Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0127110-173701 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0127110-173701
論文名稱
Title
創業認知觀點下的機會辨識過程:以創業警覺能力為中介變項
Opportunity Recognition Process of the Entrepreneurial Cognitions View: Entrepreneurial Alertness as a Mediator
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
145
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2009-12-23
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2010-01-27
關鍵字
Keywords
機會辨識、社會網絡、先前知識、創業警覺能力
opportunity recognition, prior knowledge, social networks, entrepreneurial alertness
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5853 次,被下載 2860
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5853 times, has been downloaded 2860 times.
中文摘要
機會是創業活動中的核心,而創業者若能辨識到具有潛力之機會,將影響整個新企業的未來發展。本研究著眼於最初期的機會辨識過程,發現過去研究均強調先前知識與社會網絡對於機會辨識之重要性,然而,此一論點並無法說明個人辨識機會的認知過程。因此本文旨在填補理論上對於中介機制的缺口,試圖從創業認知觀點,提出研究發問:「個人如何 (how)將所擁有之知識與資訊進行認知運作,並轉換成創業機會辨識成果之過程?」
本研究根據Kirzner (1973)所提出之「創業警覺 (entrepreneurial alertnss)」概念,強調此種創業警覺能力是創業者獨具的感知能力與詮釋能力,能夠有助於個人注意、理解、思考與詮釋目前市場上的資訊與發展狀況,進而辨識出創新程度較高、數量較多之機會。
在研究方法部分,共進行3個子研究,首先,由於現有研究缺乏創業警覺能力之測量工具,「研究1」之目的在於為建構信效度良好之創業警覺能力量表。其次,「研究2」為進行一個小型的實驗設計研究,以確認先前知識與創業警覺能力對於機會辨識數量的影響力。最後,「研究3」則是收集大量問卷調查數據,針對本研究之整體模式架構進行驗證。
研究結果發現:1. 創業警覺能力是個人辨識創業機會的重要認知能力,亦受到先前知識與專業網絡之影響。2. 欲辨識出創新的機會,個人需藉由市場知識,所建構出的良好知識架構與認知能力,來理解與預測創新機會的存在與發展。3. 欲辨識出創新的機會,個人需藉由專業網絡獲取資訊,所建構出的良好知識架構與認知能力,來理解與預測創新機會的存在與發展。
本研究在理論上建構一機會辨識過程之完整模式,並發展創業警覺能力量表以及實證調查,應有助於後續研究者更進一步探討機會辨識之內涵。在實務上,研究者將提出對於創業教育及實務創業者之建議。
Abstract
Opportunity has emerged as a focal point in the field of entrepreneurship and recognizing potential opportunities is the first step of new venture creation. A number of studies acknowledge the contributions of prior knowledge and social networks in explaining opportunity recognition. However, previous research ignored the importance of cognitive process. Thus, the purpose of this study is filling the research gap of the mediation mechanism in this process. Through the entrepreneurial cognitions view lens, this research goes a step further by asking:”how do individuals conclude that an opportunity from their prior knowledge and information?”
Entrepreneurial alertness, first used by Kirzner (1973) has been identified as a major factor in the process of opportunity recognition. We equate this cognitive ability with entrepreneurial alertness, proposing that this bridges the gap between knowledge/information and the innovativeness/number of opportunities.
There are 3 studies in this research; first, Study 1 developed a scale of entrepreneurial alertness. Secondly, Study 2 conducted an experimental design research to test the relationships between prior knowledge, entrepreneurial alertness, and the number of opportunities. Thirdly, Study 3 collected large numbers sample to test the full model. Results indicate that prior knowledge and social networks had positive effects on entrepreneurial alertness. Moreover, entrepreneurial alertness was positively associated with the innovativeness and number of opportunities. In the mediating effect, interpretation ability was partially mediated the relationship between prior knowledge of markets, professional networks and opportunity recognition.
This study contributed theoretical and practical implications. Future directions for research are described, and its practical implications for entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurs are examined.
