P. (1999). Basic emotions. In T. Dalgleish, & M. Power (Ed.). Handbook of Cognition and Emotion, Chap. 3.
Estrada, C., Isen, A. M., & Young, M. (1997). Positive Affect Facilitates Integration of Information and Decreases Anchoring in Reasoning among Physicians. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72(1), 117-136.
Eysenck, H. J. (1999). Creativity and personality. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.). Handbook of creativity. NY. : Cambridge University Press.
Feldhusen, J. f., & Goh, B. E. (1995). Assessing and assessing creativity: A integrative review of theory. Creativity Research Journal, 8(3), 231-247.
Feldman, D. H. (1999). The development of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.). Handbook of creativity. NY. : Cambridge University Press.
Gardner, H. (1988). Creative lives and creative works: A synthetic scientific approach. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.),The Nature of creativity (p.298-324). New York: Cambridge University Press.
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 513-524.
Goleman, D. (1995/1999). Emotion Intelligence. 張美惠(譯)。EQ。台北:時報文化。
Göritz, A., Batinic, B., & Moser, K. (1999). Mood Induction via the WWW. December, 9, 2001, Retrieved from http://www2.dgof.de/tband99/pdfs/a_h/goeritz_ae.pdf
Greene, T. R., & Noice, H. (1988). Influence of positive affect upon creative thinking and problem solving in children. Psychological Reports, 63, 895-898.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.
Hershman, J., & Lieb, J. (1988/1998). The key to genius. 王軍(譯)。解讀天才的心靈。台北:桂冠。
Hocevar, D. (1981), Measurement of creativity: Review and critique. Journal of Personality Assessment,45, 450-464.
Huelsman, T. J., & Nemanick, R. C. (1998). Scales to measure four dimensions of dispositional mood: positive energy, tiredness, negative activation, and relaxation. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 58(5), 804-820.
Innamorato, G. (2000). Creativity in the development of scientific giftedness: Educational implication. Roeper review, 21(1), 54-59.
Isen A. M., & Daubman, K. A. (1984). The influence of affect on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1206-1217.
Isen, A. M. (1999). Positive Affect. In T. Dalgleish, & M. Power (Ed.). Handbook of Cognition and Emotion, Chap. 25, 522-539.
Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1122-1131.
Isen, A. M., Johnson, M. M., Mertz, E., & Robinson, G. F. (1985). The influence of positive affect on the unusualness of word associations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 48(6), 1413-1426.
Isen, A. M., Johnson, M. S., Mertz, E., & Robinson, G. F. (1985). The influence of positive affect on the unusualness of word associations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1413-1426.
Izard, C. E. (1992). Basic emotions, relations among emotions, and emotion-cognition relations. Psychological Review, 99(3), 561-565.
Kaugars, A. S., & Russ, S. W. (2000). Emotion in Children’s Play and Creative Problem Solving. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2), 211-219.
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Cognition and motivation in emotion. American Psychologist, 46(4), 352-367.
Lazarus, R., & Folkman, S. (1975). A cognitively oriented psychologist look at feedback. American Psychologist, 30, 553-561.
LeDoux, J. (1996/2000). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. 洪蘭(譯)。腦中有情:奧妙的理性與感性。台北:遠流。
Leff, H. L. (2001). Affect, creative experience, and psychological adjustment. American Journal of Art Therapy, 39(3), 98-99.
Lorr, M. (1989). Models and methods for measurement of moods. In R. Plutchik, & H. Kellerman. (Ed.). Emotion, theory, research, and experience, v. 4: The measurement of emotions. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Chap. 2, p.37-53.
Lubart, T. I. (1999). Creativity cross cultures. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.). Handbook of creativity. NY. : Cambridge University Press.
Lubart, T. I., & Getz, I. (1997). Emotion, metaphor, and the creative process. Creativity research journal,10(4), 285-301.
Mansfield, R. S., & Busse, T. V. (1981). The psychology of creativity and discovery. Chicago: Nelson Hall.
