Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0131113-122750 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0131113-122750
論文名稱
Title
大緩和現象---以德國經濟體為例
The great moderation : A case for Germany
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
58
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2012-06-19
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2013-01-31
關鍵字
Keywords
馬可夫轉換模型、隨時間變動之結構向量自我回歸模型、好運氣、貨幣政策、財政政策、大緩和、德國歷史
fiscal policy, German history, markov switching model, the great moderation, time varying structural VAR model, good luck, monetary policy
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5772 次,被下載 214
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5772 times, has been downloaded 214 times.
中文摘要
本文以德國為例,研究經濟大緩和現象(The Great Moderation),運用Summers (2009)所改寫的馬可夫轉換模型與Primiceri (2005)提出的隨時間變動之結構向量自我回歸模型做實證研究,檢測德國大緩和的時間點與造成德國大緩和的主因。本論文的實證結果顯示,不同於其他國家緩和的時間點(1980年前後),德國大緩和的時間點為1993年第四季;然而,與大多數學者所做出來的三大現象(好運氣、存貨制度的改善、貨幣政策的實行)不同的是,權衡性的財政政策是讓德國經濟波動趨緩的主因。
Abstract
In this paper, we employ Markov Switching Model in Summers(2009) to document a structural date in the volatility of Germany GDP growth. Moreover, we use a Time Varying Structural VAR with stochastic volatility model in Primiceri (2005) to examine the main causes of the Great Moderation in Germany. The break date, however, differs among countries. Most of them are in 1980s, but the break date of Germany is at the fourth quarter of 1993. Although it finds that the three main reasons lead to the Great Moderation(Good luck, inventory investment and good policy) in many literatures, it is the discretionary fiscal policy that causes the Great Moderation in Germany.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書
致謝......................i
中文摘要....................ii
英文摘要....................iii
圖次......................iv
表次......................v
論文架構....................1

第一章 緒論
第一節 背景..................2
第二節 動機..................11
第三節 目的..................12

第二章 文獻回顧................14

第三章 研究流程與方法.............19

第四章 模型之建構與分析
第一節 馬可夫轉換模型Markov Switching Model..20
第二節 檢測模型Time varying structural VAR...23

第五章 變數的選擇與資料的處理
第一節 變數的選擇...............26
第二節 資料的處理...............28
第六章 實證結果
第一節 德國大緩和時間點............29
第二節 誘發德國大緩和的原因..........30

第七章 結論與建議
第一節 結論..................37
第二節 未來研究之建議.............38

參考文獻...................39

附錄.....................43
參考文獻 References
郭恒鈺,許琳菲等 (1991),《德國在哪裡?聯邦德國四十年,政治、經濟篇》,
台北,三民出版社。
晏小寶 (1993),《社會市場經濟與西德統一》上海,新華出版社。
許仟 (1993),《德國政府與政治—分裂與統一》台北,志一出版社。
邵建東,陳曉律 (1993),《德國新史》台北,五南出版社。
郭石城等 (1994),《統一後德國現況之研究》台北,行政院陸委會。
孫炳輝,鄭寅達 (2001),《德國史綱》台北,昭明出版社。
賴麗琇 (2003),《德國史(下)》台北,五南出版社。
周惠民 (2006),《德國史:中歐強權的起伏》台北,三民出版社。
Fulbrook, M., 王軍瑋,萬方譯 (2006),《劍橋德國簡史》台北,左岸文化出版社。