目次 Table of Contents
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究背景………………………………………………………………1
第二節 研究動機………………………………………………………………4
第三節 研究目的與問題……………………………………………………..10
第四節 研究範疇……………………………………………………………..13
第五節 研究方法取向………………………………………………………..15
第六節 研究流程……………………………………………………………..16
第二章 文獻探討
第一節 創業理論之回顧……………………………………………………..18
第二節 創業機會的內涵……………………………………………………..25
第三節 創業警覺能力………………………………………………………..32
第四節 先前知識……………………………………………………………..41
第五節 社會網絡……………………………………………………………..45
第六節 假說推論與研究架構………………………………………………..50
第三章 研究方法
第一節 研究設計與方法……………………………………………………..58
第二節 研究1:創業警覺能力量表發展之研究設計………………………62
第三節 研究2:實驗設計之研究設計………………………………………69
第四節 研究3:問卷調查之研究設計………………………………………73
第五節 資料分析方法………………………………………………………..79
第四章 研究結果分析
第一節 研究1:創業警覺能力量表發展之結果分析……………………… 80
第二節 研究2:研究結果分析……………………………………………….85
第三節 研究3:研究結果分析………………………………………………87
第五章 討論與發現
第一節 結果討論與分析……………………………………………………..96
第二節 研究發現………………………………………………………….. 102
第六章 研究結論
第一節 研究貢獻與意涵………………………………………..………….106
第二節 實務貢獻與意涵……………………………………………………107
第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議…………………………………………117

參考文獻……………………………………………………………………………120
附錄一:創業警覺性測量題項版本整理…………………………………………131
附錄二:青輔會「98年飛雁專案-女性創業育成班」……………………………132
附錄三:創業創新養成學苑計畫…………………………..…………………….133
附錄四:研究問卷…………………………………………..……………………134
參考文獻 References
1.巫立宇,2001,高科技新創企業合作網絡模式之研究,國立政治大學國際貿易學系未出版博士論文。
2.李信達、林志誠,2008,女性創業的產業網絡與育成政策,中小企業發展季刊,第八期,頁177-204。
3.李政、趙都敏,2007。經濟學中的創業研究:一個歷史性的回顧,創業管理研究,第二卷第一期,頁121-142。
4.周雪光,2003,組織社會學十講,北京:社會科學文獻出版社。
5.張劭勳,2001,研究方法 (修訂版),臺北:滄海。
6.張明正、陳怡蓁,2003,擋不住的趨勢,台北市:天下。
7.陳志遠、張勝立、魏式琦、楊金展,2007,人格特質、社會資本、先前知識對創業機警性影響之實證研究:創業家與經理人的比較分析,創業管理研究,第二卷第四期,頁25-56。
8.陳家聲、吳奕慧,2007,華人創業者心理與行為特質之初探,創業管理研究,第二卷第一期,頁1-30。
9.陳家聲、戴士嫻,2007,創業家社會網絡行為之質性研究,創業管理研究,第二卷第四期,頁1-24。
10.陳曉萍、徐淑英、樊景立、鄭伯壎,2008,組織與管理研究的實證方法,華泰文化:臺北。
11.創業圓夢網,2009,http://sme.moeasmea.gov.tw/sme/index.php,搜尋日期:2009/12/1
12.彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽,2006,管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試和補救,管理學報,第23卷第1期,頁77-98。
13.黃熾森,2006,組織行為和人力資源:研究方法入門,鼎茂圖書出版:臺北。
14.經濟部中小企業處網站,2009,創業領航計畫,http://www.moeasmea.gov.tw/public/Data/94281353671.pdf,搜尋日期:2009/12/1
15.劉常勇、謝如梅,2006。創業研究之回顧與展望:理論與模式探討,創業管理研究,第一卷第一期,頁1-44。
16.數位時代,2003,趨勢科技,以火紅熱情包圍全世界,取自:http://www.bnext.com.tw/article/view/cid/0/id/6095,資料搜尋時間:2009/12/10。
17.蔡依倫、謝如梅,2008,女性創業推動之模式建構與案例分析:社會行銷觀點,創業管理研究,第三卷第一期,頁61-92。
18.謝如梅、劉常勇,2009,創新機會辨識:創業警覺能力、先前知識與資訊獲取之關聯性研究,組織與管理,第二卷第二期,頁77-107。
19.Aldrich, H. and Zimmer, C. 1986, Entrepreneurship through social networks. The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship, 3-23.
20.Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., and Ray, S. 2003, A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Jorunal of Business Venturing, 18 (1), 105-123.
21.Baron, R. A. 1998, Cognitive Mechanisms in Entrepreneurship: Why and When Entrepreneurs Think Differently than Other People, Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 275-294.
22.Baron, R. A. 2006, Opportunity Recognition as Pattern Recognition: How Entrepreneurs “Connect the Dots” to identify New Business Opportunities. Academy of management Perspectives, 20(1), 104-119.
23.Baron, R. A. 2007, Behavioral and Cognitive Factors in Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurs as the Active Element in New Venture Creation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1, 167-182.