Mayer, J. D., Allen, J. P., & Beauregard, K. (1995). Mood inductions for four specific moods: a procedure employing guided imagery vignettes with music. Journal of mental imagery, 19, 133-150.
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220-232.
Mumford, M. D. & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation.( Psychological Bulletin, 103, 27—43.)
Murray, N., Sujan, H., Hirt, E. R., & Sujan, M. (1999). The Influence of Mood on Categorization: A Cognitive Flexibility Interpretation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(3), 411-425.
O’Quin, K., & Derks, P. (1994). Humor and creativity: A review of the empirical literature. In M. P. Shaw, & M. R. Runco. (Ed.). Creativity and Affect. P.227-256.
Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2000). The Transition from Childhood Giftedness to Adult Creative Productiveness: Psychological... Roeper Review, 23(2), 65-73.
Parrott, W. G., & Hertel, P. (1999). Research Methods in Cognition and Emotion. In T. Dalgleish and M. Power (Ed.). Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. Chichester, Egland: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Piirto, J. (1992). Understand those who create. Dayton: Ohio Psychology Press.
Plutchik, R. (1994). The psychology and biology of emotion. NY.: HarperCollins College Publishers.
Richard, R. (1994). Creativity and bipolar mood swings. In M. P. Shaw, & M. R. Runco. (Ed.). Creativity and Affect. P.44-73.
Richard, R., & Kinney, D. K. (1997). Mood swings and creativity. In M. A. Runco & R. Runco (ed.). Eminent creativity, everyday creativity, and Health Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1990/1997). Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes. 楊中芳(譯)。性格與社會心理測量總覽(上)--情感篇。台北:遠流。
Runco M. A., & Sakamoto, S. O. (1999). Experimental studies of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.). Handbook of creativity. NY. : Cambridge University Press.
Russ, S. W. (1996). Development of Creative Processes in Children. New Directions for Child Development, 72, 31-42.
Russell, J. A., & Carroll, J. M. (1999). On the Bipolarity of Positive and Negative Affect. Psychological Bulletin, 125(1), 3-30.
Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55(1), 151-158.
Slyker, J. P., & McNally, R. J. (1991). Experimental induction of anxious and depressed moods: are Velten and musical procedures necessary? Cognitive therapy and research, 15, 33-45.
Starko, A. J. (1995). Creativity in the classroom. White Plains, NY.: Cambridge University Press.
Stephens, K. R., Karnes, F. A., & Whorton, J. (2001). Gender differences in creativity among American Indian third and fourth grade students. Journal of American Indian Educatio, 40(1), 57-65.
Sternberg, R. J. (1988). A three-fact model of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity. Cambrige : Cambrige University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Identifying and development creative giftedness. Roeper review, 23(2), 60-64.
Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (1999). Handbook of creativity. NY : Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995/2000). Defying the crowd. 洪蘭(譯)。不同凡想。台北:遠流。
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing creativity.
Strongman, K. T. (1987/1993). The psychology of emotion. 游恆山(譯)。情緒心理學。台北:五南。
Tan, J. L. (n.d.).An example of a computer controlled experimental environment: The effects of moods on the performance of a boring task. Nov. 9, 2001, Retrieved from http://www.employees.csbsju.edu/jmakepeace/Perspectives2k/f12tan.JMM.html
Torrance, E. P. (1972). Can we teach children to think creativity? Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 114-143.
Torrance, E. P. (1988). The Natural of Creativity as manifest in its texting. In R. J. Sterberg (Ed.). The Nature of Creativity. (p.125-147). NY.:Cambridge University Press.
Velten, E. (1968). A laboratory task for induction of mood states. Behavior Research and Therapy, 6, 473-482.
Watson, D. (1988). Intraindividual and Interindividual Analyses of Positive and Negative Affect: Their Relation to Health Complaints, Perceived Stress, and Daily Activities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1020-1030.
Young, C. A. (1996). Emotions and emotional intelligence. November, 29, 2001, Retrieved from http://trochim.human.cornell.edu/gallery/young/emotion.htm#emotions
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內立即公開,校外一年後公開 off campus withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code