Ahmed, S., Levin, A. and Wilson B. A. (2004), “Recent U.S. Macroeconomic Stability: Good Policies, Good Practices, or Good Luck? ” Review of Economics & Statistics 824-832.
Blanchard, O. and Simon, J. (2001), “The Long and Large Decline in U.S. Output Volatility,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 32(1), 135-174.
Blanchard, O. and Perotti, R. (2002), “An Empirical Characterization of the Dynamic
Effects of Changes in Government Spending and Taxes on Output,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, No. 4, 1329-68.
Benati, L. (2008), “The ‘Great Moderation’ in the United Kingdom,” Journal of Money, Credit & Banking (Wiley-Blackwell), 121-147.
Clarida, R., Cali, J. and Gertler, M. (2000), “Monetary policy rules and macroeconomic stability: evidence and some theory,” Quarterly Journal of Economics p.147-180.
Cogley, T., Sargent, T. J., (2001), “Evolving post World War II US inflation dynamics,” NBER Macroeconomics Annual 16, 331–373.
Cogley, T., Sargent, T. J., (2003), “The conquest of US inflation: learning and robustness to model uncertainty,” Unpublished manuscript. New York University and University of California, Davis.
Cecchetti, S, Flores-Lagunes A. and Krause, S. (2005), “Assessing the sources of changes in the volatility of real growth,” The Research Conference of the Reserve Bank of Australia, November, 115–38.
Debrun, X., Pisani-Ferry J. and Sapir A. (2008), “Government Size and Output Volatility: Should We Forsake Automatic Stabilization?” Journal of Economic Literature, Classification Numbers: E62, E63
Fang, W., Taeng, J.-C. and Cheng S.-C. (2001), “The Great Moderation: Evidence from Five Asian Emerging Countries,” Journal of Economics and Management, Vol.7, No.1, 227-256.
Kim, C.-J. and Nelson, C. R. (1999), “Has the U.S. economy become more stable? A Bayesian approach based on a Markov-switching model of the business cycle,”The Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(4): 608-616.
Kahn, J. A., McConnell, M.M. and Perez-Quiros G. (2002) , “On the Causes of the Increased Stability of the U.S. Economy,” Economic Policy Review, 183.
Kahn, J. A. (2008), “Durable Goods Inventories and the Great Moderation,”
Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports, no. 325.
McConnell, M. M. and Perez-Quiros, G., (2000), “Output Fluctuations in the United States: What has Changed since the Early 1980’s? ” American Economic Review, Vol. 90, No. 5, 1464-1476.
McCarthy, J. and Zakrajsek, E. (2007), “Inventory Dynamics and Business Cycles:
What Has Changed? ” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 39, No. 2–3.
Pinheiro, J. C., Bates, D. M. (1996), “ Unconstrained Parameterization for Variance-Covariance Matrices,” Statistics and Computing, 289-296.
Pourahmadi, M. (1999), “Joint mean-covariance models with applications to longitudinal data: Unconstrained parameterisation,” Biometrika 86, 677-690.
Pourahamadi, M. (2000), “Maximum likelihood estimation of generalised linear models for multivariate normal covariance matrix,” Biometrika 87, 425–35.
Primiceri E. G. (2005), “Time Varying Structural Vector Autoregressions and
Monetary Policy,” Review of Economic Studies, 72, 821-852.
Smith, M., and Kohn, R. (2002), “Parsimonious Covariance Matrix Estimation for
Longitudinal Data”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97, 1141-1153.
Stock, J. H. and Watson M. W. (2003), “Has the Business Cycle Changed and Why?” MIT Press 159-230.
Stock, J. H. and Watson M. W. (2005), “Understanding changes in international business cycle dynamics,” Journal of the European Economic Association 968-1006.
Smith P., Summers P. M. (2004), “ Identification and Normalization in Markov Switching Models of ‘business cycles’ ,” Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, RWP 04-09.
Summers P. M. (2005), “What Caused The Great Moderation? Some Cross-Country Evidence,” Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City 3rd quarter, 2-32.
Smith P., Summers P. M. (2007), “What caused the `Great Moderation' ?: international evidence from a regime switching model with time-varying transition Probabilities,” webpages.ttu.edu.
Smith P., Summers P. M. (2009), “Regime Switches in GDP Growth and Volatility: Some International Evidence and Implications for Modeling Business Cycles,” The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics.
Taylor, J. B. (1999a), “The Robustness and E¢ciency of Monetary Policy Rules as Guidelines for Interest Rate Setting by the European Central Bank,” Journal of Monetary Economics 43, June, Special issue: Monetary Policy Rules, 655-679.
Taylor, J. B. (1999b), “Introduction to Monetary Policy Rules in Monetary Policy Rules,” edited by John B. Taylor (Chicago: University of Chicago Press for NBER).
Truman, E. M. (2003), “Inflation Targeting in the World Economy,” Institute for
International Economics, Washington, D.C.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code