24.Baron, R. A. and Ward, T. B. 2004, Expanding Entrepreneurial Cognition’s Toolbox: Potential Contributions from the Field of Cognitive Science, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 553-573.
25.Baron, R. and Ensley, M. D. 2006, Opportunity Recognition as the Detection of Meaningful Patterns: Evidence from Comparisons of Novice and Experienced Entrepreneurs. Management Science, 52, 1331-1344.
26.Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. 1986, The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
27.Berger, P. L. and Luckmann, T. 1967, The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Anchor Books, NYC.
28.Bhagavatula, S., Elfring, T., Van Tilburg, A., and Van de Bunt, G. G. 2009, How social and human capital influence opportunity recognition and resource mobilization in India's handloom industry. Journal of Business Venturing. (Accepted for publication.)
29.Borgatti, S. P. and Foster, P. 2003, The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991-1013.
30.Brockhaus, Sr. R. H. 1980, Risk Taking Propensity of Entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal, 23 (3), 509-520
31.Burt, R. S. 1992, Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.Busenitz L. W., West III G.. P., Shepherd D., Nelson T., Chandler G. N., and Zacharakis A. 2003, Entrepreneurship Research in Emergence: Past Trends and Future Directions. Journal of Management, 29(3), 285-308.
33.Busenitz, L. W. and Lau, C. M. 1996, A cross-cultural cognitive model of new venture creation, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 20(4), 25-39.
34.Busentiz, L. W. 1996, Research on Entrepreneurial Alertness: Sampling, Management, and Theoretical Issues. Journal of Small Business Management, 35-44.
35.Busentiz, L. W. and Barney, J. B. 1997, Differences Between Entrepreneurs and Managers in Large Organizations: Biases and Heuristics in Strategic Decision- Making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 9-30.
36.Campbell, D. T. and Fiske, D. W. 1959, Convergent and discriminate validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
37.Casson, M. 2005, Entrepreneurship and the theory of the firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 58, 327-348.
38.Chandler, G., Lyon, D., and DeTienne, D. R. 2005, Antecedents and Exploitation Outcomes of Opportunity Identification Processes, Best Paper Proceedings of the 2005 Academy of Management Meeting.
39.Cooper, A. 2003, Entrepreneurship: The Past, the Present, the Future. Acs Z.J. (eds), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 21-36.
40.Cooper, A. C., Folta, T. B., and Woo, C. 1995, Entrepreneurial Information Search. Jorunal of Business Venturing, 10, 107-120.
41.Corbett, A. C. 2007, Learning Asymmetries and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 97-118.
42.Crant, J. M. 1996, The Proactive Personality Scale as a Predicator of Entrepreneurial Intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 34, 42-49.
43.Davidsson, P. and Honig, B., 2003, The Role of Social and Human Capital among Nascent Entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 301-331.
44.De Carolis, D. M., Litzky, B. E., and Eddlestion, K. A. 2009, Why networks enhance the progress of new venture creation: The influence of social capital and cognition. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(2), 527-545.
45.DeTienne, D. R. and Chandler, G. N. 2004, Opportunity Identification and Its Role in the Entrepreneurial Classrom: A Pedagogical Approach and Empirical Test, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3(3), 242-257.
46.DeTienne, D. R. and Chandler, G. N. 2007, The Role of Gender in Opportunity Identification. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(3), 365-386.
47.Dimov, D. 2007, From Opportunity Insight to Opportunity Intention: The Importance of Person-Situation Learning Match. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31, 561-583.
48.Dimov, D. P. 2004, The Individuality of Opportunity Recognition: A Critical Review and Extension. Opportunity Identification and Entrepreneurial Behavior, Bulter, J. E. (eds), Information Age Publishing, 135-162.
49.Dollinger, M. J. 2003, Entrepreneurship: Strategies and Resources. Prentice Hall, (3ed.)
50.Drucker, P. F. 1985, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. New York: Harper and Row.
51.Eckhardt, J. T. and Shane, S. A. 2003, Opportunity and Entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3), 333-349.
52.Elfring, T. and Hulsink, W. 2003, Networks in Entrepreneurship: The case of High-technology firms. Small Business Economics, 21, 409-422.
53.Fiet, J. O. and Patel, P. C. 2008, Entrepreneurial Discovery as Constrained, Systematic Search. Small Business Economics, 30, 215-229.
54.Fletcher, D. E. 2006, Entrepreneurial processes and the social construction of opportunity. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 18 (5), 421-440.
55.Gaglio, C. M. and Katz, J. A. 2001, The Psychological Basis of Opportunity Identification: Entrepreneurial Alertness. Small Business Economics, 16, 95-111.
56.Gaglio, C. M. 2004, The role of mental simulations and counterfactual thinking in the opportunity identification process. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(6), 533-552
57.Giddens, A. 1976, New Rules of SociologicaI Method, Basic Books, New York.
58.Gough, H. G. 1979, A creative personality scale for the Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8), 1398-1405.
59.Granovetter, M. 1973, The Strength of Weak Tie. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
60.Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C. 1998, Multivariate Data Analysis, Upper Saddle River (5th eds), N.J., Prentice Hall.
61.Hayek, F. A. 1945, The Use of Knowledge in Society. American Economic Review, 35, 529–530.
62.Hills, G. E., Lumpkin, G. T., and Singh, R. P. 1997, Opportunity recognition: Perceptions and behaviors of entrepreneurs. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Babson Park, MA: Babson College, 168-182.
63.Hills, G. E., Shrader, R. C., and Lumpkin, G. T. 1999, Opportunity Recognition as a Creative Process. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Babson College, 216-227.
64.Hinkin, T. R. 1998, A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in SurveyQuestionnaires. Organizational Research Methods. 1(1), 104-121.
65.Ibarra, H. 1993, Personal Networks of Women and Minorities in Management: A Conceptual Framework. Academy of Management Review, 18 (1), 56-87.
66.Johannisson, B. 2000, Handbook of Entrepreneurship. Sexton, D. L. and Landstrom, H. (ed.,), Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
67.Kaish, S. and Gilad, B. 1991, Characteristics of Opportunities Search of Entrepreneurs versus Executives: Sources, Interests, General Alertness. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(1), 45–61.
68.Kelley, D. J., de Briun, A., Lee, H., Zhang, Y., Liu, C. Y., and Hsieh, R. M. 2009, 創業論壇:創業教育在國際上的發展現況與展望(Entrepreneurship Education from International Perspectives),創業管理研究,第四卷第二期,頁109-145。
69.Kerlinger, F. N. and Lee, H. B. 2000, Foundations of behavioral research (4th Ed). Wadsworth.
70.Kickul, J., Gundry, L. K., Barbosa, S. D., and Whitcanack, L. 2009, Intuition versus Analysis? Testing Differential Models of Cognitive Style on Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy and the New Venture Creation Process. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33 (2), 439-453.
71.Kirzner, I. 1979, Perception, opportunity, and profit: studies in the theory of entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
72.Kirzner, I. 1973, Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
73.Kirzner, I. 1985, Discovery and the Capitalist Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
74.Ko, S. 2004, Bisociation and Opportunity. Opportunity Identification and Entrepreneurial Behavior, Bulter, J. E. (eds), Information Age Publishing, 99-114
75.Ko, S. and Bulter, J. E. 2007, Creativity: A Key Link to Entrepreneurial Behavior. Business Horizons, 50, 365–372.
76.Koellinger, P. 2008, Why are some entrepreneurs more innovative than others?. Small Business Economics, 31, 21-37
77.Kristiansen S. 2004, Social Networks and Business Success: The Role of Subcultures in an African Context. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 63(5), 1149-1171.
78.Krueger, N. 2003, The cognitive psychology of entrepreneurship. in Acs, Z. A., Audretsch, D. D. (eds), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: An Interdisciplinary Survey and Introduction, Kluwer, Londres, 105-40.
79.Lee, J. H. and Venkataraman, S. 2006, Aspirations, market offerings, and the pursuit of entrepreneurial opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing. 21(1), 107-123.
80.Low, M. B. and MacMillan, I. C. 1988, Entrepreneurship: Past Research and Future Challenges. Journal of Management, 14(2), 139-161.
81.Lumpkin, G. T. and Lichtenstein, B. 2005, The Role of Organizational Learning in the Opportunity- Recognition Process. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 451-472.
82.Lumpkin, G. T., Hills, G. E., and Shrader, R. C. 2004, Opportunity Recogition. In H. P. Welsch (Ed.), Entrepreneurship: The Way Ahead, 73-90, London: Routledgde.
83.Marvel, M. R. and Lumpkin, G. T. 2007, Technology Entrepreneurs’ Human Capital and Its Effects on Innovation Radicalness. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(6), 807-828.
84.Matlin, M. W. 2004, Cognition. John Wiley and Sons: New York.
85.Minniti, M. 2004, Organization Alertness and Asymmetric Information in a Spin-Glass Model. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(5), 637-658.
86.Mitchell, J. C. 1969, Social networks and urban situations. England: Manchester University Press.
87.Mitchell, R. K., Busenitz, L. W., Bird, B., Gaglio, C. M., McMullen, J. S., Morse, E .A., and Smith, B. 2007, The Centreal Question in Entrepreneurial Cognition Resarch 2007. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(1), 1-27.
88.Mitchell, R. K., Busenitz, L., Lant, T., McDougall, P. P., Morse, E. A., and Smith, J.B. 2002, Toward a Theory of Entrepreneurial Cognition: Rethinking the People Side of Entrepreneurship Research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 93-104.
89.O'Donnell, A., Gilmore, A. Cummins, D., and Carson, D. 2001. The network construct in entrepreneurship research: A review and critique. Management Decision, 39(9), 749-760.
90.Ozgen, E. and Baron, R. A. 2007, Social sources of information in opportunity recognition: Effects of mentors, industry networks, and professional forums. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 174–192.
91.Patel, P. C. and Fiet, J. O. 2009, Systematic Search and Its Relationship to Firm Founding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 501-526.
92.Podsakfoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., and Podsakoff, N. P. 2003, Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
93.Politis, D. 2005, The Process of Entrepreneurial Learning: A Conceptual Framework. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 30, 399-424.
94.Ray, S. and Cardozo, R. N. 1996, Sensitivity and Creativity in Entrepreneurial Opportunity Recognition: A Framework for Empirical Investigation. London: Global Entrepreneurship Research Conference.
95.Ripsas, S. 1998, Towards an Interdisciplinary Theory of Entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 10, 103-115.
96.Sarason, Y., Dean, T., and Dillard, J. F. 2006, Entrepreneurship as the nexus of individual and opportunity: A structuration view. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(3), 286-305.
97.Sarasvathy, S. D., Dew N., Velamuri S. R., and Venkataraman S. 2003, Three Views of Entrepreneurial Opportunity. Z. J. Acs and D. B. Audretsch (eds.), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, 141-160.
98.Schumpeter, J. A. 1934, The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
99.Shane, S. 2000, Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurship Opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448-469.
100.Shane, S. 2003, A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual-Opportunity Nexus. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK. Northampton, MA, USA.
101.Shane, S. A. 2005, Finding Fertile Ground: Identifying Extraordinary Opportunities for New Venture. Wharton School Publishing.
102.Shane, S. and Venkataraman, S. 2000, The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226.
103.Shepherd, D. A. and DeTienne, D. R. 2005, Prior Knowledge, Potential Financial Reward, and Opportunity Identification. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(1), 91-112.
104.Singh, R. P. 2000, Entrepreneurial Opportunity Recognition through Social Networks. Garland Publishing, INC.
105.Smith, B. R., Matthews, C. H., and Schenkel, M. T. 2009, Differences in Entrepreneurial Opportunities: The Role of Tacitness and Codification in Opportunity Identification. Journal of Small Business Management, 47 (1), 38-57.
106.Swedberg, R. 2000, Entrepreneurship: the social science view. New York: Oxford University Press.
107.Tang, J. 2008, Environmental munificence for entrepreneurs: entrepreneurial alertness and commitment. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 14 (3), 128-151.
108.Tang, J., Tang, Z., and Lohrke, F. T. 2007, Developing an entrepreneurial typology: the roles of entrepreneurial alertness and attributional style. International Entrepreneurship Management Journal, 3, forthcoming.
109.Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., and Wright, M. 2008, Opportunity Identification and Pursuit: Does an Entrepreneur’s Human Capital Matter. Small Business Economics, 30, 153-173.
110.Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., and Wright, M. 2009, The extent and nature of opportunity identification by experienced entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 99-115.
111.Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., and Wright, M. 2001, The Focus of Entrepreneurial Research: Contextual and Process Issues. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 26(2), 57-80.
112.Vaghely, I. P. and Julien, Pierre-André, 2010, Are opportunities recognized or constructed? An information perspective on entrepreneurial opportunity identification. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 73-86.
113.Venkataraman, S. 1997, The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor’s perspective. 119-138. In J. Katz and R. Brockhaus (eds.) Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth. Greenwich: JAI Press.
114.Ward, T. B. 2004, Cognition, creativity, and entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 173-188.
115.Wind, Y. and Crook, C. 2005, The Power of Impossible Thinking, Wharton School Publishing: Pearson-Education, Inc.
116.Yu, T. F. 2001, Entrepreneurial Alertness and Discovery. The Review of Austrian Economics, 14(1), 47-63.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內外都一年後公開 withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code